Get PJ Media on your Apple

Anti-Gun Rant in the Daily Beast Ignores the Facts

Sir Harold Evans, husband of the website's publisher, indulges in false assertion in a misleading, inaccurate article.

by
Bob Owens

Bio

April 10, 2009 - 12:00 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

Can we call him “Sir Beauchamp“?

Harold Evans has had a long and storied career as a publisher, journalist, and historian. He was editor of Great Britain’s  Sunday Times for 14 years, has been editor-at-large for The Week since 2005, and has contributed to to other publications over a career spanning two centuries.

Evans’ books on history, The American Century in particular, have garnered popular and critical acclaim. He was the president and publisher of Random House trade group and still maintains a contributing editor position at U.S. News & World Report. In 2004, Evans was knighted for services to journalism.

In short, Sir Harold should be among the paragons of journalistic integrity.

Knowing this makes reading the blatant falsehoods in his most recent editorial all the more tragic.

Published in the Daily Beast — a relatively new online blog and news aggregator run by Evans’ wife, Tina Brown — “Accomplices to Murder” is a shrill rant against gun dealers, politicians, the National Rifle Association, and the American citizenry at large in the wake of mass shootings that have left dozens of Americans dead in recent days.

Sadly, Evans dives straight for the gutter, claiming that the “guilty” parties are “the gun dealers at flea markets and state shows who will sell any number of weapons to anyone — juveniles, criminals, nuts — without any background check or records.”

Few statements could be further from the truth.

Gun dealers in America are required to have a Federal Firearms License (FFL), and these licensees are required to document every potential transaction they might make as part of their business on ATF Form 4473. There are no exceptions made for firearms sold at gun shows or other locations; in section B of the 4473, dealers must note the “location of sale if at a gun show.”

After a potential gun purchaser completes and signs a 4473 and their government-issued photo ID is verified (also documented on the form), the gun dealer is then required to call the National Instant Criminal Background Check System for all sales. The dealer will get one of three responses to a background check from the NICS Operations Center in a matter of minutes: to proceed, delay, or deny the transaction. Regardless of the outcome, NICS will provide a NICS Transaction Number (NTN) that must be noted on the 4473. And the 4473, for all transactions the dealer takes part in (including voided and cancelled transactions), must be kept by federal law under the threat of FFL revocation and criminal prosecution.

This process practiced by dealers was confirmed by Randy Young, owner of Young Guns. He notes that a transfer of a gun to its original owner, such as a repair, is the only exception to this rule.

Mike Tilley, owner of Personal Defense & Handgun Safety Center, says that gun dealers have good reasons to be very careful about gun buyers — personal reasons that go far beyond legal requirements.

“Our families also live in the same communities in which we sell firearms,” Tilley said. “A gun in the hand of any bad guy could end up harming us and or our families, as well as help to destroy our very livelihood.”

Minors can’t buy firearms from gun dealers because they are unable to provide valid ID that shows they are of age or pass required background checks. Criminals cannot buy firearms from gun dealers because their records are on file at NICS. And as long as state agencies provide good data to the NICS, “nuts” cannot buy guns from gun dealers either.

Evans seems intent on smearing gun dealers, won’t let facts get in the way. But he isn’t finished making outlandish claims that aren’t supported by the facts.

The man knighted for his “service to journalism” tilts at another windmill when he claims that the assault weapons ban provision of the 1994 crime bill led to a drop in the use of automatic weapons.

The guilty are the congressmen who even now are planning to stop a renewal of the federal ban on assault weapons and ammunition magazines capable of semi-automatic fire (one trigger pull per shot but with magazines enabling the user to fire hundreds of rounds in a minute).

The ten-year ban on assault weapons was signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1994 but was allowed to lapse in the Bush presidency, despite a 2004 U.S. Department of Justice study finding that the share of gun crimes involving automatic weapons dropped by 17%, to 72%.

There is not now, nor has there ever been, a Department of Justice study stating that “gun crimes involving automatic weapons dropped by 17%, to 72%.”

Automatic weapons have never accounted for more than a small fraction of gun crime in the United States, and they were not addressed in the 1994 ban in any way, shape, or form.

Click here to view the 49 legacy comments

Comments are closed.