Get PJ Media on your Apple

The Chávez Legacy in Venezuela

The Marxist Dictator's Legacy: Autocratic rule, economic ruin, and South America’s highest murder rate. (You can read this article in Spanish here.)

by
Jaime Daremblum

Bio

January 10, 2013 - 12:09 am
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page


To be sure, Venezuela had a serious problem with violent crime before Chávez assumed the presidency. But its national murder rate has more than tripled since he took office in 1999, according to the OVV. Telegraph correspondent Nick Allen notes that Venezuela is now experiencing more murders than the United States and the European Union combined. To offer some perspective: The total population of the U.S. and the 27 EU member states (815 million) is roughly 28 times larger than that of Venezuela (29 million). As Venezuelan journalist Francisco Toro explains, “Venezuela’s murder rate is just unheard of among middle-income countries, to say nothing of oil-rich states on the receiving end of massive new petrodollar flows.”

The violence has many causes, including endemic corruption and Venezuela’s increasingly important role in the global cocaine trade. Governed by a regime that has supported narco-terrorists belonging to the Colombian FARC and allowed senior officials to become veritable kingpins, the country is awash in drugs, gangs, and guns. Between 2007 and 2011, Venezuela was the 15th largest arms importer in the world, importing 555 percent more arms than it did over the previous five-year period, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Its Russian-financed weapons buildup has allowed Chávez to equip tens of thousands of pro-government paramilitary fighters with AK-47 assault rifles. These paramilitaries make up the so-called Bolivarian militia, which is tasked with defending the Chávez revolution and intimidating its opponents.

As you might imagine, there have been tensions between the militia and the official Venezuelan armed forces. Chávez’s death would increase these tensions. It would also lead to greater unrest over the “Cubanization” of so many Venezuelan institutions. (In early 2010, several former Chávez loyalists published a letter complaining that institutions such as the military had been “distorted by the incursion of outside elements,” i.e., Cubans.) The disputes over Cubanization could get especially fierce if Castro acolyte Nicolás Maduro, Chávez’s designated successor, took power and governed as “a puppet of Havana” (to quote a recent prediction from former Venezuelan oil official Gustavo Coronel).

Maduro currently serves as both vice president and foreign minister. Neither he nor Diosdado Cabello, the head of the National Assembly, has anything close to the charisma, political talents, or cult-like following of Hugo Chávez. Yet both seem determined to maintain the key elements of his revolution, and both showed a complete disregard for the Venezuelan constitution in their statements about postponing the date of Chávez’s inauguration (which was originally scheduled for Thursday, January 10). Whether Maduro and Cabello will eventually find themselves — and their respective pro-Chávez factions — locked in a power struggle remains to be seen.

What about relations between Caracas and Washington? Recent news reports have indicated that U.S. and Venezuelan officials are working to secure a bilateral rapprochement, including a restoration of ambassadors. But it is hard to see how Washington could enjoy any type of “normal” relationship with a regime that shelters drug kingpins, brutalizes political opponents, confiscates private property, stockpiles Russian weaponry, threatens its neighbors, and helps Iran evade global sanctions.

The hope of Venezuelan democrats is that Chávez’s death would be followed by a national election in which opposition leader Henrique Capriles emerged victorious. Despite losing to Chávez by 11 percentage points in the country’s October 2012 presidential election, Capriles is still broadly popular, and on December 16 he won election to another term as governor of Miranda, Venezuela’s second-most-populous state.

For now, everything in Venezuela is highly uncertain and highly volatile. That’s just one more unfortunate consequence of Chávez’s autocratic revolution — a revolution that has turned an oil-rich nation into a land of crime, cronyism, and chaos.

(You can read this article in Spanish here.)

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Jaime Daremblum, who served as Costa Rica’s ambassador to the United States from 1998 to 2004, is director of the Center for Latin American Studies at the Hudson Institute.
Click here to view the 16 legacy comments

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (31)
All Comments   (31)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
But didn't Rep. Jose Serrano (D-NY) just assure us all of Chavez great love of the poor, while proposing a change in law so Obama could have 3 terms, just like Chavez.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
CHAVEZ JOINS STALIN IN COMMUNIST HELL

We can argue back and forth about the pros and cons of Hugo Chavez's 14 year presidency of Venezuela. But an unmistakable sign from providence of just how evil and bad for his country this man was, and that he didn't die a day too soon or late, was his demise on the 60th anniversary of Joseph Stalin's death. Chavez has joined Stalin in Communist hell with an old, sick, dying Castro soon to join them.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
To show you the intellectual vacuity of the Left, I give you this quote from a famous Leftist site about Chavez' death:

"I make no claim to expertise on the man or his country, his career and accomplishments deserve appreciation by those of us on the broad Left who believe in the people's right to self-governance and to use democracy to better their lives. One point that bears repeated emphasis: Despite grossly inaccurate language that will appear in the corporate media..."

It's typical Orwellian language wherein a lack of "expertise" is sufficient to highlight and even predict in advance, gross inaccuracies. Were I a father teaching a child, I'd say, "don't do that... ever. It's called being a fool." And that's not even including the advisability of supporting Chavez.

For that, on that same page, a poll shows almost 3/4 of the American readers support Chavez, and so, as Darth would say, their "skills are complete."

If Americans are trying to set a record for being the stupidest they've ever been, the daily headlines about 6 yr. old boys insisting they be treated as a girl at school and children being threatened with arrest for drawings of guns, and a college canceling classes because someone dressed like the KKK, which may have been someone wrapped in a blanket, are more than enough to convince me the meek have inherited the Earth...

... and a clown car.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"The Marxist Dictator's Legacy: Autocratic rule, economic ruin, and South America’s highest murder rate."

Also Known as, something for Obama to shoot for.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Why is it dictators all seem to be chubby paunchy dudes? As dictator, you could order up a personal trainer anytime you wanted. When are we going to see a dictator who looks like Stallone, Schwarzenegger or Van Damme? When you've risen to the level of dictator, haven't you had to kick butt along the way? How is it possible that chubby paunchy dudes are able to do that? Where am I wrong? Inquiring minds want to know!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Fwiw Chavez's possible replacement Nicolas Maduro reminds me slightly of saddam with a hint of stalin.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Breaking News! First Photo Of Hugo Chavez's Dead Body Released!

http://tinyurl.com/arfz8cd
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
A fitting epitaph from one of my favorite writers.

In the early part of his government, Mr. Chavez had met on an airplane with the writer Gabriel Garcia Marquez. The two spoke for hours, and the conversation left a telling impression on the author.

“I was overwhelmed by the feeling that I had just been traveling and chatting pleasantly with two opposing men,” Garcia Marquez later wrote in a profile of Mr. Chavez. “One to whom the caprices of fate had given an opportunity to save his country. The other, an illusionist, who could pass into the history books as just another despot."
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
El Diablo is grinning broadly: welcome!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"a land of crime, cronyism, and chaos"
SO, are we still talking about Venezuela or Chicago?
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Venezuela, by default.

Chicago, by fact.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
1 2 3 Next View All