Sharia Law Already Devouring UK
In 2008, while arguing for the need to formally introduce Sharia law into the law of the United Kingdom, the Archbishop of Canterbury claimed Sharia law was “inevitable” in the UK . He denied it was an “alien” system and called for “constructive accommodation” of Muslim law. He did this in a calculated and provocative manner, while denying a place for its more “extreme punishments.”
It is unlikely that many members of the Muslim community would be satisfied with an Anglican primate determining the limitations of the Quran and Sharia law.
This argument was rapidly followed by the Lord Chief Justice: Lord Phillips helpfully said there was a place for Sharia law, particularly in mediation. He lamented the “widespread misunderstanding” of Sharia law. The newly established Muslim Arbitration Tribunals immediately put a picture of the Lord Chief Justice on their website in appreciation of his endorsement.
In the United Kingdom, the many thousands of Sharia courts can quietly go about their business of implementing “justice” in a form totally “alien” to the Judeo-Christian tradition, denying human rights to many of our citizens — particularly women.
The “constructive accommodation” of Muslim law reached a logical conclusion with the declaration this year of Sharia law controlled zones in a number of areas geographically spread over the country, where the Islamist militants enforce their will. Their posters declare: “No music or concerts, no porn or prostitution, no drugs or smoking, no gambling, no alcohol.” A reign of terror has begun, with threats of implicit violence against anyone who “insults” Islam, changes religion, or fails to dress appropriately. I have already been contacted about assisting two individuals subject to Islamist threats.
The police stand passively by, adhering to their diversity training.
If the Labour Party had won the last general election in 2010, I believe they would have introduced Sharia law into the United Kingdom. Things have changed for the better since David Cameron became prime minister — he has criticized “state multiculturalism” as causative of terrorism and radicalism. An inquiry of the Ministry of Justice into the operation of Sharia courts had to be stopped as Muslim leaders refused to cooperate with the government; they wanted to continue to execute Sharia law in secrecy. However, this has only heightened concerns. A Conservative peer has sought to introduce legislation delimiting the operation of Sharia courts as discriminatory against women. The home secretary has at last refused entry visas to “hate preachers” like Zakir Naik. (The last Labour government welcomed Hezbollah terrorists to lecture the police on “political Islam.”)
When I was a boy growing up in London, as Roger Kimball has written, terms like “Sharia” and “jihad” were anthropological phrases analogous to witch burning, using leeches to draw blood, and cannibalism. It would have been beyond my comprehension that our political elite would seek to introduce this medieval system into one of the most advanced societies in the world.
Sharia law is the antithesis of law as representative of rational human endeavor to alleviate the human condition.
In this short piece, it is not possible to fully illuminate the “establishment” of Islam in the United Kingdom (as described by the First Amendment). I can only give examples.
An interesting case of mine involved a church in a part of the country declared a “Sharia law controlled zone.” The church had existed for about 150 years, but it was served with a noise pollution notice for the singing of hymns on a Sunday morning at 10:30 a.m. As the notice was served, the council officer said: “This is a Muslim area.” (Naturally, this statement was denied in court.)
However, it was the court experience which was most disturbing; the local court was in an area with a high Muslim population, and the majority of the judges hearing the case were Muslim. The court closed the church. I thought the only image missing from the scene was about 200 mullahs demonstrating outside the court for the death of the infidels.
The case was appealed, and moved to a district that was predominantly English (where the appeal court was situated). The court opened the church.
This case was similar to a case where Muslim police officers prevented two street preachers, Arthur Cunningham and Joseph Abraham, from evangelizing in Birmingham. The Muslim police office called it a “hate crime” to seek to convert Muslim youths. A Muslim police office failed to uphold British values: social cohesion requires that the appointment of Muslim judges and police officers is in accordance with British standards and values.
In 2005, the BBC broadcast Jerry Springer — The Opera. It conformed to the usual high standards of the BBC: Jesus in a nappy; Jesus a “little bit gay”; the fondling of Jesus’s genitals. Fifty-five thousand complaints were received, and ignored — the BBC governors declared the program “artistically exceptional.” There was legal action against the BBC, but they bravely defended themselves — using taxpayers’ money — by asserting their willingness to challenge sensitivities. No apology was given.
How brave. Yet their courage seems to fail with Islam, and there has yet to be such an “artistically exceptional” program on Mohammed (nor will there ever be).
