<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unions, Lenin, and the American Way (Part I)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 02:12:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Independant</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-421166</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Independant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-421166</guid>
		<description>Marina,
     You stated in your last post that your justification for believing the USSR was a socialist country and not a communist one was not based on just the wording of the country.  You neglected to state what your other justification(s) were though.  I’m sure that was an oversight on your part.  I’m still waiting for your explanation.
     Concerning your reference to `The German Ideology’ I noticed you conveniently posted a “quote” and provided a link to a site in a foreign language.  If you want to convince me of your position you’re not going to be able to do that with guile or deception.  That book was originally published in Russian and had been translated into every major language spoken on the planet.  If you wanted to you could have selected a quote written in English but you didn’t.  If you’re going to try and lie I’m going to call you out on it. 
      Now the one thing that you did correctly state (but seem unable to understand) was that Engel’s did believe that democracy could not cure social evil, thus the goal of communism.  So my question to you is what exactly is communism a transition from?  And if you do decide to respond be sure to do so in English and provide the specific source your referencing (that’s means a site link or a manuscript with a page number).
I’ll be waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marina,<br />
     You stated in your last post that your justification for believing the USSR was a socialist country and not a communist one was not based on just the wording of the country.  You neglected to state what your other justification(s) were though.  I’m sure that was an oversight on your part.  I’m still waiting for your explanation.<br />
     Concerning your reference to `The German Ideology’ I noticed you conveniently posted a “quote” and provided a link to a site in a foreign language.  If you want to convince me of your position you’re not going to be able to do that with guile or deception.  That book was originally published in Russian and had been translated into every major language spoken on the planet.  If you wanted to you could have selected a quote written in English but you didn’t.  If you’re going to try and lie I’m going to call you out on it.<br />
      Now the one thing that you did correctly state (but seem unable to understand) was that Engel’s did believe that democracy could not cure social evil, thus the goal of communism.  So my question to you is what exactly is communism a transition from?  And if you do decide to respond be sure to do so in English and provide the specific source your referencing (that’s means a site link or a manuscript with a page number).<br />
I’ll be waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marina</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-420022</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-420022</guid>
		<description>(28. Mr. Independant)
Sorry for being late. Not everyone gets payed for trolling on conservative / libertarian sites. Some have to work.

(26: Thank you Oleg, it&#039;s very sweet of you.)

Now, back to you, Mr. IndependAnt:

(Marina, the rational you gave in your response as proof that the former USSR was a socialist country and not a communist country was simply in it’s name. Forgetting the absurdity of that position consider this; the official name of North Korea is the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea. By your standard just because North Korea’s leadership says that their country is a democratic republic then it is. So I’ll ask you, do you think North Korea is a democratic republic? Of course not. By the same token the former USSR was not a socialist country.)

You would have been absolutely right, if it had been my ONLY argument. &quot;Democratic&quot; in a name doesn&#039;t make you a real democrat. The best exapmle is the s.c. DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE USA, promoting marxist state-dictatorship.


(...Your final point concerning my information sources is also false. The justifications for my statements are not based on an article in the Wikipedia or a comedy show but are based on the writings of the two men who invented the modern concepts)

You mean Laurel and Hardy? You cannot be serious calling the concepts of Marx-n-Engels &quot;modern&quot;, can you? The monsters lived in the 19th (!!!!!!!!!!!) century. We live in the 21st, if you need to be reminded.  &quot;Back to the future&quot;? Rather &quot;Forwards to the past&quot;. &quot;Modern&quot;. Don&#039;t be ridiculous!

(If you’re interested in learning for yourself what these concepts refer to I suggest reading the Manifesto of the Communist Party. And if you do find an instance where Marx or Engels actually do define communism and socialism as you do, please state the page number of where that is on this website.)

You&#039;re kidding me. Is the Manifesto the only thing you&#039;ve read from your gurus? The monsters suffered from verbal diarrhea. The concepts are not from the Manifesto. They&#039;re from &quot;Die deutsche Ideologie&quot; by Marx. Here&#039;s the original text:

