The New and Improved John McCain
A month ago Republican insiders were in a tizzy about the McCain campaign. They complained that John McCain had no winning domestic message, lacked focus and had come up with a decentralized structure destined to flounder. Rather than maximizing his relations with the media, McCain seemed in a losing war with the MSM.
McCain did make a change, but not one that most Republicans expected. Campaign Manager Charlie Black was kicked upstairs to a general oversight role and Steve Schmidt, former communications director, was given daily operational control over the campaign.
Still, grumblings were heard. A quiet buzz to put Republican strategist Mike Murphy in command went public when Bill Kristol in his New York Times column called for Murphy to take over the campaign. But McCain had found his man, nicknamed “Sgt. Schmidt.”
Schmidt, a veteran of George W. Bush’s 2004 campaign and chief of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s successful re-election campaign, did not reinvent McCain. He has not, as some conservatives have urged, attempted to move his candidate to the right on immigration or stopped him from talking about global warming. And McCain hasn’t given up some populist economic jargon (e.g. jumping on the bandwagon to bailout Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) to the consternation of fiscal conservatives.
But the change has been noticeable.
He has revised the campaign’s approach for dealing with the overwhelming liberal media bias. There haven’t been any more three-page letters from Mark Salter to complain about press bias which we saw earlier in the year. Instead they have used more clever tactics, likely leaking a rejected New York Times op-ed, to make their point that the MSM is in the tank for Obama.
And, likewise, there is far less “process” angst coming from the campaign and party insiders. Kevin Madden, former communications director for Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign observes, “The most important change is that there’s a reduced focus on the internal process of the campaign. Steve has always had a disdain for chatter about the levers and mechanics of a campaign and instead demands a focus on the substance of a message that is relentless in its delivery.” And indeed, the background buzz about campaign organization and comings and goings of this or that operative due to lobbyist ties has largely vanished.
Meanwhile, Schmidt has done a number of things to try to sharpen the campaign’s focus and improve its messaging. Katie Levinson, who worked for Schmidt on the Schwarzenegger campaign and served as communications director for Rudy Giuliani, says, “There’s no mistaking the newly aggressive and coordinated communications strategy of the McCain campaign. They are vintage Steve Schmidt.”
Put differently, Schmidt is attempting to make McCain into a better, more aggressive and focused McCain.
First and foremost, the McCain team has started to make the election about Barack Obama’s qualifications as commander-in-chief and more broadly his character. Before wheels lifted up on Obama’s overseas flight the McCain team was out with multiple ads, media calls and even a slick “briefing book” to make a key argument: Obama was wrong on the surge and put politics above country. Snowed under by the avalanche of Obama-mania from the MSM, McCain has nevertheless been able to get out a simple message that may resonate in the fall: Obama was wrong on the surge and would have led the country to defeat.
Second, the McCain team has become more adept at pounding a consistent message day after day. Madden notes, “The way they win is to continue to hammer home, with almost a dizzying repetition, Obama’s obtuse positions on energy, and his lack of readiness to handle the big issues of national security and the economy.”
And indeed the sheer number of media conference calls, surrogate appearances, web and TV ads and McCain speeches on a few key topics — the economy, energy and foreign policy – have replaced a scattershot approach which brought a new topic every day, and sometimes every hour. With a Saturday radio address and new policy comments at the beginning of townhall meetings, Schmidt has been able to focus both his candidate and in turn the media on a particular message for that day.
Third, the McCain team came up with its first winning policy — on energy — and a communications effort to go with it. It has helped rally conservatives and given independent voters a popular message of domestic energy development. And, unlike the past where McCain would bounce from one message to another, he has stuck with it in a coordinated effort of speeches, interviews, surrogate comments and plenty of ads.
Fourth, McCain has gotten into the ring. McCain has personally attacked Obama for ducking hard votes on immigration and for making his mind up on Iraq before getting all the facts. When asked if Obama is an “extremist” McCain didn’t mince words: “That’s his voting record. All I said was his voting record… is more to the left than the announced Socialist in the United States Senate, Bernie Sanders of Vermont.”
He hit the airwaves last Monday to blast Obama personally – calling him out for poor judgment on the surge, playing politics with the war and being stubborn and immune to the facts on the ground. And he did it again at a town hall on Tuesday. That’s a far cry from the days when McCain couldn’t bring himself to say an ill word about his opponent.
And finally, although not a match for Obama’s soaring rhetorical flights of fancy, Schmidt has found some preferred settings to place McCain and allow him to show off his record and rebut some negative attacks from Obama’s team. There are few set-speeches like the much-ridiculed address before the pea-green backdrop to compare unfavorably with Obama’s mass rallies.
A Republican operative closely following the foreign policy debate says, “The trips to Canada and Colombia were great opportunities to show that McCain understands what really counts in diplomacy better than Obama. Now the upcoming forum at Saddleback Church offers another chance for McCain to undermine Obama’s efforts to caricature him as a warmonger by touting his efforts in the Senate to make sure America promotes stability in the world by improving health, education, and economic opportunity in other countries.”
