The Return of the Prodigal Son
I grew up in a Jewish anti-Jewish household dominated by my father who never once attended synagogue and refused to associate with any of the Jewish inhabitants of the town we lived in. My father hated Jews with a passion — although I should mention that he hated just about everybody with a passion. Jews, however, for reasons I could never fathom, received an extra share of his animadversion. Perhaps this was because, despite his overweening selfishness and high self-esteem, he also detested himself and simply acted out the venerable cliché, going through the motions of classic psychological projection. He was not a lovable man. But whatever the deep interior motive at work in his lava-spewing psyche, I was taught to regard my fellow Jews with unwavering suspicion. My father was not a leftist, so there was nothing “red diaperish” about my early education. I learned only that Jews of any stripe — left or right, observant or secular — were to be avoided.
But even without such indoctrination, I was ripe for apostasy. I naturally disliked Jewish cooking. The sound of Yiddish was like gristle in my ears. The complacent and self-important worshippers I mingled with during my occasional visits to the synagogue left me cold. With only a few exceptions, I could not tolerate my Jewish relatives. I lived in fear of my uncle Snetzi, who would suddenly rush into the house and fling himself under a bed, whimpering, “They’re after me, they’re after me.” My uncle Aby was a good-natured philanderer who never had a serious thought in his life. Eventually he suffered an aneurism and spent his days shambling aimlessly about the streets, grinning inanely. My auntie Rosie, during her occasional descents upon our hospitality, would install herself in the bathroom and spend long, devoted hours rinsing out her lingerie, over and over again, like a working-class Lady Macbeth fascinated by invisible spots. My auntie Ida was partial to oily slabs of carp wrapped in greasy newspapers, which she would serve up at indigestible dinners. What had I to do with these people, I used to wonder. I was a Jew and yet I wasn’t.
The circumcision rite had to be performed on the sly, thanks to the fortunate collusion between my mother and the mohel conspiring behind my father’s back. I was given Hebrew lessons as a child during one of those rare periods when my father accommodated my mother’s wishes. Regrettably, this interval lasted only a short while — though long enough for me to pick up the rudiments. But I never had a Bar Mitzvah. Instead of attending Hebrew School to simulate what passed for correct pronunciation and learn my prayers (for the most part, phonetically), a chore my mother insisted upon despite my father’s glowering disapproval — this was the only other concession he ever made to her — I would stop off to play hockey with my schoolmates on my way to the synagogue. After several months of such enjoyable truancy, the rabbi belatedly telephoned my mother to inquire as to my whereabouts, but by then it was far too late to catch up. My mother was mortified and my father was euphoric. I continued to play hockey and though I’d devolved into a bad Jew, I evolved into a pretty good goaltender.
Later on during my university days and for many years thereafter, I grew somewhat more sophisticated in my anti-Jewishness, adopting the political positions favored by the anti-Zionists. I was perfectly aware that for many of the people I knew, anti-Zionism was merely an expedient substitution for antisemitism, but I persisted nevertheless. My father had died but I carried on the family tradition, or at least his side of it.
I was in sync with Hannah Arendt’s supercilious disdain of the Ostjuden (Eastern European Jews) whom she regarded as lower-class banausics. Had the BDS scandal, or the Apartheid Week orgies, or the “peace” NGOs existed then, I would probably have participated in their malignant festivities. I was so fervently pro-Palestinian that my mother disinherited me. I would not have thought to question the pseudo-history of an indigenous Palestinian people who formed a long-established nation, a microbial fable and, in the words of Middle East scholar David Meir-Levi, a “pernicious tradition to which more and more of our mainstream media and academia fall prey.” And I would have approved Benny Morris’ revisionist libel of Zionism in Righteous Victims as a “colonizing and expansionist ideology,” rather than affirmed it for what it really was and is, a legitimate, historical movement to reclaim, re-establish, and perpetuate the allodial legacy of the Jewish people in the land of their fathers, as I do now. I might even have worn a keffiyeh rather than a kippa. It would have been “the thing to do” and would have confirmed me in my recidivism, aside from allowing me to remain in good standing with the antisemitic aristocracy of the like-minded. I was certainly no paragon of sechel, the partly untranslatable Yiddish word — Saul Bellow’s favorite — usually rendered as “smarts.”
The shock to my system and to my congenial beliefs came with 9/11, which represented my personal crossing of the Red Sea from the captivity of unreflected notions and crude prejudice to the freedom of real, independent thinking and impartial research. I was at that historic moment trapped on a small Greek island with no way of leaving since all maritime transportation had been suspended. I gradually understood this situation as an allegory of my own prior state of mind, snared in an insular delusion without the intellectual means of deliverance or extrication.
For the next several weeks, stunned by the images I had seen on the television screen in the village café, I submitted myself to a relentless analysis of the values and convictions I had accepted as gospel. How solidly grounded in authentic knowledge were the political convictions I habitually expressed? What were the sources of my attitudes, ideas, and judgments? Why was I almost instinctively anti-Israeli in my sentiments? Why did I wish to reject my kinship with Jewish thought, Jewish communion, Jewish antiquity? Why did I march in my thoughts with the Palestinians, the anti-globalists, the welfare socialists, the Peace Now movement? Was I somehow complicit with the demonic forces that wished to bring down America and destroy Israel, that worked against my own survival and the survival of those I loved? Did I really want to become like my father? Could I be so easily brainwashed? What the hell was wrong with me?
They were not Jews who brought down the Twin Towers, but the very people I and my cohort had empathized with. These were the people responsible for the Munich massacre, for myriad airplane hijackings, for suicide bombings, for random acts of terrorism, for the slaughter of innocents, which we had risibly explained away as legitimate acts of “resistance” against the “Zionist entity” and the American hegemon, as expressions of the quest for freedom and justice. In the wake of the 9/11 cataclysm, such frivolous justifications would no longer hold up to scrutiny. New York had been the current target. The next might be Montreal where I lived, or London, or Paris, or Tel Aviv.
I came to the conclusion that I had felt and acted out of mere rote behavior and fortuitous conjecture, out of an unexamined desire to think in accordance with the inferences and presuppositions of my friends and colleagues, my intellectual contemporaries, who were all either members of the international Left or, at any rate, exhibited leftist inclinations. We had embraced the multicultural pieties of the era, were duly anti-colonialist, anti-corporatist, anti-American, and obviously anti-Zionist.
Many of these social paladins and millennial protagonists bivouac’d comfortably in university departments, upscale condos, and tony suburban neighborhoods. Their Molotov cocktails were the proverbial lattes over which they would discuss their resonating ideals, plan politically biased academic courses, deplore Islamophobia (even before the factoid), raise consciousness of the plight of the Palestinians and the machinations of the Israelis, and in effect conspire against the very democratic institutions and cultural norms that provided them with the sinecures they blithely took for granted. To my everlasting shame, though I did not go to the same lengths, I hobnobbed with professors in the English Department who would teach their courses from the standpoint of an irreal utopianism, believing in the freedom and autonomy of the aesthetic as a prototype of human possibility in a harmonious and compassionate world. This meant a collectivist future without America and certainly without Israel. They had no difficulty surrendering their intellects to such puerile and noxious fantasies. And they had no idea that they were eventually in for a very bumpy ride that would send their double-doubles all over the upholstery.






“According to Jewish tradition, since I never solemnized a Bar Mitzvah, I am not yet a man.”
This sentence is one of my biggest pet peeves. A bar mitzvah happens automatically, the moment you become thirteen years old – no ceremony necessary. Just as you’d still become eligible to vote at age 18 even if you never throw a birthday party, you became a man at 13, whether you noticed it at the time or not.
You are indeed already Bar Mitzva. Part of the ceremony of being called to the Torah for the first time is the presence of your father, who after your completion of the blessings, then publicly declares that he is no longer responsible for your sins and other doings. This ceremony, like most, is ignored except by the sensitive souls who consider events more carefully. Your semi-independence from your father’s explicit and implicit demands have given you the latitude to return to what he could not appreciate. To you and your family, a sweet New Year.
Yup. The biggest anti-Semites I have ever known are mostly fellow Jews. Those who are truly Jewish in that they embrace the Torah and Jewish teaching are reviled by those who embrace Marx and Engels. They are the ME Jews. And they use the anti-Semite accusation like Al Sharpton likes to use the race card. Funny thing is, it is the LEFT WING Jews who are the true anti-Semites because the right in America, for the most part, has more in common with the religious Jews and it is the left wing politics of the secular Jews most are opposed to. Not their JEWISHNESS. But their HATRED of it. The secular members are not Jewish ENOUGH. They are the true anti-Semites.
The bar mitzvah is easy- call any Shul and tell them you want to be called to torah, they will be happy to help you.
True story, once aa minyan I attended was short , I went next store to a stamp show and saw a man with a Jewish face, when asked if he was Jewish he said. Yes.
His name was Boris. We gave him an Aliyah. He had never before been called to Torah before. That was his bar mitzvah, oh and it was the Shabbat between rosh hashannah and yom kippur, Shabbas tshuvah, boris returned a little bit that day.
