<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: French Elections: A Poller Primer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/the_french_elections_a_poller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the_french_elections_a_poller/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:21:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noga</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the_french_elections_a_poller/#comment-8582</link>
		<dc:creator>Noga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 01:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/french-elections-a-poller-primer/#comment-8582</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton, naive? She would stare down Machiavelli, given half a chance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton, naive? She would stare down Machiavelli, given half a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kourosh</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the_french_elections_a_poller/#comment-8581</link>
		<dc:creator>kourosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 21:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/french-elections-a-poller-primer/#comment-8581</guid>
		<description>Well, yes there are many people who compare Hillary with Royal and predict the same faith for Hillary. There are some who argue there is a big difference between these two. Looking at the picture on this page, you can see how angry Hillary is (her trademark), and how cheerful Royal is. Happy and smiling.



Well come to think of it, I just remembered the debate and how nasty Royal was, just like Hillary. An Angry woman who is Na√Øve as well. The both think if they realize something today, there is no one who might have realized the same fact many years back. Naive is the right word, beside angry. So Hillary characteristics and attributes could be summoned in two words: A Naive Angry Woman. How about that?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes there are many people who compare Hillary with Royal and predict the same faith for Hillary. There are some who argue there is a big difference between these two. Looking at the picture on this page, you can see how angry Hillary is (her trademark), and how cheerful Royal is. Happy and smiling.</p>
<p>Well come to think of it, I just remembered the debate and how nasty Royal was, just like Hillary. An Angry woman who is Na√Øve as well. The both think if they realize something today, there is no one who might have realized the same fact many years back. Naive is the right word, beside angry. So Hillary characteristics and attributes could be summoned in two words: A Naive Angry Woman. How about that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