Still, the McCain team certainly is not without its problems.
With the exception of energy policy, McCain has yet to hit on a winning economic message or come up with a slogan to rival “change.” Conservatives continue to pepper the campaign with ideas, but no single, penetrating message has stuck.
In addition, McCain’s surrogates can be as much of a hindrance as a help. Phil Gramm ran head first into McCain’s effort to show he cares about the little guy, and brought on a few days of bad press as the Obama team milked the gaffe for all it was worth until Gramm finally stepped down. Even Carly Fiorina, his articulate business maven, came under fire for getting McCain into uncomfortable turf.
Moreover, there really is no antidote to the media love-fest for Obama and the imbalance in coverage and disparagement of McCain’s chances can, if unchecked, become a self-fulfilling prophesy. Not even Schmidt can convince voters that McCain is as “new” and “exciting” as Obama.
And finally, McCain is still struggling to combat the constant refrain that his administration would be a Bush third term. He continues to list his differences with the Bush administration but hasn’t yet unlocked the key to convincing voters that he’s not a Bush clone. Will he refashion our alliances? Be a better executive? Depart from traditional Republican pro-business policies in some way? McCain hasn’t really told us.
Still, with most polls showing the race within the margin of error, Schmidt can take credit for having at least righted the listing McCain ship. McCain will never be the champion of the conservative base in the way Ronald Reagan was, and Schmidt wisely has resisted the urge to even try to reposition McCain. (Considering how tough Obama’s reinvention has been going, even conservatives recognize the need to allow McCain “wide berth” on deviations from conservative orthodoxy.) But Schmidt arguably has made the most of his candidate and the media atmosphere he has been given to work with.
In an election year in which the punditocracy is convinced that the election is Obama’s to lose, Schmidt is trying to give him every chance to do just that. If he pulls it off, the recriminations and second guessing of the early summer will be forgotten. And if not, there will be plenty of “I told you so’s.”






the punditocracy is convinced that the election is Obama’s to lose…
In 2007, the punditocracy was convinced that the primary was Hillary’s to lose. She did, and He will.
The pundit’s convention wisdom of inevitability is a jinx.
McCain has seen that sacred cow fliflopping in Europe and has said ‘Enough!’like many Americans are tired of mantaining obamania,obanation with their taxes
I’d like to to think there’s more to it than who runs best the public relations show. Perhaps that’s what is behind my melancholy – the fact that elections have become more about manipulating public opinion than sound policy. It’s a circus.
I tend to agree with those who believe this election is a referendum on Obama, socialism, and a deliberate diminishing of the United States of America. There is little excitement for McCain, just a recognition that he will do less damage to the country than Obama.
If the GOP wants to generate enthusiasm for its candidates, it needs to start championing our founding principles once again instead of contributing to their continued erosion. Instead, they protect incumbents like Ted Stevens who should be tossed out into the street.
The GOP has rays of Hope in DeMint, Kyl, Cornyn, Pence, Bachmann, Sessions, Hoekstra, Hunter, Coburn, and a few others. But McCain is not of that inspiring breed. He’s a survivor, not a leader. His loyalties appear to be with those whose are inside the castle walls with him (the political class), not with those of us outside those walls. Whoever heads up his campaign faces that challenge. I do not envy them.
I’ll casting my vote against Obama with enthusiasm. What the McCain campaign does has no bearing on my vote.
RE
Well writen.
That video ad is no longer available on YouTube.
Instead of change, how about “Trust”.
Simple, to the point, and will appeal to RINO, conservatives, and old-schoolers who may not be as well represented by BHO. It says solid, dependable, accountable. It can be tied into his attacks on pork, his leadership in the service, and as a POW. Do you want change, or do you want trust? You can trust someone who stared communism in the eye and came out ahead.
Schmidt and the RNC are still holding a few “hole cards” they haven’t even played yet…
That the election is still so close IS a credit to Schmidt’s renewed focus, but the BIG PUSH after the conventions is still aways out there…and in the meantime McCain is EXACTLY where he needs to be!
3 Things are still key to this election for McCain:
1. The VP pick of McCain. If McCain doesn’t pick someone that will bring a renewed energy to the base and the campaign in general, and a focus on ENERGY issues in particular…his campaign will be handicapped at the knees! The ONLY pick that does this for him in my opinion is Sarah Palin of Alaska.
2. The Debates. One on One with Obama, with him having no teleprompter will give McCain the chance to do what he does best, and show how unprepared Obama is to lead this country. This basically won the election for Reagan, and it can do the same for McCain.
3. Gaffes, Goofs, and Garbage from the past, coming out of the Obama campaign. One of the reasons McCain is running neck and neck with Obama is the missteps and flips from Obama. From his flip on FISA, to his wrong stance on the Surge, to his boneheaded myopic decision not to visit the wounded troops in Germany, to his past associations with Wright, Rezko, and Ayers, and, oh…btw..where IS Michelle lately???
