Soviet-Russian Continuity Reminds Us There Are Two Superpowers
The seamless transition from the Soviet Union to the "new" Russia hasn't changed Moscow's strategic goals.
November 2, 2013 - 10:35 pm
Vladimir Putin’s out-maneuvering of President Obama following the Syrian chemical weapons attack has led some to ask if Putin is reviving the Cold War purportedly won by the U.S. The question itself reflects a lack of understanding of the unbroken continuity of Cold War behavior by Moscow since the transition from the Soviet Union to the “new” Russia.
In Russia, the KGB was never disbanded following the advent of the Yeltsin regime in December 1991 despite a number of name changes and re-organizations. The decision by the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) in December 1992 to substitute for the celebration of the first anniversary of the service the celebration of the 72nd anniversary of Lenin’s CHEKA reflected the unbroken continuity of the power and status of the Soviet secret police.
In the same year, Yeltsin’s regime sold poison gas to Syria that could be mounted on missiles. A year later, it was reported that Russia air-delivered weapons from North Korea to Syria, and, in 1997, Russia and Syria held joint military exercises while maintaining their Soviet era Treaty of Friendship.
In addition, Yeltsin and Cuba sent materiel through Cyprus to Syria to assist in making missiles with chemical warheads.
These activities, along with Moscow’s unbroken support from the Soviet era of Iranian missile and nuclear reactor development, suggest that what the world witnessed in 1991 was not a collapse but a strategic retreat that enabled the Soviet Union, now re-baptized as “Russia,” to enter Western institutions such as the G-7 as an ostensible democracy even as the leadership in Russia and many former Soviet republics remained KGB controlled or open to KGB blackmail.
Believing in a completely new Russia also prompted the U.S. to forego major nuclear weapons modernization through the last three administrations despite the deployment of a new Russian nuclear missile system under Yeltsin and a growing nuclear missile modernization by Putin.
The latter is taking place even as the U.S. reduces its arsenal under the New Start Treaty. In addition, the borders of the former Soviet Union remained under the control of Russian troops, and its republics were linked by treaty to Russia.
Furthermore, GRU Chief General Valentin Korabelnikov denied allegations that the GRU [military intelligence service] had lost its networks of agents over the past thirteen years. It is interesting that he waited to reveal this in his first interview as GRU chief in July of 2003 under Putin yet the general had been appointed to his post in 1997 under Yeltsin at a time when such a revelation might have cast doubt on Russia’s “break with the past.”
The dramatic events between Gorbachev’s last year and Yeltsin’s first, portrayed world-wide on television, although exhibiting peculiar aspects such as Gorbachev’s ability to broadcast a video while under house arrest and the KGB coup plotters’ failure to cut Yeltsin’s communication lines, masked the strategic continuity between the Soviet Union and Russia.