&quot;Nun aber besteht eines der wesentlichsten Prinzipien des Kommunismus, wodurch er sich von jedem reaktionären Sozialismus unterscheidet, in der auf die Natur des Menschen begründeten empirischen Ansicht, daß die Unterschiede des Kopfes und der intellektuellen Fähigkeiten überhaupt keine Unterschiede des Magens und der physischen Bedürfnisse bedingen; daß mithin der falsche, auf unsre bestehenden Verhältnisse begründete Satz: »Jedem nach seinen Fähigkeiten«, sofern er sich auf den Genuß im engeren Sinne bezieht, umgewandelt werden muß in den Satz: Jedem nach Bedürfnis; daß, mit andern Worten, die Verschiedenheit in der Tätigkeit, in den Arbeiten, keine Ungleichheit, kein Vorrecht des Besitzes und Genusses begründet&quot;.

http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Marx,+Karl/Die+deutsche+Ideologie

I&#039;m sure you&#039;re able to find the English text yourself. This is the foundation of both s.c. PRINCIPLES, that of COMMUNISM (&quot;to everyone according to his needs&quot;) and that of SOCIALISM (&quot;to everyone according to his abilities&quot;).
That is the main difference between Socialism and Communism, NOT A WORD ABOUT DEMOCRACY.

Now to DEMOCRACY. (You say: On your second point that the differences between communism and socialism are economic and not political, that is also false. In both instances the government controls the means of production, distribution, and finance. The only difference is the political mechanism that is used to achieve that. In the case of communism it’s a dictatorship and in the case of socialism it’s democracy.)  REALLY? Did &quot;The Manifesto&quot; tell you that? Or was it Jon Stewart after all? Roseanne Barr? Maaaatt Daaaaamon? Whatever. Listen to one of your disgusting gurus:

&quot;Aber die bloße Demokratie ist nicht fähig, soziale Übel zu heilen. Die demokratische Gleichheit ist eine Chimäre, der Kampf der Armen gegen die Reichen kann nicht auf dem Boden der Demokratie oder der Politik überhaupt ausgekämpft werden. Auch diese Stufe ist also nur ein Übergang, das letzte rein politische Mittel, das noch zu versuchen ist und aus dem sich sogleich ein neues Element, ein über alles politische Wesen hinausgehendes Prinzip entwickeln muß.
Dies Prinzip ist das des Sozialismus.&quot; (F. ENGELS, Die Lage Englands).

http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Engels,+Friedrich/Die+Lage+Englands.

Find the English text yourself. What Engels says is the DEMOCRACY IS UNABLE TO CURE SOCIAL EVIL. &quot;DEMOCRATIC EQUALITY IS A CHIMERA&quot; The fight between the poor and the rich CANNOT be led on the platform of DEMOCRACY. The only way is to apply the principle of SOCIALISM. Tah-dah!

 
So, dear Mr. IndependAnt, you wanted quotes, I gave them to you. Now tit for tat.
I still wanna know where this bull...t about &quot;communism is a dictatorship and socialism is a democracy&quot; comes from. Quotes and links, please!

But be very, VERY carefull what you&#039;re qouting. Remember, I can read it IN ORIGINAL and IN CONTEXT.

