The Vote Fraud Deniers
On October 9, 2011, a New York Times headline read: “The Myth of Vote Fraud.” According to the editorial board, the wave of new laws passed in 19 states, designed to fight fraud at the ballot box, was merely another Republican retro-stunt to keep minorities from voting. Immediately, Democrats adopted the headline as a great election tactic.
So it was no coincidence that in preparation for the 2012 election the NAACP announced that there is no vote fraud in America. It petitioned the United Nations Human Rights Council — composed of many of America’s detractors — to intervene in our election process. According to the NAACP, laws passed in response to a clear and present danger to the integrity of the ballot box are Republican “Jim Crow” laws.
Why? Because, according to Ben Jealous, president of the NAACP, requiring a photo ID to vote is such an egregious assault focused only on minorities that the attorney general of the United States should intervene. And he did! In tandem with his long-time friend, Eric Holder launched a massive DOJ campaign to stop what he calls “vote suppression” laws — like requiring photo IDs at polling places. He has threatened to prosecute anyone — including democratic American states — who would dare require photo ID of minorities.
Launching lawsuits against various states, Holder claims that laws which ramp up ballot security are a danger to our democracy. He contends that minorities (read “Democrats”) disproportionately do not have, and cannot procure, photo IDs. Of course, no evidence has ever been presented for this whopper, nor has it been explained how this same group manages to receive and process disproportionate welfare help — even when the government requires serious photo proof of identification for each recipient.
Remember, this was the same attorney general who dismissed a slam-dunk prosecution of the New Black Panthers for voter intimidation. (Think scary guys with billy clubs at a Philly precinct.)
The Democratic Party has promulgated talking points — fed to its sympathetic media machine buds — attacking any organization which a) alleges a vote fraud problem, or b) proposes even the most benign of ballot security measures, or c) demands a scrubbing of voting rolls. Even non-partisan organizations like “True the Vote”– dedicated to combating vote-theft – have been viciously attacked as subversive, back-of–the-bus carpetbaggers.
I like it – a little turn of a phrase back onto the progressives.
Such Neanderthals!
Exactly…one might even say that vote fraud deniers are just as bad as holocaust deniers….hmmm..now where have we heard THAT comparison before?
Is it just my imagination, or do voter fraud disputes always involve adjudication with the socialist (aka Democratic) candidate ultimately seated. I don’t count the 2000 flap, cuz the Supremes had no choice but to turn down the fiction that a bunch of Democrat activists elderly Jews rigged the ballot design so old Democrats would mistakenly vote for the Republican. And there was the part about mobs of black Americans in Miami being held back in the streets by cops (half of whom are black)from getting to the polls by the deadline after a long day at work. The FL Supremes were willing to sink that low, but the US Supremes were not, too skanky even for them. Although, now, with Elena & Sonia alongside Ruth, one wonders what’d happen with that case now.
It always amazed me that the taxpayer signed up to foot the bill for salaries and costs at ACORN, the globo-socialist pimphouse NGO. These well paid public service activists were counseled on voter registration by a Harvard trained lawyer, but had bad luck after with several incidents of apparent voter fraud, often open and mocking voter fraud. They should investigate the lawyer who instructed the ACORN folks on how to set up to register voters. That dude could be a crook, and if the matter were thoroughly investigated, he could be put up on a federal fraud case, which is a felony.
Will Secretary of Justice Eric Holder do the rat thing and transparently investigate this urgent matter?
“Every day, the media is dragged, kicking and screaming, to another story about serious vote fraud in America. Illegal voting by felons; imposters voting as the long-dead; vote rolls stuffed with ineligible names; phony registrations; non-citizens casting ballots; fraudulent absentee ballots.”
It would be nice to believe that the above statement is true, but I see no evidence of it. The Lib MSM are, as a group, serious holy crusaders for the Liberal mythical meme and they simply will NOT cover any story that points the incoherrence and falsehod of Modern Liberalism.. They want desperately to prove to their cocktail party clique that they are down for the struggle! The LibMSM hacks and flunkies busy themselves with filtering, manicuring, furiously spinning and outright lying in order to portray every story (every story they bother to cover, that is) as PROOF of the truth of Liberalism. All serious Libs believe they must use their positions and offices – whatever they might be – To further the holy cause of Modern Liberalism.
Just go to YouTube and watch the Libtard NC teacher try and forcibly inculcate her students with prenicious ideas about Mitt Romney and her personal political saviour, Obamesiah.
“You will not disrespect (question) the president in MY classroom!”
Libs truely are filth.
Same rant, she says you should not disrespect any President present or past, then goes on to call President Bush “Sh*tty”.
Can’t make this stuff up.
Do the true history of these ”social” Democrats and Senator Byrd being formed as the,KKK that didn’t want free slaves to have,guns. See the history of Planned Parenthood being formed to kill black babies as her stated goal they can’t deny. Yes they are all just disgusting ”human/cuvil rights,MLK and free,speech” frauds. Just remember Breitbart.com saying ”if ”liberals” didn’t have their double standards they would have none!
