The Gordon Brown Takedown Goes Viral
Unless you have been living under a rock or only have access to left-wing media, you might have heard about Dan Hannan. He is the MEP from Southern England who has become an internet sensation for his polite but pugilistic takedown of British Prime Minister Gordon Brown while he was visiting the European Parliament.
Completely ignored by the British media for almost 48 hours after it first appeared on UK blogs and trans-Atlantic ones like mine, the video of Hannan’s takedown is finally starting to get noticed by the British media. Upset by getting beat to the story by Fox News, Drudge, and quite a few other right-of-center blogs in the U.S., the British media is in full trashing mode. The most egregious effort so far is this biased trashing of Hannan by Channel 4 in the UK. Most amusing to those in the know about the YouTube sensation caused by the video is the fact that Channel 4 manages to get the amount of views the clip has been getting wrong by a factor of 50% x 10. Instead of mentioning that it was up to over 800,000 views at the time of the broadcast, Peter Snow said it had slightly more than 40,000. It has today broken the million views barrier. Was it a complete cock-up or a deliberately misleading comment? You take a look and be the judge.
Meanwhile, the BBC has barely managed to mention it at all. The network has been keen to stress the rather pathetic attempts by Labor’s Derek Draper, who appears on the Channel 4 piece, and MP Tom Harris, who has this to say:
What was truly repugnant about his speech was the total absence of any sense of patriotism. … Gordon Brown isn’t just Labour’s prime minister; he’s Britain’s prime minister, and for any UK politician to launch such a disgraceful, personal attack on his country’s leader — in a foreign country — is nothing short of disgraceful.
It has become rather clear that both the standard press and the Labor Party are feeling threatened by the sensation that Dan Hannan’s broadside against Gordon Brown MP has caused. He speaks for many Britons fed up with a prime minister who was not even elected to lead the country but appointed by the leadership of the Labor Party.
Hannan used a nautical theme for part of the speech:
Other ships used the good years to caulk their hulls and clear up their rigging — in other words, to pay off debt — but you used the good years to raise borrowing yet further. As a consequence, under your captaincy, our hull is pressed deep into the water line, under the accumulated weight of your debt.
What is most interesting, and should be a worry to both President Obama and the Republican Party, is the fact that Hannan’s words struck a deep chord with many Americans as well. Twitter and the Internet have been alight with people praising Dan Hannan’s appearance on Neil Cavuto’s show, even forgiving him his kind words about Obama’s candidacy. He also appeared on Sean Hannity’s show and several other U.S. programs.
This was something that many of us on the right, both in the UK and the U.S., took Hannan to task for during the lead up to the election. I was dumbfounded that such an ardent opponent of socialism and someone hewn from the same rock as Thatcher could be praising Obama.
I consider him a friend from the heady days of young adult, right-of-center politics in the UK. He, like me, is one of Thatcher’s children who spent much of the early 90s trying to get the Conservative Party to remain Thatcherite and not drift off toward the limp middle as it did under Major and subsequent leaders (sound familiar?). After his graduation from Oxford, Hannan was a regular at meetings, dinners of varying sizes, and social events in London sponsored by groups like the National Association of Conservative Graduates and the Conservative Way Forward. Young Conservatives in London lost a great talent when he went off to Brussels as an MEP. In Hannan, the European Parliament gained a permanent anti-federalist burr who would oppose its desires for continued encroachment on national powers and for micro-managing control.
We have to console ourselves that Douglas Carswell, a good friend of his and co-author of Hannan’s recent book The Plan, managed to get by the “wets” (British RINOs) and get elected to Parliament. In the book, Hannan & Carswell set out a vision for what a Conservative government should look like.
Rest assured that there are many conservatives in the UK who would like to see the next Conservative government led by Dan Hannan with Dougles Carswell as his chancellor, rather than the current lot that leads the centrist Conservative Party.
Needless to say, to hear Hannan described as “unknown,” “obscure,” or “up and coming” by the media on both sides of the Atlantic causes a bit of a snicker. Those who closely observed Hannan over the last decade or more saw him as a highflier yet to achieve his potential. Even those in the Conservative Party who did not share his Thatcherite/libertarian views knew he was going places from the first time they heard him speak.