I will post and repost this entry untill you give me what I want, honey.
Bye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(28. Mr. Independant)<br />
Sorry for being late. Not everyone gets payed for trolling on conservative / libertarian sites. Some have to work.</p>
<p>(26: Thank you Oleg, it&#8217;s very sweet of you.)</p>
<p>Now, back to you, Mr. IndependAnt:</p>
<p>(Marina, the rational you gave in your response as proof that the former USSR was a socialist country and not a communist country was simply in it’s name. Forgetting the absurdity of that position consider this; the official name of North Korea is the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea. By your standard just because North Korea’s leadership says that their country is a democratic republic then it is. So I’ll ask you, do you think North Korea is a democratic republic? Of course not. By the same token the former USSR was not a socialist country.)</p>
<p>You would have been absolutely right, if it had been my ONLY argument. &#8220;Democratic&#8221; in a name doesn&#8217;t make you a real democrat. The best exapmle is the s.c. DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE USA, promoting marxist state-dictatorship.</p>
<p>(&#8230;Your final point concerning my information sources is also false. The justifications for my statements are not based on an article in the Wikipedia or a comedy show but are based on the writings of the two men who invented the modern concepts)</p>
<p>You mean Laurel and Hardy? You cannot be serious calling the concepts of Marx-n-Engels &#8220;modern&#8221;, can you? The monsters lived in the 19th (!!!!!!!!!!!) century. We live in the 21st, if you need to be reminded.  &#8220;Back to the future&#8221;? Rather &#8220;Forwards to the past&#8221;. &#8220;Modern&#8221;. Don&#8217;t be ridiculous!</p>
<p>(If you’re interested in learning for yourself what these concepts refer to I suggest reading the Manifesto of the Communist Party. And if you do find an instance where Marx or Engels actually do define communism and socialism as you do, please state the page number of where that is on this website.)</p>
<p>You&#8217;re kidding me. Is the Manifesto the only thing you&#8217;ve read from your gurus? The monsters suffered from verbal diarrhea. The concepts are not from the Manifesto. They&#8217;re from &#8220;Die deutsche Ideologie&#8221; by Marx. Here&#8217;s the original text:</p>
<p>&#8220;Nun aber besteht eines der wesentlichsten Prinzipien des Kommunismus, wodurch er sich von jedem reaktionären Sozialismus unterscheidet, in der auf die Natur des Menschen begründeten empirischen Ansicht, daß die Unterschiede des Kopfes und der intellektuellen Fähigkeiten überhaupt keine Unterschiede des Magens und der physischen Bedürfnisse bedingen; daß mithin der falsche, auf unsre bestehenden Verhältnisse begründete Satz: »Jedem nach seinen Fähigkeiten«, sofern er sich auf den Genuß im engeren Sinne bezieht, umgewandelt werden muß in den Satz: Jedem nach Bedürfnis; daß, mit andern Worten, die Verschiedenheit in der Tätigkeit, in den Arbeiten, keine Ungleichheit, kein Vorrecht des Besitzes und Genusses begründet&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Marx,+Karl/Die+deutsche+Ideologie" rel="nofollow">http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Marx,+Karl/Die+deutsche+Ideologie</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re able to find the English text yourself. This is the foundation of both s.c. PRINCIPLES, that of COMMUNISM (&#8220;to everyone according to his needs&#8221;) and that of SOCIALISM (&#8220;to everyone according to his abilities&#8221;).<br />
That is the main difference between Socialism and Communism, NOT A WORD ABOUT DEMOCRACY.</p>
<p>Now to DEMOCRACY. (You say: On your second point that the differences between communism and socialism are economic and not political, that is also false. In both instances the government controls the means of production, distribution, and finance. The only difference is the political mechanism that is used to achieve that. In the case of communism it’s a dictatorship and in the case of socialism it’s democracy.)  REALLY? Did &#8220;The Manifesto&#8221; tell you that? Or was it Jon Stewart after all? Roseanne Barr? Maaaatt Daaaaamon? Whatever. Listen to one of your disgusting gurus:</p>
<p>&#8220;Aber die bloße Demokratie ist nicht fähig, soziale Übel zu heilen. Die demokratische Gleichheit ist eine Chimäre, der Kampf der Armen gegen die Reichen kann nicht auf dem Boden der Demokratie oder der Politik überhaupt ausgekämpft werden. Auch diese Stufe ist also nur ein Übergang, das letzte rein politische Mittel, das noch zu versuchen ist und aus dem sich sogleich ein neues Element, ein über alles politische Wesen hinausgehendes Prinzip entwickeln muß.<br />
Dies Prinzip ist das des Sozialismus.&#8221; (F. ENGELS, Die Lage Englands).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Engels,+Friedrich/Die+Lage+Englands" rel="nofollow">http://www.zeno.org/Philosophie/M/Engels,+Friedrich/Die+Lage+Englands</a>.</p>
<p>Find the English text yourself. What Engels says is the DEMOCRACY IS UNABLE TO CURE SOCIAL EVIL. &#8220;DEMOCRATIC EQUALITY IS A CHIMERA&#8221; The fight between the poor and the rich CANNOT be led on the platform of DEMOCRACY. The only way is to apply the principle of SOCIALISM. Tah-dah!</p>
<p>So, dear Mr. IndependAnt, you wanted quotes, I gave them to you. Now tit for tat.<br />
I still wanna know where this bull&#8230;t about &#8220;communism is a dictatorship and socialism is a democracy&#8221; comes from. Quotes and links, please!</p>
<p>But be very, VERY carefull what you&#8217;re qouting. Remember, I can read it IN ORIGINAL and IN CONTEXT.</p>
<p>I will post and repost this entry untill you give me what I want, honey.<br />
Bye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-419995</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-419995</guid>
		<description>And big business has it&#039;s own little union going on forcing employees to contribute to their retirement funds buying stock that does not follow the curve of employment.  Bringing workers in and out as the need be has been a game they have been playing for far too long.  Wouldn&#039;t it be nice if all workers were considered &quot;Temporary&quot; and you could shut them off, and when they have passed their time of the ratio of benefits to cost send them on.  Your bean counters and scientists have worked it out, it&#039;s just those pesky humans that insist they deserve dignity,  purpose, and respect.  Loyalty to the company doesn&#039;t mean the company has to be loyal back, does it?

