Get PJ Media on your Apple

Unusual Team of Leahy and Lee Push Privacy Protection for Email

Utah GOP Sen. Lee said the legislation is “essential to protecting Fourth Amendment rights and the interests of American citizens.”

by
Bill Straub

Bio

April 26, 2013 - 3:13 pm
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON – The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday advanced legislation to broaden privacy protections for email and other electronic communications, but several panel members expressed concerns about possible negative impact on law enforcement.

The bill attempts to update a 1986 law to “meet the challenges of the digital age,” according to Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the committee chairman and co-sponsor of the bill with Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah).

“I think Americans are very concerned about unwarranted intrusions into our private lives in cyberspace,” Leahy said. “There’s no question if somebody wants to go into your house and go through your files and drawers they’re going to need a search warrant. But if you’ve got the same files in the cloud, you ought to have the same sense of privacy.”

The measure, sent to the Senate floor via voice vote, prohibits an electronic communications or remote communications provider — like Gmail, Facebook, or Twitter — from voluntarily disclosing the contents of customer emails or other communications.

It also requires government agencies to obtain a search warrant based on probable cause before gaining access to electronic communications, thus eliminating the so-called 180 day rule that some agencies maintain grants them warrantless access to older emails. Law enforcement agencies would also be required to notify within 10 days any person whose emails are being accessed.

Lee said the legislation is “essential to protecting Fourth Amendment rights and the interests of American citizens.”

“For centuries Americans corresponded primarily through the U.S. mail system,” he said. “It was well settled throughout that entire time that such private correspondence would be entitled to the full protection of the Fourth Amendment. Modern technology has now evolved to the point where third party storage and cloud computing are now the norm. So with countless people using Google, Yahoo and other remote services to host and coordinate electronic communications, it makes it necessary for us to update this bill.”

Proponents noted that the bill, known as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, is a bipartisan effort – unusual for the 113th Congress – that carries the support of more than 100 privacy, civil liberties, civil rights, and Silicon Valley organizations.

“Everybody agrees we’ve got to do this,” Leahy said.

“We’re concerned about the Internal Revenue Service and other government agencies reading emails without getting a warrant,” Leahy said. “There are exceptions to the warrant requirement for emergency circumstances and national security but it also says the bill requires the government to promptly notify individuals that email content has been accessed.”

Despite receiving the endorsement of such divergent outfits as the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans for Tax Reform, the package has received more tepid response from law enforcement groups like the FBI Agents Association and the Securities and Exchange Commission, which fear the new restrictions could hinder vital investigations.

Several committee members, including Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), cited a letter from SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White, who cautioned that the Leahy-Lee bill could impede civil probes into issues like securities fraud since commission agents do not have warrant authority and can’t seek assistance from the Justice Department in obtaining one.

“It seems to me these concerns are very real,” Sessions said.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (2)
All Comments   (2)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
IF a person has created a personal 'save' file within their mail providers system, then it should be guarded as private. IF on the other hand mail is 'deleted' from their personal save mail files, it should be considered as 'dumpster' mail.

Individual communications such as found on internet sites that do not require restricted paid access, it should be considered public venues and public information not guarded. Such sites can only claim ownership to the site and the content provided directly by the owner on their sites and unless restricted by paid access it is a public venue as is ALL the content on the site. Also, copyright is one of the most abused things on the internet, especially on interactive sites that allow for individual commenting.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
We have Fourth Amendment rights? Somebody tell the TSA. Somebody tell the Boston area police.
51 weeks ago
51 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “Unusual Team of Leahy and Lee Push Privacy Protection for Email”