3 months is a long, LONG time to for things to happen and plenty of time for MORE s**t to hit the fan…not to mention the circus that will be the Democratic Convention in Denver.
If there’s one thing Schmidt brings to this campaign that is truly needed…it’s the knowledge from experience that this is a MARATHON, not a sprint, and the steady focus he brings to McCain’s camp is a needed and valuable asset.
I want change. I can’t trust you knuckleheads to know how to right this ship. All you “intelligent” conservatives decided not to change horse midstream and ended up trying to drown the whole country. Your party and your views on running this country can’t be trusted. Change or go the way of the dodo
John McCain’s campaign is now known for his many flip-flops and its ongoing turmoil as new faces appear constantly to take-over. It has become clear he does not have the talent to run his own campaign…how can he ever tackle the job of leading the free world? Is it his age or entrenchment in the U.S. Senate that hobbles his efforts?
Trust? From a man who says Obama is at fault for high gas prices? From a man who says Obama is willing to lose the war? Trust away, boys and get four more years of dumb.
A lot of people who do not follow politics will watch the debates. They will see it as their opportunity to determine for themselves who is the best candidate. They are not likely to give the decision more than a couple of hours of thought. They don’t trust the media and ignore them most of the time.
Palin would galvanize conservative women like my wife who have a difficult time seeing McCain as anything other than a grouchy old man. Palin has a great looking family, too. Unfortunately she represents a state with only 3 electoral votes so that works against her (and for Pawlenty).
Pawlenty would have a good influence on more than just MN and is pro-life. He would play well with seniors too, I think.
Hard working Americans have already grown weary of Obama. It’s like eating too much candy. Tastes good for a while but then you don’t feel so good… The “likely” voters who quietly go about their business each day will swing for McCain. Obama Girl will be too busy to show up and vote.
Overall, I like the direction McCain is heading. I heard him speak on tv last Friday and he gave a pretty good speech. Not flashy but he seemed sincere. He ended with an apparently often-told story about a Vietnam Vet Medal of Honor winner which was the first time I had heard it. Well-told and made me feel proud to be an American.
Bobby Jindal refused the offer of the VP slot.
Why?
Because he could smell the stench of defeat emanating from the McCain campaign.
Only after the events of November are concluded and what is left of the Republican party picks itself off the floor can the arduous task of rebuilding the modern conservative movement begin.
The first action will be to repudiate the tenents of those at the helm of the current Republican Party, whose ideas and actions differ in no discernible form with those of the Democratic Party.
Not easy making the hard decisions, but you can still blame GWB all you want.
With such simple minded posts, it’s hard to tell if this “Change” commenter is even old enough to vote.
You want change? Hang around the subway with a paper cup.
Re and Tom JW:
Sad attitude. Shared unfortunately by many. McCain is the uncola. Least of evils. Safe haven from Obama and his highflown notions of change. John McCain deserves better.
I guess I’m an anomaly among voters. I always liked McCain. He was my choice for a republican candidate well before he announced. I didn’t like Hillary and Obama wasn’t a factor then. Of all the candidates and potential candidates Democrat and Republican who flitted across my television screen, McCain was the only one who sounded genuine. A pol to be sure, but unvarnished in a highly polished field.
I readily admit that I’m prejudiced. I’m sixty-one years old and a candidate of seventy-one who can handle the rigors of a presidential campaign speaks to me. And it should to all baby-boomers. Obama looks and sounds more contemporary but in a time when Americans in their sixties and seventies are working and recreating vigorously, McCain is the more modern and representative candidate. The better repository of our hopes for our children. (And a future without socialized medicine where medical research continues apace.)
McCain is made of what Tom Wolfe Jr. in his book of that title calls, “The Right Stuff.”
He has high-tech experience and a hands-on sense of the contemporary technological world. For leader of a nation whose tax-dollars go mainly for high-tech defense and aerospace, McCain is an outstanding fit.
Sounds counterintuitive but I think McCain should drill into the issue of age rather than avoid it. Make a mockery of Obama who never had do defend himself past the age of six and pumps iron for photographers. At the age when Obama was learning to be a hipster and a hoopster and studying his navel to find material for two (so far) autobiographies, McCain was learning how to fly jets and fire guns and missiles.
Winston Churchill, the single greatest democratic leader of the Twentieth Century, became prime minister in his sage sixties. Julius Caesar, against whom all political leaders are measured, was well into his fifties when he crossed the Rubicon. Both men were seasoned politicians and soldiers with many years of varied government service behind them. Successful societies large and small have always been led by their elders.
Great change is coming with or without Barack Obama. Capital and defense driven technological change. Obama probably can’t tell you how his refrigerator, television, cell phone or computer work. He recommends community work over corporate employment to graduates when math, physics, science and engineering for whomever would better serve the graduates and better serve the nation.
Bottom line, McCain is a fine choice for a Twenty-first Century American president. He merits enthusiastic support.