I wish there were 500 more like you.
In a word: WOW. The likes of me can say nothing to improve on this essay.
But I do have a question: In passing, Mr. Solway, you call Martin Buber “a sodden philosopher” with “mulch for a mind.” Strong language! Not that I carry any brief for any philosopher, but I would really like to know why you make such a harsh judgment of him, especially considering his near-iconic status in some intellectual circles. Please, could you share your thinking on this?
Dear newbie
Check out Yoram Hazony’s magisterial The Jewish State: The Struggle for Israel’s Soul. You’ll find all you need to know about Buber therein.
David
Thank you! I loved Hazony’s Purim analysis “The Dawn”; I will seek this one out.
Antisemitism is in the air we breathe, not only in your father’s distancing himself from other Jews. I tried to make a compendium of Jew-hatred’s other sources here: http://clarespark.com/2010/11/14/the-abcs-of-antisemitism/. But with reference to the(New Critical?)theory you learned in graduate school, you referred to it with some negativity, and I attempted to track it down here: http://clarespark.com/2009/11/22/on-literariness-and-the-ethical-state/
Ironically, in trying so hard to annul what is stereotypically Jewish – those intellectuals on the left only appear all the more ‘typically Jewish’.
Mr Solway, Your writing is beautiful. Additionally, your analysis of “the region” and its history(geographic Israel),indubitablty accurate. As an avowed, non-Jewish Zionist, it is heartening to see an awakening of pro-Isael support among north American Jews. Consensus regarding “right” to ownership of Jerusalem(and surrounding territory) is not realistic. What does seem overtly apparent is that since its inception, the sate of Israel has fought and won repeated defensive wars(never ending in reality). In a material world, victors ALWAYS dictate peace terms. As most Israelis viscerally appreciate, their “right” to exist is wholly dependent on a capacity to defend. Should Israel loose a WAR, the terms of that peace would likely include NO Israel. It seems incumbent upon ALL Jews to support political movements that at least advocate for material(military) maintenence of Israel. In short, abandon the current Democrat party(American) and(in the name of self preservation)recognize that Obama(and ilk)are an irredeemable ENEMY of Israel!
The only reason Islam has any claim to Jerusalem is because at one point a Muslim empire (Damascus-based Umayyads if I remember right) conquered the city, tore down the Jewish Temple there, and then built the Dome of the Rock to try and give the city significance to Muslims for their own political purposes. Heck, they even built a second structure on the Mount and tried to claim it was the one mentioned as “the furthest mosque” in the Qur’an (or Koran, whichever spelling you prefer) even though that particular line existed before the temple did.
———-
Also you have these:
“Moreover, the Qur’an expressly recognizes that Jerusalem plays the same role for Jews that Mecca has for Muslims. We read: “They would not follow thy direction of prayer (qibla), nor art thou to follow their direction of prayer; nor indeed will they follow each other’s direction of prayer….” (Qur’an, Sura 2:145, “The Cow”) All Qur’anic commentators explain that “thy qibla” is obviously the Kaba of Mecca, while “their qibla” refers to the Temple Mount Area in Jerusalem. Some Muslim exegetes also quote the Book of Daniel as proof of this (Daniel 6:10).
Thus, as no one wishes to deny Muslims complete sovereignty over Mecca, from an Islamic point of view there is no sound theological reason to deny the Jews the same right over Jerusalem.” Shaykh Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi
———-
Ibn Taymiyya discussed the first caliphs and showed that when they ruled over today’s Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Israel, neither they nor any of the early governors nor any clerics made any attempt to build any structure over the Rock on the Temple Mount. This demonstrated, according to Ibn Taymiyya, that they did not attach any importance to it; as the early rulers and companions of Muhammad knew his views and his religion better than later generations of Muslims, no later scholar could disagree with them nor with the traditions they observed. They clearly did not attach any Islamic significance to today’s Aqsa Mosque nor to the Temple Mount in general. How then, Ibn Taymiyya reasoned, could we who never knew them nor Muhammad have the right to disagree? There is no way we could know more about Islam than they. We therefore have no right to sanctity al-Aqsa because they did not do so.
Ibn Taymiyya (1263–1328) was the same Muslim cleric that wrote that Islam had only two holy cities – Mecca and Medina.
———-
The only claims are completely politically based and just another way for Arabic Islam to stab and denigrate the Jewish religion and their claims to the region even though historical fact (even if you ignore all religious attachments) shows the Jews have had claim to the city for 3000+ yrs.
Quite true the Mohammedan ARAB Invaders (AKA Palestinians) are only in the Holy Land by Right of CONQUEST. A RIGHT they illogically, immorally and without any justification seek to deny to JEWS. BTW a NON EXISTENT Country such as Palestine cannot be OCCUPIED and you cant be a Refugee from it either.
Look closely at the Dome of the Rock. The Romans tore down the Temple in 70AD. The Byzantines built a Christian church on the site (probably just after the time that Constantine’s mother was touring the area looking for places where Jesus walked). The Islamic conquerors took over the church (the only other “mosque” in Islam that looks anything like Dome of the Rock is what *used* to be Hagia Sophia — that should be telling, right there) plastered over the Christian artwork, and installed anti-Christian, anti-Trinitarian “writings” all over the place. Now they’ve been “cleaning up” and illegally (by the laws of the country) carting out dump truck loads of artifacts and throwing them out. Archaeologists aren’t allowed to so much as poke a nose in the Dome of the Rock, so who knows what damage to history they’re doing.
Dome of the Rock is Christian Church built to commemorate the destroyed Temple. It’s been stolen.
So has Hagia Sophia.
You wrap your thoughts in exquisitely-wrought writing. Thank you for this enlightening article. I agree with you 100%.
Jews who agitate, directly or indirectly, against Israel (which, by any measure, is the most moral nation in the world, given its circumstances) are blowing on a house of cards.
Most in the galut of such mind are, as you stated, living lives of ease far removed from life and death issues, or even discomfort.
As for the Israeli left, it is at least partially rooted in racism against its own (see what passed for Haaretz ‘thought’ and ‘analysis’ when Menachem Begin was elected). Largely Ashkenazic, wealthier than average, and many with foreign passports, they will, if worse came to worse, flee Israel, leaving their poorer, less connected brothers to the fate the left’s misbegotten policies will have brought upon them.
Anyhow, I am glad you have returned. You were truly lost before.
On a lighter note, I consider myself to have a decent vocabulary, but learned many new words reading your essay!
To quote Winston Churchill, you have to be either on the side of the fire department, or the fire.
To paraphrase the Talmud, if you begin by being righteous to the wicked, you will in the end be wicked to the righteous.
Truly an excellent post! Thank you!
Winston Churchill also said:-
“How dreadful are the curses which Islam lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.
A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property‹either as a child, a wife, or a concubine must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.
No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.
Far from being moribund, Islam is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science -the science against which it had vainly struggled -the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”
And this too
Winston Churchill,said : “Any man who is under 30, and is not a liberal, has no heart; and any man who is over 30, and is not a conservative, has no brains.”
So thats why moonbats are so stupid no brains.
Winston Churchill said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last.”
Wake up Obambi and America and just look what you are doing with Islam.
Winstons insight was just amazing and its all still as true today as it was when he wrote it in the 18th Century.
~~ Sir Winston Churchill~~
Yes, David, beautifully written.
Your sackcloth and ashes, over-indulged introspection notwithstanding, you have much more to repent —
Where was your post 9/11 conscience when the Natanya pizzaria was blown away?
Where was it when each school bus and dayschool was blasted?
But I don’t want to hear it.
I want to read your “good works” that should result from penitence.
But like Freud, you’re navel gazing.
Get to work.
Wow… no words…
I was born and raised Catholic and recognized immediately your journey into an ideological abyss returning to a higher Truth revealed to us by God. Today I am a Catholic by choice and share with you an affection for what is True and Good. To paraphrase one of our saints, understanding is the reward of faith. Many blessings and welcome home.
“They were not Jews who brought down the Twin Towers, but the very people I and my cohort had empathized with. These were the people responsible for the Munich massacre, for myriad airplane hijackings, for suicide bombings, for random acts of terrorism, for the slaughter of innocents, which we had risibly explained away as legitimate acts of “resistance” against the “Zionist entity” and the American hegemon, as expressions of the quest for freedom and justice. In the wake of the 9/11 cataclysm, such frivolous justifications would no longer hold up to scrutiny. New York had been the current target. The next might be Montreal where I lived, or London, or Paris, or Tel Aviv.?
Are you telling me that it took 9/11 to convince you that these people were animals, and that everything before that could be seen as “Legitimate acts of “resistance” against the “Zionist entity” and the American hegemon, as expressions of the quest for freedom and justice?” Wow, you really are messed up. So all the acts of murder, all of the dead athleats at Munich, all of the many suicide bombers that took countless lives, the attcks on the US embassies in Africa, and the attack on the USS Cole could all be justified because some radical Islamists were making a political point?