His style reminds us of Disreali, Churchill, and Reagan — speakers greatly missed by lovers of good rhetoric. This is apt, as Hannan is as likely to quote from Reagan, Goldwater, Lincoln, or Jefferson as he is from great British leaders of the past.
The speech — which was heartfelt and passionate yet polite and dignified — reminded all of us what a great leader, rhetorician, and parliamentarian Dan Hannan is. There were calls from some for him to be leader during the last leadership election. On the basis of this latest episode, the clamor next time will be even greater.
And if the British Conservatives continue to fail to appreciate the man, I am sure that there are plenty of desperate conservative Americans who would welcome him with open arms as a new American citizen.
Desperate times call for great leaders. Dan Hannan is one such man.






The first real broadside from right in the the global war on capitalism and it will sink a few ships. The war has just begun. Good luck and God speed Mr Hannan.
..if only..
..the GOP would grow a pair like this guy’s.
The shocking fact brought to light by this article is the stifling lack of coverage of this eloquent and forceful rebuke. It shows that we will have a real battle on our ghands over the coming months and years and it may be, quite possibly, our last best opportunity to speak out against the suffocating creep of socialism in this world.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXs
This must-see video shows the heart, passion and courage of Mr. Hannan. Listening to him made me so proud to be a conservative. I wish there were more like him in Washington.
Because so many of us on the right love Sarah Palin while admitting she may not yet be prepared to assume the national stage, perhaps we might hope Sarah is watching Mr. Hannan. It’s certainly what I’d like to see and hear from an American politician.
Daniel Hannan is also apparently a guilt tripped white dude. He supported Barack Obama during the election—and even now is hesitant to take him to task. When is he going to get his act together? It is my adamant conviction that white race guilt is the greatest threat confronting the West. Obama is a master at manipulating the Hannans of the world.
The war has just begun.I think articles like this are needed everyday because the media is the front line of this war!
That video of Hannan is fabulous and so is this one here!
“Good luck and God speed Mr Hannan.”
Be careful. I sense that Daniel Hannan is another John McCain. He apparently is too guilt tripped over race issues. Folks like Hannan often wimp out at the worst possible time.
We must approach him with a huge grain of salt. Guys like Hannan unwittingly do an incredible amount of damage.
It seems to me, from what I’ve read, that the British “Conservatives” who supported Obama did so because they hated Tony Blair and by extension George Bush since Blair was an ally in the GWOT. Therefore, they all jumped on the Obama bandwagon like the dopes that, in my opinio, they are. I don’t trust any of them. Although I did love what Hannan said to Brown.
I remember Tony Blair’s eloquent words about American after 9/11, and the other kind words from the members of Parliament. They wished us well,supported us, called us their American cousins, have stood shoulder to shoulder with us during this GWOT. A lot of British people were duped by Obama’s smooth rhetoric, a lot of Americans were duped also. Hopefully everyone will wake up out of their stupor before it is too late. Go Mr. Hannan, Go !! Good luck and we need more men like you.
David Thomson: I don’t get too worked up about foreigners endorsing either of our candidates. Distance and cultural differences could have lead him to believe Obama’s promises. Americans who supported Obama don’t have those excuses.
A great leader would recognize, among a myriad of other points:
1. Today’s deficits are tomorrow’s taxes and higher interest rates.
2. The money a citizen earns is hers. Taxes should be treated as trust funds, not as a bank to finance the dreams of politicians.
3. The governement should only do for people what they can’t do for themselves.
4. Islamic extremism cannot be appeased.
5. The earth has cooled for the last two years. And it doesn’t make sense that a trace molecule comprising thirty five one hundredths of one percent of the earth’s atmosphere is controlling climate.
And smart people knew
1. You can tell a lot about a person by the company he keeps.
2. Someone whose only executive experience, as William Ayers hand picked leader, was to head an organization that spent 160 million dollars on The Chicago Schools Experiment with no discernible improvement
was not equipped to be POTUS.
David Thompson writes, “Be careful. I sense that Daniel Hannan is another John McCain. He apparently is too guilt tripped over race issues. Folks like Hannan often wimp out at the worst possible time.”
