Wake Up, Panetta: UN, U.S. Have Opposing Interests
On March 7, 2012, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stated in the U.S. Congress that the United Nations and NATO have supreme authority over the actions of the United States military. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) reacted to Secretary Panetta’s statement, saying:
I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat. … The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president, and the law, and the Constitution.[i]
I paid with two death sentences for the privilege of becoming an American, I deeply love my adoptive country, and I highly esteem her leaders. But, with all due respect for Secretary Panetta, I have to say that his view reminds me of Ceausescu, who used to state over, and over, and over:
I wrote the Constitution! I will re-write it.
In 1988 when I became an American citizen, I ended the few words I said as a sign of my gratitude with the last paragraph of William Tyler Page’s creed:
It is my duty to my Country to love it; to support its Constitution; to obey its laws; to respect its flag, and to defend it against all enemies.
I also have good reason to believe that the UN is not interested in defending the United States. In my other life, when I was one of the top members of the Soviet bloc espionage community, one of our main assignments was to turn the UN against the United States. We in the Soviet bloc poured millions of dollars and thousands of people into that gigantic project. Virtually all UN employees and representatives from the communist countries — comprising a third of the world’s population — and from our Arab allies were secretly working for our espionage services. Our strategy was to convert the centuries-old European and Islamic animosity toward the Jews into a rabid and violent hatred for the United States by portraying it as a country run by a rapacious “Council of the Elders of Zion” (the Kremlin’s epithet for the U.S. Congress), which allegedly wanted to transform the rest of the world into a Jewish fiefdom.
Unfortunately, we succeeded. In 2003, the UN expelled the U.S. from the Commission on Human Rights by the overwhelming vote of 33 to 3, and it appointed the tyrannical government of Libya to chair that body. A year later, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan decided to secretly make the UN even more anti-American.
On December 2, 2004, Annan endorsed the 101 proposals of the “High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change,” commissioned by him to build a UN “for the twenty-first century.”[ii] The panel recommended that the U.S. be further isolated by establishing the rule that only the UN could authorize preemptive wars against terrorism or any other threats. For that, the panel concluded that the UN’s bureaucracy should be significantly increased (by creating a ”peace-building commission”), its efficiency significantly decreased (by greatly expanding the already inefficient Security Council), and the treasuries of its member countries additionally raided by having them “donate” to the UN an additional 0.7% of their GNP to fight poverty. (On December 7, 2007, Senator Obama introduced into the U.S. Senate the Global Poverty Act of 2007, demanding that 0.7% of the U.S. gross national product, totaling $845 billion over the next 13 years, be spent to fight “global poverty.”[iii])
It is hard to believe, but true, that some of the authors of these proposals for “reforming” the UN were the same communist spies who had originally worked to subvert the UN. One eminent member of Kofi Annan’s blue-ribbon panel was the nouveau riche Yevgeny Primakov, a former KGB general and Soviet intelligence adviser to Saddam Hussein who rose to head Russia’s espionage service for a time — and to sing opera ditties with U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright while secretly running the infamous Aldrich Ames spy case behind her back. Another prominent member was Qian Qichen, a former Red China intelligence officer who worked under diplomatic cover abroad, belonged to the Central Committee of the Communist Party when it ordered the bloody Tiananmen Square repression in 1989, rose afterward to the Politburo, and in 1998 became vice-chairman of China’s State Council. And then there was Amr Moussa, the secretary-general of the Arab League (another KGB puppet), who stated that he missed “the balance of power provided by the Soviet Union.”