Look buddy, I don’t know who you are or where you’re from, but if you really, honestly, believed that prior to 9/11, then you were just as bad as the killers themselves. If you defended any of this scum because they were “poor, oppressed, people only seeking freedom,” then you and your friends were just as warped and misguided as the killers. And by not standing up against these people, whether on a campus, in a meeting, or to your friends, implied that you agreed with the killers as well. So don’t try and sell me on the idea that because you found you’re “Jewishness” you now “see the light” and are anti radical Islam. That’s like saying that you were a Nazi prior to World War II but after Germany lost the war you were magically convinced that you were wrong and are now convinced Nazism was wrong. A bit late to the party there, pal. Seems like everybody was anti-Nazi AFTER the war. But where were their voices when it really counted, when all of that horror could have been prevented? Oddly quiet, right?
Killers are killers and no amount of political correctness, or even anti-semitism, in your early days could justify murder, which is what all of these terrorists were guilty of. People were killed either because they were Jews or just happened to be associated with America.
I say this because there are too many people like you out there, especially in Europe. They are horrible anti-semites, especially in Scandinavia, and they try to hide their prejudice with “political correctness” or that other horrific term, “multiculturalism.” But once Israel is wiped off the map by an Iranian nuclear weapon, those same people will be oh so sorry that it happened, and they will say sadly “Oh how could this have been prevented and just look at all those innocent people who were killed.”
Save it. Save your conversion. Save your “Road to Damascus” moment. You are pro-Israel now? Swell. The problem is that there are too many people out there like you, in Europe, in Asia, and let’s not even talk about the Middle East. And it never seems to help a victim of racism or anti-semitism that you feel bad about something once tragedy strikes, like 9/11. It only counts if you help PREVENT the tragedy from occurring. And THAT is the sad part of human nature. So few people seem to have this conversion BEFORE tragedy strikes, and that’s why I don’t have much hope for the Middle East.
Libertyship46: Yours was my initial instinctive response to the piece as well.
I am heartened, however, that if someone so hardcore anti-Jewish and anti-Zionist could turn around (and there are many of them, Jew and non-Jew alike), maybe others are turning as well.
I say, take them back, and encourage them. Better late than never.
Look for future, preventive deeds of the type you ask from him and other returnees.
What if the early Christians told Saul to “Save your road to Damascus moment!”
Leave him alone. G-d loves a truly repentant sinner. If only there was a way to reach the rest like him.
Liberty’s got a point – converts can be annoying, especially when they start wooing former allies to follow them with pitches like “I didn’t leave the Democratic Party, the Democratic Party left me!” Yeah, even Reagan.
Norman Podhoretz and Irving Kristol were voting Dem when a vote for Dems was a vote for Jim Crow, and they were backing labor before the AFL allowed blacks in its ranks.
9-11 wasn’t a bad time to convert, though. David Horowitz’s conversion was timed much worse. He introduced a friend, an accountant, to the Black Panthers to keep their books. They killed her. It took the murder of his own friend to turn him against murderous associates. I’m glad Horowitz found the right side, but would he still have been schmoozing with lefty criminals if the accountant who washed up on the beach had been unknown to him?
Other converts include Whittaker Chambers, Michael Medved, Tammy Bruce, Dennis Prager, and I guess Rick Perry. A pretty good trade for David Brock, huh?
Think of all the “anti-Zionists” who didn’t covert on 9-11, though. Saving our spleen for them might be wiser.
My goodness, Libertyship46, have you no compassion? Have you always been right about everything? Have you always been the very first to spot every evil in the world? Are you so arrogant that you can’t accept that some people don’t “wake up and smell the coffee” until later than others?
It is reasonable to set bars but I think you’re setting them so high that no one but you can reach them. That’s just counterproductive. David is on the right path now and even if it comes later than we might wish, he’s on “our” side now. We should be glad for that and not dismiss him for “coming to the party” earlier.
His story of how he saw the light is clearly inspirational, as we can see in the other comments. Inspirational stories often attract converts so, with a bit of luck, his story can help other people “see the light” too.
Multiculturalism is PC for the delegitimation of Euro Christian States. Now they have turned their frowns upon Israel and are delegitimizing the Jewish State.
The thing we tend to forget, LibertyShip, is that for people like the author, his original way of thinking was shaped at an early age by his father- in a way, it’s like growing up with a political philosophy as a religion (no pun or irony intended, actually). Others are indoctrinated due to a weak will, or not having access to outside information. By the time the information is available, it’s easy to dismiss it as false or mistaken or crafted disinformation by ‘the other side’.
There are still Americans who think that 9/11 was an inside job in order to wage war for middle eastern oil, that the Palestinian people are innocent victims and the forces of Hammas are analogous to hard-pressed over-whelmed and desperate revolutionary forces, that jihadists are simply trying to preserve their way of life against imperial/corporatist westerners (and they have no sense of irony that Obama is truly a classical corporatist- he’s not a socialist, he’s ok with people owning production, he just wants to tell them what to make and how much of it, which also means he’s closer to being a fascist than we’ve ever had for a president, anywho…) At least he opened his mind- he could have dived back in, and surrounded himself with comforting thoughts of cultural relevance, and “chickens coming home to roost” (to quote a famous pastor that our President loves, but apparently slept through his sermons)
So- did it take something catastrophic? Yes. It’s unfortunate that it did so, but at least he’s looking around, and not reflexively looking to his hard-left progressive friends for moral and intellectual support. It takes a lot to cast off the chains of belief a life time of indoctrination and insulation from free thought wrap around a mind. Don’t go all soft and ‘poor you’ on him by any means, but don’t scour him either- he’s doing that well enough himself.
Wow, Ls46.
If a man repents his ways, be they however evil, will not Christ redeem him? Is any sin too great? Is not man sinful (evil) by nature? Really, if a man comes to you truly repentant, do you slap his face? Or do you embrace him? Do you not rejoice when the prodigal son who was lost returns to the fold? Is not each man’s sin his own and not others’? Will you blame him for all the others who are like how he was, but is like no more?
You are angry… angry at all those who work their evil to undermine all we have, but we are taught to hate the sin and love the sinner. If we simply hate the sinners, there can never be redemption. If you harden your heart so, and reject even those who repent, wherefore should they then repent? Why should they then not double-down in their evil and harry you further?
Men who honestly seek redemption are always worthy of redemption. It must be, or there is no hope for any of us. Learn to forgive, that you too might be forgiven. We are none of us perfect.
Well said Marc. I understand LS46′s frustration with and hatred for those who tolerate and indeed support evil, and I find it discouraging that someone as bright as David could be the leftist he describes. At the same time I think it must have taken a lot of courage for David to write this description of his upbringing and his delayed epiphany. (And I, an educated man, learned a few new words as I always do when I read Mr. Solway’s compositions.)
Libertyship46 – Usually, you and I are on the same wave length, but I am totally flummoxed by your outburst here. David Solway has charathah (regret) for what he was before 9/11 (and sometime it takes an event like that for the scales to fall of the eyes of the willfully blind) and in some sense, he has done t’shuvah (repented) for all of that. Cut the man some slack on this. Remember, his upbringing was not exactly conducive to seeing things as a Jew might. He was, to use someone else’s term, a JINO. He sees things now much more clearly, and I for one am glad for him and for that. Besides, now we all have the pleasure of reading him on PJM.
“Hear, O Isreal: The Lord our God is one Lord” (Deuteronomy 6:4)
In Christian words, read John 8:7, brothers and sisters.
The man has repented, and grown up. Lay off. Direct your anger towards the ilk-rock he crawled out from under.
Liberty: you’re on target. No quarter for Lefty-come-lately flibbertigibbets like Solway and Simon as regards their destructive stances in their adolescence.
But admiration for their mature adult works. Only let’s see more of them.
All of Europe sucks – but I’ve been REAL surprised at the anti-semitism in Great Britain. I shouldn’t be – they are the only country who expelled their Jewish population – but I am.
I go to Jewish sites when I really want to vent my spline because their are LOUSY with anti-semites who are either muslim or English and I just ravage them.
From the Brits and other Europeans I really get the sense that they just want Israel to go away. That if only that state and all the Jews were gone everything would be right with world. I really think they would be surprised that the arabs would turn right around and go after them. Damnedable fools, all of them!
David – I’ll second Eli @11 and the last sentence of Maine’s Michael @8. I hope that on Sep’t 29 (1st day of Tishrei) you will be hearing the sounds of the shofar for the required 100 sounds. May you have a G’mar Ketivah v’Chatimah Tovah and a L’shannah Tovah u’Metukah (translation – may it be written and sealed well for you in the upcoming year, and may you [and yours] have a good year and a sweet year.)
Dear Mr Solway,
Boker Tov.
I find it useful to tell myself that, since each person must be ethnically something or other, being born a Jew is at least an extraordinarily interesting, even if dangerous, karma. Living in North America, where there are several million of us, we tend to forget how downright exotic we are. At least that’s what my Tonga (of whom there are more than of us) lover once informed me of!
