News
Directly To
Your Inbox
Follow PJ Media

“The Mother of All Laws” – Is Chavez Now Officially a Dictator?


Chavez-Chirac.jpg Men in the news: Hugo and Jacques Yesterday the Venezuelan National Assembly approved legislation giving what may be dictatorial powers to their president Hugo Ch√°vez. Pajamas Media blogger and Latin American affairs expert Fausta Wertz offers this analysis.

by

Bio

February 1, 2007 - 8:40 am

by Fausta Wertz

The headlines could not have taken anyone by surprise:

VENEZUELA HEADING TOWARDS DICTATORSHIP- CHAVEZ GETS POWERS TO REMAKE COUNTRY
Chavez Gets Powers to Remake Venezuela
Chavez gets sweeping new powers

That is, anyone who had read about Hugo Ch√°vez’s January 9 announcement, “We’re heading towards socialism”, could not have been surprised by today’s headlines.

First, a little background: Three weeks ago as he proclaimed himself a Communist, Chávez swore in a new 27-member cabinet comprised of ministers that are both more loyal to him and who have lesser name recognition among the Venezuelan public. Chávez replaced the heads of such key ministries as interior, justice, finance and education, and loyal aides, including his then-Vice-President, José Vicente Rangel, who, as The Economist points out, was one of the few remaining figures in the government with his own political clout.

By doing so, he centralized all powers in his hands since the courts were already under his control.

That was three weeks ago.

Business News America reported that on Tuesday the Assembly had granted Ch√°vez ‘special powers related to the regulation of hydrocarbons and their derivates, “the electric system” as well as “supervision and control of the energy and oil ministry,” meaning Ch√°vez can proceed as he sees fit without the assembly’s intervention.’

Not as noticeable in the headlines is the news that also yesterday one of Ch√°vez’s top military advisors, Gen. Alberto Muller, confirmed plans to purchase air defense systems to guard strategic facilities, such as refineries, bridges, and hydroelectric power plants. Russia’s Interfax-Military News Agency reported also on Tuesday that Russia could supply between 10 and 12 Tor-M1 anti-aircraft missile systems to Venezuela.

The Mother of All Laws:
Yesterday’s National Assembly vote was literally out in the open: It took place in an open-air public ceremony in a square in Caracas. The lawmakers visibly approved all four articles of the law with a show of hands. The newly-appointed ministers performed for the crowd who were wearing Chavista red shirts, for the media, and for their boss. After enacting the law, they signed off with “Patria, socialismo o muerte, venceremos” (“Fatherland, socialism or death! We will prevail!”), the motto of Castro’s Cuban revolution.

Hugo Ch√°vez calls the law “the mother of all laws”, but the official name is La Ley Habilitante, the Enabling Law.

While calling the Enabling Law the mother of all laws may not be the most delicate way of referring to it, it is the most accurate. The Enabling Law grants the President special powers to legislate in 11 areas:

institutional transformation;
popular participation; establishing public function; financial and social; taxes and finances; judicial and public safety; science and technology; territorial ordinances; security and defense;infrastructure, transport and services; and energy.

While reading the law (in Spanish), I find the item on popular participation particularly interesting (my translation, emphasis added):

“enabling the Administration the organizational structure to allow the direct exercise of Popular Power, taking into consideration that deepening the constitutional principle of starring and participative democracy is a historical commitment taken up by the National Executive“.

What all that verbiage tells me is that officially the power will now be coming exclusively from the top down.

Further down the document, item #2 reads (again, my translation, emphasis added),

2. “In the realm of popular participation,
To dictate rules establishing the mechanisms for popular participation, through social control, the technique of social inspection and through the practice of volunteering, in the community organized through the application of laws and the economic realm of the State. Also, to allow the State’s institutions’ organizational structure to bring about the direct exercise of popular sovereignty.”

To any of us familiar with Soviet-style “volunteering” and “mechanisms for popular participation”, this particular section will surely send chills down our spines.

The item on taxes and finances allows for the creation of bi-national funds for bi-national programs. What nations and what programs will be involved are entirely up to Hugo.

While the Enabling Law provides an eighteen-month period for the President to enact the laws until there is a change in the Constitution, the law has no provisions limiting its duration or its scope, according to Venezuelan daily El Pais. The President has all the authority to enact the laws of transition and will repeal laws no longer in effect.

I called the Venezuelan Mission to the United Nations and they referred me to the Panorama Digital web newspaper (in Spanish). The website quotes Assemblyman Carlos Escarr√°, who states that the law will be applied in two stages: The first stage, lasting until next September, will prepare the projects. The second stage, for the following nine months, for its implementation.