You right I am 14 and still know more about politics than all of you geniuses who pulled the lever twice for Bush. We are the ones we have been waiting for! You are the ones whose time is over. Get yourself to the nearest ice flow and drift off to sea. Oh-uh here comes my conservative grandpa coming to water board me cuz I took his meds that the socialized state of George Bush helped him buy.
ps- thank heavens for wikipedia or all of you dopes couldn’t pretend you had any knowledge of our political system much less an original political thought.
Don’t feed the SNERT, folks.
RE – Well said! I’d like to think this is more than PR but that is the monster we call current reality! We didn’t create it, it started as soon as networks realized there was a whole damn lot of money selling soap and it really didn’t matter what you put on TV.
Marc – TRUST! It sounds nice, the only problem is it’s too easy to mock! The mockery has alread started in this post! I’m sad to say, what we really need is the Anti-Bambi vote (i.e. RE’s opinion) I’m not sure if there is any bumper sticker answer for Barack Hussein Obama other than… BARRY BARRY QUITE CONTRARY!
Dave II – 1,2,3 I agree! I love Sarah Palin as VP but… Kay Bailey Hutchison wouldn’t be bad either! The polls show women over 40 may be the key to a conservative win in November. Women over 40 think Barack is just a liiiiiiiittle too slick for his britches and they will quietly vote him down.
Change – Oh that was very original! Did you think that up all by yourself as you sat on your training toilet!!!? Take a deep breath Jr. before you suck your face out through your behind! That would not be pretty even for a wannabe like you.
Me&BobbyMcgee – That’s it!!!! You hit it right on the head (Sarah Palin too) listening to Bambi Obama non-stop is just like eating 200 Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups… the first 5 are great but the other 195 are like being waterboarded with peanut butter and chocolate. I have to puke!
david levavi – It’s not that we don’t really want to vote for McCain its just that is going to be SOOOOOOOOOOOO fun to vote against Barack Hussein Obama! We can’t wait. Remember: barrybarryquitecontrary.com
change, i congratulate you on your enthusiasm, please write all this down and in 4 more years read it again. Kennedy,Johnson,Nixon,Ford,Carter,Reagan,G.H.bush,Clinton,G.W.Bush
seen alot change. Obama offers change. sorry but i don’t see a third bush term, almost a second Clinton term, better a first MCcain term
“You right I am 14 and still know more about politics than all of you geniuses who pulled the lever twice for Bush. We are the ones we have been waiting for! You are the ones whose time is over.”
Speaking of change; when did 14 year olds get the vote? I must have napped thru that. Speaking of chance; Who is going to change your diapers once us old timers have drifted out to sea? BTW, what happened to all the ice floes getting melted by Global warming? IS that an official flip flop or just a practice one?
There are NO ORIGINAL Political thoughts. If you live to be 50, you will see PRESIDENT Bush as one of America’s greatest Presidents.
“People never lie so much as after a hunt, during a war or before an election.”*
*
_Otto Von Bismarck
John Samford – This post doesn’t pass the smell test to me either. I love the quote. Bismarck could have added “during an online post” if he was privy to the technology. Liberals socialists are an interesting rabid animal. It seems their dogma has been run over by their karma. LOL!
Hey Change, our goal is to melt all ice caps, kill all trees, waterboard all skateboarders, and laugh our way to the bank off the backs of whoever it is you pretend to support or believe in. Because, you know, we’re evil conservative people. There, you don’t have to think any longer.
@davidlevavi: Thanks for the excellent comment. I’ve been looking for folks who can describe McCain as the man to proactively vote for rather than casting a defensive vote.
Change,
I have a joke for you, one my father told me when I was a young man. You’re probably not old enough to understand it, but that’s OK– you’ll understand it better when you’re older, and that should be enough for any of us……
“When I was 15, my father was the stupidest man on Earth. When I was 25, my father was a genius. It’s *amazing* how much that old man learned in just ten years!”
So true, so true….
Why doesn’t McCain counter the Messiah’s ludicrous foreign circus trip with a fully-publicised visit to “Inspect” the proposed ANWR drilling area?
I’ve seen photos of the area, and it’s nothing like the descriptions given by the tree huggers.
A more desolate and unappealing area would be hard to imagine.
We’ve reached a tipping point in this campaign. This summer, the race no longer became a referendum on George Bush, but it is now a referendum on Barack Obama.
This is Obama’s doing. Everyone–for or against him–is waiting for Obama to stop acting like a rockstar and start making definitive policy stances. But it isn’t happening.
I see the partisan warlords have rolled out their warwagons. Because, you know, it’s all about if Our Guy wins. Because of the vast superiority of Our Guy’s views. The ones we already know Our Guy will absolutely lie about today and that won’t be in any evidence come the first of 2009 and thereafter.
How soon we forget, huh? Look. This isn’t about the usual politics. This is about the money.
As in, Obama, after he wins, which he will, will within those first four years become the biggest fallguy for the biggest financial debacle the country has seen yet.