It is also useful to be aware that you are one of the group that is, and will always be, the absolute most hated in the world. Mazel tov. I figure that, for as long as we can defend ourselves, then hating me devastates the hater far more than it does me.
9/11 woke millons up to the fact that there are billions of people willing to kill them for insane visions, or just to steal their stuff.
The command to love your enemies does not mean do things that will help them kill you. It means stay your hand if he comes to you in peace, begging for your help. It means seek to turn him from his wicked ways. It means pray for your persecutors.
You have, of course, written a tefilah (prayer), Mr. Solway. And the only missing words are the salutation and the valediction: Dear Most Merciful Father and Amen.
The Jewish devotion to Leftist causes and the Leftist Party always puzzled me. How can Jews embrace big government, when big government in Russia and Germany exterminated so many? And Jews have been pursued, chased, pogromed, and killed throughout the milleniums. Is the leftist embace a quest to become like everyone else? Like melting into the woodwork so you don’t get noticed? You have beared an exhorbitant price to be “God’s Chosen People”.
Then, I believe that God extended the franchise when he sent his Son to rescue the rest and extend salvation. Notice, now that evil is also pursuing the Christians. They are being murdered in Africa by the droves, usually by the “Religion of Peace”. And, “progressive” policies are continuing to push God out of the town square and out of everything. Reduce and marginalize is their quest to build the new Tower of Babel, based on government; not God. So when the Evil Doers are finished with Jews, the Christians will step to the front of the line.
Everyday I pray that God will protect the U.S. and Israel.
PattyMor – You ask the following question: “The Jewish devotion to Leftist causes and the Leftist Party always puzzled me.” You appear to be a Christian and I am Jew, and you know what, it puzzles me too.
The Jews have suffered from both left and right.
In the USA, until recently, it was the left that promised protection for minorities from discrimination.
Of course, as always, there are carve outs for Jews, and they no longer enjoy the protection of the left, which has now not only abandoned them utterly, but begun to vilify them and collude with genocidal enemies of the Jews.
New Christian friends on the Right have now adopter Jews and Israel, but the Jewish ethos is slow to catch up with reality.
Furthermore, one Ron Paul, or one Pat Buchanan or James Baker, sets back Jewish/Right rapprochement to a significant degree.
The Jewish devotion to Leftist causes and the Leftist Party always puzzled me. How can Jews embrace big government, when big government in Russia and Germany exterminated so many?
I make no claims to expertise on this subject. I am not Jewish nor do I know a great deal about Judaism and Jewish history. However, I recall reading a history of the Soviet Union that acknowledged that many Jews supported the leftist parties in the years leading up to Lenin’s coup in 1917 and that Jews had a disproportionate presence in those leftist parties, including in the leading roles. This book’s explanation of this reality is that Jews largely supported leftist parties because they felt those parties to be more in line with the social justice advocated in the Jewish sacred texts like the Torah. I don’t believe the authors went into sufficient detail to cite specific remarks in the Torah that supported this theory but I could be wrong; it’s quite a while since I read this book. I don’t recall the name of the book either, otherwise I would cite it here. Someone more knowledgeable in Jewish history might be able to offer supporting – or refuting – evidence for this notion.
I think the other key factor is that the Rightist parties were typically the ones advocating – and conducting – pogroms. Or maybe it would be more accurate to say that the parties advocating pogroms were associated with the Right?
The Russian case is similar, in spirit, to the American as regards the Jews’ predilections for the left.
The Jews were targeted for hundreds of years by the Russian nobility, both directly and legislatively as well as through their agents, the cossacks, who ran pogroms whenever they were encouraged to do so by the Czarist authorities or the spirit moved them.
The Jews of Russia saw salvation in the ethos of communism, which at least on paper promised legislated equality (protection) under the law. As regards participation, I think that simply relates to the fact that Jews tend to succeed and participate in whatever environment they find themselves in, if not locked out.
The similarity with the predilections of American Jews for the left also has a strong component of self preservation as the left was viewed as protectors of minorities, at a time when the Republicans were downright discriminatory and exclusionary (albeit not violent) vis a vis Jews and other minorities.
This of course has now changed, but Jewish attitudes have not yet.
It is natural human behavior to prefer one’s own relations over strangers. Immediate family, extended family, tribe, nation (a group of related individuals sharing language, religion, culture, history). Thus, the best a group like Jews ought to expect from any nation they share geography with will be the non-violent toleration they found in WASP America. Although everywhere they settle, Jews seem to act accordingly, they also begin to subtly attack the host nation. Don’t understand why, as a tiny percentage of the population is unlikely to dominate the majority for long, or safely. In the US, the ACLU is the prototypical Jewish attack-machine. It generates ill-will among Christians almost daily. The Soviet spy-rings exposed in the early 50s were heavily staffed by Jews, as was the CPUSA. The ultimate results of this type of activity are well-known through history. The reason so many Jews disappeared from Central Europe during WW II (Latvia having the highest percentage of Jews killed) is that so many Jews accompanied the occupation forces of the Red Army as political commissars. Some wonder if the Communists planned this; I don’t know. But when the Wehrmacht liberated (as it first seemed) these nations, they fell on those Jews with fury unmatched in Germany.
The Soviet spy-rings exposed in the early 50s were heavily staffed by Jews, as was the CPUSA.
I think it may be appropriate to add a small but significant qualifier here. While there was a strong presence of people who were ethnically Jewish, if I can put it that way (meaning people whose ancestors were Jewish and whose names were Jewish), isn’t it also the case that most of those people were not practicing Jews? For instance, did Julius and Ethel Rosenberg actually observe the precepts of Judaism like attending synagogue, having Bar Mitzvahs for their sons, and so forth? (I’m really not sure what a Jew needs to do to be considered observant.)
If I’m right about this, then many of these “Jewish” members of the CPUSA, spy rings, and even the ACLU weren’t/aren’t really Jewish are they?
I realize that doesn’t make any difference to anti-Semitic people; I don’t expect that most of those will make that sort of distinction. It seems important to me, though.
Is anyone aware of any observant Jews who spied on the USA, were members of the CPUSA, or even the Soviet Communist Party?
It’s because they’re the Chosen People. The fact that they were charged with the responsibility of receiving the Word of God and transmitting it multiplies the effects of their works, good and bad. When they do good, they do better than anyone else, and when they do evil, they do worse than anyone else. To whom much has been given, much is required.
I can’t quite understand why it seems to be only Jews, when they forsake their religion for a political faith or non-belief, are still considered Jews. This doesn’t seem to be so with ex-Christians, Buddhists, etc. Are they still considred members of those groups?
Russia by law forbade Jews to live in Russia. When Russia, with the Austrian Empire and Prussia conquered Poland in the 18th century, they conquered the country with the greatest number of Jews in the world. Catherine the Great did nothing about the Jews in the conquered area, but Tsar Alexander III enacted the May Laws against Jews in this area – the Pale of Settlement” -, instituted pogroms, etc. The period from his accession in 1881, became the time when so many Jews began to flee Russia. No wonder many Jews in Russia were revolutionaries against the Tsar!
(The Soviet Union and now Russia have reverted to the historic antisemitism, attacking Israel.)
Your statement that the GOP was discriminatory of minorities is a down right lie perpetrated by the Democrats. It was the Democrats that was the party of slavery, no nothings, butternuts and the KKK. It was the GOP who was the party of abolition. The Demcrat Party, after what was to them the political disaster of the Civil War quite cynically started rabble rousing in the immigrant community, just like it does now with the Hispanic community. They built political Machine in urban areas that survive ot this day. These machines cynically use minorities for their own end, and Democrat Jewish businessmen, politicians and “intellectuals” are far from innocent in the exploitation of these groups (it is absurd to imagine btw that the Jewish community as a whole do not have their own fair share of racists in their ranks) The Democrats introduction of Middle European, Bismarkian, socialism was a disaster, just as the attempt now to introduce Latin American style “Third Way” Marxism will be a disaster. The GOP objected to this assault on our values, not race. Just as now, the Democrats slandered with the cry of racism all who stood before their criminality.
You really need to relearn American history–you seem to be overly influenced by Democrat propagandists. They have no love of minorities at all.
The real problem with the Jew and the Left is that they have substituted the secular religion of Marxism for Judaism, and some of this has to do with self loathing, expressed as narcissism, due to the problematic historical position of Jews in Western Civilization. It has absolutely nothing to do with “discrimination” by the GOP.
Typical Leftist cant and nonsense: all problems are the fault of Americana who actually built the country. No, the Jews embrace of Leftism is a profound moral and spiritual error, and they alone are responsible for their error.
You are going way too far back, and too far south to be relevant to this discussion.
If you ask Jews of late 19th and 20th century vintage why they were and are overwhelmingly Democratic, the answer would be that the Democrats promised them c\greater integration into society, whereas wasp establishment society, represented, rightly or wrongly in their minds by the Republicans, was closed to them.