Kofi Annan had a point. The three were professional saviors. Let me exemplify with Primakov, whom I know best. After the Soviet Union collapsed, he saved its espionage service, the PGU[iv], from going into oblivion. Primakov broke it off from its mother organization, the KGB, rechristened it with the American-sounding name of Central Intelligence Service (Tsentralnaya Sluzhba Razvedki, or TsSR), and pretended it was a new democratic institution. That saved Primakov’s skin as well. Five years later, he replaced Russia’s pro-Western foreign minister Andrey Kozyrev. In 1998, Primakov became prime minister. He reintroduced Soviet Communists into the government and decided to transform Russia into a “managed democracy” whose institutions were to become “representative of the state: loyal, obedient, and indebted to those who have chosen them.” Primakov even invented a word for his democracy: dogovorosposoniye, meaning, roughly, “deal-cutting.”[v]
Primakov is an old enemy of the U.S. His espionage service — like my former one — used to spend every single day thinking up new ways to portray the American land of freedom as an “imperial Zionist country” that intended to convert the Islamic world into a Jewish colony. His first major victory was UN Resolution No. 3379 of 1975, which declared Zionism “a form of racism and racial discrimination.” Officially presented as an Arab initiative, that projected resolution had in fact been drafted in Moscow under the supervision of Primakov, turned into the KGB’s main Arabist. The resolution was openly supported by the Arab League and the PLO, two organizations on our payroll. My DIE was deeply involved in Primakov’s UN operation.
On August 31, 2001, Primakov’s boss at the UN, Kofi Annan, organized a UN World Conference on Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, which opened in Durban, South Africa. Its task was to approve new pre-formulated Arab League declarations asserting that Zionism was a brutal form of racism, and that the United States was its main supporter.[vi] Yasser Arafat, Fidel Castro, and the same gaggle of Arab and Third World governments who had supported the UN’s anti-Semitic Resolution No. 3379 in 1975 urged the participants to condemn Israel and the United States as Zionist powers who wanted to conquer the Islamic world.[vii] On September 3, 2001, the U.S. withdrew its delegation from Durban, charging that the UN conference had been “converted into a forum against Israel and Jews.”[viii] The Israeli government followed suit. On September 4, 2001, Congressman Tom Lantos, a member of the U.S. delegation, told reporters:
This conference will stand self-condemned for yielding to extremists. … I am blaming them for hijacking this conference.”[ix]
The September 11, 2001, attacks came seven days later. On that same day the KGB was celebrating 124 years since the birth of its founder. The weapon of choice for that horrific act of terrorism that has changed the face of our world was the hijacked airplane, a concept that had originally been invented by the KGB.
Our 25th ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, once said that if the glass zoo on the East River that quarters the United Nations “lost 10 stories, it wouldn’t make a bit of difference.”[x] I could not agree more. Most of the people “working” at the UN are probably still anti-American spies anyway, since old habits die hard in such organizations.
The peace and freedom of the world depend on the power of United States, not of the UN bureaucracy, as was always the case. Let us hope that our secretary of Defense and our secretary of State will learn that as well.
[i] Jed Babin, “Leon Paneta: Clueless or Brazen?” American Spectator, March 12, 2012.
[ii] “Follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit: Note by the Secretary-General,” United Nations, General Assembly, Fifty-ninth session, Agenda item 55, p.3.
[iii] Lee Cary, “Obama’s Global Tax,” American Thinker, May 21, 2008, as posted on http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/the_global_candidate_proposes.html
[iv] Pervoye Glavnoye Upravleniye, the First Chief Directorate of the KGB, or the foreign intelligence service.
[v] Yevgenia Albats, “Democratic Façade in Russia, The Washington Post, June 6, 2000, p. B7.
[vi] “New racism declaration unveiled,” CNN.com/WORLD, September 4, 2001.
[vii] Reuters, Mandela urges fight against racist ‘contagion,’ The New York Times, September 1, 2001.
[viii] Pamela Constable, U. S., Israel Quit Forum On Racism, The Washington Post, September 4, 2001.
[ix] Betsy Pisik, U. S. walks out of conference on racism, The Washington Times, September 4, 2001.
[x] R. Emmett Tyrrell, “Bold U.S. voce to the U.N., ”The Washington Times, March 11, 2005.
Thank you for this article, General.
I intend to print a copy, roll it up tight, and beat the liberals in my family over the head with it.
