The Romney Local Rumbles On
I grew up in New York City, and regularly traveled by subway. The various train lines had express service (e.g., from 59th Street to 125th Street in Manhattan) as well as locals, which made every stop. After Mitt Romney’s decisive victory in the Illinois primary on Tuesday, winning another big collection of delegates, the Romney campaign may have believed it was now on the fast track, the express train to the nomination.
Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor and a favorite of those who had been pining for a deadlocked Republican convention and a new entrant to the race, endorsed Romney on Wednesday. Rush Limbaugh seemed pleased with Romney’s more vocal conservative messaging in his victory speech Tuesday night, and seemed to be signaling that he was at peace with Romney’s nomination, arguing that the conservative alternative to Romney may in fact be Romney (whatever that means).
And then came “Etch A Sketch” — an offhand comment by Romney campaign advisor Eric Fehrnstrom that appeared to suggest that Romney was ready to start anew for the fall campaign against Barack Obama with a different message (a fresh slate on an Etch a Sketch). Without having said as much, the instant analysis of the comment was that Fehrnstrom was in effect admitting that any perceived Romney pivot to the right to win the nomination would be reversed with a move to the center for the fall campaign. Both Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum seized on the stumble and immediately had Etch a Sketch kits distributed by their campaigns to reporters at campaign stops.
I am not sure why it would be shocking news that candidates who win contested races for the nomination, mainly among a political party’s most committed activist voters, might try to broaden a campaign message for a fall campaign to win over those who are not partisan to one party or another, and who might have a somewhat different agenda of issues than the party’s base. The fact of the matter is that virtually every national campaign is an attempt by the nominee to expand out from the base of the party which nominated that candidate to get to the 50% or more needed to win.
The problem for Romney is that he has been battling an image as a moderate (an inauthentic conservative) and a flip-flopper in both this campaign and his first race for the GOP nomination in 2008. So Fehrnstrom’s error may have been to say publicly what everyone expected anyway (since moving to the center for the fall campaign is politically smart) in an impolitic manner suggesting cynicism by the Romney campaign and disregard for the conservative voters he has struggled to attract in the primaries so far.
Romney wants the fall campaign to be about the economy: gas prices, energy policy, federal spending, growing annual deficits and the accumulated federal debt, ObamaCare, and tax and regulatory policy. He will not run a campaign on social issues, which are of paramount importance to a significant part of the GOP base. Evangelical Christians and other social conservatives are also very concerned about economic issues, and Romney is counting on their votes in November since his approach is far more attractive to this group than Obama’s.
As Rick Santorum has emerged as Romney’s chief rival, reporters, particularly those who are not sympathetic to any Republican (probably over 90% of the national press corps), have seen an opportunity to inject social issues into the campaign. The controversy over Obama’s contraception initiative that seemed to infringe on the rights of religious organizations appeared to have died down for a bit after an attempted compromise was offered by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. But it then erupted and became the main news story for several days after Rush Limbaugh trashed Sandra Fluke, the woman who had testified at a House hearing. Of course, Santorum himself has aided and abetted these social issue controversies by bringing up some of these issues on his own, such as the need to enforce pornography laws, or saying that John F. Kennedy’s statement during the 1960 campaign in Houston on the role of religion in public life made him want to throw up.
Though it has been Santorum who has been most closely identified with these controversies, the Democrats seized on them to declare that the Republicans had launched a “war on women.” Though the charge was nonsense, it damaged the poll standing of all the GOP candidates, including Mitt Romney, the clear frontrunner for the nomination. It is no wonder that the Romney campaign wants to pivot from these topics to the economy.
So will Etch A Sketch be a major roadblock to Romney securing the nomination? That seems very unlikely. Romney has secured about half of the delegates he needs for the nomination and about 55% of all the delegates won by any candidate to date. He seems likely to to come out ahead in winner-take-all races in California, Maryland, New Jersey, and several other states.
As he has already, Romney will lose some states along the way. Rick Santorum holds a solid lead in Louisiana, which is next up on Saturday. Santorum could win in his home state of Pennsylvania, in North Carolina, in Wisconsin, and in Texas. But the delegate math for Santorum is daunting. Romney’s big lead in the delegate race, and his likely wins in some of the winner-take-all states, as well as delegates Romney will pick up from his proportional share in states where Santorum wins, will very likely get him to the 1144 number he needs before the convention.
The bad news for Romney is that the renewed flip-flopper charge will encourage Santorum to stay in the race for a longer period of time. Newt Gingrich appears to be out of money, and more likely to depart early, especially after his dismal performance in Illinois (a fourth place finish with about 8% of the vote). If Santorum does not think he will be nominated, he might still stick around to build more of a national base for a second try at the White House in a future year (no one seems to kick the disease of running for president after just one defeat, especially on the Republican side). Or he may dislike Romney enough to want to force him to win every delegate he needs. Or he may see this as a last chance on the national stage and an opportunity to advance his values and beliefs.
In any case, the longer the race goes on, the more money Romney will need to raise to fight for every delegate to get to Tampa with enough in hand. And that will detract from his ability to pivot in the next few months and aim all his fire and resources at Barack Obama. The media wants the race to continue, and so does the president. Rick Santorum will determine how long it goes on.






An advisor said it. Proves Romney hired a Steve Schmidt. Now Rick has endorsed Obama. Rick is toast.
