Sued by French TV: A Conversation with Philippe Karsenty
Why PJ Media Pays So Much Attention to Al Dura
Last week I had the pleasure of interviewing Philippe Karsenty when the French media gadfly was in Los Angeles.
More than any other English-language media outlet, PJ Media has been focusing on Karsenty’s Paris libel trials concerning the Al Dura matter. French state-owned television France 2 has sued Karsenty for accusing (on his site Media-Ratings) the network of broadcasting doctored news footage, which falsely stated Israeli troops killed the twelve-year old Palestinian boy Mohammed al Dura.
Why are we paying so much attention to this legal battle in France, which is based on a disputed event in Gaza over seven years ago (2000)? Well, certainly not to gain clicks or attention on the Internet, I regret to say.
We are following this because part of the mission of PJ Media is to examine the errors and omissions of mainstream media and try to understand why they occurred and to correct them. This began with the Dan Rather affair, which gave this company its name.
The Al Dura affair is arguably more important than Rather. The American anchorman lost his job for promulgating false documents about Bush’s National Guard service.
The France 2 news footage – shot by Palestinian cameraman Talal Abu Rahma and then produced and narrated by the French-Israeli anchorman Charles Enderlin – blames the Israeli army for child murder. What could be worse than that?
This Al Dura video, and the subsequent photo excised from it of the supposedly dead boy, has been called the “Mother of All Fauxtography.” And that could be so – at least for our time. (False photos, art and documents incriminating nations and ethnic groups are an ancient phenomenon.)
The phony photograph went round the world, inspiring Muslims everywhere to hatred of Israelis and Jews and helping to foment and justify the second Intifada. The photo appeared on postage stamps and on billboards throughout the Islamic world and Western Europe. Public squares and streets were named for the “martyred” boy. The murderers of Daniel Pearl claimed they were avenging young Mohammed’s death at the very moment they slit the American journalist’s throat.
When I was in Paris in 2004, I saw the fake photograph blown up on posters and displayed all over the Left Bank and at historic locations like the Luxembourg Gardens. No one thought to question it. The Israelis had killed the boy. It was as potent a piece of propaganda for our time as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was for an earlier epoch, perhaps more so, because it was virtually uncontested.
PJ Media will stay on this case until this calumny is corrected and France 2 publicly admits its errors. I would like to acknowledge the efforts of Richard Landes and PJM’s Paris editor Nidra Poller in this regard.
Some recent trial notes on the case by Professor Landes are here. A compendium of all PJ Media coverage is here.
Whatever happened to the boy Al-Dura? I read somewhere that the Palestinian authorities refuse to allow his body to be exhumed. That means he is dead and buried. What did he die of? Does anybody know? If, at the end of the tape he is seen as still alive, at what point was he killed afterwards?
Incredibly important story, great interview.
I read somewhere that the Palestinian authorities refuse to allow his body to be exhumed. That means he is dead and buried.
Right now, all we know is that there is a grave site with his name on it. Whether he is dead and buried, remains another question.
“Pajamas Media will stay on this case until this calumny is corrected and France 2 publicly admits its errors.”
These were not “errors.” They were wrongdoings. Otherwise France 2 would not try so desperately to prevent the truth becoming public.
This Al Dura video …has been called the “Mother of All Fauxtography.”
It should be called the “Mother of All Known Fauxtography” because the best Fauxtography isn’t recognized as Fauxtography.
Did Dan Rather testify for the French Government as a “fake but accurate” Expert Witness?
It’s not too surprising. You have to understand the Western MSM naivet√© wrt
the Islam culture of dishonesty
Taqqiyah instructs Muslims to use misinformation as a means to an end. France 2 was caught with their pants down, looking stupid for being so naive. Now, they have become part of the problem by covering up the lie instead of coming clean. They are just as responsible as the original actors in causing the violence through the region with this lie.
There was no autopsy performed, so there is no telling if the boy did die or not. Exhuming the body and running a DNA test would clinch that question.
France 2 is not the only one to blame. The world media was sent a 3 min part of the raw footage, and chose, just like France 2, just to air the 59 sec that kicked off the second intifata.