WHEN AN ISLAMIST PUSHES YOU , YOU PUSH BACK ….DON’T GIVE AN INCH , BECAUSE THE ISLAMIST WANTS TOTAL CONTROL …. IF YOU SEE A COUPLE OF COCKROACHES TODAY AND DON’T GET RID OF THEM IMMEDIATELY , YOU’LL BE OVERWHELMED BY THEM …. THESE ISLAMISTS ARE LIKE COCKROACHES , SO GET RID OF THOSE THAT ARE IN YOUR HOUSE AND DON’T ALLOW ANY MORE OF THESE FILTHY DISEASE CARRYING BUGS ANYWHERE NEAR YOUR HOME AGAIN ….AND THAT’S THE TRUTH !!!!
Your name is in lower case, so we know your keyboard isn’t stuck on caps lock. So that was by choice?
Lots of elderly people grew up with caps only computers.
Better to say, sorry luv, it is no longer politically correct to use caps, only lower case, ‘cos otherwise you’ll deafen people via their eyes.
i think the whole purpose of danseagull’s post was to NOT be politically correct
IT HURTS OUR FEELINGS THAT WE ARE FORCED TO BE CONFRONTED WITH THE WAY THESE PEOPLE ARE DRESSING.
Of course it was by choice, and RIGHTFULLY SO! He is exactly correct except that describing Islamists as ‘cockroaches’ is an insult to the cockroaches…
PLAINLY AND EXCELLENTLY PUT.
Here is another example of sharia-based judicial decisions in the UK:
How calling someone a “white bitch” is not racist and being a drunken muslim saves you from jail
The defence of the drunk Somalian women was that they were muslim and so weren’t used to drinking. The judge suspended the sentence.
If they were truly Muslim and were drinking, I suspect they have a stoning in their future. Funny how the courts refuse to impose the edicts of sharia on Muslims…
Mr. Diamond,
Bless you for the work you do.
“Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset [us], and let us run with patience the race that is set before us. ”
Letter to the Hebrews 12:1
I am praying for your nation. Great preaching and prayer turned England and Scotland in the 18th Century. The people need the emptiness in their lives filled with Christ.
I actually believe that at this point, the only way for the UK to save itself is to restore the Monarchy, dissolve Parliament, and start massive treason trials.
This will probably take another English Civil War.
Unfortunately, Prince Charles is tickled pink about Islam. He can’t say enough good about it.
You need more than just the Monarchy; you need them to be “Defenders of the Faith” again.
Well, perhaps there is hope in William & Kate. They seem to be a bit more level headed. But you make an excellent point in that so many seem to be blinded and fooled by this beast that is Sharia. Are these people incredibly naive, incompetent, insane or all three?
OMG! I had no idea about Prince Charles! WHAT is he thinking!!?
Doesn’t he have a clue that if muslims take over that he’ll no longer be royalty? OR a prince.
Anyone know how the Queen feels about the muslims? I don’t follow the UK very much.
I think only a Crusade will save England, and Europe. This time, they do not need to leave the continent.
Britain needs a new King.http://www.answeringmuslims.com/2011/12/you-are-getting-sleepier-and-sleepier.html
Good article but I would like to correct two points:-
1) In the Birmingham incident the two officers were not police officers but Police Community Support Officers (sort of ‘deputies’ without full police powers)
2) BBC money is not taxpayers’ money (no choice in making payment) but licence fee payers’ money (no TV, no payment due.)
On the BBC funding — distinction without difference.
It’s a tax on owning a television set – even if you never use that set to view the BBC.
I guess that Battle of Britain thing didn’t work out as well as you thought; you’ve been invaded anyway and it’ll be a close thing as to who’d be worse, Nazis or Muslims. Next Crescent Rolls will be abolished since they came about as a symbol of the celebration of the turning away of the Turks from Vienna in 1683.
My question is this: have you people gone completely insane? What in the world are Muslims doing in Britain anyway? They have no interest in being good citizens but come only because the English have done something no Muslim country can do: make a nice country to live in. Certainly the majority of Britain’s Muslims are not radicalized but yet they certainly have no loyalty to English tradition and so if push comes to shove they will side with Sharia.
I guess I shouldn’t be too hard: after all, politically correct pedagogy in this form originated in the U.S and not England. We are only a demography away from giving up our own Muslim zones to the reality of immigration. Resolve is a word cut out of the American zeitgeist as being too masculine to cozen and so get ready for the fall out here as well.
We already have a political atmosphere where the Tea Party, not organized around race, is racist and where a Hallmark Card is hauled out by the NAACP Los Angeles chapter recently for allegedly saying “Black Ho’” rather than “Black Hole” on its recorded greeting.