ETCH-A-SKETCH is more like Mittens’ Waterloo: it confirms from his own inner circle what so many – not just on the right – have said about the empty suit named Romney.
What you claim Santorum said is FALSE.
Granted, he also didn’t say, “I don’t worry about the very poor”, “I like firing people” and the such either….
100% wrong. Romney will be the nominee and he will defeat Obama in November.
1) You do not own a crystal ball.
2) Should he gain the nomination, it would not “prove” you right.
3) You only make a fool of yourself making such claims as “fact.”
4) Romney Cheerleaders are THIS CLOSE to Obama Zombies in this respect.
I knew we could find Ed Wallis, with Obama campaign skill, trashing Romney at 3:30 in the morning, shortly after the submission of this article. Too bad you didn’t get to be first on this one but all nighters are hard to do every night, eh? Good effort though Ed. Now go get some sleep so you will be fresh for your Etch-a-Sketch nonsense when your alarm rings and there are more Romney articles. Sheesh.
I agree Mitt will be the nominee. He will be the nominee because Republicans are voting for him..no other reason..ED…
.At this point in Mitt’s career…I do not believe he will defeat Obama. I fear for our nation at this point. He just doesn’t have the moxie to face Obama in a debate..and for what ever the reason..people judge on what they “see”, Mitt sweats, has a nervous little laugh, puts his foot in his mouth. He has made millions, did not take daddy’s money to do so..but we never hear that part of his story..only his gaffs.
Yesterday in particula…The press showed us how far they are willing to go to protect Obama’s actions and “words’…In the next few months I fear it will be a slime fest..
.BUT..Santorum need NOT fear..he will NOT be part of it..He’s like a little kid that has been told “NO”…scream, cry, roll on the floor, say absolutely stupid things…if he wants to see the Republicans defeated, he’s doing a really good job at helping Democrats. AND…there is no way on God’s green earth that Rick or any of the others, except Mitt, will have the delegates to get the nomination..so, they make fools of the Republican party..and a vote for a third party will also assure an Obama win..I do not understand how anyone could NOT understand that.
It appears that Democrats stick together, always..Republicans bicker like children and bring forth less than desirable candidates and proceed to tear them and the party apart…
,Rick can look forward to having his words of yesterday used in Democrat ads in the very near future…
I do not like ANY of the nominees..ANY…but I think a Republican president will bring Van Jones etc to a screeching halt. No matter, the press will be out in full mob mode.
I think Obama will win reelection..but not because he deserves it, and we will usher in a new way of life here in America..tragic simply tragic, our downfall will be assured at that point.
.I truly, truly fear not for myself or my chldren, BUT my grandchildren..they will not know the wonderful country we grew up in, the freedoms, the opportunities, the happiness..
Ed, I think you and Rick Santorum are suffering from Romney Derangement Syndrom(RDS). The Etch-a-Sketch is a stretch by the RDSers to try to make it about Romney’s policies when his campaign advisor was talking about how you run your campaign (what you focus on, who you focus on, where and when you travel, ect). Out of all of the Republican candidates Romney has been the most on topic, and consistant in his views. Romney, like Reagan, might have changed his viewpoints over a long time, but Romney has not made any “flash” changes. Both Newt and Rick have tried atttacking capitalism to try to “score points” and now Rick is stating Obama is better than Anyone But Obama (ABO), again to try to “score points”. You might not like that Romney has overtime changed his ideology, but most thinking, investigative, and thoughtful people do. Unlike Santorum, Romney actually balanced a budget (in one of the most liberal states too!).
THANK YOU..WELL STATED
YOU suffer from Romney DELUSION Syndrome:
*CONSISTENT* ?!?
Mitt “I’m Pro-Life AND Pro-Choice” Romney?!?
Mitt “I’m Progressive AND severly conservative” Romney?!?
Pathetic, how low Mittens’ Cheerleaders have to stoop to defend their empty suit.
consistent or not…you are just all wound out because people are voting for romney twice as much as for rickey…
Rickey boy likes to lay the blame for most everyone voting for anyone but him..on everyone but himself..whiner that he is..
fair enough..then please defend a man who:
–supported No Child
–supported Medicare Part D
–supported creation of a new agency in DHS (not to mention its joke of an offspring, the TSA)
–supported multiple hikes in the debt ceiling
–supported pro-union legislation
Explain how any of the above makes Ricky from PA a conservative. Yes, he hates gays, and would outlaw abortion and pornography, three things that absolutely no dinner table conversation includes. Ricky is as big govt as it gets; he just happens to want to inflict govt in areas you approve of, though in substance, it is no different than Obama.
By the way, Romney said “I like firing people” in regard to service providers who do lousy work, a sentiment most of us can appreciate. But keep sounding as uninformed as the typical Dem.
That was cute, Mr Ed. Sheesh.
This aid makes a statement that can be twisted and turned to suit any ears that hear it.
How unfortunate republicans look for any reason to eat their own candidates. This is nothing more than childs play and I cannot even believe any adult would bite on this. No wonder America is in decline.
We have been in decline, intellectually, ever since the beginning of the Great Dumbing Down, described here: http://clarespark.com/2012/03/22/3760/. In this blog, I nailed the many cultural pessimists who inhabit one faction of the Right, and picked up by “moderate” conservatives like Reinhold Niebuhr.
“The problem for Romney is that he has been battling an image as a moderate (an inauthentic conservative) and a flip-flopper in both this campaign and his first race for the GOP nomination in 2008.”
