<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Presidential Candidates Take Their Opening Shots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 06:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bradley</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-65822</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 17:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-65822</guid>
		<description>Nothing in reply to the obvious point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing in reply to the obvious point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bradley</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-65598</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-65598</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not following your points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not following your points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David W. Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-65455</link>
		<dc:creator>David W. Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-65455</guid>
		<description>As long as Democrats defend the sleaze of the Clinton years, and that &quot;Vote early, vote often&quot; describes Chicago
politics - is it any surprise to see what kind of political animal
Barak Hussein Obama is?

As for oil from Canada being vilified by the Kyoto Koolaid Klan on the basis of being
&quot;dirty&quot; , but oil from Venezuela isn&#039;t (when it
is &quot;Dirty&quot;) - expecting
the new KKK to be consistent is too much to expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as Democrats defend the sleaze of the Clinton years, and that &#8220;Vote early, vote often&#8221; describes Chicago<br />
politics &#8211; is it any surprise to see what kind of political animal<br />
Barak Hussein Obama is?</p>
<p>As for oil from Canada being vilified by the Kyoto Koolaid Klan on the basis of being<br />
&#8220;dirty&#8221; , but oil from Venezuela isn&#8217;t (when it<br />
is &#8220;Dirty&#8221;) &#8211; expecting<br />
the new KKK to be consistent is too much to expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bradley</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-65209</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-65209</guid>
		<description>Beats me. Who are you talking to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beats me. Who are you talking to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64560</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64560</guid>
		<description>&quot;we are never going to be independent of big oil as the other successful “green” countries have managed to become.&quot;

I&#039;m sorry, but which countries are these?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;we are never going to be independent of big oil as the other successful “green” countries have managed to become.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but which countries are these?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bradley</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64340</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64340</guid>
		<description>Er, no. George Soros is not funding the Obama campaign through secret mechanisms on the Internet and thousands of puppet contributors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, no. George Soros is not funding the Obama campaign through secret mechanisms on the Internet and thousands of puppet contributors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bess Cannon</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64160</link>
		<dc:creator>Bess Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64160</guid>
		<description>Until we eliminate the destructive forces of greed, we are never going to be independent of big oil as the other successful &quot;green&quot; countries have managed to become.  It takes a good government to accomplish such status and, since greed runs rampant through parts of our governing bodies, we can&#039;t achieve the wonderful status the other countries enjoy. Also, we would have to unseat that rich guy pulling all the strings from his lofty perch.
They say he is really running this country.
I forget his name, I believe it is like Oros,
or something like that. Anyway, they say he is running this country, the campaign, etc. the way he wants it.  Maybe all that money Obama pulls in is channeled down from him through
layers so as not to be obvious or unlawful.
Maybe this is why Obama opted out of public funding. He is assured of all the funds he needs.  What upsets me is the thought that the
highest office in our land is up for grabs to the highest bidder.  It is sad we have come to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until we eliminate the destructive forces of greed, we are never going to be independent of big oil as the other successful &#8220;green&#8221; countries have managed to become.  It takes a good government to accomplish such status and, since greed runs rampant through parts of our governing bodies, we can&#8217;t achieve the wonderful status the other countries enjoy. Also, we would have to unseat that rich guy pulling all the strings from his lofty perch.<br />
They say he is really running this country.<br />
I forget his name, I believe it is like Oros,<br />
or something like that. Anyway, they say he is running this country, the campaign, etc. the way he wants it.  Maybe all that money Obama pulls in is channeled down from him through<br />
layers so as not to be obvious or unlawful.<br />
Maybe this is why Obama opted out of public funding. He is assured of all the funds he needs.  What upsets me is the thought that the<br />
highest office in our land is up for grabs to the highest bidder.  It is sad we have come to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64072</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64072</guid>
		<description>The main basis of coal-to-oil is a progressive idea.

The best way to manufacture it is to use a nuclear power plant&#039;s CLEAN energy to do it efficiently and CLEANLY(virtually 0 pollution to create). 

Replacing a coal-fired power plant(if not several at a time) with a much more efficient nuclear plant reduces pollution.

The infrastructure to SUPPLY the coal to the power plants is in place already. Switch it to clean oil production, while dumping the coal power plants.  The remaining coal plants can be considered to converted to clean-coal facilities.  Again, the cost-effective basis for coal production was based on oil hitting $40 a barrel.  Instead of the the profit going directly to Arab sheiks, it can actually go to this country.  And maybe ideas such as investing tax dollars into alternative-energy, or even national health-care insurance would make an iota of sense.  Liberals calling the credit card company to increase the limit again just isn&#039;t going to turn us into a solar/wind/battery nation, ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main basis of coal-to-oil is a progressive idea.</p>
<p>The best way to manufacture it is to use a nuclear power plant&#8217;s CLEAN energy to do it efficiently and CLEANLY(virtually 0 pollution to create). </p>
<p>Replacing a coal-fired power plant(if not several at a time) with a much more efficient nuclear plant reduces pollution.</p>
<p>The infrastructure to SUPPLY the coal to the power plants is in place already. Switch it to clean oil production, while dumping the coal power plants.  The remaining coal plants can be considered to converted to clean-coal facilities.  Again, the cost-effective basis for coal production was based on oil hitting $40 a barrel.  Instead of the the profit going directly to Arab sheiks, it can actually go to this country.  And maybe ideas such as investing tax dollars into alternative-energy, or even national health-care insurance would make an iota of sense.  Liberals calling the credit card company to increase the limit again just isn&#8217;t going to turn us into a solar/wind/battery nation, ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64069</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64069</guid>
		<description>Probably because there&#039;s not enough money going to politicians to BE interested in it.  Bush, to his credit, has mentioned coal-to-oil several times over the years, but it simply falls on deaf ears.  I&#039;ve heard it in speeches where the normal talking heads will take a chance to point out a funny-looking snicker rather then what was said anyway.   All the people that pull the strings live in sound-byte land, nobody ever really looks into anything until the subsidies start to roll in, or the voting constituency cries loudly enough. Irregardless of the popularity polls between Obama and McCain, the drill/no drill polls are now roughly at 70% favorable, regardless of political party. 