Are you watching the real news? About Freddie, Fannie, Indy, and scores of little systemic failures? About some fifty trillion dollars in unpaid debt and entitlement obligations? About a trillion dollars already gone and housing only a third of the way back down to the basement? About how we make nothing and buy everything on credit and on the wage of a globe full of 3rd world makers?
Solely because, so far, they trust the dollar. Ever wonder what happens after that dollar goes belly-up? I mean, it’s based on thin air after all.
See, we’re just now seeing the first indicators of the obsolescence of the US’s monetary system. The fractional reserve system doesn’t work. The Fed and the last ten administrations killed the richest, most productive, most prosperous and freest nation in history.
So we need a fall guy and I think we know who that guy is. The inexperienced, double-talking, self-centered, idea-less Socialist-in-disguise called Obama will simply inherit the end of our current way of life.
It all adds up. Including why McCain is irrelevant, now, tomorrow, and in the future. Bush got out with his legacy, such as it is, largely intact. The next guy likely won’t.
Ten
Suck really really hard on that lemon. I know it makes you feeeeel sooooooo goooooood to be soooooo negative. A Democrat will never ever be blamed for anything bad that might happen. Never. And when America is tested after a new president is sworn in, even the stupid mistake Obama’s judgment will lead him to make in response will be blamed on Bush.
Braveheart
Excellent idea. McCain could fly up to Alaska to interview Governor Palin for the VP job and she could invite him and the press to personally inspect the pestilential bog that sits above the oil in ANWR. I would love to see Clair Shipman and David Gregory trying to avoid going insane during a broadcast with the clouds of noxious insects crawling into their eyes, nose and ears.
Ten, they’ve been saying similar things since at least Carter’s day if not earlier. And, “this time” is always somehow *gonna be different* than “last time”.
*yawn*
Manufacturing still represents about 1/5th of the economy. Same as it did 40 years ago. What has happened is that the machines have gotten smarter and we don’t need so many people aking stuff. In fact we don’t need so many machines.
So let me see. We have a situation where we have made a couple of trillion in mistakes. In an economy whose profit runs around 13 trillion a year and rising. And yeah 50 trillion in unfunded liabilities. That is going to hurt. About 4 years of profit. If it gets paid out over 40 years it is almost down in the noise.
We are doomed.
The New and Improved John McCain….
Plan (A) Copy Obama
1. Obama says “more troops for Afghanistan”… McCain says “I think so too”
2. Obama says “staged withdrawl from Iraq”… McCain says “Time horizon is a good idea”
3. Obama says “tough direct diplomacy with Iran”… Bush sends negotiators. McCain says “Good idea”
The only thing that has been “New and Improved” is McCains ability to follow Obama’s lead.
Sen. McCain will have difficulty with me based on his record. He wanted the ‘maverick’ mantle early on when I don’t care much about maverickness or hopeychangeyness, either. Neither of these men are running for President but Super-Senator and Sen. McCain should at least be able to see the difference between an Executive and a Legislative agenda. Sen. Obama is clueless on that, too, a naive Chitown machine politician willing to obfuscate past in order to get his hands on power. I had never thought to see a cult of personality behind a politician in the US, as that has always been the realm of petty dictators and tyrants. So who to vote for: a man who can’t figure out what a President does after bing in the Senate for decades or one who wants personal power to reward his cronies and ‘remake’ the country to his desires?
I will vote against the power hungry.
I have extreme problems voting for the clueless.
But I will, most definitely, vote for gridlock in DC as I no longer see anything from there as a ‘solution’ to anything. Keep ‘em busy fighting each other. That is a real good voting agenda and has been for nearly 4 decades. More gridlock, please!
Braveheart & Mark in Texas: Problem here is that McCain has changed his position on drilling but not enough to include the ANWR, that’s still off limits the last time I checked.
Another example where Mr. Schmidt, with a candidate who’s a far better speaker unscripted, can’t help on focus is McCain’s statement on payroll tax increases during ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday (look at today’s editorial “McCain’s Tax Blunder” in _The Wall Street Journal_):
“There is nothing that’s off the table. I have my positions, and I’ll articulate them. But nothing’s off the table.”
This on top of McCain’s opposition to Bush’s tax rate decreases back when it counted … well, as another commentator put it, a campaign isn’t going to work well if the leader sounds an uncertain trumpet.
“Not easy making the hard decisions, but you can still blame GWB all you want.”
There is nothing that can’t be blamed on GW; either George W Bush, God’s will, or global warming.
“waterboard all skateboarders…”
Brad, if McCain puts this in his platform, he’ll win overwhelmingly.
McCain has had more “insert foot in mouth” moments than I wish to remember. For instance, he just went back on his word that he wouldn’t raise taxes. How idiotic is this guy?!?!
Obama’s Hope Theme is hopelessly corny – straight out of a high school valedictorian speech. The only serious part is the people who have responded to it – represents some serious stress fractures in American society.
