<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The United Hates of America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:45:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jw</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-266159</link>
		<dc:creator>jw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-266159</guid>
		<description>James Glazov&#039;s book is excellent.  However, it might be supplemented by a history of the &quot;Left.&quot; which derives its name from the French Revolution - the National Assembly was seated in a semicircle, with Jacobins led by Maximillian Robespierre on the far left and the monarchists and clericals on the far right.  Revolution became fashionable in the 19th century, with revolutionaries thinking of themselves in the tradition of the Jacobins and so &quot;Left.&quot;  Vladimir Lenin regarded himself as such, establishing the Soviet Union in a permanent &quot;Reign of Terror&quot; in order to prevent &quot;Thermidor&quot; (the month in which Robespierre and his colleages were overthrown and executed).
Robespierre gave a speech at the National Assembly in February of 1794, justifying the use of terror to establish virtue, hence the origin of the term &quot;terrorism.&quot;  Sergei Nechayev in 19th century Russia invented ways of bringing the revolution (like Saul Alinsky) - see his Catechism of the Revolutionary. 
 The enthusiasts for mass slaughter and the like called &quot;the Left&quot; which James Glazov describes,are followers of Robespierre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Glazov&#8217;s book is excellent.  However, it might be supplemented by a history of the &#8220;Left.&#8221; which derives its name from the French Revolution &#8211; the National Assembly was seated in a semicircle, with Jacobins led by Maximillian Robespierre on the far left and the monarchists and clericals on the far right.  Revolution became fashionable in the 19th century, with revolutionaries thinking of themselves in the tradition of the Jacobins and so &#8220;Left.&#8221;  Vladimir Lenin regarded himself as such, establishing the Soviet Union in a permanent &#8220;Reign of Terror&#8221; in order to prevent &#8220;Thermidor&#8221; (the month in which Robespierre and his colleages were overthrown and executed).<br />
Robespierre gave a speech at the National Assembly in February of 1794, justifying the use of terror to establish virtue, hence the origin of the term &#8220;terrorism.&#8221;  Sergei Nechayev in 19th century Russia invented ways of bringing the revolution (like Saul Alinsky) &#8211; see his Catechism of the Revolutionary.<br />
 The enthusiasts for mass slaughter and the like called &#8220;the Left&#8221; which James Glazov describes,are followers of Robespierre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. von Ost</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-261064</link>
		<dc:creator>D. von Ost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-261064</guid>
		<description>Re: #34
Yes, no doubt Glazov is an International Treasure, along with Mark Steyn, Sowell, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: #34<br />
Yes, no doubt Glazov is an International Treasure, along with Mark Steyn, Sowell, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misanthropicus</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-261052</link>
		<dc:creator>misanthropicus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 00:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-261052</guid>
		<description>Excellent book, and Glazov is a fine, very knowledgeable and witty man, a scholar in Russian/Soviet affair - I attended the book launch in Los Angeles last Thursday and I was impressed. Everyone should get &quot;United In Hate.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent book, and Glazov is a fine, very knowledgeable and witty man, a scholar in Russian/Soviet affair &#8211; I attended the book launch in Los Angeles last Thursday and I was impressed. Everyone should get &#8220;United In Hate.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Alston</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-261036</link>
		<dc:creator>G Alston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 23:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-261036</guid>
		<description>#32 -- &lt;i&gt; In most cases, they are educated beyond their ability to think wisely.&lt;/i&gt;

Ummm.... OK, that about wraps that up. Meds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#32 &#8212; <i> In most cases, they are educated beyond their ability to think wisely.</i></p>
<p>Ummm&#8230;. OK, that about wraps that up. Meds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. von Ost</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-260990</link>
		<dc:creator>D. von Ost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 21:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-260990</guid>
		<description>Re: #28:
Science has been, and is arrogant; same as religion and all dogmas.  Religion has nothing to do with God. It is men who link religion to God.

