Understanding Obama: His One-World View and Foreign Policy
The frantic, frenetic, high-pitched squeal from all sides of the political aisle could have deafened most any ears. When the United Nations Security Council voted unanimously to institute a “no-fly zone” against Libya and its leader Moammar Gaddafi, there were shrieks of disgust. Where is President Obama? How could he allow this? And, conversely, what has taken him so long?
In 24-plus hours when the bombs began to fall on Libya (some 100 or more Tomahawks in the first bombardment), the shrieks continued. Isn’t this the anti-war president? How did he win a Nobel Prize? This is unconstitutional!
It is one of those rare moments: even though both sides come to the table from vastly different points of view, they have the same end game — what is President Obama doing? Even Louis Farrakhan, who I submit to you is an awful person, asked the question: “Who the hell do you think you are?”
It is blazingly obvious that for all the pundits’ talk about understanding Obama, none of them understand Obama. The Right does not understand the depths of his nature, and the Left does not understand his willingness to play them like pawns (see useful idiots.) Most importantly, neither side has grasped the proper context of Obama, and the fact that Libya has played out exactly as he wanted it to.
I was one of the many people disgusted by Obama’s lack of oratory in 2009 when Iranians were being killed in the streets of Tehran. They wanted to vote. They wanted the opportunity to choose their leaders. They wanted to be able to choose their destiny. Yet, they needed help. Not all help comes in the shape of bullets and rockets, or cruise missiles and combat troops. Sometimes, help comes from those who will stand with you and back your cause, and no greater ally can be had around the world than the United States. With a speech from the bully-pulpit that is the presidency, the world can move a great deal. With the strength and gravitas of the presidency, those who are oppressed recognize that they have an ally in the world. The hard work may still be theirs, but the realization of friends does much to encourage and empower them, in spite of the work ahead.
Obama was nearly silent during those days, and none of his speeches had any connect-ability. There was no tone that could be distinguished as purely American, no words of encouragement that could rally a people, or a nation.
Much of this silence was seen again during Egypt. The president, on his own (or because of yet another gaffe by U.S. Vice President Joe Biden) gave a tacit endorsement of President Hosni Mubarak. One week later Obama was calling for Mubarak’s ouster. On his own accord, Obama legitimized the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt should they fill the void left by Mubarak. Then, silence again. Mubarak, after much back and forth, announced he was stepping down, and the military was taking over. It’s an Obama victory — or so the MSM says. But history already shows the president’s flip-flop not as smart politics, but luck. In two cases where people desire freedom, the American president said nothing.
From the time the Libyan civil war started, to when UN Security Council decided to act, 31 days passed. While there are certainly well-organized elements in Libya (and Egypt) that would be horrible leadership choices for these nations (Muslim Brotherhood, socialists, etc.), their opportunism does not mean an exclusion of other alternatives or realities. There are those who wish to be free, who wish to choose their own lives. While socialists and others may have a heavy hand in the protests, that does not mean they speak for all the protesters yearning to be free.
Thirty-one days, and President Obama gave no speech of note. There would be no reference to “a shining city on a hill.” No chance of hearing, “I have a dream!” Nothing that would embolden and empower. Nothing that would show a freedom fighter that he has friends in the world. Nothing to show the fighter that the fight is worth the reward and that nothing that is worthy is easy. All that was heard from Obama was flowery rhetoric that Gaddafi must go. And then, silence.
It was Glenn Beck who showed the video clip, over and over and over and over again. It was from then-Senator Obama, Democrat nominee for president of the United States. It was five days before the election. Candidate Obama was at the podium, with his then-typical bravado and swagger. He stated clearly, firmly, and with no hesitation, “We are five days from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”
Our manchild who would be king has a completely different compass than we all do. Except for Wisconsin unions and Ivy League professors, BHO has a standard MO. Wait until decisions have already been made to weigh in. That way, he can have it both ways if he wants to. There was a wonderful essay prior to the election of 2008. The author made the case that O’bama was one thing only: a facilitator. He was not a leader. He could not make decisions. And point of fact, he really ISN’T making decisions. He is carrying out policy. He is clearly a 1 trick pony and is utterly unable to adjust based on dynamics. He was late to the game with BP in the gulf, he was late with the Ariz shooting, he was late with the earthquake, etc. This is who he is. Im not even sure it relates to his vision of the U.S.A. I think it is purely ideology. No question, he does not like anything about our country’s legacy or exceptionalism, or history. But he is dogmatic and inflexible. and being late is part of that.