My view of the *Maverick* persona is not as harsh, especially in the context of the clubbiness of historical Republican gamesmanship. Raised in various forums elsewhere, including PM, is the idea that the Democrats failed to *own*the Iraq War, make it their cause, if you will. The breach only got bigger as the difficulties piled on and suddenly we’re on the brink of Armageddon. The process replaced the problem as the *rancid* political divisions diluted professional attempts to fix problems, all now subsumed under the pretty umbrella of Hope – while they get the b@stards.
Republicans must make greater efforts to do what the Democrats have mastered – seemingly – the election is still out – which is build effective coalitions. There is a cheap way to do this and a responsible way to do this.
To the extent that the current group of Republicans has absolved themselves of this responsibility, the Party is now tasked with breaking from the clubbiness of retrenchent to reconnect with those of us who support the fundamentals of good government, that would include fiscal responsibility for a start, and those of us who still believe in the principles of conservative government as a superior alternative to some form of collective care-taker. Back and forth. We’ve been here before.
In no small way, I sense some cognitive dissarray as Republicans come to grips with a reality they don’t much like. Enter McCain, the messenger with a not so nice message.
Yes they can. Whether or not they will is another matter.
McCain is winning big with voters over 40. You know, grown ups.
Change? No thanks.
Prosperity? Sign me up.
Here’s my suggestion for the McCain campaign and the whole damned Republican party:
Start asking this question:
Are we still a Nation? Do we believe in an America with well-defined borders and a philosophy and spirit that are uniquely and genuinely American? Do we, as Americans, see ourselves as citizens of a great country, or as “citizens of the World?”
This is not rhetorical flummery. These are genuine, earnest questions in light of 1) Obama’s obsession with international approval, and 2) His constant need to damn America with feint praise or to even outright insult his own country. They are important questions in light of the whole illegal immigration issue, and the relentless pressure from the global community to try to make America conform to international “standards” which are corrupt and which threaten individual freedoms.
Will John McCain be the “American” President, and will the GOP be “America’s Party?”
Obama sure as hell isn’t going to govern as an American, and the Democratic Party of today is most certainly not America’s Party.
All I can say is I can see it’s working. There are signs of it everywhere.
A few have even resurfaced here at PJM making snarky remarks after having disappeared for awhile. They’re nervous. And Team Obama is making excuses/throwing what jabs they can on the cable shows.
They know the numbers are showing a downward trend. At the very least, BO didn’t get the bump he’d hoped to get. Some big mistakes were made on the road, and they’ve got to clean up the mess.
You could see it on BO’s face today when asked about McCain’s recent attacks – he doesn’t like it. Not one little bit. Especially when ridiculed. Kind of detracts from the aura. I think a great ad could be made of the comparison someone made of BO to the fabled rooster who thought he brought up the sun each day.
And it looks like the Man Upstairs isn’t answering BO’s much publicized prayer. (Was it really given to the news media BEFORE finding its place in the Wall as an article at American Thinker says? That’s gonna hurt, if true.)
He asked the Lord to help him guard against pride. A tall order, to be sure.
Not that God isn’t able. But reading Dana Milbank at the Washington Post (linked at Riehl World) makes me think God is doing what He usually does. When He knows the (lack of) sincerety behind the request.
And I just keep thinking of the dollars being spent on security for this clown. In that article, though he’s not even president, he’s shutting down roads already as he makes his way to “meet” with people. Is he demanding this? Who the heck does he think he is?
Just imagine if he is elected and being young, we’ve got to pay for security beyond his years in office – and all those extra pension dollars too. I don’t think we can afford to elect this guy. Somebody’s gonna have to break it to him. We’ve got a budget to balance.
For McCain, how about “_Real_ Change”? Anyone not an Obama zombie knows the “change” mantra is rubbish, that the situation in Washington will continue as before, but why not go for rhetorical one-upmanship? How could Obama’s gang reply to “_Real_ Change”? Maybe they respond with “_Really_ Real Change”–ha!–”Unbending Change” or even “More Change than You can Shake a Stick at”?
“From a man who says Obama is willing to lose the war?”
Why is this a question? The entire Democrat party is trying to lose this war. That they are failing is one reason why Obama is not doing as well as he should be.
The old guy should rest and relax until Labor Day. Nobody cares in August except those who already know how they’re going to vote.
The R’s need to get back to the Three-legged Conservative (Social, Hawkish, Economic) who defines the typical Republican voter. Going for one issue folk, like fiscal conservatives, is not enough. Whats required is going for folks who embrace the whole of conservatism.
Problem Sen. McCain has, he’s not going for any of conservatism. He’s part of the Republican liberals who keep trying to knock over the Three-legged Man. And he’s been trying to do this for a long time as well. Which does an awful lot to explain why things are so rough.
Add in that its the Democrats year to lose (War in Iraq is largely won, and GWB had eight years…time for a change, and the economy is struggling), and you’d think the Dems would be blowing the doors off. I suppose thats a testimony to how terrible the Dems are.
I can sympathize. Can’t this time, both parties lose, and America win?