It isn’t just “an image” if it is confirmed by Mittens’ demonstrated political track record over many, many years.
“We didn’t know a single Republican when we jumped in in December.”
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ann-romney-we-didnt-know-single-republican
I pity those that believe this man is a conservative.
Santorum is justified in not throwing in the towel, despite the clamor over at Fox and Drudge.
Romney has Socialized Medicine, Planned Parenthood, Wall Street bailouts, Harvard, and now, voter fraud? on his resume. http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/23/romney-voter-fraud-allegations-loom-as-general-election-liability/
And he’s starting to get his own cult-like following. He’s sort of like a white Obama.
Romney is a really weak candidate. Look at where he is winning. In big, blue states and big, blue cities. These are places where Romney will not take the delegate count in November. So what if he wins Massachusttes in primary, but loses in the general election. The Latte Crowd is not enough to push Romney over the finish line. And Romney is a liberal, not a moderate as he likes to portray himself. His record in Mass. as government screams liberalism. One has to really wonder, does the GOP estalishment really want to win?
Are you claiming that states like South Carolina, Alabama and Mississippi will go into the Obama win column in November?
There are none so blind as those who WILL not see.
We’re talking about Romney Zombies like YOU.
Do you REALLY have that much trouble responding to what PattyMor has to say?
Georgia and Mississippi will go Obama this time around. Tennessee and Arkansas are too close to call. Look at the 2008 polling data, here you have your answer.
Look at where he is winning. In big, blue states
Like Florida? Ohio? New Hampshire? Virginia? If you think that these are “big blue states” then that sums up the problem with the anti-Romney crowd – they don’t know anything about politics.
And I believe you and Ed Wallis both must be working for the re-election of the Communist and his Politburo.
Hysterical Jimmy, we post here to see that THE MOST CONSERVATIVE POLITICIAN ELECTABLE gets the nomination.
YOU, Little Debbie, moira et al seem to be uninformed, jingoistic, whiny cheerleaders with their panties in such a bunch that not a single one of you can offer up a persuasive argument why Mittens should be the nominee.
It’s time you quit the self-discrediting “you’re an Obama Troll!” cr*p.
After this comment, Romney is now in a box. The only way to prove to conservatives that he means what he says may have to be by making Santorum Vice President. With Santorum on the ticket, conservatives know that he will not let Romney stray far from the conservative ranch. And it doesn’t hurt that Santorum is from a big northern state like Pennsylvania, which would be important in the general election. Romney will probably eventually win the delegate count, but Santorum will have more than enough delegates to give Romney a hard time at the convention. The only way to stop open civil war from breaking out at the convention could be to put Santorum on the ticket. It may be the one way to show the party that conservative and moderate Republicans have finally united to defeat Obama. It may just work.
There is no way Romney will put some little kid on the VP ticket. We need a man, like Rubio, not a whiney 2 year old. Have you listened to any of Rubio’s speeches? Me likes some man! Romney/Rubio two committed family men, who love their wives and their God and their country – that is, the United States of America. Yes, I know Santorum has a good family, but he is way too whiney. Besides we have to focus on the economy and when that is up and running then there is time (I hope) to address some of the other issues. But you must have the country along with you on these things, and so you have to change the heart of the country and turn it away from the radicals on the left.
Romney will never have czars in the White House, he will never have communists in the white house, nor maoists.
He said he will give passes on 0b0z0care to all 50 states (not 57) and then work to get rid of it.
If we give insurance companies a chance to compete – if you limit the amount an attorney can profit from a suit it will go a long way to help with the health of the country.
oh no….santorum has no respect for mitt…remember..and he wouldn’t run with someone that his whiney ass didn’t “respect”, because he was beating the freaking tar out of him…whiney rickey needs to remember this
The Etch-A-Sketch comment just confirmes what conservatives have known about Mitt from the start; Mitt has no core convictions. Mitt’s Governorship in Mass. was never about the people of Mass., it was a resume enhancement, a springboard to higher office, nothing more. And his runs for the Presidency isn’t about the American people, or the Republican party. The only thing that Mitt has EVER been about is Mitt, and his desire to redeem his father’s failed legacy. This is why Mitt would lose to Obama. Voters will more quickly vote for a candidate whose beliefs they may not entirely believe in than they will someone they see as having no beliefs at all; this is why GWB beat John Kerry (another Mass. flip-flopper) in ’04. The only, very slim, hope that the GOP has at this point, IMHO, is a brokered convention, where a candidate with at least a slim chance of winning can be chosen, since neither Mitt, Rick, Newt, or Paul have a hope in hell in November.
Yep!
Dreams From
MyMitt’s Father.heh
neither Mitt, Rick, Newt, or Paul have a hope in hell in November.
A lot of the people I see here bashing Romney are Democrats trying to cause chaos in Republican ranks. One tip off is that they hate all the Republican candidates, not just one of them.
Commenter “Northern Light” is another such individual.
Romney hasn’t convinced me that he is resolved to overturn Obamacare, the biggest issue before us. On the contrary, there are parts of it he likes. The Etch-a-Sketch prop is unnerving, especially with a man who has reset the screen too many times already. What are we going to get next? A Massachusetts liberal who hasn’t renounced Romneycare. Wake up, America.