Also, scientists are not stupid, not at all. Many are simply not wise. In most cases, they are educated beyond their ability to think wisely. Most of them (and/or the layman) haven&#039;t really looked any further than the externals to answer the existential questions.  It has been rather, a lack of real scientific curiosity; so that, if it doesn&#039;t fit the predetermined parameters, it is not worth investigating.  When much has been invested in a particular way of thinking, it is extremely difficult to stray from it.  It is simple human nature.  And this applies to politics to a very significant degree.

As not being able to explain everything... Actually, many things do exist that will never be provable by any scientific means, because they transcend the physical, therefore, the scientific.

Be well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: #28:<br />
Science has been, and is arrogant; same as religion and all dogmas.  Religion has nothing to do with God. It is men who link religion to God.</p>
<p>Also, scientists are not stupid, not at all. Many are simply not wise. In most cases, they are educated beyond their ability to think wisely. Most of them (and/or the layman) haven&#8217;t really looked any further than the externals to answer the existential questions.  It has been rather, a lack of real scientific curiosity; so that, if it doesn&#8217;t fit the predetermined parameters, it is not worth investigating.  When much has been invested in a particular way of thinking, it is extremely difficult to stray from it.  It is simple human nature.  And this applies to politics to a very significant degree.</p>
<p>As not being able to explain everything&#8230; Actually, many things do exist that will never be provable by any scientific means, because they transcend the physical, therefore, the scientific.</p>
<p>Be well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Alston</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-260888</link>
		<dc:creator>G Alston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-260888</guid>
		<description>#28 -- &lt;i&gt;But they stopped exploring any further, mostly due to scientific arrogance. What if the manifested physical problems had spiritual origins, well beyond what they were/are capable of detecting?&lt;/i&gt;

Those who don&#039;t get science will typically cast scientific inquiry as arrogant. They also usually have some sort of other &#039;out there&#039; belief. Those who aren&#039;t religious or who cast it aside might opt for little green men and argue that arrogant scientists can&#039;t detect them because they&#039;re too stupid to look for them, too ignorant of physics to build quantum flux capacitor inter-dimensional jammers to render the LGM&#039;s visible, and so on. The religious will hold forth about demons, possessions, miracles, and stigmata; they will often go on to claim equipment can&#039;t be built.

In all cases we call these folks &quot;crackpots.&quot; Not being able to explain everything isn&#039;t the obverse of &#039;therefore everything exists.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#28 &#8212; <i>But they stopped exploring any further, mostly due to scientific arrogance. What if the manifested physical problems had spiritual origins, well beyond what they were/are capable of detecting?</i></p>
<p>Those who don&#8217;t get science will typically cast scientific inquiry as arrogant. They also usually have some sort of other &#8216;out there&#8217; belief. Those who aren&#8217;t religious or who cast it aside might opt for little green men and argue that arrogant scientists can&#8217;t detect them because they&#8217;re too stupid to look for them, too ignorant of physics to build quantum flux capacitor inter-dimensional jammers to render the LGM&#8217;s visible, and so on. The religious will hold forth about demons, possessions, miracles, and stigmata; they will often go on to claim equipment can&#8217;t be built.</p>
<p>In all cases we call these folks &#8220;crackpots.&#8221; Not being able to explain everything isn&#8217;t the obverse of &#8216;therefore everything exists.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Alston</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-260886</link>
		<dc:creator>G Alston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-260886</guid>
		<description>#13 -- &lt;i&gt;Evolution is the basis of their belief system. It is a total denial of a transcendental being involved in the affairs of man. Therefore man is the sole determinate of his own destiny.&lt;/i&gt;

Evolution isn&#039;t a leftist belief system. It&#039;s reality. You don&#039;t &quot;believe&quot; in reality. You choose to classify denial of reality as belief and then turn around and attempt to classify acceptance of reality as belief. These aren&#039;t similar things.

A glass sits on the table. The guy denying reality believes that the glass isn&#039;t there. The guy accepting reality doesn&#039;t need to &quot;believe&quot; that the glass exists. It simply does. The guy accepting reality isn&#039;t going out of his way to deny it or believe anything.

Similarly you are claiming a &quot;belief&quot; on the part of those who accept the reality of evolution that isn&#039;t there.

And yes reality being what it is implies that there&#039;s no god mucking about in the affairs of man. Shocking.