Let’s get it right. Obama is a closer. He is here to ram the progressive socialist agenda down all of our throats while we the sheeple scratch our butts and wonder whether or not we should fund NPR. He’s all about smoke and mirrors….he jaunts off to Brazil and orders the attack enroute….
We all need to realize that this country is on the brink of totalitarianism….all of the same conditions that existed in Nazi Germany, Russia and China before their revolutions are now in full swing here. After 20 years of educational preparation….separating school curriculums from towns and replacing them with federal and state mandated curriculums that have made our kids dumber while making their parents feel helpless in the understanding of new educational methodologies that make no sense, destruction of the family through severe economic stress and fear of job loss, gradual erosion of private property and privacy rights under the guise of “security concerns”, and the replacement of our constitution with UN madates and alliances….we are just about a lost cause.
Obama was the hand-picked Ivy Leaguer who met all the criteria valued most by blind-eyed, self-righteous American sheep. A cute biracial black man with a nice strong Ivy League affiliation and network, who can read well off his teleprompter is just what was needed to bring it all home. Soon we will be back to the days of feudalism…..we will all work our butts off to support the corporate/political complex and let our efforts pad their coffers while we move in with our married children because we can no longer afford to live on substandard wages in areas with grossly inflated housing costs.
And we just all sit around blithering while this happens under our noses.
Absolutely disgusting. America, UK, and all other non-Muslim nations should stay out of this conflict. It is for Muslims only to deal with. Let the Muslims use their great oil wealth, their military and their planes, etc. Let Muslims fight this war if that is what they want.
And who will be the winners? Al Qaeda or the Muslim Brotherhood?
Newsflash; AQ is MB and MB is AQ.
That’s right; if you’re equal, step up to the plate and take your swings. Then we won’t have to listen to echoing politically correct garbage like this from young South African stupe Richard Pithouse about these uprisings:
“They are revolts against a global power structure that is formed by an international alliance of elites with one of its key principles being the idea, the racist idea, that Arabs are ‘not yet ready’ for democracy.”
Brother, I don’t want to be a racist and so I won’t let you use me for a crutch; okay, you’re ready – fight! We need our resources to impose a no-fly around Detroit so the population level can surge back from the levels of 1910.
I’m all ready for the idea that muslims are ready for democracy. In fact I’m so ready I promise to stay as far away as possible and cross my fingers that they’ll make a nice place to live and stay there instead of coming to America with their advanced ideas about how to make friends and influence people.
Obama’s actions ARE unconstitutional, but have been sanctioned by Congress since late 2001.
See: http://www.justice.gov/olc/warpowers925.htm
No one could foresee the election of an incompetent juvenile to the Presidency of the United States, nor the appointment of MORE incompetent juveniles to offices that have the power to make decisions without Congressional oversight.
So, the question is; Who is going to repeal this unconstitutional power of 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541-1548 (the “WPR”)?
Nobody will do anything!
You’re probably right. After all, Joe Biden voted for the “Act”.
See:
http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=7830&can_id=53279
Can we start the impeachment process now?
O-BOMB-A is doing what he said he would do BEFORE getting elected. One World Order downgrading U.S.A. — See UN and NATO and coalition of Arab countries running Libya bombing.
AND THE LIAR IN CHEIF..OBAMA HAS SAID NO WAY ARE WE GOING INTO LIBYA! HE GOES OUT OF THE COUNTRY, (AGAIN) AND BINGO? WHY HAVE WE NOT HEARD 1 WORD FROM CONGRESS, THEY COULD HAVE CALLED FOR A MEETING 1,2,3, THE MORE OBAMA GETS AWAY WITH ALL THIS B.S., THE MORE ”WE THE PEOPLE” WILL PAY , NOT MONEY, BUT OUR LIVES……GOD BLESS ALL
Who gave this man the authority to do this “one world” crap with our troops?