I don’t think so. Watch his interview with Neil Cavuto–Hannan was fairly uncomplimentary towards John McCain, and stated quite clearly that his choice, were he allowed to vote in the U.S., was Ron Paul. Hannan correctly observed that Ron Paul was the only American politician who knew that the right course of action for the country’s economy was for the government to do nothing.
That doesn’t sound like another John McCain to me.
=M=
“Hannan correctly observed that Ron Paul was…”
Ron Paul advocates a wimpy foreign policy. Why is Daniel Hannan infatuated with politicians like Paul and Barack Obama who seem naive about the existential threat of Islamic nihilism? Paul is more often than not right concerning economic matters. It is the other stuff that is worrisome.
Where or where is the AMERICAN version of this great man?
I really appreciate Mr. Hannan’s speaking out on the consequences of government spending and how doing so will not bring an economy out of rececession. I also appreciate his willingness to talk on US talk shows like Hannity and Don Cavuto and anywhere else that he has been talking. This Congress and this President are, as stated in President Obama’s inaugural speech, “remaking America”. What I see is not a country I believe I can live with, or for that matter one that can even survive.
Our (Democratic Party) Senators and Representatives of the House have also made it very clear that they will not listen to the constituents they represent. If they Had the Bank Bailout, the Stimulus Package, and the Omnibus would not have passed. I fear that it will come down to a peaceful march of many millions on Washington to stop this “Budget” that has elements that will last for decades from passing.
If this Administration does pass this Budget, I believe Americans will have lost their future. One possible solution is for Americans to march on their State governments and demand a recall of the States representatives and a call for a new election.
As for the other comments being made by Mr. Hannan about nationalizing healthcare, I wish everyone would listen. We are about to allow our representatives the opportunity to pass legislation that will force Healthcare overhaul (not reform) with no knowledge as to what that will look like. These decisions are also being made by individuals without the input of those healthcare professionals and Hospitals that will be affected. If there is one way to truly destroy the system that is it.
Ron Paul doesn’t understand that nature abhors a vacuum. He wants the United States to abandon the world’s stage. In the short term this will provide great benefits. In the long term the world will be run by America’s enemies.
Ron Paul is naive and short sighted. A necessary requirement for anyone who wises to adorn himself with the esteemed description conservative is the inclination and ability to take a long term view.
By the way,
Mr. Hannan for Secretary of the Treasury!
Okay, we’ve sifted and rationalized Hannan’s support for Obama. He’s talked to Hannity and with any luck will talk to other American journalists. When is someone going to challenge the man himself about this silly stance already? Are American journalists not doing it because they’re coddling his white guilt, fearful themselves of walking the sacred cow past the slaughterhouse door?
For anybody not immersed in American socio/political culture, Barack Obama looked very pleasing. Just like the VAST majority of Americans cheered him for that 2004 speech at the Democrat convention.
Likewise, free market/limited government advocates are inherently attracted to Ron Paul’s
basic image. Else, he could not hold a seat in Texas.
What too many Paul supporters do not grasp is that his foreign policy precepts amount to extreme prior restraints on human activity and that this precludes implementation of economic/homefront freedom. Ask a hardcore Paulbot to join with you in repealing gun laws or mark-to-market and they will insist on withdrawing from Iraq and having you agree with said withdrawal before they will even condescend
to talking about functional coalitions.
If Hannan learns to probe a little, he will get by his current limitations.
Missing from this story is more critical detail on Hannan’s support for BHO in our recent election and, more importantly, his reasons for that support – some of which were echoed by Americans who may have supported McCain, but who doubted he’d be very well-received by the rest of the world. As mentioned, Hannan discussed this during the Cavuto interview, for those who may not have seen it. From his point of view he makes sense of it.
Having supported BHO, Hannan can’t be credibly ridiculed and then dismissed by the American left. They know it, which is why they haven’t fired back in any real way yet, and have fallen back on inferences that he’s a “newcomer” (read: inexperienced).
In some ways, Hannan reminds me of Rep. Thad McCotter. More of that sort of leadership, please.
