Spain Smacked by a Dose of Economic Reality
A national truck driver’s strike in Spain may be winding down, but it has brought the already-troubled Spanish economy to a standstill. It has also highlighted what happens when a welfare state goes wild. Some 90,000 self-employed hauliers say they are protesting the soaring cost of diesel fuel, which has climbed to 1.30 euros/liter (about US$8 per gallon) from 0.95 euros one year ago. Skyrocketing fuel prices are, clearly, a big problem all over Europe. But what really irks Spanish truckers is their exposure to the reality of market economics.
They are angry that an economic downturn in Spain has reduced the demand for their services. There is now too much trucking supply for too little trucking demand, which according to the basic laws of economics implies lower transport prices.
So the truckers want the government to bail them out via artificial price supports. They are demanding that the government impose a market-distorting minimum transport tariff, a solution that would allow hauliers to continue with business as usual while passing the additional costs over to consumers.
The government has proposed setting aside 55 million euros to encourage early retirements from the over-saturated sector. But the striking truckers are not interested in compromise. Indeed, they are betting that the government will cave in to their demands. After all, the Spanish government always gives in to labor unrest.
In the meantime, the truckers are determined to share their pain with the rest of Spain. The strike is effectively shutting down a large chunk of the economy because most goods in the country are shipped by lorry, due to inadequate rail-freight infrastructure. Many factories have been forced to close production lines for lack of supplies. Spanish consumers, panicked that they will run out of food, have emptied supermarkets in towns and cities across the country. As for petrol: Some 75 percent of service stations in Barcelona have run out of gasoline; nearly half of the service stations in Madrid have been closed.
Spain complains
But truckers are not the only Spaniards taking some extra time off. Indeed, job walkouts protesting exposure to market economics have become a national sport in Spain. According to the Spanish Confederation of Employers’ Organizations (CEOE), Spanish workers held 334 strikes during the first four months of 2008, which resulted in the loss of 14.3 million man-hours of labor. These figures represent a 72 percent increase over the same period in 2007. During all of 2007, there were 852 strikes in Spain that resulted in the total loss of 22.5 million man-hours.
Considering all these grievances, it seems strange that Spanish voters in March gave Socialist Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero another four-year term in office. After all, pre-election polls showed that the majority of Spaniards knew full well that Spain was not on the right track, economically or otherwise.
Maybe they allowed themselves to be persuaded that everything would somehow be okay, thanks to Zapatero’s postmodern relativistic political discourse, which posits that all problems are by definition imaginary. Or perhaps they were bribed by the 22 billion euros — a whopping 2.1 percent of Spain’s GDP — in handouts that Zapatero promised to bestow upon them if re-elected.
In any case, Spain’s myriad market disequilibriums are coming home to roost, and all at the same time.
For example, Spain has been reeling from the collapse of a housing bubble that for the last 15 years has enabled the notoriously uncompetitive economy to post some of the highest growth rates in the European Union. Millions of Spaniards are now struggling to accept the fact that they were lulled into a false sense of never-ending prosperity.
At the same time, the generous financial subsidies that Spain has received since joining the EU in 1986 are drying up. During the past 20 years, Spain cashed in on some 100 billion euros — equivalent to nearly one percent of its GDP every year — by way of EU Structural and Cohesion Funds, which are designed to narrow the gap between the EU’s wealthy and poor countries. But now that Spain has reached a per capita GDP of 98.5 percent of the EU average — it was 72 percent in 1986 — the country will begin paying more into the EU than it receives back.
The implication is that Spaniards will have to strike less and work more. But that seems an unlikely prospect. Spain recently led a block, including Belgium and Greece, which sought to prohibit British workers from working more than 48 hours a week. Spanish Socialists complain that if Brits work more than Spaniards, Britain will have an unfair competitive advantage.
Problem? What problem?
Just before the March elections, Zapatero insisted that the Spanish economy would grow by 3.3 percent in 2008; since his re-election, however, the government has revised that figure downwards on an almost daily basis. Indeed, Spanish economic growth has slid to 0.3 percent in the first quarter of 2008 from 0.8 percent in the last three months of 2007. Standard & Poor’s, the ratings agency, predicts that Spain’s growth will slow this year to 1.8 percent from 3.8 percent in 2007 and to 1.6 percent in 2009.