I have repeatedly heard pols say that there is no evidence of voter fraud. That’s all the more reason to act now to prevent its continuation.
Republican “Jim Crow” laws!!? OMG!! It appears Mr. Ben Jealous president of the NAACP could be and 8th grade graduate of the Detroit public school system. Just to set the record straight “Jim Crow” laws were enacted in the Deep South by the, then controlling Democratic party. In the early to mid 1900s those thugs riding around the country side on horse back, wearing white robes and hoods too ashamed to show their faces while beating and hanging black men, were all Democrats. Once you remove their hoods, you’ll see the real face of racism.
If a cloud passes over a barn it’s the New Jim Crow. What the author really failed to point out, is that the DOJ is not just partisan, it is seriously racist. Holder’s not just a Democrat, he is working for his “people” and doesn’t even try to hide it. Holder’s turned the DOJ into a de facto branch of the Southern Poverty Law Center and the NAACP. Meanwhile, the Dem Party blithely accuses the entirety of the GOP as well as the Tea Party of being racists, with no overarching evidence which would connect such dots. The Dem Party has transformed itself into a race and gender pimp. They don’t fight with ideas, they fight with slanders they themselves are most guilty of.
holder belongs in prison. hundreds of people dead and he still gets to make decisions about our country? justice dept.? pure alinski in practice. up is down, right is wrong. perfect example of how the first gay kenyan potus pretender has no love for America, or anybody else for that matter. the very sight of him is nauseating. if this bunch of halfwits say there is no voter fraud, watch out!
As late as 1948 the Honorable Richard Byrd of West Virginia was an officer of the KKK; LBJ was getting his career started and never voted for a civil rights act while in the Senate; and George Wallace, Strom Thurmond et al were all around for the fight against Brown vs Board of Education and other good things. All were Democrats. Woodrow Wilson segregated the District of Columbia. Why should we expect anything different from this lot?
Why should we expect anything different from this lot?
Cuz the “narrative” tells us to. And, at least half of us rely on the gubmint for our finances now, which is quite the motive to munch on a pie o’ bullsheet, no matter how distasteful.
Btw, a narrative is the telling of a story. When we accepted the telling of tales over the reporting of facts, we set the course to where we are now: under the informational thumb of a lying gubmint operating through a narrative news entertainment industry, both the gubmint and media endorsed by liar professors, all headed up by a visionary leader who’s a pathological liar.
This election can hinge on 1-2%. Its easy to cheat that amount for a victory. What do we do if it is stolen?
Ballot box, soap box, jury box–& sooner or later, if necessary, the cartridge box. But, in line with what Master Sun advises, our first target should be the Demagogues’ *plans* & their media establishment doesn’t even need shooting to be defeated.
Ballot box, soap box, jury box–& sooner or later, if necessary, the cartridge box. But, in line with what Master Sun advises, our first target should be the Demagogues’ *plans*, & their media establishment doesn’t even need shooting to be defeated.
The way to fight this is to go to http://www.TrueTheVote.org and sign up! You can help research voting rolls in your community to make sure that felons, non-citizens, and the dead are not on the rolls. You can also be connected with others in your community who are interested in stopping voter fraud, and learn how to properly monitor elections in your state.
Those states which Holder is suing have already filed appeals, and Texas is challenging the right of the DOJ to review voting law changes for some states when other states not covered by the VRA are free to enact photo id laws without review of the DOJ. It is being pushed to be heard before the November 2012 elections.
If the inane insanity continues unabated into Nov. I may not survive the assaults to my common sense and rational thought and just become a blathering idiot, as the brain turns to mush.
There’s one angle which never gets much discussion in this “debate” but ought to put the whole photo ID disenfranchisement argument to rest. And that is that in most if not all states, in order to REGISTER to vote, you have to … wait for it … show a photo ID! The only way that a person can be eligible to vote is if they have already proven that they have an ID. So, the only people who can be disenfranchised by not having an ID are those who are not registered!
Democrats are so shamelessly dishonest when it comes to elections.
Well, you’ve gotta love those Democrats. Every day they bring out a story about voter fraud. Well, they are the ones that are screamin about it and also the ones who are perpetrating it. Their first attack ALWAYS points the finger at conservative voters. Now they want the voting laws changed for some states, but not for all. Let me see, why would that be? Perhaps they like the idea of voting law changes for some states, but not for all. Others are allowed to enact photo id laws with no review from the DOJ . . . as some states are free to enact photo id laws with review for the DOJ. They have been working on this for months and don’t seemed to be worried about getting caught doing the wrong thing. Wake up, Republicans before true conservatives will be forced to form another party, and will know who to let in and who to turn away.
What about the 15,000 DEAD voters in FLA? Howcome some Cities have more voters than population? Why are we letting Spain count (OBBUMMER supporters) our votes? Why isn*t the press (hello, FOX- LIB MSM wont) asking these questions at press conferences? Why no answers to simple questions? WHY WHY WHY????????????
53,000, not 15,000 –(sorry –now you’re even more upset –but —)
These poor minorities already HAVE state IDs they have to to get food stamps.
Has there EVER been a more corrupt AG than Holder?