Rather amazingly, most in the UK MSM are trying to claim it was, is and shouldn’t be ‘newsworthy’… and suffering the consequences when brave/dumb enough to do it online with comments enabled.
I think some here are not too keen on the notion that all in the blogosphere are equal, but some expect more equal coverage in the MSM than others. Especially in the face of actual accepted IT/media audience measures, because, well, they are just ‘right’ and others just don’t know the ‘right’ people.
From what I’ve heard Daniel Hannan say on TV, it is clear that he has the greatest respect for our Constitution and founding principles. I think he could support Obama because he didn’t realize that so much harm could be accomplished so quickly under one-party rule. Currently, there are no checks and balances in our government. And we see the results.
I do wish that more of those who run for office in the US, Republican and Democrat had half the respect for our founding principles as this man. We can only pray that at least some of them are paying attention.
There are many white people suffering with white guilt syndrome. Is there a cure?
There are many white people suffering with white guilt syndrome. Is there a cure?
Yes. He now lives on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington.
Obama has been in office for two months and we are looking for a
‘GREAT WHITE HOPE.’
Now that Hopenchange is Punch Drunk it shouldn’t be to hard to take him out.
Float like a Romney. Sting like a bee.
Campaign slogan:
Never in the course of human history have so few stolen so much from so many.
“…but who doubted he’d be very well-received by the rest of the world.”
Warning bells should be going off in your head. Daniel Hannan is naive about the ways of the world. Americans cannot be be overly concerned about being liked. They must rather focus on being respected. Those folks in “the rest of the world” who feel more comfortable with Barack Obama are also usually inclined in favoring a militarily weakened United States. They believe we are the cause of much misery on the planet.
MARK TWAIN ON SOCIALISM: TWAIN AGREES
This is not what made America great.
http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2009/03/mark-twain-on-socialism.html
- Americans cannot be be overly concerned about being liked.
Uhm… Hannan – you might have noticed this – is not American. Different citizenship, different motivation. His explanation for his support indicated that he’s not naive in the slightest.
Hannan is a Brit. I don’t take exception to such buying into BO’s message, really. I mean, how much do most people know about British politics? I’m sure if I started to follow it, I would get many things wrong at first, and for awhile.
In contrast, when he speaks fiscal responsibility, he is flawless. I’ll forgive him many warts for that.
“Uhm… Hannan – you might have noticed this – is not American.”
I am very well aware that Daniel Hannan is one of our American cousins. That doesn’t change things in the least. He is still naive to think that we need to worry about being more liked in the world. No, Hannan is obviously a British style Ron Paul. He has his head on straight when talking about economic issues—but he leaves much to be desired when discussing existential threats to Western civilization.
“I am very well aware that Daniel Hannan is one of our American cousins.”
Whoops! Meant to say: I am very well aware that Daniel Hannan is one of our United Kingdom cousins.
It needs no courage to talk against Gordon Brown who is
useless, coward, appeaser and a Chamberlain. Daniel Hannan did a good job but I make my judgment when Dan addresses the biggest threat Britain faces in her history and its name is Islamofascism. I hold my praise for Dan until he invites Geert Wilders to talk and show his film Fitna in the European parliament and he understands that Barack Hussein Obama is as lousy as Gordon Brown.
Can’t he run for something here in the US? How about Truthteller General?
Dan Hannan is a good man and a great politician – he is wasted in the European Parliament (where I worked with him and the other Conservative MEPs for over two years) and needs to be in Westminster.
All of his political views are sound.
Except for his support for Senator and President Obama, which is both long-standing and continuing.
http://trackacrat.com/category/barack-obama/
Hannan can’t be our Treasury Secretary; Britain needs him. Ron Paul should be our Treasury Secretary; it would empower him to do something about our budget without putting him in command of the military or foreign policy.
The book Dan and Douglas Carswell wrote is racing up the Amazon.co.uk charts and is up to 47 (number 1 in its catagory).
David Thomson:
“Why is Daniel Hannan infatuated with politicians like Paul and Barack Obama who seem naive about the existential threat of Islamic nihilism? Paul is more often than not right concerning economic matters. It is the other stuff that is worrisome.”
David, The rant was the point, not the person.
I don’t think a lot of us are counting on Hannan to renounce his citizenship, come to the United States, run for congress, and castigate Obama the way he did Gordon Brown. I think the majority of us here wish that some conservative here would do that instead of mincing around the halls on congress, smooching the Dear Leader’s butt.
David Thomson: hundreds of millions of people around the world, including the United States, were fooled by this arrogant, elitist, narcissistic, usurper of power, Charlatan-in-Chief. Even Gov Huckabee admitted the other day that he was wrong in thinking that Obama would become centrist once he takes office, and that Hannity was right when he said during the campaigns that the usurper was a socialist at heart and had intentions to distribute wealth (as Obama said he would during the campaigns and to Joe the Plumber, but the masses who adored him weren’t listening or didn’t want to accept the truth about the usurper).
Yes, there’s a lot of white guilt, but I’m noticing now there’s also black guilt. Blacks, especially the very religious, know that Obama has a lot of flaws. You’ll actually hear them now criticizing him or questioning his policies, or feel embarrassed when you bring up something that Obama did (like his very telling Special Olympics gaffe). They don’t get all crazy like during the elections, when whites couldn’t, or didn’t want to, criticize the usurper in front of their black colleagues co-workers or friends. Now, gloves all are all off, and everyone is questioning the narcissus – a sort of collective Equal Opportunity bashing.
David Thompson writes,
“Ron Paul advocates a wimpy foreign policy. Why is Daniel Hannan infatuated with politicians like Paul and Barack Obama who seem naive about the existential threat of Islamic nihilism? Paul is more often than not right concerning economic matters. It is the other stuff that is worrisome.”
You can’t have it both ways here, David. Either Hannan is another McCain, or he’s not, and I cannot imagine two more divergent foreign policies than those of McCain and Paul.
Naive though he may be on foreign policy, on the economic front Hannan is quite correct, and has clearly struck a nerve, both here in America and in Britain. One can only hope that someone in this country will stand up and do the same as he has, and tell Obama to his face that his policies are not only wrong, but dangerous.
=M=
Well in a sense as an MEP Hannan is knee deep in “foreign policy” because he is in Brussels as a Brit. The EU is bizarre on so many levels. I think many people are reading way too much into some of the things Hannan has said in interviews. I know him rather well and he certainly does not agree with Paul on foreign policy (ie isolationalist, anti-Israel etc etc).
TGray…The American version is here….Glenn Beck. He’s sounding the alarm for all to hear. He’s rousting the sleeping giant that is the American patriot. Thousands are already listening.
@30. David Thomson: - I am very well aware that Daniel Hannan is one of our American cousins.
Apparently not, because you believe…
- That doesn’t change things in the least. He is still naive to think that we need to worry about being more liked in the world.
Hannan’s citizenship and his viewpoint change everything about his motivation for his preference for a US President!
First – rather than sit there telling yourself he should think like you, why not try putting yourself in his position for a minute or two? Hannan never said that we / Americans need to worry about being more liked. As a very savvy British politician, Hannan realizes that America needs to be able to regain moral and political leadership, globally. That’s not going to happen as long as the rest of the world perceives the US to be run by what they see as some stupid, lying redneck from the sticks, as the international media disingenuously portrayed Bush, McCain and Palin. From Hannan’s viewpoint, Obama was a better choice NOT because we Americans should care how the rest of the world sees us, but because HE CARES how the rest of the world sees us.
Here’s a thought: why not try listening to the interview. That might help. Fast forward to 7:18 -
Hannan goes on to explain precisely how and why the Republican Party lost leadership of the U.S. He is correct on every single point.
Hannan’s rationale is the right one. America – in the eyes of the world – has now “done the right thing.” Whatever happens now, the American People – our country – can’t be blamed for picking the “wrong” guy, because in the eyes of the rest of the world, Obama was the only valid choice. Just as the American left can’t criticize Hannan for his rant because he supported Obama, the rest of the world can no longer demonize America politically – because we elected Teh One.