To be truly progressive, a good model may look something like this:

-Immediately approve new drilling and new nuclear power plants. Configure new plants to also be capable of being used for coal-to-oil production.  Nuclear power plants can also be used as the most effective and efficient way to create hydrogen.  Ironically, the green-dream of hydrogen would most likely rely on more nuclear power to make it even remotely feesable as an energy source.

-Immediately fund increasing refining capability, this is paramount NOW. And in typical fashion, &#039;greenies&#039; are trying to block refinery expansion, even if the NEW plant with 3 times the capability reduces overall pollution 80%...

-stay with ethanol, but dump wasteful and dangerous subsidies for corn ethanol and focus on the truly productive yields of sugar cane(and some other new crops currently in the works).

Oil prices are driven by speculation.  If new refining capability is approved and gets underway, and drilling is allowed, this WILL make an immediate difference. Other tactics like releasing half the reserves will also drive the price down. Don&#039;t believe the bullshit-there is PLENTY of oil in this world to be had.  The obsession we have with putting ourselves at the mercy of third-world countries however, is a mystery to me.

I have nothing against &#039;alternative energy&#039;, but it is something that will really only flourish off of the back of fossil fuels.  And without stability in the supply of fuel, there will never be stability in progress. The technology nor capability are ready to wean us off of any oil, nor is there any reason to dump billions of tax dollars into it to rush inefficient variations into use.  Right now its mostly politics, tax-payer subsidies, and get-rich-quick schemes.  Becoming self-sufficient is paramount to this nation, not to mention holding the key to funding such massive undertakings of true alternative energy and our own nations infrastructure(i.e. the nation&#039;s dams and levys, waterways, and roads.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably because there&#8217;s not enough money going to politicians to BE interested in it.  Bush, to his credit, has mentioned coal-to-oil several times over the years, but it simply falls on deaf ears.  I&#8217;ve heard it in speeches where the normal talking heads will take a chance to point out a funny-looking snicker rather then what was said anyway.   All the people that pull the strings live in sound-byte land, nobody ever really looks into anything until the subsidies start to roll in, or the voting constituency cries loudly enough. Irregardless of the popularity polls between Obama and McCain, the drill/no drill polls are now roughly at 70% favorable, regardless of political party. </p>
<p>To be truly progressive, a good model may look something like this:</p>
<p>-Immediately approve new drilling and new nuclear power plants. Configure new plants to also be capable of being used for coal-to-oil production.  Nuclear power plants can also be used as the most effective and efficient way to create hydrogen.  Ironically, the green-dream of hydrogen would most likely rely on more nuclear power to make it even remotely feesable as an energy source.</p>
<p>-Immediately fund increasing refining capability, this is paramount NOW. And in typical fashion, &#8216;greenies&#8217; are trying to block refinery expansion, even if the NEW plant with 3 times the capability reduces overall pollution 80%&#8230;</p>
<p>-stay with ethanol, but dump wasteful and dangerous subsidies for corn ethanol and focus on the truly productive yields of sugar cane(and some other new crops currently in the works).</p>
<p>Oil prices are driven by speculation.  If new refining capability is approved and gets underway, and drilling is allowed, this WILL make an immediate difference. Other tactics like releasing half the reserves will also drive the price down. Don&#8217;t believe the bullshit-there is PLENTY of oil in this world to be had.  The obsession we have with putting ourselves at the mercy of third-world countries however, is a mystery to me.</p>
<p>I have nothing against &#8216;alternative energy&#8217;, but it is something that will really only flourish off of the back of fossil fuels.  And without stability in the supply of fuel, there will never be stability in progress. The technology nor capability are ready to wean us off of any oil, nor is there any reason to dump billions of tax dollars into it to rush inefficient variations into use.  Right now its mostly politics, tax-payer subsidies, and get-rich-quick schemes.  Becoming self-sufficient is paramount to this nation, not to mention holding the key to funding such massive undertakings of true alternative energy and our own nations infrastructure(i.e. the nation&#8217;s dams and levys, waterways, and roads.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bradley</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64059</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-presidential-candidates-take-their-opening-shots/#comment-64059</guid>
		<description>Why isn&#039;t the White House pushing this idea?

&gt;Kay:

Here’s a basic 101 on coal-to-oil

http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/8229
Jun 23, 2008 - 3:51 pm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t the White House pushing this idea?</p>
<p>&gt;Kay:</p>
<p>Here’s a basic 101 on coal-to-oil</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/8229" rel="nofollow">http://www.thenewamerican.com/node/8229</a><br />
Jun 23, 2008 &#8211; 3:51 pm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