But that’s not all. Annual consumer inflation jumped to a 13-year high of 4.6 percent in May. And according to the Labor Ministry, the number of registered jobless shot upwards to 2.35 million in May, the worst figure since post-Franco recordkeeping began in 1979. The National Statistics Institute says the unemployment rate jumped to 9.6 percent in the first three months of 2008 from 8.6 percent in the previous quarter, the biggest jump since the first quarter of 1993, when the Spanish economy slipped into recession. Some financial analysts fear the unemployment rate could spiral to 13 percent in 2009.
So far Zapatero’s post-modern approach to Spain’s economic crisis seems based on three reality-evading pillars: denial, passing the blame, and more denial. His Plan A has involved a pop psychology campaign advising Spaniards that “pessimism does not create jobs.” Plan B blamed “radical liberalism,” which in euro-speak means the free market. Zapatero now wants to implement Plan C, a global advertising campaign in the world financial press designed to highlight his economic management skills.
Spaniards, having grown accustomed to three decades of spoon-feeding by Socialist largesse, are in for a long, hot free-market summer.






For what it is worth, I actually run one of the largest transport companies in Iberia. facts regarding the strike are essentially correct except:
- While the strike is winding down in most areas it will probably last another week in Galicia, Asturias, Cantanbria and most of Pais Vasco were the real radicals are.
- A lot of these small transporters will leave the industry and for many this is a way of negotiating the best exit deal. Given Zapatero’s track record, this seems to me to be a logical strategy. Others, like those in the port of Bilbao who strike even though they enjoy the highest rates in the country, just feel like it.
- Sr. Zapatero gave his personal guarantee to manufacturers that he would make sure they keep going through the strike…….and then did nothing, cero, ni leventar un dedo to fulfill his promise – leaving predictable chaos in his wake.
- Anyone who truly believes there will be growth in Spain GDP this year is smoking too much dope.El crisis is tangible and getting worse. Automotive sales declines are accelerating. Most major clothing retailers are seeing declines on same store sales. Shopping centers like El Corte Ingles where I live are like ghost towns – something I have never seen. The rising LIBOR rates forcing rising house payments is taking money directly out of average persons standard of living – as the Spanish leave pretty close to their means. This strike will just be the icing on the cake to destroy anyone’s financial aspirations for the year.
Having lived in Malaga for the last couple years 2005-2007, it was apparent there would be a serious property and credit crash around the corner. The problem is Spain has its own internal sub-prime issues. Much of the over-priced property bought in the last 5 years was purchased by the Spanish themselves. The property boom of the last 10 years flushed lots of cash right across the economy. Hence banks started offering easy credit to the Spanish sub-prime market.
I remember in 2005 buying some clothes at Zara in Malaga, and i noticed that i was the only person paying in cash out of a queue of about 15 people. At the time I thought there was no way this economy as i saw it could sustain this kind of credit madness. Once the housing market busted the whole skeleton would collapse.
This same thing happened in a smaller way in the late 80′s through to about 95. There was a serious Andalucian downturn and property could be bought at a real bargain. No doubt the cycle will happen again.
Spain…in economic trouble….Oh well.
Unfortunately this is only the beginning – the recession will be long and harmful to most of the people.
And many people are still living in “Alice Wonderland ” – they don´t realize until now that they have been lied and cheated by Rodriguez Zapatero who still promised 3.3 % GDP growth in March before elections – also that LIBOR and inflation would decrease from May on – the contrary happened.
The transport strike has been the first great one (but not the last one ) – people are already calling for General Strike on July, 15 – a really stupid move because it will only cause more harm to the spanish economy.
But this is the reaction when people find out about lies from government.
Wow…look at what the U.S. is in for when NObama takes office if the insanity here matches Spain. The world is going to Hell in a hand basket for sure.
Sue is right. The U.S.A. may soon be led by a
Barak Husein “NoBamaNation”
The USA is not going to committ economic suicide by electing Obama. Sorry to disappoint the Marxists in the USA and through out the world.
We can tell the difference between a leader and a loser.
So the socialists and bums and cowards who voted this party in get to eat the fruits of their labor. Unfortunately, they are probably too stupid to learn from their mistakes until it is too late, a la Venezuela, Zimbabwe…
I can only hope that if enough socialists and welfare rats and cowards were to elect a marxist here, that we would do better, find that we have a Pinochet ready to rise up and to the required dirty work.
“Or perhaps they were bribed by the 22 billion euros — a whopping 2.1 percent of Spain’s GDP…”
“During the past 20 years, Spain cashed in on some 100 billion euros — equivalent to nearly one percent of its GDP every year…”
These statements cannot both be true.