While you’re at it, come over to Israel and knock the leftists here senseless too!
Why are leftists even IN Israel? If you have rockets crashing down on you and THAT doesn’t wake them up, then what will?
Facts and leftists are like oil and water. Think Ward Churchill.
Once those rockets can reach Tel Aviv, I think things might change.
snork, you have great insight.
I am DEEPLY involved with nationalist activist ‘boots on the ground’, and one of our conclusions was just that-once missiles slam into Tel Aviv (and its surrounding burbs) all hell will break loose.
Whereas I am fortunate enough to live in a high end area, I have nothing but admiration for all my Zionist brothers and sisters, wherever they hail from. Not so for our main leadership.
Most reside in the chi chi areas of central Israel, and have nothing but disdain (despite their babblings) for the ‘poorer’ Israelis in the south. While they urge the kiddies from the south to have ‘courage’, patting their parents on the back for ‘staying strong’, they would NEVER-in a million yrs-allow their own to be terrorized, not for 4 days, and most especially, not for a decade.Yes, the south has been rocketed for over a decade!
Suffice it to say, once they hit the center, the shit will really fly.And, that will be a good result, it will FINALLY end the madness. A madness NO other rational leadership would tolerate. Such grave dereliction of duty would end any other western leadership’s days in office, especially with over a million citizens left terrorized, even after the missiles stop! Not in Israel.
From what I can tell, most Leftists, and Leftist movements in Israel are European and American “Jews In Name Only” who moved to Israel with the sole cause of being agitators.
And for more on the US’s weak response to the Soviet Union, please read Revel’s book How Democracies Perish, that I summarized here: http://clarespark.com/2011/04/09/jean-francois-revel-and-father-mapple/. Having been in the UN papers of Ralph Bunche, I can say that the author of this article is entirely accurate. The Wilsonian internationalists command academe, with few exceptions and we are indeed, as a nation, chumps.
I quoted Dimitri Volkogonov on his 1986 assessment of Zionist-directed America, and I doubt that many took it seriously. See http://clarespark.com/2011/12/02/the-whiteness-of-the-whale/. I hope that this article, published by Pajamas Media, goes viral. It is of crucial importance, and validates every controversial blog I have ever written.
Right on the mark, Hunter! I have been saying this since I was 19, (now 64), and people just do not get it! If I had my druthers, the UN would be long gone, and we would not take part in it, and our country would have saved trillions. Corrupt from top to bottom!
For decades the best reason for the US to remain in the UN has simply been the second half of the “keep your friends close” adage.
Still, there are other options for the property. “The U.N. Building. What a joke! They turned it into low rent housing. It’s a dump.”
Astonishing. Simply astonishing.
Thank you, you are a good and grand American!!
Sorry for the repetition: “Get the US out of the UN, and get the UN out of the US.”
And put BHO in the UN as it leaves the US!
you succeeded? In 2003? Only, what, 13 years after your great project collapsed?
Get a grip. I have no idea what you think you were up to in the cold war, but if that is your measure of success, you weren’t very good at it.
I suggest there were a few things much more relevant to a UN vote in 2003 than some romanian spy fantasy. The GWOT, for example, kind of got a few despotic regimes offside.
Work for the UN, do you?
This is your idea of regime change courtesy of the GWOT:
A regime where a bunch of Islamists, who are on another anti-Israel crusade are now in charge?
A regime where some of the most advanced MANPADS (man portable air defense missile systems) have made their way into the hands of terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah?
A regime where we put a corrupt administration into power who would turn on us and side with a country who has been co-opting the legitimate efforts of NATO member countries to rid it of Al Quaeda and Taliban influence?
Okey dokey sport, I got where you’re comin’ from!!
Thank you, thank you !! This should be required reading for every Congressman.
Assuming they could understand it. Byebye UN. Tally Ho, Panetta.
Mr. Capeca, you have made a grave error.
You should not respect Leon Panetta. He is now what you once were – an enemy of America. He’s a useful idiot of the first order, and keeping him around was one of George Bush’s worst mistakes.
That aside, thank you for the article, and welcome to America!
“You should not respect Leon Panetta. He is now what you once were – an enemy of America.”
Apparently that sentiment it shared with some of our troops.
“In a sign of the nervousness surrounding Mr. Panetta’s trip, the Marines and other troops who were waiting in a tent for the defense secretary to speak were abruptly asked by their commander to get up, place their weapons —outside the tent and then return unarmed. … Asked why, he replied, “Somebody got itchy, that’s all I’ve got to say. Somebody got itchy; we just adjust.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/world/asia/panetta-visits-afghanistan-following-massacre.html?_r=1&hp
Leon is just feeling the love. heh
“Nor could he explain why the Afghan was on fire. ‘For reasons that are totally unknown to us at this time, our personnel discovered that he was ablaze,’ Mr. Little said.”
That could very well be the best line I’ve ever seen in the NYT.
Unfortunately, not since WW2 have the military forces truly been used as the Constitution dictates – a declaration of war. Instead we have police actions and limited engagements and kinetic military actions.
And in truth, that America was ever a free country or bound by the constitution only lasted until the Whiskey Rebellion. We’re more like that hysterical colony founded by the Puritans. Only instead of witches, we panic over drugs and anything that might harm the children.
You might want to read some actual history of the Salem witch trials, instead of just regurgitating what the left spoon-fed you in the government school.
Obama & Co. have made it clear from day one that U.S. interests are subservient to the interests of the global community. Ceding war making responsibilities to a polyglot collection of thugs, kleptocrats, despots, and eight century barbarians is prima facia evidence of malfeasance, and derogation of duty. Such an arrangement is tantamount to treason. The United Nations is an abject failure. It was born of high ideals at the conclusion of the second cataclysmic war of the 20th century, but quickly degenerated into a morass of corruption, greed, and immorality. The high ideals of western civilization are anathema to the world of Islam, and no amount of diplomatic double-speak can remedy that. It is time for truly enlightened nations to exit the UN and establish an international institution that will not be dependent upon the fetid swamp that now constitues the General Assembly; a collection of misfits that mirrors the motley accumultion of misfits and degenerates depicted in the Star Wars bar scene.
Interesting atricle, but to the non-coolaiders, yawn.
So what youre saying is, the usual suspects are up to their usual games?
And except for the seduction of money, prestige and make-work positions that breed laziness and inefficiency among the UN careerists, it might actually be worse?
Uh-huh, and?
We all know that cabal of spies needs to be shot, like, yesterday…
and the site bulldozed over to make way for:
1 – A Nuke-u-lar Powerplant
2 – A Nuke-u-lar Missle Silo
3 – An airbase from which Nuke-u-lar bomb laden aircraft can launch strikes against the capital cities of the home contries of these (heaped uncerimoniously into a mass grave) spies that we just yesterday shot.
My question isn’t what these bastards are up to.
I’ve known that for 40 years
My question is:
How do we get 1, 2, and (expecially!) the latter part of number 3 accomplished.
The point, and usefulness, of such articles is that there are millions of people in our country who are uninformed. The die-hard Koolaiders can’t be helped, but the many in the mushy middle CAN be, if we provide the correct information to counteract the massive disinformation campaign the left has been running for the last hundred years.
Dear Mr Pacepa,
I am presently reading George Jonas novel Vengeance , written in 1984. As I read through your article it affirms once again that the Communists have fueled terrorism around the world. Their latest effort “Occupy” has failed miserably though.The book names Bernadine Dohrn as a famous female terrorist. To think the the leader of the free world associated himself with Ayers and Dohrn is remarkable.
The Cold War never died. Putin just assured us he will sell arms to Assad. The Middle East, nothing more than a killing ground for Americas blood and treasure.
The book I mentioned is a worthwhile informative read. It delves deep into the world of all the factions of terrorism.
“The peace and freedom of the world depend on the power of United States, not of the UN bureaucracy, as was always the case.”
Thank you Mr.Pacepa … I grimaced when Panetta calmly talked treason; only treasonous morons could try to convince thinking constitution-loving and law abiding patriots that somehow “international law” trumps the constitution. Who in THE hell do these people think they are? Panetta, along with his partners in crime
needs to receive the JACK BOOT WHERE THE SUN DON’T SHINE … no, he’s not deserving of any more respect than that; outside of the fact that he’s a human being.
Virtually all UN employees… were secretly working for our espionage services… to convert animosity toward the Jews into a rabid and violent hatred for the United States.
There are a couple of problems with your story:
First, two people can keep a secret, if one of them is dead. Thousands of people cannot keep a secret.
Second, those of us in “flyover country” were well aware of your activities, so it wasn’t a secret.
Third, if the rubes know then the enlightened elite know, so it’s even less of a secret.
Forth, if the enlightened elite know then the policy makers know, so it’s not a secret at all.
So, to correct the statement… “Virtually all UN employees, the State Department of the United States, and the entire Democratic Party were working to convert the centuries-old European and Islamic animosity toward the Jews into a rabid and violent hatred for the United States”. Again, that’s not a secret except, perhaps, to the Jews who work diligently to remain willfully ignorant as they support toxic policies that will lead to their annihilation.
Do you have a point?
“Wake Up, Panetta: UN, U.S., Have Opposing Interests.”
The first part of that headline assumes that the Secretary of Defense and the POTUS do not share the same interests as the United Nations.
Leon Panetta has always struck me as a conformist, a go along to get along type guy, over his head as CIA director and way over his head as Secretary of Defense, the job with which he was rewarded for being a good company guy, a good lap dog.
In saying those mind-boggling words before Sessions’ committee last week, Panetta was absolutely reflecting the orientation of his overseer and boss Barack Obama and the extensive bloc of individuals in the Obama administration that wants to move the United States in the direction of so called “international law”, the old antiquated Constitution be damned.
That the United States continues to provide something in the range of 1/4 of the UN’s total operating budget is a travesty.
Panetta sounded a little baffled during his appearance before the Senate committee; no surprise to learn he thinks there’s a foreign controlling legal authority for US military intervention. Panetta should resign, but of course won’t because liberals don’t have a sense of shame, much less honor.
Same goes for the Bamster; it’s no surprise to learn that he’s the UN’s pet hamster. One can view the instance where he went smiley face among a group of Latin American thugs and semi-dictators as a ‘look at where I am’ victory lap; their coolness toward him was feigned so as not to give the game away.
May God bless Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL). He is one of the few people left in Congress (aside from the people elected by the Tea Parties) who still has a grasp of what the Constitution is all about. The United States Congress did NOT abdicate all of its rights to some global entity, and the fool currently living in the White House needs to know that. And if there was any justice or backbone left in Congress, it would approve a bill that would make it an impeachable offense for any president to take us to war again (as Obama did in Libya) without a declaration of war. You remember a declaration of war, don’t you? Those are one of those quaint little ideas our Founding Faithers only gave CONGRESS the power in implement, NOT the president. Even George W. Bush, with both Afghanistan AND Iraq, at least got resolutions from Congress to start those wars. But not Obama. He thought he had the right to attack Libya just because the UN and NATO said it was OK. Think about that for a moment. Our president just decided that Congress was irrelevant. This man really, really, needs to be voted out of office in November. Our country, our Congress, and our Constitution depend on it.
Mr. Mihai Pacepa ends his moving and painful — but well written and referenced — essay on an optimistic (or at least “hope”ful) note, “Let us hope that our secretary of Defense and our secretary of State will learn that as well.”
With all due respect, Mr. Mihai Pacepa, your own previous sentence (well, two sentences prior) refutes such optimism. “… old habits die hard in such organizations.” Are we to “hope” that Obama’s own minions are unlike his heroes at the U.N.?
I’m sorry, sir, but I don’t share your optimism — at least on that particular point.
Readers interested in examining a long list of other high crimes (not as many misdemeanors) committed by the U.N. — with your money — are invited to visit Another Slow News Day’s blog page devoted to tracking those crimes.
http://anotherslownewsday.wordpress.com/united-nations/
Access to dozens of other topics featured at ASND, many involving and/or related to the U.N., is available from the Update Topics menu tree.
Thank you for this article General.
Unfortunately – the Secratry of State and the Secretary of Defense are in the same Camp as most of the Members of the UN. They are both ashamed of the US and would like to undermine the American Constitution – they and the political party they advocate for cannot allow individual rights and individual freedom as they believe that these freedoms and rights as enumerated in the American Constitution undrmines the Authority they believe the state should have.
While they probably believe more in the Mussalini form of Socialism than the Stalin form of Socialism – either way all the rights and power rest with the state – and thati is what both the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense want for America.
Sad – But True
Thank you for this article General.
Unfortunately – the Secratry of State and the Secretary of Defense are in the same Camp as most of the Members of the UN. They are both ashamed of the US and would like to undermine the American Constitution – they and the political party they advocate for cannot allow individual rights and individual freedom as they believe that these freedoms and rights as enumerated in the American Constitution undrmines the Authority they believe the state should have.
While they probably believe more in the Mussalini form of Socialism than the Stalin form of Socialism – either way all the rights and power rest with the state – and thati is what both the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense want for America.
Sad – But True
I’m afraid this whole administration is shot, no pun intended, especially after this Panetta dope had his own troops disarmed before talking to them in Afghanistan today. Disgraceful and dishonorable.
Many years ago a certain shoe banger addressed the UN. In part of his speech he stated “We will bury you”. He also said something like it would be done by lolling us into a sense of winning while subverting us from the inside. That the communists would wait and let us destroy ourselves. Could this be what is happening now? Infiltrating our schools and government? Working more and more to bring the minds of our children over to the communist line? Weakening us from the inside? Getting us to fight each other?
General Pacepa, I’m sure you know who I am referring to, a Mr. Kruchev way back in the 60s. My thoughts went back to that speech when the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union fell. My thought was give thanks but keep watch.
General, I think history might have turned out a little differently if the Clinton administration hadn’t have put the US military at the disposal of NATO. As you correctly point out, the US furnished military air power to NATO, only because NATO wanted it, to bomb the crap out of Serbia. The US had no dog in that fight. But that was all the evidence the hard liners in Moscow needed to prove that the cold war was still on, and the west had aggressive intent against the Slavic peoples. So it was precisely this notion – that the US must dance to Western Europe’s music – that contributed to the continuing hostility from Russia.
But maybe not. This is just my speculation.
Ah, Ceaucescu.
Somehow you never see that famous videotape of he and his harpy of a wife being summarily executed anymore. Ever wonder why that is?
Thank you, thank you for writing this! I just posted something, again, on my FB page. Hillary C. wants us to sign a law with them, restricting our gun ownership, and also tieing us into other things, surrounding this issue. The agency is corrupt, has been since day one, and the US is the biggest contributor, and the building is on our land. For many years, countries did not pay much into it. It is corrupt from top to bottom and needs to be gone off of our soil, and we need to pull out of it, or at the very least, speak up more about the corruptness and insanity, such as having China be a voting member, with all its human rights violations, and its mistreatment of our business men that go there, by taking all their manufacturing secrets, and lowering their currency value, which makes it impossible for American companies to compete.
The United Nations must depend on American money and tolerance to enable it to exist. Panetta is a party hack who has not had an non-political job for years. Both should be gone.
“I also have good reason to believe that the UN is not interested in defending the United States.”
Apparently neither is Obama.
Obama’s EPA Slapped With Lawsuit
http://freebeacon.com/the-epas-alt-fuels-tax/
Panetta is just another CFR flag holder for global government. The only thing he will defend is the UN, and NATO.
His statement of the US needing international permission does not get any more clear folks. I suspect he worships at the Lucis Trust fondation inside the UN building.
Along with Durban, what about Agenda 21 ‘sustainable development’ and Kyoto ‘global warming’?
Gorbachev’s 1985 deal with Eurocommunist parties to create a new Soviet west of the Urals led us to the EU.
Funny how the Clinton years gave us the New Party takeover of the Democrats-which led to the Democrat Socialist Alliance takeover of the Congress 2007, White House 2008, the economy 2009.
Funny how China became rich and nuclear, the Euro was born, the financial laws were re-organized, and global warming became a major concern in the Clinton years as well.
Funny how the UN is in New York; and New York (Goldman Sachs and co.) funded the Euro and green investment,
just like New York sent Leon Bronstein (aka Trotsky) to fund the Bolsheviks.
Oh, and terrorism- don’t forget the 90′s large scale attacks here and overseas- all because of those militias of bitter clingers, I’m sure.
So if the KGB trained the Islamics then, who is riling them up now?
Which Party is bringing them in and warning us against Islamophobia and anti-immigrant ‘discrimination’?
So if Wall Street and K Street are the agents of DC, who else is DC directing their biznis skills to?
Woops, I forgot to add that Democrat professionals were running election campaigns in Europe during the Clinton years too. Odd, that.
Can’t be co-ordinated organizing like Obama allies were doing for the Muslim Brotherhood, Iran, and the 2001 Saudi Rebel 6 takeover, can it?
Forgive my obtuseness and multiple posts, let me be perfectly clear.
After the USSR fell, the American Democrats saw their chance to take first position on the global Communist pole. They then began working to rebuild the Bloc and co-ordinate with it’s allies.
FDR, Wilson’s acolyte and Stalin’s friend, attempted and American Soviet.
Todays Democrats believe they can achieve it.
Ms Kutnicki, do you remember when the peace now raised a huge protest against Ariel Sharon after Sabra-Chatila , do you remember how an armored corps colonel
(eli geva ) refused to shoot at Beirut in 1982, and was suddenly hailed as a hero,instead of being sent to martial court for a heavy sentence ?All those events were prepared well in advance with the generous help of stupid liberal american jews, and with the heavy influence of the CIA.The manipulation of the israeli opinion has been a very deep operation and it produced what you try to figure out as ” bourgeois decadence “, but this is the final result of 30 years of moral subversion through persuasion from top to bottom:The Begin government was very naive ( Begin named Aaron Barak to the supreme court !) , the Shamir government was short-lived he had to accept rotation with the left,Israel was weakened by the lebanese drag and quagmire, then came the 1st intifada,which took by surprise the Labour government, then the came the USSR fall and the huge immigration of 1 million russian jews.Shamir was constrained by the USA to accept to join the Madrid conference in exchange for the US guaranty for israeli loans ( to absorb the immigration ).Then came the 1992 elections the victory of the Labour and the treacherous Oslo accords.So between 1982 and 1993 ; Israel was most of the time on the rear gear, subject to events rather than actor of its free-will destiny. The moral decay that you now see all around you is the fruit of these shaky period. Even the great warrior Ariel Sharon betrayed in 2006 the core beliefs of the Likud when he ordered the retreat from Gush Katif.So I don’t think as you write that once the iranians missiles will fall on Tel Aviv high ends areas , the decadent bourgeois will change their minds and get back to the high moral and ethic behaviour of the zionist pioneers.Unfortunately they will cry for surrender or will leave the country.
I believe you may have solved the mystery of Jewish socialists in Israel as well as here:
Operatives doing community organizing.
One spy was named Saul Alinsky; the original version of his book was “Reveille for Radicals”, 1944 (when he arrived).
Such as the many Red Mafya Jews released from Russian prisons and sent to Israel as immigrants.
Such as the many who fled the war between National and International Socialists, were sent, or recruited.
FDR imported thousands of the worst of the worst of Eastern Europe; they survived the famines and pograms by being the worst, and ran the death camps as the Germans were all on the Front. So many, they were forming whole towns on the East Coast; Truman got rid of about 4,000 in the government agencies, but many more were left- and being promoted!
If the UN is a rich prize, Western institutions are richer prizes still.
Russia was outgunned- and also planned to win the war without bullets and with the assets intact; that is the point of a resource war, after all.
The old strategy of steal credit and deflect blame has another aspect.
Since the agenda and history must be hidden behind lies, it will be forgotten.
The next generation will never know they are righteously attacking the innocent.
This is how subversion becomes a self-sustaining cultural myth.
I doubt think too many liberal Democrats are going to agree about the U.N., seeing as it how it’s one of their brilliant creations.
But, if they ever do, they’ll start trying to act like it’s all somebody else’s fault, like they do with things like Jim Crow or the Vietnam War.
If they ever start sneering at the U.N. and making noises like it’s all some right wing plot, then you’ll know they’re getting tired of it.
“On March 7, 2012, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta stated in the U.S. Congress that the United Nations and NATO have supreme authority over the actions of the United States military”
I don’t know exactly what he said, but the U.N. has no authority over the military operations of the United States, according to its own rules.
Not as long as we have veto power over decisions made by the Security Council.
We can do anything we please, including flagrantly breaking the provisions of the U.N. treaty, and there’s no legal mechanism they can employ to stop us…’cause we’ll just veto whatever it is they try to do. They can bitch and moan, and that’s about the limit of what they can do.
We might decide to voluntarily follow the U.N.’s lead, but they can’t make us.
Here we go again – and Hillary dodged sniper rounds in Bosnia!
Leon even death by a suicide bomber or a gas truck igniter won’t cover your poor choice of words when it comes to pronouncements about the UN.
Just keep a sharp lookout – dark doorways – sneaky types hanging around outside of your building – you know the drill !
I am sure you feel safe because Oby has your back – must be kind of how Netanyahu feels?
Baffled that the Secretary of Defense could be, would be so openly ignorant and dismissive of the substance of law and independence of the USA.
Baffled, not outraged. This kid-glove treatment of clear ignoramuses at the levers of the government with the lives of many Americans in their hands is a large part of the problems now facing America. Shame on ANY Congressman or Senator who can muster no more response than bafflement at this outrage..
The next GOP prez should take some drastic measures in regards to the UN. It is full of subversives and spies posing as beurocrats (sp). WITHDRAWL from the UN completely. Go on national TV and say the UN should consider moving its headquarters to Moscow from NY. As Bush had the gonnads to say, the UN is becoming irrelevent, the next prez should say it is.
Immediately start reaching out to the western enlightened nations, and totally isolate islam, China, and Russia just to start. It would be bold and “radical” to the usual suspects, but welcomed by a center right majority of our nation. The diplomacy angle has not worked as well for us as the soviets (ie.. the curent democrat party positions), so lets back all the way off and evaluate.
All,
Got three books for you to read. If you like them, recommend them to anyone whom you think would enjoy them (or anyone who has a very myopic world view):
1. The Naked Communist by W. Cleon Skousen (the same guy who wrote the Five Thousand Year Leap)
2. The Venona Secrets by Herbert Romerstein and Eric Breindol
3. Venona: Decoding Soviet Espionage in America by John Earl Haynes and Harvey Klehr
These books, just based on what the General has to say, will reinforce the notion that “Tailgunner Joe” McCarthy may not have been that far off in his claims. Imagine turning McCarthyism into a more positive word.
Also, if you have any anti nuke friends, a good one to shut them up with would be “Hell to Pay, Operation Downfall and the Invasion of Japan, 1946-1947″ by DM Giangreco
Is this the reason the NAACP is approaching the UN about voter id laws, because they will be apt to side with them and “pressure” the President to attack conservatives groups?