Ever the eternal optimist, I see the dividends already pouring in from this in some ways because, as most of us knew long ago, BHO didn’t have 1/10th the executive experience or talent required to manage the most powerful, complex government in the world. After only two months, a significant portion of America is already beginning to see how wrong their choice was. That portion will only grow if things continue as they have been – to the point where some enterprising journalist is (finally) going to smell a Pulitzer and start thoroughly investigating not only his past – the one completely hidden by the media – but past actions of Congress as well with respect to the credit meltdown. Then the sh!t is going to hit the fan, and the rest of the world be forced to recognize the truth if it does.
Now, we could blow it and not capitalize on those dividends (the Republican Party has become experts at this), but the possibility is there. So it’s a long-term, strategic win-win. A bit subtle to grasp, but if you think about it, it’s there.
.
@36. Andrew Ian Dodge: - The book Dan and Douglas Carswell wrote is racing up the Amazon.co.uk charts and is up to 47 (number 1 in its catagory).
Good to hear. I had a passing thought that might happen, actually… as I was adding it to my wish list.
GB needs a Winston Churchill now, Hannan ain’t him. I am not impressed by the guy. A lot of his talk in Hannity and other interviews here is just tuned to please the American audience, but not sincere.
Just a quick note:
the correct name is the Labour party, not “Labor” party.
Ah Daniel Hannan… one of those MEPs who are against the EU and it’s waste and want it dismantled but are quite happy to take the massive salary, perks and unknown amount of dodgy expenses and ‘gifts’ until that sainted day arrives… AKA a hypocrite.
Rather than take the count at You Tube, 1.5 million and counting, the BBC took the count from Hannon’s You Tube page, which is around 40,000.
I wish, I pray, I beg that someone, anyone, here in the United States would give Obama a verbal thrashing like the one Daniel Hannan did to Gordon Brown. There would be such an amazing shout of approval that the Brits would hear it all the way “across the pond.” We need men and women of character and backbone to stand up to this insane liberal democratic agenda that will eventually bankrupt this nation. People here in the United States must stand up, as Daniel Hannan did, and let our worthless representatives know that enough is enough and that we actually are smart enough to know that all this massive spending will quickly lead us to disaster.
JoshC so how exactly is he supposed to oppose the EU in the UK? We all know that the efforts curb federalism in the UK have been a massive failure. Much those I admire the efforts those who opposed the leviathan which is the EU.
An MEP is able to expose stuff no one else can. Before slagging Hannan off it might help if you did a wee bit of research on his efforts (for which he has suffered) to expose EU waste, secrecy and anti-democratic actions.
He is doing far more good as a cranky MEP that he would as a back-bencher in the UK parliament.
And…it isn’t only MEP Hannan of the UK Independence Party, or UKIP, but UKIP MEP Nigel Farage as well. MEP Farage was on the poduim just before MEP Hanna’s speech and gave PM Brown a good throttling too.
From the UKIP YouTube page:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDwQEEAZhWM
Frankly, I think that a Hannan lead new polity based upon the Borjomi declaration would be a boon to common sense.
After all, why should we conclude that borders should remain unchanged?
Gordon Clown’s speech to the EU was more in the way of delivering a job interview: he’ll need someplace to earn unearned wages when the UK kicks him out at the next election (or hopefully before, as more of his lameduck ministers slide into sleaze – or end up watching porn at the taxpayer’s expense)
Hopefully for Clown the truth that Hannan and others handed out won’t spoil his chances of a cushy non-job at the EU. The EU doesn’t care about uselessness in office, so he ought to be okay.
Mr. Hannan has explained his support for Obama clearly and convincingly. His position is essentially that sometimes, and Jimmy Carter is an excellent example, it takes a few years actually seeing tax-and-spend policies at work to remind us all, yet again, that it doesn’t work. If it takes four years under Obama to usher in a new era of fiscal restraint and the accompanying economic growth, we will be better off in the long run and so will our kids.
Bush was no conservative, let’s make that perfectly clear. His spending habits are more in line with FDR than Reagan, and furthermore, he has given the left an excuse to increase spending even more. After all, where were all the fiscal conservatives when he was in office? McCain’s grasp of the economy is worse than any kindergartner with a piggy bank, so he would have delayed our return to fiscal sanity even longer. Let’s bite the bullet and remain civil for the next 4 years, and let inflation and interest rates do our bidding in the next election. Short term pain for long-term gain.