Exclusions form country clubs, law firms, hospitals and universities – rightly or wrongly, those were perceived as WASP/Republican practices. Why do you think every major city has a Jewish hospital? Why forces contributed to the establishment of Brandeis and Yeshiva Universities?
Where they cynically manipulated by the Democratic party? Possibly. Probably. No matter, that’s what happened.
Going back to KKK days is going back way too far, and too far south. The Jews who cam to the USA were ignorant of the racist roots/currents of the southern Democrats. Again, they looked at things in terms of their own experience in the USA in the late 19th and earlier 20th century, and the WASPS were not felt to be their friends. You can argue that no one was, and you would be correct, but they felt they would have greater opportunity for integration under the Democrats, and guess what, in those days, they did.
Go to a Reformed congregation and it is little more than a secular political club and too often simply an Obama fan club. The left broke with its historical antisemitism after WWII, but since the late 1960s has returned.
There are lots of explanations for the 60% hanging on to Obama and his nouveau-WASP (but anti-freedom) elite. We also know that history is full of cases in which many Jews assimilated into oblivion. Why should now be any different? The human weakness and societal decay at the heart of the political left have have destroyed many a culture throughout history.
Also, add Calvin Coolidge to history lessons! He was one of the most friendly presidents to Jews, Blacks and other minorities.
In pre-revolutionary Russia “the Right” meant something quite different from American conservatism circa year 2000. It meant autocracy, the abolition of liberalizing reforms (such as the institution of parliament), and some very unpleasant policies where the Jews were concerned — famously expressed by Konstantin Pobedonostsev: “one third [of the Jews] will emigrate, one third will perish, the rest will assimilate.” The Right not only stoked pogroms but made wide and extensive use of antisemitic propaganda, unmatched in its scope and intensity before Hitler and later the Arab world.
The current American mainstream right, in the context of pre-revolutionary Russia, would just be called liberalism.
The left (or lefts, because there were many factions with important differences, and which ranged the gamut from ethnic nationalism to internationalism) was quite different from today’s Obama-type New Left. One must be careful before drawing parallels with today’s politics.
Actually, for about a thousand years before the 20th century things were usually the other way around: the “big government, usually the king or another local ruler, protected the Jews against raging mobs of peasants (who were motivated by religious bigotry and the hope to loot). This is one of the typical explanations for why the Jews have excessive trust in government and elite authority, and why they were so caught off-guard by the “top-down antisemitism” of Russia and Germany.
Yeah, big government protected the Jews during the Middle Ages – except when it didn’t. Check out the massacre of Jews in England in 1189 and the expulsion of all Jews from England in 1290, etc. The ‘blood libel’ led to moral panics throughout Europe from time to time, resulting in the mass killing of Jews. Sometimes the government tried to protect them, sometimes it didn’t, and sometimes it participated in the persecution.
“big government protected the Jews during the Middle Ages – except when it didn’t.”
That actually sums up the story of Jewish life in Medieval Europe pretty well. My point was that they were dependent on the ruler for their protection. When the king would decide it was no longer in his intrest to protect them, they were massacred or expelled. It’s happened in France (multiple times), in England, in various German dutchies, and most famously in Spain and Portugal.
Thank you for sharing your journey, David. And, for eloquently sharing your personal pain.
The siren song of leftism, the peer pressure cultism, the threat of being ostracized or blacklisted, can cement in a young,impressionable mind… all the fear and loathing against Israel and America inherent in today’s academia, mass media, Hollywood and nearly the whole of our Democratic Party.
Shamed into “staying away from those people “, who are by definition, racist, homophobic, xenophobic, dim-witted, evil, greedy, and militaristic.
After all, who would want to associate with such a group?
Of course, the truth comes to us all in a myriad of ways. For many, 9/11 was the truth that put the lie to which side was advancing evil. Today, many people are sensing the frog being boiled one degree at a time, installing leftism by stealth into our DOJ, our healthcare, our tax base, our real estate market, our auto industry, our energy and our space exploration, our borders and next…our defense capabilities.
American non-leftists are the new Jews. Blamed, ridiculed, enslaved and exiled. On November 12, we are going to have to say collectively… not “Let my people go”….but “Let go of my people”.
It’s so painful to read this modern Jewish journey, especially so after Jesus, the most famous Jew of all time, paid such an enormous price to show us a better way to get rhough it. The answer has been before us for 2000 years, yet many still ignore it.
Larsen E Whipsnade – I say this as gently as I can: Unfortunately, the hands of Jesus’ adherents are not clean in these matters. Christianity’s big mistake was to become a state religion.
And that is exactly what many Leftists claim is the big mistake of Israel.
Enjoy!
EscapeVelocity – My response would be that Israel a Jewish state in the sense that it is a haven for the Jews. The state itself, for the most part, is not run by Jewish law or by a rabbinical class. It is run by a secular/political class (some of whom may be observant Jews) using a combination of English and Turkish law, as well Knesset law, to govern the country. And if the Left has a problem with that, ask them where they were from 1938 through 1945.
22. Jack in Silver Spring:”Christianity’s big mistake was to become a state religion.”
For example, in . . . ? China? Brazil? Canada? USA? Vietnam? Jamaica? Australia? Uganda? Please enlighten us!
Well, there was Rome (after 315 or so), and then the Eastern Roman Empire, and then all the rump Western Kingdoms that replaced Rome, such as France, the German states, the Italian States. Other places where church and state were intertwined were the Nordic states,as well as the Russian state, and of course Spain and Portugal. I think, but here I am less sure, that the Spanish and Portugese colonies as well as some of the North American colonies of Britain, France and the Netherlands all had a state religion. Aside from America, it took the enlightment, and most of the 19th century, for church and state to separate in Europe.
Rome. 363 AD. Christianity became an official State Religion.
It is why we worship on Sunday, rather than Saturday (the actual Sabbath). It is why Christmas is on Dec. 25th, what was back then, the Winter solstice. These were the holy times of Apollo, the Sun god.
Thus was born the Catholic church, and was corrupted a-borning. It became a large, centralized faith, a magnet for wealth and power seekers. This is why Catholicism did so much evil in God’s name, thus violating the 3rd Commandment.
“Thou shalt not take my name in vain.” Vain means void, empty, fruitless. Do not assume God’s name for your own empty purposes. You are not God. Do not pretend to speak for Him. Yet that is exactly what the Popes and priests did for centuries. Thus, the Reformation. Do not do it “in the name of God”.
Is that the best you guys can come up with? Some vague, hateful rumors from 500 years ago? Give us a break – this is a discussion for grownups, not teenage atheists
Rumors? I would suggest a good course in history from antiquity through the enlightment.
Marc Malone – I couldn’t link to your comment at 12:16 AM, but there is one Jewish Republican in Congress, although not a Senator: Eric Cantor. I hope we start seeing more.
Pure Anti-catholic bigotry. You sir are a bigot. You should be ashamed of yourself. There are few institutions that have done more good over the centuries than the CATHOLIC CHURCH.
Stop spouting false histories and learn some real history.
(this blog should be ashamed that it allows such bigotry on it.)
I offer pure historical truth, and you guys label me a bigot. You offer ad hominem attacks. (And, Whipsnade, I am not some dumb teen.)
It is an historical fact that, in order for Christianity to be made a legal religion in Rome, all their holidays had to conform to the other 2 legal religions, the primary of which was the worship of Apollo. Rome did this for functional reasons, so business was not disrupted for too damned many holy days. Christianity could have continued as an unofficial religion. They chose to be “official”. State sanctioning of religion cannot ever end well.
As for Catholicism having done so much good, look around the world wherever it has been dominant. Always there is socialist, big government thinking. I also point to the crowning of Kings (the proclaimed Divine Right of Kings). I point to the Borgias. I point to the Inquisition. I point to the wars of the Popes. I point to the gross Usurpation of God’s power to condemn you to Hell (excommunication). They still maintain they have that power. I point to the conquest and slaughter of American natives by the Conquistadores with the cooperation of many Catholic priests.
I, myself, am an Evangelical Lutheran (not some atheist, Whipsnade). I am on the Right. Most of us are, although many Mainline Protestants are not. Most Roman Catholics, in my experience, tend to be on the Left. You want proof? Look at the list of US Senators. The Catholics are mostly Dems (8 Pubs, 14 Dems). (Every single Jew is a Dem, btw.) You do not see this ratio with all the other Christians. A rough skim shows they mostly tend to the Right, not the Left.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_United_States_Senators
I do not hate Catholics, by any means. I do recognize their long, corrupted history, which WAS the reason for the Reformation, which is also another absolute, historical fact. You have heard of Martin Luther’s 95 Theses, haven’t you?
I am told that 90-95% of Christians are Roman Catholics. Here in the USA, they are not so dominant. The same goes for England and Germany, where Protestantism is stronger than in other areas. It is no coincidence that these societies are freer and have been far more prosperous than areas where Roman Catholicism dominates.