Meanwhile, black flash mobs targeting and assaulting whites and the Congressional Black Caucus, which is organized around race, are NOT racist.
We have lost our senses. The Third World: a nice place to visit, no one wants to live there, not even those in the Third World. Immigration should be completely blocked in the West and illegals thrown out on their ear.
Israel is running ads asking Israelis to come home because in the last several years a few tens of thousands of illegal immigrants have entered from sub-Saharan Africa through Egypt and that’s not including tens of thousands of guest workers from places like the Phillipines.
The West is being overwhelmed demographically by failure.
Many of the Nazis of the Third Reich actually WERE Muslims.
Well people bring it on themselves, and can solve the problem themselves.
What you have is pathological altruism where every victim is innocent (actually loser).
The problem is not Islam but the enablers, the codependents, and I would start with the churches and work to the politicians.
“The problem is not Islam but the enablers…”
Yes. That is the whole point.
Precisely. Start with the secondary target and move to the primary. Neutralizing the fellow travellers wherever they are found (generally burrowed into the woodwork of some rotting government, media, education or legal bureaucracy) is a good beginning.
Tally ho!
You can kiss England goodbye-REgressives put that country on the road to destruction after the end of WWll. When they confiscated everyone’s weapons a few years back, that was the end writ large.
As for it coming to a state near me? I’ll tell you, I’ve had a wonderful life and if some scumbag moslim gets in my face, I’ll have no regrets.
There is a steel backbone in the UK that hasn’t been seen in several generations. It will emerge and it will get ugly if it has to. I find it utterly disgusting and contemptuous that Judges and Community leaders have let things go this far. The only opportunity to right this problem will soon be the worst of all options: violence.
We in the US have a tradition of keeping our powder dry. Judges, Juries, Congressional Representatives, and the Executive Branch Leaders of all stripes know this instinctively. Push the people too far and there will be rebellion.
In those places that suppress such behavior, the rebellion will be that much more painful. I wish the UK hadn’t gone that far, but it seems they’re already there. Say a prayer for all. This won’t be pretty.
The foolish Brits allow the muslims to crap in their own kitchen they’ll continue to eat it…..fools!….let them eat (muslim) cake!
“ . . . The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”
– Winston Churchill
Sounds like a quote from Churchill’s “Story of the Malakand Field Force.” That book should be required reading for all. His observations about islam were absolutely prescient. If you haven’t read it, go to this link: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/9404/9404-h/9404-h.htm. You will be enlightened.
The River War, first edition, Vol. II by Winston Churchill
Publisher:London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1899
Pages 248 50
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as
hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The
effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly
systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of
property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A
degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the
next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law…
Thanks Mark. I downloaded the Churchill book. I look forward to reading it so I can help warn my fellow Americans of the threat Shari a brings to our constitutional rights.
Well, now we know why our imam in chief shuffled the Churchill bust out of the white house.
Great point except I doubt very much that the likes of Obama has even read a word of anything Churchill wrote. He probably lacks the capacity to even process his writing style. Far too complicated for someone who was raised on “Collectivism: good. Capatalism: bad.”
Is it true that Orthodox Jewish courts operate in the UK in the same sense Sharia is being proposed?
But orthodox Jewish law doesn’t claim to take precedence over UK civil law, just as in the U.S., where it doesn’t claim to take precedence of U.S. civil law. Nor does it claim to bind anyone that isn’t Jewish; it is simply an agreement between two parties to abide by a certain set of rules (above and beyond the civil law).
There is no comparison between Orthodox courts and sharia courts , because many moslems believe that ‘sharia law’ is from their deity and therefore must be imposed on ALL humans , moslem and Non moslem alike, as “man made” law is inherently unjust. IOW, these moslems think they are doing us a great favor by trying to inflict their loathsome schools of sharia law upon Non moslems. This belief appears to be absent among Jews…I have never heard or read anything to suggest that Jews commonly believe their religious laws should ideally be imposed upon non Jews .
The only thing currently protecting Non moslem people in the UK and the EU from being subject to sharia law is demographics ; the only thing ultimately protecting Non moslems in the USA is our Second Amendment. “Elites” in the EU have made it plain that they believe sharia law trumps human rights; too many “elites” in the USA would gladly allow sharia law to trump the Constitution.
Well Jewish religious law is certainly enforced against non-Jews though this is not as you say, common. However this suggests that demographics works both ways and not an unwillingness to do the same thing if they could.
Why discuss what a person cannot do as if they don’t want to?
“In Israel” I forgot to put in after “non-Jews”.