“Romney hasn’t convinced me that he is resolved to overturn Obamacare … ”
He’s convinced us of the exact opposite! While one advisor is out comparing him to Etch-a-Sketches, another advisor is out telling everyone that they won’t repeal Obamacare:
http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/01/25/romney-advisor-no-obamacare-repeal/
Mike – How many times does Romney have to say he will repeal Obamacare for you to believe him? Do you recall the Novewmber “shellacking?” Romney worked hard campaigning for republican candidates the last 4 years. Is that something a “liberal” would do? Where was Santorum and his support?
Like it or not, Romney has this election sewed up. He will be our nominee. Santorum would have to win 70% of the vote from here on out to bypass him. Not going to happen.
Sit back and relax, Romney has his campaign under control and a majority of good republican citizens to help him.
Ten thousand would be too few. He has no credibility, so what he says doesn’t matter.
The Republican establishment is convinced that conservatives will take their medicine, mind their manners and take their place in the pbaack of the bus….and pull the lever for Romney. This campaign advisor should resign immediately or Romney should fire him.
There is no explaining away such an arrogant, naive comment. The only way Romney can refute it is to refute the individual who said it. His actions are being watched and his words are being heard by conservatives.
Whether or not The Republican establishment realizes it or likes it, the key to Romney’s election is the conservative vote. He’s got the moderates..they have no where to go…Conservatives do…they will go home. Romney had better embrace the conservative leadership and base…and he had better do it soon.
I am a conservative…and I will not take my place in the back of the bus.
Whether or not The Republican establishment realizes it or likes it, the key to Romney’s election is the conservative vote. He’s got the moderates..they have no where to go…Conservatives do…they will go home.
That statement makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Conservatives understand the need to beat Obama. Conservatives also understand that there are other elections at stake this year. Nobody is staying home.
Moira, if you’re going to abuse polemics, you’d best learn first not to contradict yourself in the process, thereby discrediting anything you have to say.
Conservatives know very well there are important e.g. House/Senate elections…but due to the excessively obnoxious behavior of Mittens and his sycophants, that box for “President” may go unchecked.
There you have it. We have the perfect right and ability to UNDERVOTE, and I shall do so (so will my two sons and my wife – my daughter doesn’t like him either but can’t vote this time). We have a senate race and a house race to vote in. There will be some issues on the ballot, presumably a state constitutional amendment.
If the GOP nominates the smarmy Mr. Romney then I have no choice, merely an echo and I don’t vote AGAINST people, that wins nothing, and often garners worse results. Obama faced with a Republican Congress in full opposition mode is not a horrid thing, while we sort out what the Federalist or even a chastened and revitalized Conservative Republican Party stands for, and who it will nominate in 2016. (BTW I am pretty sure that’s what the cooler heads in the GOP were thinking, anyway.)
I look at it this way. I will be alive in 2016, or I won’t – God determines that. I will have a job of some kind, and a roof over my head. I have managed to provide my family those items for 25 years pretty much on my own. And the world won’t end. And if it does, I will throw myself on the loving mercy of the Almighty, and rejoice in His Grace for eternity.
Will the United States of America fail if Obummer is re-elected? Probably not. It won’t be a better place, but it will still be here. At least for a while. Even that will sort itself out over time, nothing constructed by man lasts forever, does it?
So, the pledge:
Willard Milton Romney is a Limousine Liberal Democrat masquerading as a Republican; therefore I WILL NOT vote for him; EVER!
Regards,
John – The Mighty Fahvaag
The statement makes all the sense in the world, Moira. What do conservatives gain by supporting a vanilla flavored version of BHO? It’s becoming clear that a substantial number of people still haven’t learned ANYTHING since ’08; maybe it’ll take four more years of BHO before people FINALLY get it. I just hope that there’s still something left of this once great nation by the time 2016 gets here.
“vanilla flavored?” What a strange comment to make.
What do conservatives gain by supporting a vanilla flavored version of BHO?
You oppose all the Republican candidates, not just Romney. You’ve said so yourself right on this thread. You’ll be voting for Obama again this year.
No, actually, I’ll be voting for Gary Johnson, as I’ve said in other threads. I’m a Libertarian leaning independent conservative, I’ve voted for every GOP Presidental candidate since Reagan in ’84, and I’m sick of suppressing my gag reflex every time I’ve pulled the lever for an “R” candidate since ’92, McCain was thf final straw!
Perry was my candidate, but I could’ve lived with Newt; not perfect, but with a conservative record in the House. I like Paul, but his foreign policy is a bit to Pollyannish (or should that be PAULianish?). Santorum cares a bit too much about what I do with a consenting female in my own bedroom; I’m voting for President, not a daddy. Mitt is BHO, minus the good tan, but with better hair. We’ve GOT to get back to the 10th amendment, or we’re SCREWED!!!
Now former senator Sanatorium tells us that we should just keep Obama rather than have Romney for the nominee..
-
Any wonder why the people of Pennsylvania threw his Senate Rino ass out the door?
Granted, Santorum is almost as clumsy with his words as
Mitt “I like firing people”, “I’m not worried about the very poor”, etc. Romney.
ALMOST.
Do you ever comment on any other Pajamas Media threads Mr. Ed? It appears you only come here to bash Romney when you get the opportunity. Your disdain for him is almost borderline abnormal.
I doubt few pay any attention to your comments anymore.
1. Why, yes, I do, Debbie.
2. I don’t write for YOU, sweetie.
3. Typical of the Mittens Cheerleaders, you express contempt for dissent and a strong desire to shut down any debate of the merits of candidates…
…only heaping worship and praise of their pre-ordained “chosen” one.
GEE. Now, *why* does THAT sound so familiar?!
Ed, you haven’t ever debated anything around here. You are just a troll throwing around your anti-Romney slogans and snippets. You seem to have the skill of a Democrat with this particular exercise. Do you work for the Obama campaign, or not? If so, that would explain things pretty well. If not, what do you think you are doing? ABO2012
KEEP IT UP, Jim Baker:
You are showing the entire world what UNHINGED IDIOTS Romney Cheerleaders are.
You have no arguments, just insulting labels like “Obama Troll.”
Grow up or shut up…your choice, honey.
You didn’t answer my question, Ed Wallis. But you did manage to try the usual Democrat tactic of insulting the adversary. Since you claim you are not working for Obama the question was “If not, what do you think you are doing?” I say you are just trashing Mitt Romney and I don’t see how anyone but those who want a Communist President would want to be doing that at this point. So, without the pusillanimous drivel, answer the damn question please. ABO2012
Hysterical Jimmy, we post here to see that THE MOST CONSERVATIVE POLITICIAN ELECTABLE gets the nomination.
YOU, Little Debbie, moira et al seem to be uninformed, jingoistic, whiny cheerleaders with their panties in such a bunch that not a single one of you can offer up a persuasive argument why Mittens should be the nominee.
It’s time you quit the self-discrediting “you’re an Obama Troll!” cr*p.
Yeah! Because the problem is not any weakness in Romney but people pointing out the weakness.
Your comment is just an extended version of “LA-LA-LA! I don’t want to hear you!”
So, instead of having a decent debate, you prefer the others to shut up.
Listen: It’s not that we are “Romney bashers” or anything. We are just worried about the country, and we have legitimate REASONS to be worried about the apparent lack of principles in Romney.
If you read my post below, you can see, for instance, how Romney could handle the whole thing: “It’s Obama who took the country to extreme left, we are returning to the center”.
Heck, he can still correct the course and state something like that. And, no, I don’t like Romney, yet I prefer to be constructive and critical in a better way than you choose to be a Romney cheerleader.
The problem is that Romney is nowhere near correcting this bad step. He chose to express “disappointment” of Santorum, instead of address the disappointment everybody is having of him.
If you have a way to communicate with Romney campaign, go ahead and tell all this to him. Don’t kill the messenger just because you don’t like the message, read all the criticism and try to get the idea, for heaven’s sake.
I was addressing my comment to Mr Ed, not you x. I realize not everyone is going to support Governor Romney and respect that right. I also realize Mr. Ed appears on these threads with harsh critism of Romney to the extent of being abnormal. He has also attacked many of my comments in the past.
That being said, it is clear to me Romney is not a liberal. He has spent the past four years campaigning and helping republicans to gain seats. A liberal doesn’t do that.
Dissent is always good but turning a blind eye to abnormal obsession is not my flavor.
ABNORMAL OBSESSION, Debbie?!
“X” and I are more “normal” than you know…which you may well find out the hard way the day after the November election if Mittens is the nominee.
You offer mindless platitudes. BORING.
You offer insulting dismissals (too)…so don’t get your panties in a bunch when I return in kind.
Just another Democrat posing as a concerned Republican.
No, Steve.
A Concern Troll would start out more like, “I’m a severe conservative, but somehow Newt and Rick bother me…”.
On the other hand, Romney Cheerleaders/Trolls make no such pretense: they go directly to the I’M A WISHY WASHY NO-VALUES MODERATE THAT MIGHT HAVE VOTED FOR OBAMA BUT JUST SORTA VOTE IN THE MIDDLE EVERY TIME BECAUSE I DON’T UNDERSTAND REALITY, SO IT’S EASIER TO CRITICIZE THOSE WHO HAVE ETHICAL STANDARDS AS EXTREMISTS.
Like I said earlier, you Romney Cheerleaders are little different from the Obama Zombies who devalue everyone with the slightest critique of their pre-ordained “chosen” one. YOU ARE SICK.
The sad thing is that had Mitt been giving Illinois-esque speeches since 2010 then he’d have wrapped up the nomination long ago.
I don’t particularly care that Romney has historically flip-flopped like a landed fish, what I care about is getting him so firmly locked into Conservative principles now that he can’t flip-flop in the future. But if I believe the media when it says Romney has a tight, well-run campaign, then the Etch-A-Sketch comment reflects his plan both for the election and for governing.
I also don’t particularly care that Romney’s only concern is Romney as long as he understands that his future interests coincide with mine. If Romney truly understood that to win election he must run such a Conservative campaign that there would be no questioning his Conservatism, and that to win re-election he’d have to govern as an actual Conservative, then I’d be fine with his ideology being one solely of vested self interest. But Romney is clearly convinced that to win election he must run left-of-center, and he’ll govern left-of-center to win re-election. Sorry Mitt, it’s not in my self interest to help elect a candidate that I’m convinced will govern against my interests and the argument that “Obama is worse” is not a winning message.
a good friend has a long-time relationship with a man who worked closely with romeny during the olympics. His firsthand close observations was romeny’s focus is results – iow: fixing the US economy so american’s can have jobs with money in their pockets to support their families and afford to buy their own healthcare.
The definition of a Political Gaffe is when a politician tells the truth. Except for the fact that Romney is a better public speaker, we are signing up for the third term of GWB. We have a President who believes that Big Government is great, as long as Democrats are in charge. We have a Republican Candidate who believe that Big Government is great, as long as Republicans are in charge. Regarding the big issue of the day, Obamacare, I believe that “President Romney’ would have signed it just as willingly as President Obama did. GWB had no problem with Big Government and we saw 8 years of GWB undermining and marginalizing a relatively Conservative Congress. Is Romney better than Obama? Of course! but not by much. Their difference seem to be a matter of degree and not substance.
There you have it.
If the campaign was based on principles, the answer would have been something like: “NO, it’s Obama who took the country to extreme left and we are returning to the center”.
Instead, the answer couldn’t be worst: “eh.. uh.. not… it’s all like etch a sketch… now you see it, now you don’t… Principles! That’s it”.
(Now, I hope nobody will come out with some Santorum stuff here, I am not supporting Santorum either)
We already knew that X. Comrade Obama is proud of you, I’m sure.
You’re just another cheerleader.
Sure, I don’t like Romney, yet I prefer to be constructive and critical in a better way than you choose to be a Romney cheerleader. As you can see in my post, Romney can still address the issue with something like “It’s Obama who took the country to extreme left, we are returning to the center”.
Instead, he is expressing “disappointment” of Santorum, instead of addressing the disappointment everybody is having of him. And you are making the same kind of error.
If you have a way to communicate with Romney campaign, go ahead and tell all this to him. Don’t kill the messenger just because you don’t like the message, read all the criticism and try to get the idea, for heaven’s sake.
That was succinct, X. What made you the messenger? As for me, I don’t like politicians in general. But, I like Communist politicians the least because they want to destroy the free enterprise system. I like the free enterprise system. It has allowed me the pursue of happiness. Obama is a Communist politician. Sniping at the Republican who has the best chance of being Obama’s opponent doesn’t seem to me to be the way to defeat Obama. Enough said, X. ABO2012
Repeatedly chanting “he’s the best to beat Obama!” without offering any reasoning why he is the best of the GOP bunch in the ONGOING Primary Season – which you and your drone Mittens Cheerleaders constantly seem to forget – is akin to Obama Zombies shouting “Yes We Can!”. SEEK MENTAL HELP, Jim.
I think that Santorum endorsing Obama is much bigger news and a much bigger blow to Santorums campaign than anything which a Romney advisor said.
Up until to now I’d have been perfectly happy with Santorum in the (unlikely) event he won the nomination. But between his “war on porn” comments and now his remarks that if he loses the nomination, there is no difference between the Republican and Obama, I’ve lost a ton of respect for the man.
I don’t understand why his stumbles never seem to attract attention or cost him support.
Earth to Steve. Earth to Steve.
Romney and his toe tag libertarian buddy Ron Paul have outspent Santorum, Gingrich, etc. by between 4 and 12 times in each of the primaries so far. Without the negative, hurtful ads Romney probably would not have any delegates.
Earth to Steve. Earth to Steve.
Oh, well, I tried.
Romney and his toe tag libertarian buddy Ron Paul have outspent Santorum, Gingrich, etc. by between 4 and 12 times in each of the primaries so far.
Boo hoo! You poor babies!
This whiny, childish, petulant attitude on the part of Santorum supporters is really not impressing me. If the money disparity bothers you, have you considered giving Santorum some money?
I’ll leave Gingrich out of this since the only person giving him money is Sheldon Adelson.
“I don’t understand why his stumbles never seem to attract attention or cost him support.”
That’s what the comment was about Stevie. The MSM doesn’t need to cover what the Romney/Paul Media have already thoroughly carpet bombed.
..and you have failed.
Romney has repeatedly demonstrated his ability to organize, raise funds, and mount a campaign. He knows how to work the system. It is your right to not support him or not like him as a candidate. But, fer crissakes, drop the “out-raised and outspent” mantra. It’s tedious and boring. And you are beginning to sound like the whiny losers who sit around all day saying, “shut up and deal.”
This is politics (not beanbags). You and the others moaning about this should be complaining about your beloved Sphinctorum and Newter who could not get themselves on a primary ballot in Virginia and RWD’s (Rat-with-Dentures) consistent failure to enroll in all of the districts in a state to get the delegates he (might have) won in a primary.
Sphinctorum couldn’t run a general campaign to save his asss. His petulant, keening holier-than-thou sanctimony, the threats from the sycophantic MSM of him shutting off everyone’s internet porn and placing cameras in bedrooms (while simultaneously absconding with their rubbers) would be too much. It would be a marathon of walk-backs from his daily outbreaks of hoof-and-mouth disease.
And Newter, with his glorified book tour campaign and insistence on around-the-clock Lincoln Douglas debates, would bottom out quickly once EVERYONE discovered he is just all anti-MSM-gotcha-questions zaps and no substance. His act gets old really, really quickly.
I will freely admit my cause is purely ABO; I want that hideous POTUS out of the people’s house so badly I can taste it. That said, Romney has promised (and will continue to say) repeatedly that he will work to repeal ObabaCare. So, while you mention he has flip-flopped before, at least there is a better chance of him doing that than the dead-solid certainty that Obama will want to keep the one element of his pathetic presidential legacy in place.
Further, I am not willing to risk the distinct certainty that The Chicago Jesus will stack the SCOTUS with two — possibly three — raging liberals who will affect our lives for the better part of two-three decades.
And finally, are you willing to have another 4-5trillion added to our deficit? I do not think Romney and an (R) congress will come anywhere close to that.