It is not bigotry to level criticism, when it is deserved. Labeling me bigoted is no different from the Left calling us racist. It is ad hominem. It is an attempt to silence dissent… because you cannot handle it. The intolerance is not just on the Left. I am guessing you are Catholic, hmm?
Sunday worship dates back to the first century, as does celebration of Christmas. While there were arguments over what day Christmas should be celebrated on, there were many who were convinced that Jesus was indeed born on December 25, and they wrote apologetics accordingly. Regardless, Collosians 2:16 tells us not to judge on the basis of Sabbath keeping. To put it bluntly, cursing Catholics for “changing the Sabbath” (even though we never actually claimed that Sunday is the Sabbath) is the heresy of the Judiasers. So please, read up on the Council of Jerusalem before you rant again, and do take note of the fact that it was the Puritans, not the Catholics, who started calling Sunday the Sabbath.
Most of the original settlers in New England were trying to get away from the state religion in England. Need any more examples?
As a Christian Judeophile, I add a hearty “hear, hear….” Many of my Christian friends try to be evenhanded, and accept the anti-Zionist perspective on the nation of Israel. This is a valuable collection of sources and arguments against that false fairness.
Well, I love Jews. I think they are amazing. I love everything about them. So maybe that can balance things out a bit.
That’s just silly. The Jews make no claim to be perfect or better than anyone else. Their beliefs are wise and admirable but individuals never follow beliefs uniformly or perfectly.
“These were the people responsible for the Munich massacre, for myriad airplane hijackings, for suicide bombings, for random acts of terrorism, for the slaughter of innocents, which we had risibly explained away as legitimate acts of “resistance” against the “Zionist entity” and the American hegemon, as expressions of the quest for freedom and justice.”
You forgot to put your name among those, responsible for atrocities.
I do not like people like you who “ba zech mine tairs”(love themselves).
“I was in sync with Hannah Arendt’s supercilious disdain of the Ostjuden (Eastern European Jews) whom she regarded as lower-class banausics.”
I’m only familiar with The Origins of Totalitarianism but this is surprising to me. What is the evidence of this?
Like Stan, I too wonder where Hannah Arendt showed a disdain for the Ostjuden.
David, I know you don’t typically reply to comments on your articles but I see one exception for this article so I hope you don’t mind a personal question about a very personal essay. Was your father Larry Solway, who used to be one of the panelists on a CBC program This Is The Law many years ago?
I’m just asking because Solway is not a terribly common name and the Jewish community here in Canada is not that large so it seems reasonable that he might be related to you and even be your father. I suspect he was NOT your father because I didn’t get any sense of self-loathing from Larry Solway on that program. Mind you, he didn’t get much opportunity to express such feelings in the context of that program!
–
In any case, heartiest congratulations on your self-discovery! We’re stronger with you than without you!
No Henry, Larry wasn’t my dad, though we may possibly be distantly related. We corresponded for a while 10-15 years ago, but then for some reason the conversation ended.
David
Thanks for your reply, David. I’ve been curious about that ever since I first saw you post here on PJM
And again, congratulations on “seeing the light”. I know from my own experience that it isn’t easy to see things from an entirely different viewpoint. In fact, I’m not sure you ever completely change. I still find myself thinking or saying something that I realize is just leftist nonsense occasionally even though I “saw the light” in the early 80s. It’s hard to shake off that early brainwashing, especially when it is fortified by media that continue to push the same views and attitudes that first brainwashed me.
I’m always interested in learning what inspires people to make such dramatic changes in their views. As far as I can tell, others who made such big shifts in their views, like Solzhenitsyn, typically had some kind of background that favoured a positive point of view, if I can call it that, but then a variety of other factors effectively forced them to take a diametrically-opposed point of view which finally proved to be completely insupportable for them, causing them to return to something close to the positive childhood influence. In Solzhenitsyn’s case, his mother raised him Christian but he was mocked for this in the atheist Soviet school system and was brainwashed into becoming a Marxist. However, as his participation in World War II continued, he increasingly saw signs that Communism wasn’t the good thing that he’d been led to believe and he started to doubt and question. He was still a Marxist when he was arrested and sent to the Gulag but there he finally realized the profound inhumanity of the Soviet system and returned to the Christianity of his youth. Not a perfect parallel to your own story but not completely different either.
I think it would be fascinating to read a book about conversions like this. There are many people who’ve had this experience, some famous and others not, but I think all of their stories would be interesting. Even a profound change in the opposite direction would be interesting if they were as honestly written as your article.
Best regards, David, and I look forward to more of your articles in the future.
David–a wonderful essay, and one that (as usual with your writing) sent me to consult the dictionary more than once. I can’t say that about most things I read on the web!
you describe what a lot of us have been through.
I was born and raised a non-religious Jew and finally converted to Christianity in my late 30s, after my daughter was born. I like to think it was purely because of a belief in Jesus that I converted, but I have to be honest and say it was partly to deny my Jewishness.
despite all that, I always knew that I was still Jewish, simply because I knew if Hitler was around, I’d be put in the camps too, no matter how many rosaries I’d said.
my daughter just went on her Birthright trip last year, and I can only describe her as being on fire for Israel. so now I (at age 58!) am finally starting, with my daughter, to learn about Judaism.
I’d like to send this article to all my self-hating-Jewish relatives, but I doubt they’d read it. they know, you see, living here in the relative safety of the US, that THEY know what is best for Israel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jujo_VVTyS0&feature=related
Thank the Lord my Texas Jewish pals are just some of the guys. Somehow they seemed to have escaped the conflicted manifestations of their heritage. Mostly my whole group is pro Netanyahu, pro Israel, and wonder what the Yankees are on about with all the hate and such. I guess we are just ignorant rednecks but we can’t even be sure which of the guys Is Jewish.
Jewish history in the U.S. is dominated by the Coasts, and is highly selective. There is a long cultural tradition of what you describe – in the South and most particularly in Texas. People forget the millions of Jews who came to the U.S. through the two other major ports of entry (in South Carolina and Texas).
There are lots of good books that bring the broader history to light and that help explain what you describe. A couple of are: Jewish Stars of Texas, by Hollace Weiner; and Henry Cohen: The Life of a Frontier Rabbi, by Jimmy Kessler. Henry Cohen served one congregation continuously from 1884 to 1952. He is one of the greatest figures in Texas religious history, and a community organizer in the best sense.
The only reason Islam has any claim to Jerusalem is because at one point a Muslim empire (Damascus-based Umayyads if I remember right) conquered the city, tore down the Jewish Temple there, and then built the Dome of the Rock to try and give the city significance to Muslims for their own political purposes. Heck, they even built a second structure on the Mount and tried to claim it was the one mentioned as “the furthest mosque” in the Qur’an (or Koran, whichever spelling you prefer) even though that particular line existed before the temple did.
———-
Also you have these:
“Moreover, the Qur’an expressly recognizes that Jerusalem plays the same role for Jews that Mecca has for Muslims. We read: “They would not follow thy direction of prayer (qibla), nor art thou to follow their direction of prayer; nor indeed will they follow each other’s direction of prayer….” (Qur’an, Sura 2:145, “The Cow”) All Qur’anic commentators explain that “thy qibla” is obviously the Kaba of Mecca, while “their qibla” refers to the Temple Mount Area in Jerusalem. Some Muslim exegetes also quote the Book of Daniel as proof of this (Daniel 6:10).
Thus, as no one wishes to deny Muslims complete sovereignty over Mecca, from an Islamic point of view there is no sound theological reason to deny the Jews the same right over Jerusalem.” Shaykh Professor Abdul Hadi Palazzi
———-
Ibn Taymiyya discussed the first caliphs and showed that when they ruled over today’s Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Israel, neither they nor any of the early governors nor any clerics made any attempt to build any structure over the Rock on the Temple Mount. This demonstrated, according to Ibn Taymiyya, that they did not attach any importance to it; as the early rulers and companions of Muhammad knew his views and his religion better than later generations of Muslims, no later scholar could disagree with them nor with the traditions they observed. They clearly did not attach any Islamic significance to today’s Aqsa Mosque nor to the Temple Mount in general. How then, Ibn Taymiyya reasoned, could we who never knew them nor Muhammad have the right to disagree? There is no way we could know more about Islam than they. We therefore have no right to sanctity al-Aqsa because they did not do so.
Ibn Taymiyya (1263–1328) was the same Muslim cleric that wrote that Islam had only two holy cities – Mecca and Medina.
———-
The only claims are completely politically based and just another way for Arabic Islam to stab and denigrate the Jewish religion and their claims to the region even though historical fact (even if you ignore all religious attachments) shows the Jews have had claim to the city for 3000+ yrs.
Oh yea, let’s not forget the fact that before the Jewish people were able to return prior to WWII the area was a bloody desert. Jewish engineering and stubbornness rebuilt the region and made it prosperous again, which it had not been since their original expulsion. The REAL reason the Arabs want Israel gone is that it’s a constant reminder that Arab culture can only copy and has no ability to succeed except upon the ruins of others. Even with all their oil money they are only just now getting to the point where they are turning their desert land into something capable of supporting large numbers of people. The problem being they’re only spending the necessary time and money to make their cities look nice, and not on actually making their country viable on its own.