&lt;i&gt;Void of any ultimate good or evil they see everything (like Jim Henson of the Puppets)as separate sides of the same coin. Hence doing evil is the same as doing good if it achieves the end result desired. &lt;/i&gt;

Incorrect. The concept of good cannot exist without the concept of evil. They *are* two sides of the same coin. Merely knowing this doesn&#039;t excuse doing evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13 &#8212; <i>Evolution is the basis of their belief system. It is a total denial of a transcendental being involved in the affairs of man. Therefore man is the sole determinate of his own destiny.</i></p>
<p>Evolution isn&#8217;t a leftist belief system. It&#8217;s reality. You don&#8217;t &#8220;believe&#8221; in reality. You choose to classify denial of reality as belief and then turn around and attempt to classify acceptance of reality as belief. These aren&#8217;t similar things.</p>
<p>A glass sits on the table. The guy denying reality believes that the glass isn&#8217;t there. The guy accepting reality doesn&#8217;t need to &#8220;believe&#8221; that the glass exists. It simply does. The guy accepting reality isn&#8217;t going out of his way to deny it or believe anything.</p>
<p>Similarly you are claiming a &#8220;belief&#8221; on the part of those who accept the reality of evolution that isn&#8217;t there.</p>
<p>And yes reality being what it is implies that there&#8217;s no god mucking about in the affairs of man. Shocking.</p>
<p><i>Void of any ultimate good or evil they see everything (like Jim Henson of the Puppets)as separate sides of the same coin. Hence doing evil is the same as doing good if it achieves the end result desired. </i></p>
<p>Incorrect. The concept of good cannot exist without the concept of evil. They *are* two sides of the same coin. Merely knowing this doesn&#8217;t excuse doing evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatriotUSA</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-259475</link>
		<dc:creator>PatriotUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 07:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-259475</guid>
		<description>#5 said:
What they fail to comprehend is that the liberal left of today is by NO means a humane movement, nor a progressive one. It has alot more in common with Islamic fascism than with democratic principles. The putrid truth of the matter is that the leaders of the far left are totalitarian in their views and brook NO dissent. In their perverse world view there are NO lines that cannot be crossed which will interfere with their power, or the imposition of their new utopian world order.


Well put, well said Adina!! There is no arguing with liberals or those of the far left. They can only see their own greatness and almost all of them suffer from the &quot;legend in their own mind syndrome.&quot; You cannot rationalize or debate them. They fall apart at any criticism or correction and everyone else, and their opinions are just plain wrong. We are witnessing this right here in the USA as the mullah obamaham and his liberal cronies cuddle up to the muslim/islamofacist world at Israel&#039;s expense and the degradation of our nation&#039;s security. Liberalism equals tyranny and is totalitarian in nature. There is NOTHING progressive about todays liberals as they find common ground with the iedologoical nightmare that is islam. Lierbals and progressive sway and dance to what ever the popular movement or cause is, throwing cautions to the winds to enforce &quot;progressive and socialist change&quot; even if the populace is against such perverted movement to the far left.Islam and the left have found common ground: they both hate America, the constitution and our freedoms that so have have given the ultimate sacrifice for.

There is no peace within islam, and with islam there can be no peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5 said:<br />
What they fail to comprehend is that the liberal left of today is by NO means a humane movement, nor a progressive one. It has alot more in common with Islamic fascism than with democratic principles. The putrid truth of the matter is that the leaders of the far left are totalitarian in their views and brook NO dissent. In their perverse world view there are NO lines that cannot be crossed which will interfere with their power, or the imposition of their new utopian world order.</p>
<p>Well put, well said Adina!! There is no arguing with liberals or those of the far left. They can only see their own greatness and almost all of them suffer from the &#8220;legend in their own mind syndrome.&#8221; You cannot rationalize or debate them. They fall apart at any criticism or correction and everyone else, and their opinions are just plain wrong. We are witnessing this right here in the USA as the mullah obamaham and his liberal cronies cuddle up to the muslim/islamofacist world at Israel&#8217;s expense and the degradation of our nation&#8217;s security. Liberalism equals tyranny and is totalitarian in nature. There is NOTHING progressive about todays liberals as they find common ground with the iedologoical nightmare that is islam. Lierbals and progressive sway and dance to what ever the popular movement or cause is, throwing cautions to the winds to enforce &#8220;progressive and socialist change&#8221; even if the populace is against such perverted movement to the far left.Islam and the left have found common ground: they both hate America, the constitution and our freedoms that so have have given the ultimate sacrifice for.</p>
<p>There is no peace within islam, and with islam there can be no peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. von Ost</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-259451</link>
		<dc:creator>D. von Ost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 05:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-259451</guid>
		<description>There will be many scoffers, but now, this needs to reside in the collective consciousness of humanity.

