http://i48.tinypic.com/2qjhms6.jpg

MORE PROOF (needs proof reading):

ABSOLUTE PROOF. These are posts I put on another website

[below is regarding an article discussing the lack of "climategate"
and "climate gate" in auto suggest despite the fact that both terms
were searched for more than "climate change" in the past week]
29 11 2009
Joe (04:03:54) : Your comment is awaiting moderation

After I type in all of these letters: “CLIMATE GATE” it suggests
“climate gates” something different.

when i type “climateg” all the way to “climategate” IT SUGGESTS
NOTHING!
29 11 2009
Joe (04:08:20) : Your comment is awaiting moderation

BTW the results on google for “climategate” have GONE DOWN to
6,690,000. IT USED TO GIVE >12,000,000.

When a story breaks the reuslts normally INCREASE for at least hte
first month. But in under a weak the numbers have decreased by over
half.

I wish them edia covered things. It disgusts me.
29 11 2009
Joe (04:11:53) : Your comment is awaiting moderation

OMG “climate gate” (two words) gives even less.

RUNDOWN:

“climategate” and “climate gate” both gave over 12 million results at
first.

NOW:

“climategate” : 6,690,000
“climate gate”: 6,180,000

TO SHOW THAT THIS IS ABSURD AND DIRECT CENSORSHIP

“climate wall” yields: 32,600,000 !!!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT WHAT??? Google you bastards.

29 11 2009
Joe (04:14:36) : Your comment is awaiting moderation

Also more proof of tampering “climate gate” is yielding less than
“cliamtegate”. climate gate should always yield more as it SHOULD
result in all sites with the word “climategate” (thaks to google’s
algorithm) BUT also any websites taht have the words “climate” and
“gate” in them.

THIS IS DISGUSTING

I don’t know, and I don’t care!

BTW, don’t be quite so condescending and dismissive in your lumping of Fox in with the rest of the mass media on this subject … since it’s the ONLY network covering it. One is MUCH better than zero. Especially when it has the runaway highest ratings.

Given all of the pressing issues, namely that something needs to be done to bring this to a larger audience (in a way that leaves open the [at this point] somewhat unthinkable possibility of reversing decades of planning by the powers that would-like-to-be), how does it transition from internet commenting and frivolously writing congressmen to actual change?

This, I feel, is really the most important collective decision that needs to be discussed. I’ll tell you from the start that I don’t think this is a ‘oh you stupid left wingers’ or ‘that Obama sure is a bad man’ conversation. It was mentioned above by ONE person that it doesn’t matter if it’s a Republican or Democrat in office right now (I’m paraphrasing), because this point would have come to pass regardless of who won the 2008 election. This is something much bigger than all of that. So, like the aforementioned commenter noted, there somehow has to be a transformational shift in ‘We the People’s minds. Your average American these days is apathetic, at best, when an issue of something bigger than their immediate life is brought up. And I’m giving credit enough to said American by granting that they can comprehend all of these allegations and their associated implications.

So I suppose the question I really have is.. can the majority of you commenting say realistically that you don’t define yourselves in the issues of party politics? That the issues of today are not because of Obama, nor are they because of George W, nor any single leader/congress to be in control at points before them? These are examples of the questions I find most troubling when attempting to theorize methods for revolutionary acts to take place, and they are predicated daily by all of the mass media outlets previously mentioned, INCLUDING Fox News. I only raise this point because throughout most of the reading on Climategate and whatnot for the last little while, I find this daunting trend of the standard Conservative/Republican Fox News mouthpieces being almost heralded as defenders of some sort of journalistic ideology that, frankly, is not the case. Mass media is mass media at this point, as is big government as it exists today (the primary parties), etc.

The real problem is that a ‘boy who cried wolf’ mentality has accompanied this general malaise of the populace, and with good reason. For anything real to occur with regards to stopping huge events from taking place that would greatly alter the course of not just our nation, but the nations of the world, there has to be consensus among the beginning planners of said revolution that favoritism and finger pointing from within are both unnecessary and damaging to a public face. Read that to say: if something is actually going to be done, we cannot align ourselves with any organization/outlet that has publicly shamed itself and reduced its credibility in any way. The obvious answer, then, is that everything needs to be formulated from scratch, yes? So let’s start figuring this out. How? Where do we start? Let’s start upping the proverbial ante and putting something real on the ground other than eloquent yet unheard truths that our forefathers would have started working to repair long ago.

Too bad we can’t do squat to influence which way it goes!

check out the nipcc’s report…

http://www.nipccreport.org/

“In “Climate Change Reconsidered: The 2009 Report of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC),” coauthors Dr. S. Fred Singer and Dr. Craig Idso and 35 contributors and reviewers present an authoritative and detailed rebuttal of the findings of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), on which the Obama Administration and Democrats in Congress rely for their regulatory proposals.”

i haven’t read all the way through the thread yet, so if someone has already posted this, apologies.