Comments on: Tinfoil Nation: Why 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Linger

By: steve jobs conspiracy

steve jobs conspiracy — Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:08:58 +0000

Excellent submit, very informative. I wonder why the opposite specialists of this sector do not understand this. You must proceed your writing. I am sure, you have a great readers’ base already!|What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I have found It positively useful and it has aided me out loads. I am hoping to give a contribution & aid different customers like its helped me. Great job.

By: Marlyn Klemp

Marlyn Klemp — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:59:32 +0000

Amazing how the creative impulse survives in the most terrible and inhuman of conditions-.wow enchanting,wow dps,wow talents

By: купон атор казань

купон атор казань — Sat, 12 Nov 2011 06:52:36 +0000

Its such as you read my mind! You seem to grasp so much approximately this, like you wrote the e-book in it or something. I feel that you just could do with a few p.c. to pressure the message house a bit, but instead of that, that is wonderful blog. An excellent read. I will certainly be back.

By: Ed

Ed — Wed, 05 May 2010 15:46:41 +0000

WTC 7 how did it colapse ?

By: Bill

Bill — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:40:52 +0000

You fail to understand that intelligence is always actionable, and there has never been any evidence provided by Bush that he tried to take action on any of the dozens upon dozens of warnings against terrorist attacks. He clearly did not try to protect America, he simply allowed us to be attacked so as to “generate an appetite for war” he claimed was “the problem” he faced in garnering support to invade Afghanistan – see page 209 of the 9-11 Commission report.
All your blather on this blog attempts – and fails – to do is provide excuses for Bush, whereas you’ve never shown us how he and his administration were working to the best of their abilities to provide the top notch defense that America deserved.

By: Richard Blake

Richard Blake — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:07:19 +0000

Three links that should be the last word on 911 conspiracy theory

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/50427/911_conspiracy_theorists_echo_early.html?cat=62

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/991808/alex_jones_dnc_confrontation_with_michelle.html?cat=8

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/728809/what_should_be_the_last_word_on_the.html?cat=9

By: Eddy

Eddy — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:34:22 +0000

Why are rumours of Bushs cabinet going around such as condaleisa rice calling her relatives on 9-10 telling them to “Not take a flight on 9-11? among all the others that have jumped ship with the bush administration? There are too many implications that are uncertain except for the facts: 1) bush did the exact same thing as his father did when each got in office.Sending our troops over to protect their precious oil and now look at the prices.2) They are allied with the Saudis who control oil and prices. England and other global countries are outraged and finally an investigation is being done.3)bush sends everyone to war for his and cheneys special interest but vetoes a bill that would help Children recieve health care which I have worked my life away for and cannot get in 4 years! I Love America but hate sin.

By: Good Lt

Good Lt — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:40:06 +0000

Ignore the Troofers here.

They linger on debunker boards, trying with no success to claw their ways to coherent arguments. And it never happens.

Jon Gold tries frequently this same garbage at Screw Loose Change, and he fails equally heroically there, too.

Troofers are simply misguided members of a faith-based cult of baseless conspiracy fantasies.

Just point and laugh at them.

By: Roderick Reilly

Roderick Reilly — Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:44:51 +0000

News Flash to the American Public:

In his latest diatribe aimed at Europe, Bin Laden admitted complete responsibility for the 9/11 attacks. He did the same in a videotape unearthed during the Afghan invasion.
Of course, Bin Laden could be working for Dick Cheney.

By: tanabear

tanabear — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:32:44 +0000

OmegaPaladin: “Wooten – that isn’t molten steel dripping off of the building. That is another molten metal, perhaps aluminum, or another compound.
Steel, as I’m sure you know, becomes more pliable under heat, even jet fuel heat. That provided the source of structural failure.”

If it is aluminum then this is a hypothesis to be tested. NIST wrote,

“Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials, which can display an orange glow…”

Steven Jones did experiments to verify this he concluded: “This is a key to understanding why the aluminum does not “glow orange” due to partially-burned organics “mixed” in (per NIST theory) – because they do NOT mix in! My colleague noted that it is like oil and water – organics and molten aluminum do not mix. The hydrocarbons float to the top, and there burn – and embers glow, yes, but just in spots. The organics clearly do NOT impart to the hot liquid aluminum an “orange glow” when it falls, when you actually do the experiment! We conclude that the falling metal which poured out of WTC2 is NOT aluminum. Not even aluminum “mixed” with organics as NIST theorizes”