No, mate, Sactorumizing Obama for four more years as POTUS unfettered by fear of re-election and with his massive, delusional ego driving his efforts to emblazon his legacy into the history of America is far too dire to contemplate.
You will not end up with your precious conservative Nirvana in 2016. You will have more than 50% of the slavering droolers demanding handouts and fully ready to saddle up “Plugs” Biden for a Demo Redux.
Toe-tag? Yep, toe-tag America and bag her up if Obama gets another four.
And you don’t seem to understand that Romney can’t buy the general election. He doesn’t have that kind of cash. He has never shown an ability to compete on anything close to equal terms in funding, and it will be impossible for him to raise the $1-2 BILLION he will need to ATTEMPT to demagogue Obama the same way. He’s pouring all his effort into a dead-end strategy that CAN’T work in the general election.
so, say the universe turned upside down and santorum managed to pull off the nomination – is that the argument he’ll use when obama wipes the floor with him? ’cause if he can’t handle romney, no way no how can he handle obama’s team.
You are echoing the blatant misrepresentation of what Santorum said.
“You win by giving people a choice. You win by giving people the opportunity to see a different vision for our country, not someone who’s just going to be a little different than the person in there. If you’re going to be a little different, we might as well stay with what we have instead of taking a risk with what may be the Etch A Sketch candidate of the future.” (courtesy of James Antle over at Amspec)
Since Romney has problems with plain language (flip-floppers find it difficult to pin down the real meaning of anything), what this means is pretty simple.
Given a choice between a Democrat and a “Democrat” the voters will chose a Democrat every time. (wonder where I have heard that one before?)
Santorum was stating what he truly believes the voters will do with a Romney nomination. They will vote for Obambi (the devil they know and is supported by the media that they are bathed in…).
Santorum is right. Romney is a liar for making the purposeful misrepresentation of what Santorum said.
Dirty politics… Flip-flops can’t be hidden, and the Democrat Propaganda Machine is going to eat Romney for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. And Romney won’t have conservatives, who won’t be too pleased to oblige him while covered with Romney manure, will leave his political bones to bleach in the sun.
Willard Milton Romney is a Limousine Liberal Democrat masquerading as a Republican; therefore I WILL NOT vote for him, EVER!
-TMF
If you’re going to be a little different, we might as well stay with what we have
That sure looks to me like he is endorsing Obama over Romney, so I don’t get your objection.
The two people who are “a little bit different” are Romney and Santorum. There is hardly a sliver of daylight between the two candidates positions.
1. Oh, a linguistic sophistication issue. He was offering his opinion of what the voter would be thinking.
2. There is a sliver of difference between Romney and Santorum.. When? Now? ok Romney is talking like Santorum now. This afternoon he’ll be talking like Obummer… tomorrow… Proust, A week from now he’ll sound like Hillary! NLN… Whatever it takes, right?
Romney is a phony. I am not buying an ounce of his hooey… He’s not a choice, he’s an echo.
This was posted on theblaze.com and I agree with it. •
Tigress1
Posted on March 23, 2012 at 9:41am
So Rick, you think that having someone in the White House who along with Hillary Clinton are going to BYPASS CONGRESS and give $1.5 BILLION to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt for military aid is better than Romney? Someone who has apologized for America how many times is better than Romney? Someone who is a pathological liar is better than Romney? Someone who has spent over $1 TRILLION on a “Stimulus” so that unemployment wouldn’t go above 8% and it has been above 8% the entire time he has been in office is better than Romney? Someone who has more czars than Russia is better than Romney? Someone who forced Obamacare down our throats claiming premiums would go down in price which we all know from our billing statements that that was a lie. Someone who wanted to sit down and talk with Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, Castro is better than Romney? Someone who’s entire energy policy was a total failure is better than Romney? Someone who wasted billions on Solyndra, etc. only to have them fail is better than Romney? Someone who has bashed the TEA Party and praises the Occupiers is better than Romney? Someone who has created more debt than all the Presidents COMBINED since the inception of the United States is better than Romney?
Rick, you just blew your entire campaign with that one. If you care one iota for this country and can stop thinking about yourself and your ego, then you should get out of the race now.
“If you care one iota for this country and can stop thinking about yourself and your ego, then you should get out of the race now”
well, there’s the rub. santorum really is insane, and can’t stop thinking about himself and his hatred of romney. he whines about how things “aren’t his fault” as much as obama.
I interpreted the statement to mean that once you have the nomination and are then actually running for President, it’s essentially a brand new campaign. Which it is. Why this is being made an issue is beyond me.
The media, both right and left, pounces every time Romney (or someone in his campaign) says something which can be twisted. The big news today however is Santorum’s insane statement that we may as well stay with Obama as elect Mr. Etcha-sketcha. So far Hannity and Levin have avoided this debacle but the good folks who comment at Hot Air have handed Santorum his a$$.
“..but the good folks who comment at Hot Air have handed Santorum his a$$.”
..justifiably.
I want to elect the most conservative candidate on the slate who will repeal ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank Financial Reform in their ENTIRETY and advocate for actual health and financial reform. I want to live in the Constitutional Republic of America NOT the Environmental Constitution of Global Governance oppression. Rick Santorum is the last candidate standing with those principles who provides a direct CONTRAST to Barack Hussein Obama.