Jerusalem was conquered (according to the Islamic tradition) by Caliph Omar, before the Umayyad dynasty.
I’m aware, but it was the Umayyad dynasty that decided to try and impart any kind of religious significance to Muslims on the city of Jerusalem. It was a political decision, one that several Islamic scholars agree had no backing in the Qur’an.
England conquered Ireland, it didn’t remove the Irish right to a country in their historical homeland.
Sorry for the double post, it was refusing to show up for me after I posted it the first time so I thought it hadn’t gotten posted.
“I lived in fear of my uncle Snetzi, who would suddenly rush into the house and fling himself under a bed”.
Absolutely genius.
Glad to have you back David. Excellent well written article.
A few days early. L’Shana Tovah.
You certainly suffered a really miserable Jewish upbringing and childhood and I feel very sorry for you. Your parents should never have treated you in such a way and if they are alive, they should “klop kapores” for the way they denied you your heritage and faith. No doubt they and the rest of your family had entirely understandable reasons for behaving the way they did, but still…
Mr. Solway, may God bless you for having made your monumental and successful effort to overcome the bitterness and hatred for Judaism and Jews that your family inflicted on you and attempted to instill in you in their misguided and thoughtless way. Your return to your Jewish People is truly a blessed event, something you should be very proud of.
Many religious Jews like myself pray daily for the unity of the Jewish People and the return of our brothers and sisters who have been lured away by the siren song of the decadent and materialist West and the allure of the pagan liberal and secular ideologies.
All the best, Kol HaKvod, and Shalom!
Just as an aside. His mother tried to give him his heritage, so don’t blame his entire family. It seems that she was cowered by an abusive (my words, not his) father? Anyway, we all must realize the effect upbringing has on a child. Devastating!
Just look at our commander in chief! Both his father and mother (and minister) hated America and democracy and you can’t tell me that is not the reason it is manifested in everything he does.
Loved the article glad he found his heritage.
Jacobite
Can I just add george soros to your list. He said the happiest time he remembered was when he was used to take the property of the Jews (his people) for the nazis. Now he was young and he could’ve said he regretted it, but he didn’t -”it was the happiest time.” Where do we think he got started as a billionaire? He would like to destroy this country and he has his man in the white house trying to do it.
I hope the Jews wake up before it’s too late for them and for all of us as well.
If the essence of Judaism is Exodus and the discovery, at Sinai, of a declarative sentence (I am what I am) when asking for the name of God (for an ostensive), then the paradoxes of our lives can be more readily appreciated. The call of Hashem is at once a call to iconoclasm, or refusal of idolatry. But the world, with its needs, desires and conflicts cannot empty itself in response to this call, which thus also becomes a call to correct ritual practice and the quest for justice by which one hopes to make his life and the things of this world worthy of Hashem. It’s not surprising that our forebears struggled with this equation, or that Jews continue to resent aspects of Jewishness, whether of those who indulge in iconoclasm or ritual pieties. In any case, the recognition that a Jew is a Jew however he strays is wise.
Whether, however, Jewishness can help explain the goalie phenomenon, I can only say to the guy spread-eagled across the crease, “good save”.
“The Return of the Prodigal Son”
Welcome home David.
If anyone wishes to understand Judaism, they need as well to understand quantum electrodynamics. In the first place this esoteric science tells us that time and space are not fundamental characteristics of the Universe, but emergent qualities. Thus, there can be a supernal being who is outside the realm of time and space. Second, it tells us that the act of observing the universe determines its nature, which vaguely (I am still working on that) explains why two people can look at precisely the same set of observations and draw different conclusion. As in Mr. Solvay’s case, in order to change his views, a great amount of energy must have been expended (literally) to perceive things in a different light. Those unwilling or unable to add energy to brain function my never be able to “change their minds.”
The intersection of quantum physics and biological function is a new and exciting field. It may help us to understand that we live in a world so strangely different than our perception of it, that even Einstein call the quantum phenomenon of “entanglement” spooky. That is where two particles that have become entangled, but then separated, behave in concert even if the distance between them becomes very great. Right now (before Rosh HaShannah) I need to express great personal modesty and engage in very reserved behavior, as an acknowledgement that I know nothing at all about my relationship to the universe in which I find myself. Spooky nothing! Plain scary!
I could write a similar story. My parents were Christians but my sister’s husband was Jewish. We recited both Jewish and Christian prayers before dinner though we, the younger generation were not religious. Additional prayers were added along with new additions to the family. My parents believed in God and were happy to share the wealth. As time progressed and the family grew, so grew the representation of the world’s major religions and political divisions around our family table.
Because of the era, it was not religion that my siblings and I identified with, but the prevailing liberalism of our time. The different religions that we shared were more of, as you said, shared history/culture etc., rather than a belief system.
I also had an awakening; different but similar. You see, being young and having people that I loved represented amongst the world’s religions and political groups, it made it easier for me to see differences based on human nature v/s culture/religion/history.
With that as an intro, let me just say that I was very disappointed that you went down this road: “in Christian Antisemitism: A History of Hate, “The forces that led to the Holocaust are still active”.
I hope you can continue to grow and realize that you are still blinded in this regard. Sure, you can make the argument but it is historical rather than meaningful. And I will be so bold as to tell you that it shows ignorance on your part regarding what Christianity is about.
For every anti-semitic Christian you can find me, I can find you anti-semites from any other group. Anti-semitism is no different than racial bigotry or pick your poison bigotry and hatred. Anti-semitism, as you have so well defined in your own journey, is about hate, blame, insecurity and all the other factors you aptly chronicled. That you so easily transfered the big pile of blame to Christianity, as a whole, in such an off-hand and matter of fact way, says more about where you are at, than it does about Christianity or anti-semitism.
I hope one day you can see that as well.
Dear Rachel
Forgive me, but I think my meaning may not have been sufficiently clear.I am not speaking of individual Christians like yourself or of laudable denominations like the Evangelicals but of an antisemitic strain within the institutional apparatus of the faith stemming in large part from the Gospel of John, put into practice over the millennia at the cost of horrendous suffering, and recognized, for example, by Pope John XXIII who sought to stem the tide. William Nicholls, whom I quote, was a true man of faith and a major religious scholar who knew whereof he spoke. The distinction I am aiming at is that drawn by the great Danish thinker and true Christian Soren Kierkegaard between a noble Christianity and a debased Christendom. The historical record is indisputable. You can see this species of hatred at work today in the conduct of the World Council of Churches, in the liberal-left leadership of the United Church of Canada, the Presbyterians in the U.S., the Methodists, the Supercessionsts (cf. Jimmy Carter), the liberation theologists (cf. Reverend Wright) and others.
David
I’m sorry I missed your response when I posted below. In this light, I can not disagree with you and I understand the point you were trying to make.
I would like to share a short story.
Ten years ago I was acquainted with a very nice intelligent middle-aged woman. It was the time of the last Intifada, when buses exploded each other day. And she said once that Arab children are to be killed at the birth time. I was shocked and protested. But she even had not understood me. Nevertheless, I hoped that she just didn’t understand what she says.
A few years passed, and we accidentally met once more. On my questioning how was she doing, she replied that her husband had suddenly passed away. The answer to my condolences was that I don’t need to worry: she and her children are already not alone. She kept meeting with an Arab guy from Gaza. It was before we left Gaza, and he worked in Israel. She also immediately expressed her utter disdain of the Israeli oppression of Arab people. I was amazed how seamlessly did she passed from extremely right extremism to extremely left one. Probably she would be able to write an essay on her conversion.
There is more evidence of such simple pole exchange. One of the most wellknown cases in Israel is the case of Mordechay Vaanunu, who published Israeli nuclear secrets in the West. He was a right-wing activist at the beginning. Some people just see the world in black and white. It is very easy, only takes a simple recoding, to exchange black for white.
I surely hope that it is not the case here. But whenever I see accusation of the extreme left, with which I mostly agree BTW, I recall that the extreme right does not differ (remember “tag mechir”). The truth is always somewhere in the middle. Unfortunately, nobody considers himself on a boundary, and therefore the truth is elusive. In this last self-reflexing sentence I obviously prove that I am a true Jew.
In particular, I don’t like the description of Tsipi Livni as working for the destruction of Israel. I don’t like her, but she is not an enemy! I also probably would not be able to write in such words on my own father.
I agree with Ariel @41. This is a fascinating bit of retrospection… fascinating but flawed. I can’t help but nod at, say 95% of what David Solway describes, but to lump Livni in with those “working against the survival of the Jewish state” is perverse. There are self-hating Jews and there are those who, in righting the balance, tip it too far in the other direction. To argue that someone’s political efforts may, inadvertently, be counter-productive, is one thing, but it is quite another to suggest that those efforts are consciously treacherous. Sorry, David, you lost me there.