“Why discuss what a person cannot do as if they don’t want to?”
I’ve never heard a Jewish person demand that I subject myself to their religious strictures. I *HAVE* heard that from Muslims.
Well go to Israel and try and marry a Jewish woman and then you can say you have.
it’s true that Jewish law in Israel is the law of the land, however, Christians and Moslems also have their own religious laws and are allowed the religious freedoms under those laws. If a Jew wishes to marry a non-Jew, one or the other needs to convert or they can go to Cyprus and marry civilly. Most Israelis are secular and the Rabbinate does not control their daily lives.
What do you do when you travel to a foreign country: do you expect laws to be as they were at home? Israeli laws are Israeli, not US.
In the US, Jews do have a Bet Din (Jewish court of law). However these courts are typically used for civil cases where both sides agree to abide by the ruling of the court. This is no different than agreeing to abide by arbitration. Typical uses of such courts would include deciding if someone was violating the laws of what is Kosher (civil courts don’t want to get in to that anyway), perhaps a divorce where both parties are orthodox Jews, or maybe a dispute between two parties in a synagogue.
Under no circumstance would a court of this sort attempt to establish jurisdiction in matters where one side or the other does not agree to abide by the decision. It goes against every tenet of Judaism to impose their religion on others without their consent. Read the Book of Ruth for a Biblical view on what it means to be Jewish.
Thus, the difference between these courts and the Shariah courts, which attempt to establish jurisdiction wherever they can.
That said, in Israel, the laws are derived from Jewish Theology just as laws in the US were derived from Christian Theology. Israel is the land of the Jews, and there are peculiarities in those laws that you might notice. The social laws in the courts there are necessarily derived from Jewish law. It is not an imposition upon you as a Christian. If you want to buy pork, you can. If you want to drive a car on Jewish Holidays, you can. If you want to keep your shop open on the Jewish Sabbath, you can. But such behavior is largely discouraged in a culture that is nominally Jewish, just as Jews would notice blue laws or dry counties in parts of the US.
In any case, the situation you describe of marriage in Israel may be true. There may also be details you may not want to share. Nevertheless, you could be married in another country and as far as the Jewish Courts are concerned, it is valid –just as we have with Gay Marriage here in the US.
oh goody we have a new MOBY (or maybe an old one with a new nickname)–
don’t feed the trolls
The idea that everyone who disagrees or challenges is a troll is stupid. What do you want and sanction then: “Yes, you’re right?”
Mmmmmmmmmm. That’s intellectually stimulating and ensures an exchange of ideas. In fact that kind of insulated community devolves into mindless parochialism.
Saudis just beheaded a woman for sorcery: damn witches; she probably baked some kids into a pie. You can also be killed for publicly declaring you will no longer worship a lucky meteor by walking in a circle around it.
http://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/2/8/29121/World/Region/Saudi-woman-beheaded-for-sorcery.aspx
There is still time.
Enough women are still alive who remember what it was like when English laws required that a women have her husband’s permission to work. When the money she earned belonged to him.
A few still remember how it was when he owned everything and rape was legal within a marriage and almost impossible to prove outside.
Since we have no women left who remember how it was before we had the vote, and when corporal punishment was still permitted (to wives, children etc.); except for a few historians, our first step must be to teach
- The History of Women’s Emancipation in England
to this generation of children. Preferably before the muslims rewrite UK history as they already have Persian & Arabian history and the history of India.
re: corporal punishment for children in schools, etc. was permitted until 1970, – but actually domestic violence became illegal in 1850. Just most of us did not know.
What is the point of lamenting what Brits themselves have allowed to happen within their own borders?
In the name of political correctness, inclusion, multiculturalism etc. they have rolled over under the steady drip drip drip of Muslim incrementalism. Apparently, the courts have not stood up with a firm enough declaration that…this is English law, take it or leave it.
The drip drip drip is a deliberate and well defined tactic of non-violent jihad, to slowly and relentlessly infuse Islam into western societies and to eventually prevail in such numbers that those societies are absorbed, crushed, even. Asked the disgusting Mullah Krekar, apparently still residing in Norway, about Islam’s plan to take over Europe through Muslims breeding like “mosquitoes”. (his word)
It is easy to lay blame when you don’t live within such population pressures as now experienced in the British Isles, but, from perception across the pond, with prominent Brits like George Galloway and the Archbishop of Canterbury, the police, the BBC, some of the courts & the former liberal government paving the way, what did you expect?