Panorama Digital has a post on reactions to the law, where the National Assembly President Cilia Flores states that there were no objections by those members of the opposition who participated in the discussion. She also states that people who oppose the law and have stated that they’ll request the Venezuela Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo de Justicia) to repeal it have every right to use all available resources to that effect. But, as I noted, the President already controls the courts.

Tal Cual calls the new law, “giving Ch√°vez all, absolutely all, special powers”.

In plain words, Hugo Ch√°vez is now officially a dictator.

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

10 Comments, 10 Threads

  1. 1. Econ-Scott

    Shades of 1938.

    How does Czechoslavkia and Poland & Russ — ….er Columbia and Ecuador feel about El Presidente for life ?

  2. 2. David Nicholas

    I can’t believe he actually called it an “Enabling Law”. The legislation that made Herr Hitler “Der Fuhrer” was called the “Enabling Act”.

  3. I am sure there are millions of Venezuelans today whispering to their friends, ” I told you he was a Communist madman and you didn’t believe me. Where will we go?”
    Expect a flood of refugees on our southern borders. I don’t think Hugo
    will be a benevolent dictator. So this
    man, who used the central instrument of democracy, the vote ,to seize power will soon become the latest darling of the left.
    Watch for sweeping reforms (nationalization) and reordering of the education system.

    And pray for the deliverance of the Venezuelan people from the misery and madness they are about to endure.

  4. “Participatory democracy” is the buzzword by which leftwing activists sell Hugo et al. to the public: a patina of direct, democratic (seemingly swift and just) decision-making over enhanced state powers.

    I wonder whether that slogan has traction in Latin America the way it does up north?

    Also, is it unreasonable to suspect that Venezuela is in the works to become a launching pad for Iranian missiles?

  5. 5. A. Derubeis

    Praying for the Venezuelan people is most certainly justified, they and many others will need it. However, people usually get the government they deserve usually through diligence or apathy but in this case, I suspect, fear and intimidation.

    Evidently, the world has retained nothing of importance from history. Chavez is a dangerous certifiable monster and, as such, we should stop buying anything from his country or, from any other country that is supporting him.

  6. 6. Bill

    “I don’t think Hugo

    will be a benevolent dictator.”

    No. I suspect he will be a jovial, jocular and absolutely delightful dictator. Chavez is not like Fidel or the Soviet dictators, he is a character in the truest sense of the word. And his dictatorship will show it. What will not be shown is the thuggishness of his functionaries who I suspect will be anything but benevolent. But who cares. All eyes will be on South America’s Number One Ham.

  7. 7. gcblues costa rica

    who cares? i do. i live in latin america. this guy is a robert mugabe, and he has been supported by the lefty intellegencia ?sic? in the usa. from carter to liberation professors, this guy was enabled by the usa’s left…..do recall the outrage by the usa left during the coup attempt. and jimmy the idiot carter certified his “election” que pathetica.

    they left whines wanting bush to accept and apologize for his mistakes. when will the left apologize for supporting mugabe, chavez, and destroying every inner city in america with its welfare policys?

  8. 8. aN

    Well, Bush just assumed dictatorial powers without Congress voting on it.

    Alas, we cannot in good conscience rebuke another country for practically anything any more. We’re the country that says torture isn’t torture, that the mere threat of terrorism is enough to give up the rights our forebears fought a revolution for.

    We are hypocrites. Our president is a dictator-wannabe. He just isn’t any good at it.

  9. 9. jB

    aN, don’t be stupid. You dismiss Chavez’s rise as a dictator because of your hatred for Bush?
    But I shouldn’t take you so seriously. You probably can’t even define torture or terrorism (and I mean actual definitions, not convoluted examples).

  10. That aN castigates the Military Commissions Act, and the weaseling that Bush etc were doing prior to that, isn’t stupid.

    Where he’s being stupid is invoking “we”. I’m one of the “we” who voted against the Congress that signed that Act. How is it hypocritical for “we”, who realised what Bush was doing and voted accordingly, to point at Chavez and to call him out as “even worse than Bush”?

    aN is also being stupid in hijacking the thread with this nonense. I can only assume that he’s trying to guilt trip us – and I include all Americans in this “us” – against acting in our own national interest. I’d say that he’s also unpatriotic, and even treasonous in the “aid and comfort” sense, but he’d probably view that as a compliment.

    Even when the Right is as crooked and dictatorial as it was last year, guttersnipes like aN make it really REALLY hard to vote Left.

Leave a Reply

Click here to subscribe to the Daily Digest, to stay up to date with the latest at PJ Media. (You will be sent an email asking you to verify your email address. If you have previously subscribed, no verification email will be sent.)