Workers are paying into a system that lay-offs, down sizing, and restructuring, profits the company and the stockholder unless of course you are the worker who was laid-off, down-sized, and restructured.

The Unions know what business knows.  If it&#039;s not in writing it doesn&#039;t mean a thing.  The conditions of the working man and woman were appalling and still are appalling in many parts of the world.  Business Conglomerates has skipped every step they could because they have lived by the convenient mantra &quot;Greed is good&quot;,  for them at least.

The Union wants to get rid of an extra hoop requiring them to get a majority of cards signed to even be exposed to the workers and show them  what they offer and that is understandable.  That businesses wants to keep the extra hoop that Unions go through is understandable.
Just for once be honest and admit that it&#039;s all about the numbers and not about the workers.  We see that now with the stock market rising while unemployment continues it&#039;s climb.  We see the stimulus money used to pay bonuses because business conglomerates know to keep the inner circle happy so that their free for them can continue.  Bonuses are not paid for the performance of the company but for their performance in  turning a blind eye to business as usual (wink, wink).

The Soviet Union did all it could to hang heavy yokes around the people for the benefit of the few.  They used the workers and the workers union to benefit the party.  The Soviet Union and now Russia have nothing to offer because they have sucked the soul from the people 360 degrees whether in the name of the people or in the name of the state.  Of course there are the few insanely wealthy that continue to whoop it up in Moscow.  

You are going to have to wait another few generations before the people will forget and the history books are erased telling the story of how the United States was built off the backs of ordinary people and their little children. Everything they asked for was begrudgingly given from schooling, to decent working hours, to decent working conditions, to half-assed job security.  Even  fighting and dieing and getting wounded in bloody wars did not guarantee fair treatment and many benefits that veterans enjoy today were fought for with tooth and nail.

You think that because you now live under the Constitution that suddenly it&#039;s the big bad government that is out to get the lowly poor business man who just wants to make a living and help bring some others up with him.  The  bones on this Country are the Bill of Rights where all men are created equal endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.  Even the founding fathers knew to take the worth of a man out of the hands of other men.  According to you that Union was somehow not necessary to establish and make sure this country did not fall into the same old world of the benefit of the few at the expense of the many.

Your living in a Real Union now buddy, not a fake Union where you came from. Get used to it.  We still haven&#039;t forgotten and some are learning now, that if it&#039;s not in writing it doesn&#039;t mean anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And big business has it&#8217;s own little union going on forcing employees to contribute to their retirement funds buying stock that does not follow the curve of employment.  Bringing workers in and out as the need be has been a game they have been playing for far too long.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if all workers were considered &#8220;Temporary&#8221; and you could shut them off, and when they have passed their time of the ratio of benefits to cost send them on.  Your bean counters and scientists have worked it out, it&#8217;s just those pesky humans that insist they deserve dignity,  purpose, and respect.  Loyalty to the company doesn&#8217;t mean the company has to be loyal back, does it?</p>
<p>Workers are paying into a system that lay-offs, down sizing, and restructuring, profits the company and the stockholder unless of course you are the worker who was laid-off, down-sized, and restructured.</p>
<p>The Unions know what business knows.  If it&#8217;s not in writing it doesn&#8217;t mean a thing.  The conditions of the working man and woman were appalling and still are appalling in many parts of the world.  Business Conglomerates has skipped every step they could because they have lived by the convenient mantra &#8220;Greed is good&#8221;,  for them at least.</p>
<p>The Union wants to get rid of an extra hoop requiring them to get a majority of cards signed to even be exposed to the workers and show them  what they offer and that is understandable.  That businesses wants to keep the extra hoop that Unions go through is understandable.<br />
Just for once be honest and admit that it&#8217;s all about the numbers and not about the workers.  We see that now with the stock market rising while unemployment continues it&#8217;s climb.  We see the stimulus money used to pay bonuses because business conglomerates know to keep the inner circle happy so that their free for them can continue.  Bonuses are not paid for the performance of the company but for their performance in  turning a blind eye to business as usual (wink, wink).</p>
<p>The Soviet Union did all it could to hang heavy yokes around the people for the benefit of the few.  They used the workers and the workers union to benefit the party.  The Soviet Union and now Russia have nothing to offer because they have sucked the soul from the people 360 degrees whether in the name of the people or in the name of the state.  Of course there are the few insanely wealthy that continue to whoop it up in Moscow.  </p>
<p>You are going to have to wait another few generations before the people will forget and the history books are erased telling the story of how the United States was built off the backs of ordinary people and their little children. Everything they asked for was begrudgingly given from schooling, to decent working hours, to decent working conditions, to half-assed job security.  Even  fighting and dieing and getting wounded in bloody wars did not guarantee fair treatment and many benefits that veterans enjoy today were fought for with tooth and nail.</p>
<p>You think that because you now live under the Constitution that suddenly it&#8217;s the big bad government that is out to get the lowly poor business man who just wants to make a living and help bring some others up with him.  The  bones on this Country are the Bill of Rights where all men are created equal endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights.  Even the founding fathers knew to take the worth of a man out of the hands of other men.  According to you that Union was somehow not necessary to establish and make sure this country did not fall into the same old world of the benefit of the few at the expense of the many.</p>
<p>Your living in a Real Union now buddy, not a fake Union where you came from. Get used to it.  We still haven&#8217;t forgotten and some are learning now, that if it&#8217;s not in writing it doesn&#8217;t mean anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Independant</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-419718</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Independant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-419718</guid>
		<description>Mr. Hoffa,
No, not so much.  If what you&#039;re saying were true then you should also believe that fascists are just capitalists in a hurry.  I think not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Hoffa,<br />
No, not so much.  If what you&#8217;re saying were true then you should also believe that fascists are just capitalists in a hurry.  I think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banned by Huffpo</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-419708</link>
		<dc:creator>Banned by Huffpo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 01:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-419708</guid>
		<description>The Teamsters have been a real boon to organized labor.