I’m hearing the experts say that, in order for McCain to win, he has to do a better job of separating himself from Bush.
One comes to mind immediately. It responds to our deep debt and speaks to fiscal conservatives. McCain made his name for 25 yrs. on fighting pork. Bush didn’t veto enough bills and get tough with Congress. I’m hoping McCain will. Promises to keep government small (Bush grew govt.) and congress’ spending in check so we can cut taxes should speak to every voter.
I’d love to see Romney put to work slashing government waste as he did to turn around private sector corporations in trouble.
Obama today is spending his time trying to answer the Britney/Paris ad. Spinning that that was all it was about. I don’t know if it’s working. But this kind of thing might have put BO off his game. And I’m glad McCain’s campaign is calling him on using the race card in his response to the ad. It’s not that he’s “scary” or “different” — it’s that he’s all hype and no substance. But that’s what BO did in the primary – he played the race card every chance he could.
BO doesn’t want to be ridiculed. After all, isn’t that one of the Alinsky rules? That’s his area of expertise. How unfair if that comes back to bite him.
JMC is back!!!
It’s a great surprise and He can fingerpoint and penetrate sharply into the obamabluff
In response to David Levavi:
“Sad attitude. Shared unfortunately by many. McCain is the uncola.”
The pale alternative to the popular darker choice. Reading you loud and clear so far.
“Least of evils.”
A poster subsequent to you thanked you for offering a positive rather than a defensive account of McCain. When “least of evils” is hailed as positive, the terrain is pretty well staked out, I think.
“Safe haven from Obama and his highflown notions of change. John McCain deserves better.
I guess I’m an anomaly among voters. I always liked McCain. He was my choice for a republican candidate well before he announced.”
He was once my choice too. Whichever party flag he was planning to run under.”
…
“I readily admit that I’m prejudiced. I’m sixty-one years old and a candidate of seventy-one who can handle the rigors of a presidential campaign speaks to me. And it should to all baby-boomers.”
Is this presumptuous? I think we have yet to see how he will hold up physically and emotionally.
“Obama looks and sounds more contemporary but in a time when Americans in their sixties and seventies are working and recreating vigorously, McCain is the more modern and representative candidate.”
*McCain is more modern?* I don’t know what to ask here except what can you mean by this assertion?
“The better repository of our hopes for our children. (And a future without socialized medicine where medical research continues apace.)”
Neither of the candidates is promoting socialized medicine, as I presume you know. Your veneer of level-headed even-handedness wears all the way through when you parrot patently false McCain campaign talking points. As for medical research, with the exception of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology’s analysis of his support, McCain seems to be on the ball in this respect, but who, in this race, appears not to be?
“McCain is made of what Tom Wolfe Jr. in his book of that title calls, “The Right Stuff.””
I just can’t see this. He was a priviged goofball in the service from academy days through his crashing of three aircraft before he was shot down. He was renowned for violating the military code prohibiting adultery before and after his POW days. While a prisoner he collaborated extensively with the enemy, divulged military information, accepted special treatment and helped produce anti-American propoganda over a period of at least several weeks. This can’t be attributed to an excruciating moment of breakdown under turture. This is collaboration pure and simple.
He has been abusive to his wife in well-documented public instances, calling her a cunt and a synonym for whore. He has made jokes which would get him fired for sexual harassment if he were running the local UPS depot, including jokes about bestiality and women enjoying rape. Is this the right stuff the the leader of the women of the free world?
He is notoriously hot-headed and impatient. Numerous well-respected Republican have been quoted as being aghast at the prospect of him in control of our military.
He circumvented the law to keep his drug-addicted wife from being prosecuted for the drugs she illegally obtained through the charity which she had ostensibly set up to provide medicine to third world children.
He is frequently dishonest with what he himself calls the worst possible motivations (search Youtube for MCCain and Confederate flag to hear it from his own mouth.)
He has shifted position like a weathervane, pandering for votes. A partial list includes:
Gay marriage, Abortion, Ethanol fuel, Tax Cuts, His Cuba Position, Immigration, Ethics reform, War for oil, Big Oil, the religious right, talking to Hamas, promise to withdraw from Iraq, Muqtada al-Sadr, Russia in the G8,
Afganistan, Inheritance tax, Drilling for oil within 30 days, English as the official language, Bush’s policies,
Social Security, Torture, Civil Rights, the “Psychological” recession, Iraqi political progress,
Insurance coverage for contraception and viagra, The Dream Act, Payroll tax increase.
Now you may approve of the new positions he has leapt to to secure the nomination but is this wishy-washy flip-flopping a sign of The Right Stuff?
And please, anyone can can watch and hear McCain’s politically motivated position changes on each of these issues simply by querying YouTube with “McCain” plus any one of those issues. I’m not talking about anything but indisputable historical fact.
“He has high-tech experience and a hands-on sense of the contemporary technological world.” Oh please. He doesn’t know how to read or post to this website. Now you’re being silly.
“For leader of a nation whose tax-dollars go mainly for high-tech defense and aerospace, McCain is an outstanding fit.”