All (without exception) outward manifestations of human thought, activity, etc., actually derive from their spiritual correspondences.

Consider this: All the evil that humans manifest (especially nowadays) might be due to the spiritual possession of the human heart-will- mind.

The ancients held some grains of truth when they suspected a spiritual possession when someone acted in an abnormal way.  Let no one deride their beliefs, because there has always been a good degree of truth in this.

When the age of Enlightenment, Industrial Revolution, etc., came about, most people scoffed at these apparently unsophisticated notions.  Of course, it was said, now we know through science that their ailment is only a chemical imbalance, or psychological disorder, and so on.

But they stopped exploring any further, mostly due to scientific arrogance.  What if the manifested physical problems had spiritual origins, well beyond what they were/are capable of detecting?

Today, what is being seen and wondered at by most rational and decent people is nothing less than an unprecedented and quickened possession by negative entities that exist in other planes of reality or pseudo-reality.  These entities are naturally attracted and drawn to individuals who resonate with specific aspects of their negative nature; and now are making their presence increasingly felt through them.

Where does this information come from?  Divulging it would only create unnecessary anxiety in humanity and the detailed knowledge itself would not necessarily help anyone.

It will be proper and useful for good and just individuals to honestly meditate on this.

All the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be many scoffers, but now, this needs to reside in the collective consciousness of humanity.</p>
<p>All (without exception) outward manifestations of human thought, activity, etc., actually derive from their spiritual correspondences.</p>
<p>Consider this: All the evil that humans manifest (especially nowadays) might be due to the spiritual possession of the human heart-will- mind.</p>
<p>The ancients held some grains of truth when they suspected a spiritual possession when someone acted in an abnormal way.  Let no one deride their beliefs, because there has always been a good degree of truth in this.</p>
<p>When the age of Enlightenment, Industrial Revolution, etc., came about, most people scoffed at these apparently unsophisticated notions.  Of course, it was said, now we know through science that their ailment is only a chemical imbalance, or psychological disorder, and so on.</p>
<p>But they stopped exploring any further, mostly due to scientific arrogance.  What if the manifested physical problems had spiritual origins, well beyond what they were/are capable of detecting?</p>
<p>Today, what is being seen and wondered at by most rational and decent people is nothing less than an unprecedented and quickened possession by negative entities that exist in other planes of reality or pseudo-reality.  These entities are naturally attracted and drawn to individuals who resonate with specific aspects of their negative nature; and now are making their presence increasingly felt through them.</p>
<p>Where does this information come from?  Divulging it would only create unnecessary anxiety in humanity and the detailed knowledge itself would not necessarily help anyone.</p>
<p>It will be proper and useful for good and just individuals to honestly meditate on this.</p>
<p>All the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lonie</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-united-hates-of-america/#comment-259434</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lonie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 04:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56091#comment-259434</guid>
		<description>Carlos the Jackal, that old Commie terrorist, converted to Islam in prison during the mid 1990s.  He gave as his reason that only Islam remained capable of fighting and destroying the United States and Capitalism.  That&#039;s Glazov&#039;s idea in a nutshell, the reason for the alliance of left and Islamist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlos the Jackal, that old Commie terrorist, converted to Islam in prison during the mid 1990s.  He gave as his reason that only Islam remained capable of fighting and destroying the United States and Capitalism.  That&#8217;s Glazov&#8217;s idea in a nutshell, the reason for the alliance of left and Islamist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