WHY is there no outcry from Boehner etc????? is this all a conspiracy?
Do you not notice that there is very little outcry from the Repubs on ANYTHING ( drilling, border security, etc) ?!!
“Do you not notice that there is very little outcry from the Repubs on ANYTHING?”
DITTOS!
Good article, I like the way you capped it off with the irony of his rhetoric.
I disagree. Not a good article. Not at all.
What gripes me the most is all of the stuff about the US being better than other nations. We could have been, but we squandered it all.
The US stopped being better than other nations when we stopped upholding our own Constitution. Once Reagan left office, all bets were off. Among other things: Making wars in parts of the world where US interests were not at stake – starting with Gulf War I, the Balkans, Gulf War II, Afghanistan, Libya, you name it. Fighting on behalf of any Muslim power is automatically fighting AGAINST US interests. And let’s not even talk about all the other inroads into the Constitution that have been made so as to promote Obama’s socialist agenda.
Our REAL enemies are the Muslims that we have allowed to infiltrate the US. Obama’s father was one of them, and by all accounts, he was a very bad man. Nothing in our Constitution requires us to accept refugees, immigrants, or even tourists, from ANYWHERE, especially not from enemy countries. Islamic doctrine is completely incompatible with the US Constitution. If a Muslim who actually believes in Islam swears an oath of citizenship to uphold the US Constitution, that person is, by definition, lying.
Very well said!
ANSWER : Definately Obama’s plan. Looking out for his own kind.
His only regret is that he can only use his Union thugs against his opponents while Quadaffi gets to use his military.
Quadaffi is less a threat to the USA than is Obama. He needs to go along with the cowardly RINOs who sit passivly while the UN makes decisions for for the USA. A shame.
And what is really disgusting and scary? The democrats can come up with another type like Obama, pretty much any old time.
Their ranks are stiff with screwballs.
“Even Louis Farrakhan, who I submit to you is an awful person, asked the question: “Who the hell do you think you are?””
WHY IS EVERYONE QUOTING SCREWY LOUIE AS IF HE HAS A MORAL POINT TO HIS SPITTING ANGER?????? The man HAS BEEN ON THE DOLE FROM THE MADMAN OF LIBYA FOR YEARS!!! He sees he revenue stream shriveling before his eyes. Please! Get his motives out there before you morph him into just another American who has the Constitution held to his heart. Why hasn’t Louie been hauled before a Senate Investigation Committee years ago for his ties to this cretin and just what is he doing for the money? Why? Because he is BLACK and we are all scared shitless????? OOOOO!!!! Terrified to be called a raaaacist so we’ll just turn away when this ogre makes nicey nicey with a man we have, on a whim, decided to bomb? Quite frankly: WHO THE HELL DOES LOUIE THINK HE IS????
Precisely! Political correctness is going to destroy our country. If the Republicans don’t get tough with their actions and rhetoric, we will become a one world government…Maybe the Republicans think they’ll be part of the ruling class elites and will be able to govern the rest of us lemmings.
Obama was nearly silent during those days (Iranian uprising)….
Are you kidding me? Obama emphasized that no nation can impose its will on other nations, and describing what happened on the Iranian streets as ‘robust debate’.
This is one of the best commentaties i’ve read about libya and the psychology of the America-hater who rode the efforts of 6 decades of marxists undermining of this country to somehow get elected as its leader.
He isn’t ignorant of history. He is contemptuous of history. He isn’t igorant of the laws of economics. He is contemptuous of the laws of economics. He isn’t ignorant of the desires of 300 million Americans. He is contemptous of not just those desires, but the 300 million Americans as well.
As Beck says “something isn’t right here”. Yes, something is eerily, deadly, frighteningly wrong.
Obama’s world view is based on no one nation being better than any other.
As for your base assumption that Obama does not see USA as any better nor worse than other nations, no, it is not true.
The first fundamental belief for any Leftist is that the Western culture (America esp.) is bad and the system it represents, evil. Everything the Left does is to knock the only remaining so-called superpower down.