As he did in the 2008 campaign, Romney is spending 15 to 21 million in every state to attack his party opposition almost exclusively. Romney and the progressives of the RNC were the ones who tinkered with the caucus/primary process for this election so he should not be complaining. The caucus/primary process is suppose to be a PLATFORM to discuss the issues Americans are concerned about and how the candidate would begin to correct the situations.
Barack Hussein Obama CANNOT run on his record and has been the one who has brought up the issues of PORN and POPULATION CONTROL to usurp our Constitution for global environment governance. Remember Holder wouldn’t enforce existing porn laws and called for new laws (SOPA or PIPA) to censor the INTERNET through the FCC as he did with other websites over copyright. Obama mandated a decree for contraception, sterilization, abortifacients and abortion coverage in ObamaCare affecting the oppression of freedom of conscience and the First Amendment to distract from economy, job destruction, energy suppression, and his surrender of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Romney is the only one who has consistently gone after 0b0z0!
Somebody told the truth and everybody goes crazy. Who did not know politicians say whatever to get elected and then do pretty much whatever they want.Recent case in point Obama. I pretty much vote on character and some backgroud info. Everything else is a crapshoot.
Stock price of Ohio Art, the manufacturer of Etch-A-Sketch jumped from $4 to over $10 a share in one day after this statement was made. Currently back around $6/share.
Hasbro shareholders (Mr Potato Head) are hoping he will grow a mustache and start wearing glasses soon.
I can tell conservatives from my perspective is that, I’m not only comfortable with Romney, I’m excited about the possibility of him possibly being our nominee.
Jim DeMint.
But I’m sure that DeMint is just another establishment RINO.
If Romney is elected, we can expect the Harvard and Goldman Sachs crowd to change desks. That’s about it. He’ll be cordial to Pelosi like Bush and McCain were.
I seem to have lost some of the name. This from theblaze.com
mphonic
Posted on March 23, 2012 at 12:33pm
Has this level of sore loserism, even mormon bigotry, ever been escalated to this level before in this history of the USA since they drove the Mormons out of Illinois and murdered their prophet? I think not. Some major passive aggressivism has been percolating here…
To think that this makes ANY SENSE AT ALL on a political level is nonsense. Rick has lost his MIND in the same sense that when people can’t help themselves and their hatred and bigotry take over. And this right on the heels of getting his “blessing” from that preacher who wants everyone who doesn’t pray like he does to “GET OUT!!” of America. I can’t help but think of the 1st Amendment when I hear preachers like that, and who quote the Founding Fathers so hypocritically, and fondly, like they respect them or something… and then tell non believers to GET OUT!! of America. WOW. Rick is entangled with all that.
Report Post »
Dear Reader,
Please take part in this short survey that was conducted for a research project by students of the University of Freiburg (Germany). It is completely anonymous and will only take you about 5 minutes. Thank you, we appreciate your help.
http://ww2.unipark.de/uc/FG_UniFreiburg_Wagschal_LS/b4c0/
Isn’t is great to know that if either Obama or Romney is elected, our country will continue to be run by geniuses from Harvard and Goldman Sachs?
Lame, Ceteris Paribus, Obama troll. I think you can do better.
Romney was never part of the radical left, like 0b0z0 was/is! He was not part of the 60′s free love and sex. He went to Harvard but he studied and when you see his grades it will be nothing like the radical’s in the white house now. Course 0b0z0 won’t release his – hmm let’s see, poor grades, affirmative action student, or maybe foreign student. Maybe someday one of those people at Harvard will grow some cahones and release the information “under the table.”
No, they won’t and it wouldn’t matter anyway. The fix is in. The birth certificate is a forgery and the media doesn’t even care about that.
…smetcha etch…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=d5pLrwINs1o
————
Flamers, flame on. Fact is, the entire R party (with the media) is the G HW Bush party, the World Socialist Party. Not the Reagan party. (They hated him too.) If you want something different, you better wake up soon. If not, I hope you find all this speculative infighting to be fulfilling. It will continue to be your venue of outlet as GHWB and SO many others see their wishes fulfilled.
—Evidence of what everyone but the 80% of normal people stand for—
———–one tip of the iceberg————
“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a
profound reorientation of all human society, unlike
anything the world has ever experienced – a major
shift in the priorities of both governments and
individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of
human and financial resources. This shift will
demand that a concern for the environmental
consequences of every human action be integrated
into individual and collective decision-making at
every level.“
– signed by G.H. Bush, 1992
I guess no one is reading any more, but I want to post this, cause I just posted it on hotair.
Perhaps you don’t think we should be offended by all the things you say about Romney?
There is no way he is anything like 0boz0, but there is no use arguing with you because you won’t listen to reason.
Has no one heard that he took $1.00 a year for all four years he was gov?
He took nothing for the 4 years he saved (yes saved, I was there) the Olympics.
He has spent years serving his Church and the poor (I guess about 15).
He pays a tithing to his Church.
He has spent 25 years as a Sunday School teacher.
Does any of this sound like 0b0z0?
He donated the money his father left him to charity.
There is not a hint of scandal in his business dealings. You might not like that people were fired, but isn’t that what we want him to do with the bulging government largess?
Come on, he has made himself and he knows how to help the economy.
Please, please vote for whomever, but when it’s all over we must unite against 0b0z0.
In his own words:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/romney-in-02-only-connection-to-the-republican-party-is-my-party-registration/
I hope the race continues a long time. We at least need to send a message to the establishment (besides I haven’t voted yet).