Get PJ Media on your Apple

The President Should Declare Victory in Iraq

Barack Obama should go to Baghdad at the end of this month and state that the seven-year conflict to free Iraq from tyranny has been won.

by
N.M. Guariglia

Bio

August 22, 2010 - 12:00 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

Despite an otherwise misguided foreign policy, President Obama’s management of Iraq has been comparatively judicious. Like Bush, Obama has not done all he could – or should. The Iranian problem is being ignored; Tehran’s influence in Iraq has not been adequately countered. But overall, Obama has quietly sustained the Bush-Petraeus surge/de-escalation plan of 2007-08 and has respected the Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government. For supporters of a stable, peaceful, and democratic Arab ally, this administration’s continuity of Iraq policy should not go unappreciated.

Now the U.S. combat role is coming to an end. In a recent speech to Disabled American Veterans, President Obama restated the August 31, 2010, deadline of “[changing] our military mission from combat to supporting and training Iraqi security forces.” The usual ascetics are involved, too. On August 31, the official title of the war effort will be renamed from Operation Iraqi Freedom to Operation New Dawn. We should welcome this change in taxonomy. The war as we once knew it — or at least as Obama defines it — will be over.

But the United States should go one step further. At month’s end, President Obama should travel to Baghdad and declare victory in the second Gulf War.

Would this be a premature declaration, Obama’s “mission accomplished” moment? Though battered and beaten, the enemies of a free Iraq will continue to wield a veto on when “combat operations” come to a conclusion throughout the theater. Those caricaturized neocons had it right: self-government in Iraq undermines Khomeinist circles in Iran, Ba’athist dictators in Syria, and Wahhabi princes in Saudi Arabia. So long as these regimes exist and fund terror, they will continue to fight the United States — using Iraq as a proxy battlefield. There could be another al-Qaedist insurrection; Iran could intervene militarily. There are a whole host of bad things that could happen in 2011 and beyond.

But these possibilities should not dissuade the United States from declaring victory now, in 2010. Those hypothetical events would constitute a new affair, a different epoch. This war has lasted more than seven years — March 2003 through August 2010.  In ’06, all seemed hopeless. In ’07, the strategy was changed and it has been a positive (though uneven) trajectory since. While violence remains, together with the Iraqis we are nevertheless entering a new era. This is a good thing. From an American perspective, Iraq is the new Israel: an ally worthy of defense; under siege from a common enemy; destined to be part of the broader, regional conflict between freedom and tyranny for the foreseeable future.

Tens of thousands of brave Iraqis have bled and died fighting alongside U.S. troops against Islamic terrorists. As we withdraw from Iraq, President Obama should make it known to the region that we will remain committed to our friends. We are in deep need of a show of strength. Wouldn’t it be nice to see Obama go to Baghdad, stand with Iraq’s motley crew of political leaders (Allawi, Maliki, etc.), along with Secretary Clinton and Generals Odierno and Mattis, and state in front of an audience of rowdy U.S. and Iraqi soldiers the triumph over Saddamist cultism, dictatorship, insurgency, and jihadist terrorism?

Click here to view the 15 legacy comments

Comments are closed.