Get PJ Media on your Apple

Waiting for Dorner

When the names of your colleagues at the LAPD are on the manifesto of a double-murder suspect still at large.

by
Jack Dunphy

Bio

February 19, 2013 - 12:09 am
Page 1 of 3  Next ->   View as Single Page

So you show up at work one day, and your supervisor tells you that instead of your normal duties you’re going to be working a protection detail at a fellow officer’s home.  Okay, you say, but why?

And your supervisor tells you that they’ve identified a suspect in a double murder, the one down in Irvine that everyone’s been talking about, the one where the daughter of a retired LAPD captain and her fiancé were shot to death while sitting in a car.  And he goes on to tell you that the suspect is a former LAPD cop who was fired a few years ago, and that he had put some kind of twisted manifesto on his Facebook page saying he had declared war on the LAPD and would hunt down and kill everyone he held responsible for his getting canned from the job.  And their families.

And you say, “What?”

Then you get a copy of this guy’s manifesto, and the first thing you do is skim through it looking for your name.  And though you’re relieved not to find yourself listed among the killer’s targets, there are people you know on the list and you wonder if all of these protection details the LAPD is scrambling to put together will be in place before the guy strikes again.  And you think, the guy blames the retired captain (among many others) for his getting fired, so he goes out and kills his daughter?  And her fiancé?  What the hell is wrong with this guy?

Plenty, as you come to learn, for as you read more deeply into his manifesto you realize he’s put a lot of thought into it — a lot of pretty tangled thought, but a lot of thought nonetheless — and he says he’s got all kinds of guns and military gear and knows how to use them and not get caught.

Then your cell phone starts ringing.  It’s people you work with or used to work with, and they have questions.  Have you seen the manifesto?  Can you believe so-and-so is on the list?  Can you believe the guy is willing to kill family members over this?  And then you talk to a coworker who tells you that a friend of his is on the list, and your coworker says it was he who informed his friend to arm up and hunker down more than an hour before anyone from the department got around to officially warning him.

Then they tell you the cop you’ll be protecting is someone you used to work with, and you and the rest of your detail drive 30 or 40 miles to his house out in the suburbs and get set up.  A few guys in tight on the house, a few others farther out, a few others even farther out.  Every car that comes through the neighborhood has to be checked out.  You want to knock on the door of the house you’re guarding and ask how your former coworker is doing but you don’t want to bother him and his family, because God knows how they must be feeling.  But then he needs to go out for some groceries, so you arrange to put him in an unmarked car with some cops in plain clothes, so at least he can go and get what he needs without making a big scene at the supermarket.

And when he gets back from the grocery run you talk to him for a minute in front of the house and ask him how he’s doing.  Okay, he says, but it’s hard on the family.  And even though he tries not to act worried — because, you know, we’re cops and we never want to act worried around other cops — even though he tries to act like he isn’t worried you can see that he is and you can see that he hasn’t slept much and you can only imagine how his wife is doing and how he explains all of this to his kids, who can’t go to school or the playground or even out in their own yard.

So you tell him you’ve got his back, that you and the rest of the detail have the neighborhood covered.  And he thanks you and goes back in the house, but you know he’s wondering: If the killer shows up here, are you going to be able to stop him?  And you wonder the same thing, because even though you and the rest of the cops on your detail are armed to the teeth with every weapon the LAPD allows you to have (and maybe one or two it doesn’t), you know the killer you’re looking for has some formidable weapons of his own, including, if the reports are true, a .50 caliber sniper rifle, the bullet from which would go right through your ballistic vest and your car and probably a house or two before it stopped.

Click here to view the 79 legacy comments

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (10)
All Comments   (10)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Here's what I get out of this.
Police officers, threatened by a maniac, will be (rightfully) paranoid and do whatever it takes to bring the criminal in, or kill him. The feeling of vulnerability, that this time, they are the targets, is awesome indeed.
Then, the next day, when a woman tells them her deranged ex-boyfriend is threatening to kill her, it will be business as usual.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
It's not completely fair to say that. When I was 9 years old a cop drove me to the hospital. He came out to the little town i was in at an enormous rate of speed and went to the hospital at an enormous rate of speed. And I am fine with all my body parts attached (more or less) and function these many years later.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
The idea of murdering someones daughter and calling up the dad to talk about it makes me sick.

Why do the eviiest deeds seem to come from the biggest dumb-fcks?.

1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Dorner called for banning assault weapons and silencers. Yet he owned and used both, and more. Typical hypocritical left-wing position. "Nobody should get to own guns but me, because my life is more valuable than yours."

So where is the table full of captured weapons police chiefs across the nation love to display when they nab a perp?

The only way I knew Dorner had a silenced weapon was when a citizen found one overlooked by the cops in the snow at Big Bear and reported it toTV news crews.

There seems to be two sets of laws: one for cops and ex-cops, and one for citizens. Cops and Feds get to be armed to the teeth with weapons the rest of us can't own. To defend themselves, Citizens are instructed to vomit on the assailant's shoes and run away as fast as possible.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Thank goodness Dorner was stopped pretty quickly!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I feel for the cops in that situation. It's tough being the target of a terrorist.

But there's a bigger and very important nationwide issue that should have been addressed: cops attacking innocent civilians.

It happens all too frequently, as it did *twice* in this case. Usually, it's when police storm a house, suddenly and without warning, armed with automatic weapons and protected with armor and helmets. Most of these events are simply not necessary. They aren't doing it to protect anyone - they're doing it to grab a drug dealer or someone else with contraband. And that's no reason to put the public at risk.

There are times when the cops need the heavy armament and protection. But these days, too often, they use it when they don't. They look more like the SS than our protectors.

The ethos has changed. Cops used to trained to protect civilians. Today that training is diluted by an emphasis on protecting the police. Add to that the no-knock raids - which may result in more convictions, but place civilians in a lot of danger - and you have a problem. No-knock raids are a new phenomenon - started in the '70s as part of the drug war. But they are used more and more. The result: our police departments are militarizing.

If someone storms into your house, you have to ask: is it a home invader whom I should shoot, or cops with the wrong address who will shoot me 71 times (Tucson, AZ) when they see me armed.

We pay our soldiers a lot less than we pay cops, and those soldiers are expected to take a lot of fire, and run a high risk of injury or death. We should expect our cops to be willing to take the same risks - it should be *their* lives, not ours, that are at risk in their actions.

Tough? Well, they can choose a different career. But if police are there to protect and serve, they can start the protection by not shooting innocents, not storming innocent houses and killing pets and terrorizing the residents. How do they expect to have our trust when they behave this way.

I wish Mr. Dunphy would recognize how bad the police are starting to look - to law-and-order people like myself, not just cry-baby liberals - and I wish he would address that issue. Not going there in this narrative, where there were two instances of cops attacking innocent civilians, is an example of how the police have grown apart from whom they are supposed to protect, and have lost necessary sensitivity to the impact they have, and the way the community feels.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
No mention that the police who shot civilians should be brought up on charges? Sorry but if a civilian did this they would be held accountable.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
So when is someone going to address the elephant in the room. I'm referring to the tortured logic of the LAPD discipline system where Officers are required to report suspected misconduct but, as the Dorner case proves, do so at the risk of their jobs. That kind of Catch 22 needs to be eliminated.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
I hate LA. One day scientists will discover there is some manic radiation that deranges everybody who moves here.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All