A great number of tax dollars went to replace the jets he crashed, but his troglodite lack of understanding of technology is a fact you seem to be trying to negate by force of will and repetition of a falshood.
“Sounds counterintuitive but I think McCain should drill into the issue of age rather than avoid it.”
This is fine if he can make it work.
“Make a mockery of Obama who never had do defend himself past the age of six and pumps iron for photographers.”
Yes, after pledging *not* to substitute making mockery for substantial campaigning, McCain is now doing little but following your advice here. Time will tell how well mockery substitutes for statesmanship.
“At the age when Obama was learning to be a hipster and a hoopster and studying his navel to find material for two (so far) autobiographies, McCain was learning how to fly jets and fire guns and missiles.”
Kind of like W. Half a trillion dollars of debt later, with the largest expansion of government in the history of the world and the suspension of your and my habeus corpus rights under Bush, I think we can see what kind of qualification “learning to fly jets and shoot guns and missiles” is.
“Winston Churchill, the single greatest democratic leader of the Twentieth Century, became prime minister in his sage sixties. Julius Caesar, against whom all political leaders are measured, was well into his fifties when he crossed the Rubicon. Both men were seasoned politicians and soldiers with many years of varied government service behind them.”
True enough.
“Successful societies large and small have always been led by their elders.” Of course you know this categorical statement is false. Shame on you.
“Great change is coming with or without Barack Obama. Capital and defense driven technological change. Obama probably can’t tell you how his refrigerator, television, cell phone or computer work.”
And McCain can? This is just more silliness. Obama defeated the Clinton machine largely via savvy utilization of technology. He is defeating McCain the same way now. When will McCain bring all this knowledge to bear in his own bets interest, never mind that of the country?
“He recommends community work over corporate employment to graduates when math, physics, science and engineering for whomever would better serve the graduates and better serve the nation.”
Oh for heaven’s sake. You imply that Obama recommends abandoning science, all the while the current adminstration has been abetting the undermining of science education at every level by pandering to religious fundamentalists with “Creation Science” in the schools, and frequently ordering good science to be redacted from reports to the government in favor of politically motivated malarky.
“Bottom line, McCain is a fine choice for a Twenty-first Century American president. He merits enthusiastic support.”
You’re entitled to your opinion.
Yesterday, probably at the bidding of the new McCain strategist, someone had the audacity to ask Obama what his religious persuasion was before he became a Christian. Not surprisingly, Barack was flabbergasted by such a harsh, impertinent and crude question. After just seconds, though, Obama ragained his composure and proceeded to clearly explain;
When he was growing up in Indonesia, virtually everyone was a Muslim.
However, Barack was never a radical Muslim. He has always wanted everyone to live in peace and prosperity.
And, as President, Obama described how he vigorously plans to redistribute the wealth of this country. Through executive order Barack told the McCain’s question-fed reporters, that he’ll set a profit ceiling on the three biggest oil companies, above which all monies shall be earmarked to initiate wholescale reparations for direct decendants of slaves. Additionally, some of the monies will go to the funding of free healthcare and welfare for both legal immigrants and immigrants who are legal-by-desire.
Special 30% cost of government capital gains taxes on stocks, bonds and private home sales will also be initiated to refill the Bush-drained governmental coffers.
These are just a few examples of the visionary changes that are part and pacel of America’s new “Comprehensive Program for Shared Prosperity.
So,remember, when you vote for Obama, you’ll be electing to change the financial fabric of the United States for the progressive better, replacing it with a European model that puts all Americans on an equal financial footing; spreads the richness of America to all, white and black, disadvantaged and well off. Under the new Barack administration, we’ll all be working for the common good. That’s the kind of change, the kind of future, a vote for Obama secures. One nation. Under Obama. Where, in a very real sense, we all work for each other. High taxes, yes. But the poor and left behind will get back their contributions ten fold. While America may no longer be a world power, she’ll be once again a proud, respected nation. Praised, not scorned by leaders throughout the world.
What do you think will happen to America in the nearest future? It seems to me that General Election in the USA looks starts to look like comedy show. [url=http://www.animalssession.com/forum/member.php?u=1274]:D[/url] Yesterday I found the following post in periodics:
“The Naked Cowboy endorses McCain–ooookay [url=http://rpg-z.com/forums/index.php?showuser=3963]:)[/url]
The Naked Cowboy was just on tv saying he plans to endorse
McCain. [url=http://www.traductores-espanoles.com/Foro/member.php?u=1279]:D[/url] LOL I’m sure McCain’s camp will relay that to him
and I am sure it will mean all the difference to the
outcome of the election. NOT!
McCain’s entire campaign has been a 3 ring circus. What
happened there? Bozo the clown Bush would have been right
at home if they had let him anywhere near them. ROFL
How exactly does Bush show his face now that his entire
party has disowned him? [url=http://www.sladeham.com/the_message_board/member.php?u=985]:([/url]“
X4vrPv