And crime syndicates.

Jimmy Hoffa? Say . . .  how&#039;d you like to have a Chicago union plumber fix your toilet? 

Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Teamsters have been a real boon to organized labor.</p>
<p>And crime syndicates.</p>
<p>Jimmy Hoffa? Say . . .  how&#8217;d you like to have a Chicago union plumber fix your toilet? </p>
<p>Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Hoffa</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-419556</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Hoffa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-419556</guid>
		<description>Mr Independant:

Communists are simply Socialists in a hurry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Independant:</p>
<p>Communists are simply Socialists in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReCon USMC</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-419422</link>
		<dc:creator>ReCon USMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-419422</guid>
		<description>Obama is the Cobra inside his being 

He that looks the other way  and who trust his known enemies that would die for their cause .

Could just as well make and argument to trust a Cobra in his  kind and understanding loving  hands . 
The old farmer found a Cobra lying on the road almost dead of the frozen cold . He gently picked if up and rapped his own coat around the Cobra to save the Cobra&#039;s  life and warm him up . The Cobra  laid there  almost dead in front of his warm fire place for weeks . 
The old farmer feed and nursed the Cobra until it was warm outside . So one day he opened his door to set the Cobra on his way .
When  headed for the door the Cobra suddenly turned and bit the old Farmer for no reason at all  . 
 He said to the Cobra ... I trusted you , saved you , feed you and warmed you,  how could you kill me ? 
The Cobra said I did nothing wrong you fool .
I did what Cobra&#039;s naturally do .
As do all your enemies with a cause . 
Any Country or person that Trust his known enemies hands his fate to the Cobra .
Obama is doing what Cobra Naturally .
 The Art of War 
(required reading) , countless hours of study )and test for ReCon Marines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is the Cobra inside his being </p>
<p>He that looks the other way  and who trust his known enemies that would die for their cause .</p>
<p>Could just as well make and argument to trust a Cobra in his  kind and understanding loving  hands .<br />
The old farmer found a Cobra lying on the road almost dead of the frozen cold . He gently picked if up and rapped his own coat around the Cobra to save the Cobra&#8217;s  life and warm him up . The Cobra  laid there  almost dead in front of his warm fire place for weeks .<br />
The old farmer feed and nursed the Cobra until it was warm outside . So one day he opened his door to set the Cobra on his way .<br />
When  headed for the door the Cobra suddenly turned and bit the old Farmer for no reason at all  .<br />
 He said to the Cobra &#8230; I trusted you , saved you , feed you and warmed you,  how could you kill me ?<br />
The Cobra said I did nothing wrong you fool .<br />
I did what Cobra&#8217;s naturally do .<br />
As do all your enemies with a cause .<br />
Any Country or person that Trust his known enemies hands his fate to the Cobra .<br />
Obama is doing what Cobra Naturally .<br />
 The Art of War<br />
(required reading) , countless hours of study )and test for ReCon Marines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Independant</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-419353</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Independant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-419353</guid>
		<description>Dear Marina &amp; Oleg,
     You still don’t seem to understand the concept of what I’m stating.  So I’ll try a different approach.  To begin with I’ll point out the errors of you statements.  Marina, the rational you gave in your response as proof that the former USSR was a socialist country and not a communist country was simply in it’s name.  Forgetting the absurdity of that position consider this; the official name of North Korea is the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea.  By your standard just because North Korea’s leadership says that their country is a democratic republic then it is.  So I’ll ask you, do you think North Korea is a democratic republic?  Of course not.  By the same token the former USSR was not a socialist country.  On your second point that the differences between communism and socialism are economic and not political, that is also false.  In both instances the government controls the means of production, distribution, and finance.  The only difference is the political mechanism that is used to achieve that.  In the case of communism it’s a dictatorship and in the case of socialism it’s democracy.  