Misperceptions and Misconceptions on War and Oil
Old Heraclitus knew the only constant was change. Most moderns also perceive the undeniable truth that nothing stands still and that nothing endures indefinitely. One need only refer to politicians to understand the mutability of their most deep-seated beliefs.
Take America’s distinctly non-Heraclitean Vice President Joseph Robinette Biden. Good Ol’ Joe has never been at a loss for words, especially when he can mangle them and his thoughts better than his boss or when he can simply be obtuse.
Like his boss, his beliefs and opinions are written on the wind and he was markedly windy when, among other utterances, and after deep study of the Constitution, he eruditely concluded that, ”The Founding Fathers had vested the power to authorize even the limited use of military force in the Congress not the president—unless it was necessary for the president to act swiftly to repel an attack on the United States or to rescue U.S. citizens:” http://bit.ly/h8uSRp
That was then, in 1998 as the senior senator from the State of Delaware. Now, as VP during the reign of Obama, he remains eerily silent as the president launches an undeclared war in Lybia without so much as an obeisance, a request for a consult, or a May I? from Congress. For all his faults, GWB did his constitutional duty with Iraq and Afghanistan and received the advice and consent of Congress before going to war.
The more things change, the more Joe changes as does President Changeling, the constitutional scholar, who also flipflopped on the Constitution last weekend.
When asked on December 20th, 2007 during his campaign for the presidency when a president “would have the authority to bomb Iran without first seeking authorization from Congress,” candidate Obama was adamant in declaring virtually never: “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation:” http://bit.ly/eGkLhT
George W. Bush was commander in chief in December 2007, Barack Hussein Obama in March 2011. Either Libya was about to attack America last week or Obama acted in violation of the Constitution when we hurled Tomahawk missiles at Khadafy. Or, everyone, including members of his own party, are misreading the law of the land.
Another misconceived perception is the illogical belief that if America pumps more oil, we would have more oil. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=3937
Brilliant article! Right on the money. Thanks so much, especially for standing up for America’s national interests.
No, that starting shot was fired long, long ago. Obama is just another team member, one who happens to be in a place in history where he can do a lot of damage to liberty. He’s not anywhere close to being the first traitor to occupy the Oval Office. Woodrow Wilson beat him by nearly a century, and he’s arguably not the first.
Their team’s motto is “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” And if they haven’t got a convenient crisis, they are not above manufacturing one. They are consummate opportunists, guided by a well-understood goal and a polished game plan.
But if your larger point is that Obama is not incompetent, but evil, yes, and the sooner conservatives stop dribbling down their chins about Obama’s supposed “incompetence”, the better.
Well said. The destruction of the freedoms enumerated in our founding documents, which define the FUNDAMENTALS of this country, the USA, have been under assault practically since our founding. obama is merely a pawn of those who seek our subjugation. I love the telling quote of Nathan Rothschild who said,” Teach those impudent Americans a lesson, bring them back to colonial status.”, nearly 200 years ago.
Freeing the oppressed peoples is most certainly NOT a goal of obama.
During the campaign, had Americans mastered critical thinking, taught in the old days in public schools, they would never have voted for any person who said nothing concrete. I even bought and read ‘The Audacity of Hope’ trying to see what the man meant with his abstract, high-flown phrases. The book was certainly a sham, and probably misled many into making assumptions about what he meant. Still, I keep wondering why didn’t that warning bell that rang in my mind also ring in other’s?
At this point, Rasmussen Polls show that 41% of potential voters approve of the president. That approval is in sharp contrast to other Rasmussen Polls that show American’s belive in capitalism and free markets. This is another puzzle that seems to indicate Americans are lacking in critical thinking skills and knowledge of history.
This is exactly the same point I made at my blog in, “Libya: Mission accomplished?”
This administration, including Ms. Clinton, has placed American military employment subservient to the United Nations and, most particularly, the Gulf States. Although some US critics have called the Libya intervention a “cowboy” action no different from the (presumed) cowboy actions of G.W. Bush, it’s more than obvious that Obama does not see it that way.
