German Daily: Bush Was Hitler
A new book compares the anti-Semitism that led to the notorious Dreyfus Affair in France to "Islamaphobia" in America that led to Guantanamo.
June 29, 2009 - 12:24 am
The American novelist and essayist Louis Begley was in Frankfurt’s Old Opera House earlier this month to promote the German edition of his new book Why the Dreyfus Affair Matters. The English edition is first scheduled for release in late August. Oddly enough, however, a German translation has already been published. The German edition bears a different title: The Dreyfus Affair: Devil’s Island, Guantánamo, a Historical Nightmare [Der Fall Dreyfus: Teufelsinsel, Guantánamo, Alptraum der Geschichte].
The German title is not only grammatically puzzling. Why the emphasis on Dreyfus’s place of imprisonment — an incidental feature of the Dreyfus Affair? And what is the “historical nightmare”? And what does Guantánamo have to do with it? An article in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) on Begley’s Frankfurt appearance makes somewhat clearer the significance of these associations. Referring to the book, FAZ author Edo Reents writes:
Relentlessly and with a pressing intensity, Begley lists the anti-Semitic incidents that took place in France during and after the Dreyfus Affair. He then moves from this to the American Islamophobia of the Bush government, which, inasmuch as it illegally imprisoned and tortured people, essentially behaved no differently than the National Socialists.
The passage is remarkable in that it weaves together two of the favorite idées fixes that have occupied Germany’s chattering classes in recent years; the famous “Bush=Hitler” meme and the notion that “Islamophobia” is, in effect, the new form of anti-Semitism. (On the latter meme, see my earlier PJM report here.) In so doing, it is not really Guantánamo as Devil’s Island that the passage invokes, but rather Guantánamo as Auschwitz.
The outrageousness of such a comparison ought to be obvious — especially in Germany. Even if some of its former or current occupants should turn out to be innocent of their presumed connections to al-Qaeda or the Taliban, no one was ever imprisoned at Guantánamo simply by virtue of being a Muslim. So how is Guantánamo supposed in any way to be evidence of an “American Islamophobia” analogous to the German anti-Semitism that led to Auschwitz?
And then, of course, there is the yawning difference of scale — a difference of so many orders of magnitude as to be tantamount in itself to a difference of kind. Altogether, somewhere around 750 detainees are believed to have been held at Guantánamo since the first transfer of prisoners took place in 2002. Most of these have since been released and, of course, none of them was killed. What has this to do with the millions of Jews who were systematically slaughtered in the Nazi death camps or by the mobile SS Einsatzgruppen?
The comparison is obviously ludicrous. And yet there it is, presented with great solemnity in the Arts and Culture [Feuilleton] section of Germany’s most prestigious daily. Of course, on Reents’s account, it is not Reents himself who is drawing the comparison, but rather Begley, who is not only American, but, as Reents takes pains to remind us, also an American Jew. This too is typical. In accusing Israel of “Nazi-like” crimes in recent years, the German media has made ample use of Jewish intellectuals and even not-so-intellectuals (like, for instance, the “hysterical housewife” Evelyn Hecht-Galinski) as apparently unimpeachable “star witnesses.” By repeating the sort of outlandish comparisons that have hitherto been the reserve of the “anti-Zionist” extreme Left and on the strength of their “Jewishness” alone, such instant authorities have served to render these comparisons socially acceptable.
It is clear from Reents’s account that Begley is destined to serve much the same sort of function. After all, what better authority to “prove” that America’s treatment of Muslims has been like Nazi Germany’s treatment of Jews than an American Jew? Thus Reents continues:
From the mouth of another author, this comparison would presumably appear too bold. Begley drew it calmly and then avowed his own origins: he has always been an Atheist, he said, but whenever and wherever the spirit of anti-Semitism stirs, he proclaims [bekenne er sich zu] his Judaism. For one is born a Jew, one cannot chose to be one like one chooses an opinion.
But all is not lost. Reents tell us that Begley is “confident that the innocent Guantánamo detainees will one day be rehabilitated like Alfred Dreyfus finally was.” At Frankfurt’s Old Opera House, he apparently pleaded, moreover, for Germany to take some of these “innocent detainees,” “whose acceptance outside of America Begley described as a desirable act of friendship.”
Thus is the circle of reality-negating absurdities closed. Bush was Hitler. Guantánamo is the product of an “American Islamophobia” analogous to the German anti-Semitism that led to Auschwitz. But America can still redeem itself by “rehabilitating” the innocent Muslims incarcerated at Guantánamo, just as France eventually rehabilitated the falsely-accused Jewish officer Alfred Dreyfus. And Germany can even help America to redeem itself, by accepting some of these innocent Muslims from Guantánamo, which would be an “act of friendship.”
Germany: the very country in which an al-Qaeda cell hatched the 9/11 plot and a country that not only has provided, but continues to provide safe haven to some of the world’s most notorious Islamic extremists. (For examples, see my previous PJM report here.)