Your final point concerning my information sources is also false.  The justifications for my statements are not based on an article in the Wikipedia or a comedy show but are based on the writings of the two men who invented the modern concepts.  Perhaps you should try researching these topics before you try to discuss them.  If you’re interested in learning for yourself what these concepts refer to I suggest reading the Manifesto of the Communist Party.  And if you do find an instance where Marx or Engels actually do define communism and socialism as you do, please state the page number of where that is on this website.  So in closing I would like to restate my point that if you want to discuss the failings of socialism (and as I’ve stated before, there are many) then you should at least understand what it is you’re talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Marina &amp; Oleg,<br />
     You still don’t seem to understand the concept of what I’m stating.  So I’ll try a different approach.  To begin with I’ll point out the errors of you statements.  Marina, the rational you gave in your response as proof that the former USSR was a socialist country and not a communist country was simply in it’s name.  Forgetting the absurdity of that position consider this; the official name of North Korea is the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea.  By your standard just because North Korea’s leadership says that their country is a democratic republic then it is.  So I’ll ask you, do you think North Korea is a democratic republic?  Of course not.  By the same token the former USSR was not a socialist country.  On your second point that the differences between communism and socialism are economic and not political, that is also false.  In both instances the government controls the means of production, distribution, and finance.  The only difference is the political mechanism that is used to achieve that.  In the case of communism it’s a dictatorship and in the case of socialism it’s democracy.  Your final point concerning my information sources is also false.  The justifications for my statements are not based on an article in the Wikipedia or a comedy show but are based on the writings of the two men who invented the modern concepts.  Perhaps you should try researching these topics before you try to discuss them.  If you’re interested in learning for yourself what these concepts refer to I suggest reading the Manifesto of the Communist Party.  And if you do find an instance where Marx or Engels actually do define communism and socialism as you do, please state the page number of where that is on this website.  So in closing I would like to restate my point that if you want to discuss the failings of socialism (and as I’ve stated before, there are many) then you should at least understand what it is you’re talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Barham</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-419320</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Barham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-419320</guid>
		<description>Obama and the modern Democrats, favor a Eurpean mercantilist society, where the elite few, in government, business and labor unions come together and manage the economy and the rest of the &quot;maggots,&quot; as Cass Sunstein calls us. The 19th century Democrats were the true American libertarians of Jefferson to Cleveland, while the 20th century Democrats passed the interventionist policies of the GOP to follow Rousseau and Marx, as cited in THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS on Amazon and www.claysamerica.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama and the modern Democrats, favor a Eurpean mercantilist society, where the elite few, in government, business and labor unions come together and manage the economy and the rest of the &#8220;maggots,&#8221; as Cass Sunstein calls us. The 19th century Democrats were the true American libertarians of Jefferson to Cleveland, while the 20th century Democrats passed the interventionist policies of the GOP to follow Rousseau and Marx, as cited in THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS on Amazon and <a href="http://www.claysamerica.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.claysamerica.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg Atbashian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/unions-lenin-and-the-american-way-part-one/#comment-418967</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg Atbashian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=68993#comment-418967</guid>
		<description>HAHAHA! God bless you, Marina! Excellent response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHA! God bless you, Marina! Excellent response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