40. rachel
Well I agree – the Christians are not the problem, the Christians are really the only ones who will support Israel. No I am not anxious for the end of the world and hope and pray that we may all strive for peace. However with obama hoping to bring the 12th imam, and the secular jews supporting him, I worry. I’m not sure that’s what you had in mind, Rachel, but I’m not an Evangelical so I’m not sure who David was pointing to.
I’m not sure I understand exactly, but my point is not about Obama or the end of times.
I spent half a life-time listening to liberals and Jews alike mock Christians and blame them “all” as being intolerant, anti-semitic, bigoted, small minded, etc. And for half of my life I just accepted it as true. Those believing Christians were “all” nutters! And likewise for me, it was for me, a slow realization that this belief was not only false, but that the ones who were intolerant and bigoted were the very people making those accusations.
My point is that people are people, but ideas have consequences. One can go on about the sins and the history of anti-semitism in the Christian church much the same way the Palestinians can go on about the history of oppression by the Jews.
I guess my point is that the ideas of true Christianity, just like the ideas of true liberalism, can not be ascribed to the individuals who pervert those same ideas.
Hmm, a serious response to Solway’s article would demand a book! And there are now a fair number of books on Jewish self-loathing (which tells you how bad and pervasive it is), so I will keep it as brief as I can..
Solway details a pervasive neuroses, even psychoses, among his family members and how such a background didn’t exactly help to anchor him in moral clarity. He could have been writing about my own family (I grew up in the Diaspora, not Israel). I think a lot of it has to do with the long-term effects of generations of Jew-hatred on the Jews themselves, their sense of personal identity, their lack of security etc, the hatred is internalized and manifested in these neuroses. Of course there is also the effects of the stresses of modern day living that effect all of us, Jewish or not, and lead to all kinds of mental disorders etc.
A bigger problem than self-loathing per se, is apathy and indifference – and this is pervasive among Jewry. Also as Solway writes, Israel hatred is hatred of the Jews, and if Israel were destroyed they will be going after Diaspora Jewry next. And when I say ‘they’, I mean anti-Semites of every stripe. I have been thinking these exact thoughts.
Another thing worth remarking on, the current Jew-hate fest at the UN (Palestinian ‘final solution’ bid) has been enabled through Jewish Israeli Oslo Syndrome, but I have not seen anybody in the English language press (media or internet) point this out. What I mean is if there were no PA bureaucracy and administration, which has given legitimacy and enabled Arafat’s PLO terrorist outcasts to present themselves as a ‘government in waiting’; there couldn’t have been the farcical dishonest PA bid at the UN in the first place. And the PA was made, and made legitimate and respectable through the Oslo Accords. No Oslo Accords, no PA, no bid at the UN. Abbas would just be another terrorist (which he is) living in Tunisia or some-such, with his terrorist PLO. The Oslo Accords laid the road to hell, for where we are now with the Palestinians. The Israeli Left gave us the Oslo Accords, and legitimized a terrorist group and a terrorist Arafat as moderate peace-partners. And now it has inevitably led to where we are today..
And the Jewish Israeli and Diaspora Left have engaged in a wilful denial (a kind of retrograde amnesia) about all this, and the rest of us have let them get away with it! In other words, the consequences and pervasiveness of Israeli Jewish self-loathing and wishful thinking (never mind the Diaspora) are far worse than even many of the staunchest pro-Israel Jews (and non-Jews) realize.
Dear Larry,
Those are my thoughts and feelings exactly. The understand that you expressed is understanding that I also have.
I think that the way out of this stressful detrimental state of mind and stressful painful experience of living in the world that I think that almost all of those of us who are Jewish are experiencing or have experienced is for those of us who are Jewish to have compassion and kindness for each other and to be kind to each other.
And the way out is to have right understanding of the nature of experiencing being in the world, and to abide with wise right equanimity.
The way out is to be mindful, and to develop discernment, and to discern what actions will cause harm and what actions will be beneficial, and to not do any harmful actions, and to do beneficial actions.
Kind regards,
Dan
Correction:
“…The understanding that you expressed is understanding that I also have…”
Directed here by a friend–
One of my boys will not be home with us this Rosh Hashanah, but will be at a hotspot along one of our problem borders. And yet, there is always balance in the world, if we just look. For every one of our men away from their families, protecting our right to be proudly Jewish, another comes home. A warm ‘welcome home’ to you!
Best wishes for 5772
May God in his love bring peace to us
– ת’ביא ש’לום ע’לינו ב’אהבתך
David
Has it ever occurred to you that maybe some people just don’t like be members of a Tribe that mutilates their young as proof of membership?
And people who tolerate the murder of the same young when they are in the womb have no moral authority to criticize circumcision.
Sorry
I didn’t mean for that to be anonymous.
You don’t have to be a Jew anymore than you have to be an American.
If anyone in here is really interested in getting to the root of what causes anti-Semitism, then one needs to stop looking to blame the self-hating Jews or the Catholics or the liberals or the Council of World Churches. Blaming those entities is as valid as blaming the KKK for racism or blaming communism or socialism for the roots of class warfare.
It is the act of blaming itself that is the root cause. It is the human need to want to feel important and to feel a part of a group. Pick your group that wishes to blame another group for whatever misfortune ails them. Said group is just capitalizing on the human condition for their own purpose. These machines capture the hate, the insecurity, the jealousy, the feeling of being unwanted and utilize it for their own purposes in the same way politicians use, “it is for the children” to line their own pockets with your tax money. Every tryant or successful politician that has ever lived fully understands what I am talking about.
You see, the minute you point at another group and claim it’s adherents or its history are to blame then you have lost the battle and a guilty of the very crime that you decry.
Believing (believing is key) adherents to Judaism and to Christianity are less prone to falling prey to this affliction. The ten commandments and the teachings of Jesus instruct others not to covet the goods etc and to behave in such a manner as to somewhat inoculate individuals from changing evil thoughts into actions, and thus by changing the thoughts of behaviors of one individual at a time, western civilization and true liberalism were born.
If you want to stand and point your finger to the true source for anti-Semitism or racism, or any other movement based on blame, just stand in front of a mirror as you do so.
Dude … welcome back
Add 2 Sons and a Daughter, Not Prodigal but Captive
Proof that Darwin Was Right: The Iraq-Iran Hikers
The ”Darwin Award” is conferred on individuals who unknowingly gave their all in the inadvertent interests of preserving humanity’s gene pool by expiring in the process of committing acts of amazing stupidity and thereby removing themselves from the danger of further corrupting the genetic makeup of the human species.
Without referencing darwinism and the survival of the fittest, Spike TV features any number of deserving Darwin Awards winners on “1000 Ways to Die,” a ghoulish series on how people meet their Maker via wooden-headed choices.
Usually conferred posthumously, exceptions should be granted for giving a “Darwin” to the recently-released Iraq, (or was it Iran?) hikers.
Most Americans were delighted when Shane Bower and Josh Fattal were finally set free by the Iranians and were able to re-join fellow hiker Sarah Shourd on American soil after what the HuffingtonPost.com a 2-year “saga,” a term most often reserved to describe heroic adventures rather than idiotic blunders.
America may be desperate for heroes but Bower, Fattal, and Shourd hardly fit the bill.
In an impressive display of Islamic magnanimity toward a gender customarily stoned to death for much less grievous offenses than violating Iranian territorial integrity–and alleged spying–Shourd was released in 2010.
All three had been captured the year before as they blithely traversed the Iraq-Iran border since, apparently, the millions of acres of national parkland, untrammeled mountains, woods, and deserts available to hikers throughout the United States and other civilized countries held no attraction or opportunities for adventure.
Instead Bower, Fattal, and Shourd chose what they believed to be Iraq’s Kurdish region, . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=5563.)
Your’e comments is going too long!
The writer never examines or addresses WHY he felt it necessary to just fit in with his lefty pals; why he refused to look at his political ideology from an unemotional vantage; why he was a lemming of the left.
Many jewish folks have the same upbringing as he did and did not become puppets of the left wing intellectuals.
As Eric Hoffer said, those who join radical groups, regardless of the ideology of the group, all share the same personal attributes of wishing to belong to a group – any group – that helps them fill in their vacuous lives.
It was Himmler (or some other very hi ranking Nazi) that stated “just bring me a rabid communist, and in no time I will turn him into a zealous Nazi.”
“The True Believer – Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements,” by Eric Hoffer. Everybody should read this book.
Touching. Genuine. On the mark. Many of us share a similar biography. Read your books. Look for your articles. Keep writing. You have a voice and an audience.
Buber’s Zionist thinking was muddled but he was a quite brilliant existentialist thinker.
Wonderful paintings! That is the type of info that are supposed to be shared across the internet. Shame on Google for now not positioning this put up upper! Come on over and seek advice from my site . Thanks =)
You understand thus considerably in terms of this subject, produced me in my view believe it from so many various angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be involved except it’s something to accomplish with Woman gaga! Your personal stuffs excellent. All the time care for it up!