I agree with Daniel. While Obama would certainly pull us leftward (and for that reason will not get my vote) I don’t see the kind of structural labor problems arising here. Our primary similarity – the sub-prime mess – is working its way through at this point and should be mostly in the past by the time B.O. makes it to office (if he does).
The *big* question for American voters is whether they will recognize that the sub-prime mess was largely a result of a consciously-chosen strategy of loosening up credit so that previously underserved populations could get credit more easily. There is plenty of blame to go around but the politicians who pushed for easier credit to serve their constituents certainly deserve a good portion of it.
“The USA is not going to committ economic suicide by electing Obama. Sorry to disappoint the Marxists in the USA and through out the world.
We can tell the difference between a leader and a loser.”
Daniel — Ermm. We elected Jimmy Carter. I remember. I was there.
“The strike is effectively shutting down a large chunk of the economy because most goods in the country are shipped by lorry, due to inadequate rail-freight infrastructure.”
The pains in Spain are blamed on trains.
Pity.
It remains unclear whether the author is for a true free market handling of the transport crisis (thus, allowing the market to kill 40% of small transport companies) or for setting the claimed “minimum fare” to them and further subsidies. He can’t blame Zapatero for both, unless the whole point was just blaming him instead of making a sensible statement. It’s certainly not free market, nor “Economic reality” what the strikers are demanding. Plus, these are not “labor” demands, but employers’.
Hyperpotamus Said:
“These statements cannot both be true.”
We don’t have enough data to make this determination unless you are assuming a static GDP over the past 20 years which, I think you’ll agree, doesn’t make a lot of sense.
Hey Wildmonk
I really do agree with you. When you mention where the blame should be placed or is unfairly placed only on the lenders and their subordinates. there is no doubt people got loans that should not have. But when you say that you leave out that homeownership is the tool that propels wealth. In the last 25 years it has become increasingly harder to obtain a home. So in order to close the family wealth disparity we have in America rules were relaxed. So you have to go back 25 years and more to find out why this disparity in family wealth exist. To find the real root is to place true blame. But for some reason I think you will choose not. I will make it easy. “What came first the chicken or the egg”?
with regard to the 22 billion vs 100 billion euro, perhaps I misread it, but isn’t the 22 billion an internal Spanish wealth transfer but the 100 billion an external transfer from the EU to the Spanish?
Jose,
The minimum tariff is simply not going to happen, period. While this is what the radicals are pushing for, the industry understands that this is impossible.
There will be a reduction of transporters in the market whereby the amount of transport on offer adjusts to meet demand. This is both labour and employer as the bulk of the people and companies affected will be small companies and owner operators.
The end result will be to force transport rates up via increased rates and reduced cash flow (30 day terms vs. 60-90 day) putting further inflationary pressure on an economy that I believe will show negative growth. Thus the economic mess will become somewhat worse.We will see by how much.
While Zapatero can not be held responsible for all these ills, it is not seriously disputable that govt. policies are not pro growth as Spain enjoyed with Aznar. As industry and investment moves east the only real light at the end of the tunnel is a revival of real estate when the financial crisis eventually sorts itself out – and who knows when this will happen.
Hey Hey:
25 years ago, exactly 25 years ago?! Let’s see, what could have happened 25 years ago? Well, the early 80’s was the era in which millions of American car and electronics jobs were shipped overseas to Japan. It is when it first became hard to make a good living without a college degree because blue collar jobs shifted overseas, hence reducing the value an earning power of poorer Americans. Is that what you are referring to?
Sorry to sound snarky, I just meant to say that not everything that happened in the early 80′s was a direct result of Reagan policies.
It is difficult for me to understand how a tax cut for the poor (even though the rich got a bigger one) made the poor poorer. There had to have been other factors in involved and I suspect the collaspe of US car and cheap electronics industries had a lot to do with it.
American car unions didn’t help themselves. Late 70s/early 80s American cars were built like rubbish (ditto British cars). People got sick of it and bought more reliable Japanese cars. It was not the fault of Reagan or the public. In a proper free capitalist country you buy what is best for your needs. Why buy rubbish if you don’t have to?
Look just do what they do here in the the USA blame Bush!Viva la Obamanomics!
Spain is suffering because it didn’t hop on the US-UK-Israel’s War on (of) Terror. Remember, all roads lead to the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAncuwwUbj0