Get PJ Media on your Apple

Simpson-Bowles, the Sequel: Lawmakers Get Lowdown on New Deficit Reduction Plan

Something for each side to loathe: $740 billion in increased revenue over the next decade and a higher eligibility age for Medicare.

by
Rodrigo Sermeño

Bio

April 25, 2013 - 12:34 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON – With another fight over the federal budget deficit looming, the former co-chairmen of the Bowles-Simpson commission began briefing lawmakers last week on their latest plan to get the economy back on track and the nation’s debt under control.

Former Sen. Alan Simpson (R-Wyo.) and former chief of staff under President Clinton Erskine Bowles released a plan on Friday that would end cuts under sequestration and put debt on a downward path as a share of the economy.

Simpson and Bowles headed the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, more commonly known as the “Simpson-Bowles” commission – created in 2010 by President Obama to identify policies to improve the fiscal situation in the medium term and to achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run. Their names have become synonymous with deficit-cutting, as the two men have been advocating their cocktail of spending cuts and revenue increases for years.

The new plan includes $740 billion in increased revenue over the next decade and a higher eligibility age for Medicare – options that both Republicans and Democrats have respectively rejected.

“By picking up on where budget negotiations left off last December, we have crafted a plan that we believe could be enacted into law over the course of this year, and would represent a tremendous step forward in putting our nation on a fiscally sustainable course,” Bowles and Simpson write in the report.

The commission’s final report outlines a four-step plan to eliminate the debt deficit. The first step was to reduce discretionary spending, which according to the report happened in 2011. The second step was to raise taxes for the wealthiest Americans as part of the “fiscal cliff” deal. Step three, which would occur over the next 10 years, completes the job of “putting debt on a downward path” through a mix of healthcare reform, mandatory spending reductions, tax reform, and wholesale government reform. The final step would provide additional recommendations to “put entitlement programs on a fiscally sustainable course.”

“We’ve done the easy stuff. We’ve capped discretionary spending and we’ve raised taxes on the rich. We’ve done the stupid stuff, such as sequester. Now we’ve got to do the hard stuff,” Bowles said at an event unveiling the plan’s details on Friday at the Newseum in Washington.

Under the updated proposal, debt would fall from 76.4 percent of GDP in 2013 to 69.3 percent of GDP in 2023. Currently, the debt as a share of GDP is shrinking, but the new plan would speed up the process of deficit reduction.

The plan aims at reducing the deficit by $5.2 trillion over 10 years, with most of those savings coming from spending reductions. It would raise $740 billion in new revenue, mostly by reforming the tax code. Specifically, the plan directs Congress to produce comprehensive tax reform to bring down individual and corporate rates while reducing the deficit.

The plan also calls for cuts to future Social Security benefits in a similar fashion as proposed by President Obama through the “chained CPI” – an alternative measure for inflation that takes into account the way consumers change their habits of consumption as price changes. For instance, if beer gets more expensive and the price of wine stay the same, consumers will tend to buy more wine and less beer.

Medicare eligibility age would increase and subject a larger portion of the population to means testing. Bowles and Simpson want to reform Medicare and Medicaid by reducing drug costs, reducing provider payments, and increasing income-related premiums.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (6)
All Comments   (6)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
How about rainng the interest rates and stop the printing presses. We have a lot of redundant beurocracies. We could abolish the Department of (no)Education. We could close military bases around the world, stop foreign aid, abolish the Davis-Bacon Act and all prevailing wage laws. Plus, lot more.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
What is always baffling to me is the fact that most Americans know SSI and Medicare, food stamps, welfare and sundry tax loopholes are going to have to be cut. The politicians think we are married to them when most are not.
The rub comes when we as a people do not want to give up what we have paid into because we (inherently) know the government will not do the right thing with the money. Pay down debt and deficits - they will spend it on new useless programs.
So why should I give up my slice, if you are just going to piss away all the rest?
It is a weird little dance we do...then we re-elect the f*ck He*ds!!!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Once more, these two display their irrelevance in that they fail to advocate the one thing that can get The Leviathan, and it's negative influence upon the economy, under control:

REDUCE THE SIZE AND SCOPE OF GOVERNMENT, AND RETURN TO ITS ENUMERATED ROLE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION!
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Simpson-Bowles may be the best we can hope for, but that is a sad commentary on the accountability of the federal Government. In the past such deals which trade new revenues for spending cuts are always one-sided in implementation. Taxes are raised immediately and pocked by the government, but the cuts never come.

And there is another caution. Much as I like and admire old Alan Simpson, he got rolled on the 1986 Simpson-Mazoli immigration in law the same way. He trusted the Democrats to deliver on border security and they didn't. They simply took their 3 million or so new voters and walked away. Same trick: give me what I want now and I'll repay you on Tuesday.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
That is why ANY "comprehensive" reform bill is scam. These things should be done one step at time, and the next step not taken until the first is completed to the satisfaction of the American People.
First step in "immigration reform" should be "Secure the Borders."
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"...He trusted the Democrats..."

Well, there's where the experiment failed...
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All