Community organizer that he is at heart, this president believes that only the “international community” (of which there is no such thing, but let that pass) can authenticate or authorize military actions by the United States. Since in this case the target is an Arab country, the endorsement of the Persian Gulf states was required. Since the Congress represents neither the “international community” nor the Arab states, then not only is Congress’s authorization not needed, it would actually be counter-productive by maintaining the unjust position that America’s national self-interest is predominant. This compulsion to subordinate US military operations to the “international community” also explains why the president has vowed to hand operational control of American forces over to a European authority (just who is yet to be determined).
By at least conceptually placing America’s interests and the use of its military second or third to the “international community’s,” Secretary Clinton and President Obama likely believe that their main purpose in this intervention has already been accomplished, no matter the outcome on the ground in Libya.
To the writer of this article – I wonder what opinion you would have if you were born in another country. Probably you would see with more objectivity that what Obama is doing represents fairness in the world. Also his approach to foreign policy is the silver bullet in the war on terror. But it takes a few moves to see that.
More “objectivity” … “if we were born in another country” ???
How condescending of you. How sickeningly … european.
“the silver bullet in the war on terror” ???
Riiiiight.
Yeah, “fairness.” It’s too bad that America just didn’t stay home, take care of its own defenses, and mind it’s own business when the Nazis were at your doorstep (brought to you by the extraordinary sense of “fairness” of Chamberlain and his like … and then the Soviets — all in the name of your twisted idea of “fairness” … of course.
Never again will we come to your aid. You have drunk your own final poison.
Your idea of “fairness” is to bridle the power of the U.S., jump on its back and suck it’s blood, till there’s none left — and all that’s left is your “multiculti fairness” for you to eat.
There’s still some possibility that we can save our world for our own children.
Europe (including the U.K.) (at least those who are like you — who are the overwhelming majority) is going to get what it, with its supercilious false sense of superiority and monumental hypocrisy, deserves.
@londoner: you say the writer would see things more objectively like Obama had he been born in another country.
Do you mean born in another country like Obama was?
And FYI: life isn’t fair. I learned that in the 2nd grade. They need to add that to the curriculum wherever you are from.
Sure, sure, it represents “fairness,” until outsiders need our firepower to rescue them from their neighbors. Then they aren’t interested in fairness at all. They just want our help.
“Silver bullet?” Who is that masked man, Tonto?
Londoner if what you say is true then the Manchurian President has moved the pieces on the chess board toward the Fabian objective more skillfully then those who still think they have a sovereign nation understand.
CORRECT,if you were born in another country, Mr. Londoner, you would not have the slightest clue as to the content of the Constitution of the USA. That is why we had the Revolution, to get away from dupes like yourself. You do not share our history. Europe will never understand the way Americans think because you were not formed in the same way. This is not about international perception, which you accept as Sovereign. It is about American law and the American Constitution which has been violated. There is no reason that these actions could not have been taken without consulting Congress. You have a simplistic mind because you Londoners have already sold yourselves to the group think of international submission. You are slaves to the international melting pot, where you need never make a decision, as all will be done for you. Enjoy your Shariah Law as it makes its way into UK jurisprudence!
Londenor, a persons place of birth has nothing to do with your critism. Had you been born in America then maybe you would feel diferently. As to the objectivety of what Obama represents comment; one must fist understand that Obama can not define “fairness in the world” outsinde of his one world vision. Fairness does not allow the luxury of picking and choosing what battles in which you choose to engage. As to his foreign policy being a “silver bullet”, he has no foreign policy other than apology and pandering.
This is not a chess game. Obama campaigned on “hope and change” and “fundamental change”. He did not then define what that was and still does not explain. But he has succeeded in accomplishing those goals. He has distinguished hope by his pandering to the Unions, making consessions to foreign governments, and pushing his one world governance idea. He hsa virtually change the way America operates through government take over of private industries and financial markets. His fundamental change is demonstrated by his ignoring of U.S.Law and the end runs around congress to advance his agenda.
No, you don’s have to be born somewhere else to understand Obama. We fought our war of independence from arbituary rule. We lost the lives of our young men in battles around the world protecting countries from being invaded by foreign armies. And, America was and still is the country others looked to for assistance in humanitarian assistance during times of natural disasters.
How’s the head injury doin’ Londoner? Smashed upside your cranium by a mob of Muslims pushing your dumb white British ass out of your own neighborhood?
Obama is definitely covering something up. However he loves all the wild rumors because I believe they are just distractions from his reality. The single shinning star that keeps Socialism from ruling the world is that the USA is so successful. That means it must be taken down from within, by teh brainwash citizens called liberals.
Given his disrespectful statements about the USA Obama probably does believe in world government. But he also gives us reason to believe that this is largely about his angst at seeing conservatives leading the US, and thus the world, in the past—he really believes that after his election there is no turning back. People like him—“we’re the ones we’ve been looking for,” meaning American leftists, leading the US automatically makes it a better country; one supposes that this transformation happens through some sort of magic. The Bamster may believe he knows what he’s doing, but the end result–garbage in, garbage out–is not going to change and this is why he will not be president after Inauguration Day 2013.
Good piece.
Obama is like the master magician. The magician , like Obama use their ability and cunning to impose their will on the masses. Both use their crytic style upon the masses to exploit their weakness and prejudices. Unlike the magician, Obama use words and phrases to make the unblievers to become believers of his rhetoric. Once addicted to this rhetoric, through the use of words and phrases, his phony and pathetic acts are never challenged.He noe has absolute power to lie, deceive and exploit the masses. Being the poltroo that he is, he will hide and lurk in the background, while army of boisterous, deplorable, rabid and repugnant belivers do his bidding, to perserve his delusion of integrity and false brilliance.. The transformation from magician to KING is complete. His ideology to a world government has begun. Beware the masses may get what they don’t understand.
He’s really an idiot, isn’t he. An idiot.
Everything you’ve said, Mr. Tony Katz, is correct. Undeniably correct. The reason the pundits don’t “get” it — is that it just sounds too crazy — they refuse to believe it in spite of the clear evidence — because it’s just too … insane. That an American president, no matter how far left, could …. Yet, that’s the way it is.
Is it not also clear that Iran is behind a good deal of the recent unrest? If you were Iran, wouldn’t you be? Or Al Queda? Does anyone think they just sit around on their thumbs? The unrest leaning toward Islamism (and eventually a Caliphate) is good for them, isn’t it? Don’t you think they’ve been planning … that they’ve been doing whatever they can to move their plans ahead? Even if they have to cuddle up to Al Queda … and the Muslim Brotherhood. It’s as clear as crysal.
(Btw — anyone who thinks those few in the M.E. who really long for a true form of democracy — that they have any chance in hell — well … dreams are nice, but can lead to terminal brain death if taken as reality.)
Don’t you think our Administration knows this?
Just what does the “One World” entail? Doesn’t it involve strong powers — as long as it isn’t the U.S. — exerting regional might? Wouldn’t that involve Iran getting Nukes (any day now — if not already) and dominating their “region?” Isn’t it all part of the One World plan?
Unbelievably stupid, yes, but as I said at the top here — they’re Idiots — extremely dangerous idiots.
When will the point of no return be crossed? Or has it already?
When enough Americans believe these people are merely idiots, instead of understanding they are evil people following a master evil plan.
Perhaps. Every time some conservative bleats about Obama’s “incompetence” or “idiocy”, we are that much closer to the point of no return.
Mark v — Their kind of “idiocy” is — evil —
is the epitomy of evil.
Mark v — Their brand of “idiocy” is — evil —
is the epitomy of evil.
Good read Tony.
And your correct on so many levels. Not only does Obama not believe that America is exceptional, but I might go so far as to say he doesnt even like this country very much if at all. I’m almost to the point of thinking this man is trying to sabotage this nation. I mean, you really have to try to screw things up as much as he has.
As for Iran… Isn’t Valerie Jarrett originally from Iran? Coincidence? Maybe-maybe not.
As for this Libyan “intervention”….. He clearly didn’t want any part of it from the get-go. I’m pretty sure Hillary cornered him and told him to get on board or else. And Im starting to think Im a war monger cuz Ive been on board anytime there’s even talk of a bombing campaign. I guess I’m a jerk.
Thx for the awesome article Tony!
When Obama does something apparently inexplicable, I have learned to ask myself “what here is what Soros wants?” This article has educated me to include “what does the UN want?” I am still, perhaps incorrectly, trying to reconcile all this with a stubborn belief that, under it all, he wants what the West hating portion of the Muslim world wants.
Most people think Obama makes big blunders when he makes all the mistakes he does. I don’t think so, I think he carefully thinks everything out. He did not support the demonstrator’s in Iran because he was against them. He waited until the “G” man had almost taken the Libya back and then he bombed. You may think the UN voted independently to go into Libya, I don’t think so, I think they carried out his wishes. Who is he to tell the “G” man or the “M” man to turn over their country to the opposition, he certainly has no authority to do this. It is amazing how every decision he makes is against the United States: take the oil spill he waited so long to start the clean up; ane would not let any other country assist; the anti israel statements he has made, while the US has always supported Israel ( here it is necessary to throw in that God always blesses those who bless Israel). As most people refer to him as a socialist, I take the courage to adamantly and forcefully state he is a communist. Every decision and representation he has made has been against the US no wonder the UN loves him so much and the Nobel peace committee awarded him the peace prize. I watched the MSM beat the hell out of George every day, not a single day went by without the MSM saying something bad against George but the opposite is true for “O” the MSM falls over each other worshiping everything he does. having said all this, the only thing we can do is place our trust and faith in the God of Abraham and Isaac, The Word.
The common word for an international based socialism is communism. And yes, we elected one and gave him the keys. Now about that tendency we have of never holding anyone in our elite class accountable?
Now the real question is, once we have to admit we have a real honest to goodness America hating communist in our White House is who put him in there? Do the RINOs and John McCain, Mitt Romney et al. dance to the same drummer? Enquiring minds need to know. There is really no useful function in not recognizing this card carrying member for what he is.
As valid as most of the criticisms have been over how this president has taken America into its third war in the Middle East, I think they all have missed the very point you raise.
As a modern-day “progressive liberal” Obama is at the end of a long line of leftist “one-worlders” who, for nearly a century, has pushed, plotted and schemed to end the American Experiment and force this nation to subsume its will to the “greater collective” of one-world government.
Consider how this man has taken us to war. He did NOT abide by the Constitution which gives “war powers” solely to Congress. To this former “Professor of Constitutional Law,” Section 8 of the Constitution which lays out that only “Congress shall have Power to declare War…” is merely a road-bump on the super-highway to one-world government.
Did he point to any Congressional approval, action or even nod that we should send missiles and war-planes into Libya? No, he doesn’t need no stinkin’ vote by Congress; he has the “UN Mandate.” A mandate from that nest of despots and dictators who have taken control of the UN. To Obama, their will trumps the Constitution and the will of the American people.
Think of the precedent here. In the future, presidents will not be able to act on the interests of America alone. No, thanks to Obama, they will have to bow low before this international congress of totalitarian thugs and thieves and seek permission to act in the name of the American people. Welcome to Obama’s Brave New World!
This is the best description of Obama and of the presidential situation in the present White House. Thank you.
Thank you for compiling facts and organizing this material in such a logical manner. If only our younger generation would listen and become enlightened! We are fast losing what we fought for in 1945. Pray that God will still shower His grace on our great country.
PART OF A PLAN. DO YOU MEAN THAT THIS WELL PLANNED RESPONSE WHICH APPEARS TO BE STUPIDITY IS PART OF A PLAN. THERE IS NO ONE YET BORN WHO COULD CAMOUFLAGE SUCH STUPIDITY WITH A PLAN.
HE IS THE MOST INCOMPETENT AND DUMBEST PERSON THAT I HAVE YET TO SEE.
IMPEACHMENT FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, NO.
” ” IDIOCY WHILE ON THE JOB, ABSOLUTELY !!!!!
Manny, Obama might be dumb and incompetent, but he is certainly having an effect on your country and the real question is who cast him for the part he is playing? Maybe playing dumb and incompetent comes natural to him but the results of his actions are still damaging to all of our rights as a sovereign people.
Manny, I disagree. There is not stupidity here everything is a cold calculated response. No idiot could coldly dismantle this country the way this idiot has. Every move, every idea he has has been directed by the think tanks of the UN, Council on Foreign relations, the Bilobergers and the Tri-Lateral Commission. Any and every embarrasment possible he has laid on the country.
BREAKING NEWS: Arizona House Gov Committee Votes 5 to 1 to Approve Presidential Eligibility Bill as Part of Renewed Effort in AZ
The reason that the Obama second term might have to be filled by another of the Fabian Socialist/Communists like we all suspect. It is imperative we don’t fail to understand why the Republican establishment hates Sarah Palin. I would posit that it is as simple as she isn’t part of the cabal.
There you go again. Postulating this man has ideas about anything except the wonderfulness of him and his.
Can it be possible that some people believe OR disbelieve what he says, what he doesn’t say, what he plans, what he doesn’t plan. Isn’t he a Constitutional Scholar who does not know there’s a Bill of Rights as major segment of that document of principle and law ? Who either doesn’t know or was teasing when he talked of the 57 states of the Union ? Who doesn’t know OR does know and tells his employers,the citizens of the USA, a fairy tale of who made him, where he was fabricated and who directs him via his governing strings.
We have,thanks to bien-pensant /establishment media drum and bugle corps (corpse?) of the illiberal liberals, the backward looking to the governing styles of the 18th century progressives, the America and “people” hating “democrats” / multiculturalists / internationalists the most blatant puppet ever to become CEO of the USA
BUT “he’s an intellectual”. We can now see what that means in context. People still believe he exists as sentient being. Yet we do not know who is pulling his strings.
Tony, I think you are definitely on the right track as to what motivates Obama. However it may entail even more than just a “one world government”. Here and there during unguarded moments Obama and those close to him have made statements that I believe reveal his inner thinking. His comment during the campaign about “typical white people” was surprising. Usually politicians are extremely careful not to offend entire groups. Also quite odd was his returning of the oval office bust of Churchill to the United Kingdom. Michelle Obama’s comment that she had never been proud of the United States until her husband was elected president was strange as well. But what if Obama is driven by resentment not at the alleged failures of Western Civilization but rather its tremendous success? Especially compared to the Muslim culture of his forebears? The Muslim cultures of his forebears simply cannot currently compete with the vastly more advanced Western cultures. So psychologically how does Obama deal with this reality? A modern, mature Western man of any ethnic background would simply say that given time the Muslim cultures will become modernized and catch up to Western Civilzation. I’m sure they will. But perhaps egged on by the anti-Western multiculturalism of elite thinkers Obama sees himself in terms of his ethnic identity rather than as an individual American. But then he has to live with the lack of success of his chosen “ethnic” identity. The bottom line is that Obama is very likely driven by resentment at the success of Western Civilization and justifies his undermining of Western values on the moral equivalence and multiculturalism arguments of Western elites.
Obama, (or more corectly, his handlers) might have a plan, but those 100+ ‘Present’ votes show that Obama has no guts.
52.9% voted for him. Roughly 50% ~say~ they approve of his performance, varies from one day to the next. Perhaps 40% would vote for him today, and once the brown shirts get out the vote, probably more come Nov. 2012.
øbama is a problem. The bigger problem is the American voter. We can blame lib education & media, but can’t solve those problem. Bottom line is our voters have so little education and critical thinking skills that elections are like junior high school popularity contests.
To counterbalance that, aware voters have to run twice as hard to stay in the same place. As a poster said above, the libs have an endless parade of candidates just like ø. Ours aren’t much better. Tea Party may not be a great answer, but it’s the only one I know of.
Exactly right ~ I am close to tears but tougher stuff are we Americans.
I did not vote for Obama. I voted Republican for the first time in my life. There are so many reason to believe Obama should not have won the election that I am not going to begin the list.
It is the conscious policy of President Obama to reduce energy use by pauperizing the citizens of the United States. He reduces our wealth by failing to drill for gas and oil at home. We pay billions in foreign aid to oil-producing countries, including those who seek to undermine America as a force in the world for democracy. This is both the effect and indeed the intent of his redistribution policies.
Mark v –
Their brand of idiocy — is evil.
The epitomy of evil.
Everything Barako does is part of the plan ! The plan is to bring America down and rebuild a Socialist part of a one world government ! Believe it friend’s.