I saw a Channel 4 series a few years back. The vile rant of an Islamic religious leader (Grand Mufti?) was being piped in live from Saudi Arabia or Egypt to the Muslim assembly in London, recorded by the tv station’s undercover camera.
But it is futile to talk about pressures within communities. Britain is either shutting down the Islamist agenda or it is not. If the horses have escaped already, it is futile to talk about locking the barn door.
The same pressures are operating within the United States, enabled by the current (even former) federal government that seems to want to go out of its way to accommodate Islam and enabled by an atmosphere of political correctness. In the US, geographically larger and more diffuse, the pressures are less obvious, but we have Muslim enclaves that are growing in number and demands.
They thank Allah for the softness and weakness of the infidel.
“My question is this: have you people gone completely insane? What in the world are Muslims doing in Britain anyway?”
You seem to forget at one point we had an empire.. and a fair number of Muslims that came over to Britain had British passports. This doesn’t excuse their behaviour or refusal to intergrate…
The point of Empire was for the British to colonise the Wogs, not to have the Wogs colonise the United Kingdom.
You lot seemed to have got all that backwards, huh?
And as many of your former colonies have proved themselves to be rather spectacularly unsuited for anything even remotely resembling competent self-governance, your “Open Door” immigration policy is nothing less than utter madness.
Were I a Limey, I would fervently pray that the next monarch takes his duty as Defender of The Faith more seriously than HRH The Queen does.
A few well-publicized banishings and a burning or two would soon put things back aright.
Maybe y’all will luck out and Charles will suffer a mortal gardening accident.
This article understates the problem in Britain.
1. Sharia courts alredy have their judgements enforced by mainstream civil legal system through the Arbitration Act.
2. Bigamy is a criminal offence but Muslim mem are not only never prosecuted, they get welfare payments for each of their wives.
3. There has never been a prosecution for female genital mutilation.
4. Halal butchery is rapidly becoming the norm (abbatoirs handling pork being the exception) because it is easier to process all animals the halal way than separate the meat.
The US keeps the inflow of Muslim immigrants down to a minimum and this gives them the time they need to digest the unassailable fact that few Americans outside of a tiny number white trash types, nuts, drug dealers, and black prison inmates have any interest in Islam. In fact the immigrants learn to their horror that even in the politically correct and well identified social studies sinkholes in this country Islam is deeply underappreciated and as far as the average American is concerned it doesn’t exist.
My friend, I fear that you are living in a bubble. Please do a little research to find that there is certainly creeping sharia in the U.S. Please don’t brush it off as an aside. Do your homework. I mean, haven’t you heard about Dearborn, MI?
Last time I looked into it Muslims were not being allowed into the country in the same numbers as they were prior to 9/11; although, the Bamster, in his wisdom, may have had this policy reversed. But my main point is that the overwhelming vast majority of Americans have little interest in Islam and view it as something rather close to being an unnatural practice, as far as religions go.
Hate to break the bad news to you, davelnaf, but since 2001 the U.S. has admitted over 50,000 Somali refugees alone(not counting any other middle eastern refugee admitted during the same time period) The numbers have actually increased since 2001…!! Since obama has taken office the numbers have risen even further(Google: Somali refugee relocation)
The terrorist related organization known as C.A.I.R.(council on American islamic relations)has already filed numerous lawsuits in many states over “islamic discrimination,” sharia law, so-called “honor killing,” etc. They are using our own laws and U.S. Constitution against us. They have a plan to “take over from within.” There won’t be any “radical jihad” like in the middle east, they take over by population explosion numbers and will vote or demand their sharia over our current laws. Sounds too crazy to be true, but shure as I’m sittin’ here, it is…
“There won’t be any “radical jihad” like in the middle east, they take over by population explosion numbers and will vote or demand their sharia over our current laws”…
Your right although jihad hasn’t seemed to stopped them in their tracks. They go balistic over cartoons or whatever, (sadly, plenty of morons who know nothing about islam, will sympathize as to why we shouldn’t offend them). So they won’t be able to control themselves (they have no way to do so)..they are a controlled bunch those muzzy’s- who won’t be satisfied unless they can violate someone else (that of course is the only way they can let some of the pressure out…off?)
maybe you should take a look at what our government is up to this week
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-administration-welcoming-islamic-group-washington-discussion-tolerance
The book “Londonistan” provides useful background information in more depth than can be given in a short editorial piece.
The day after 9/11, in a little know chain of events, every Muslim vendor on the streets of Bronx County failed to appear. Pickup trucks driven by gang bangers with flags that read “Kill the Palestinians” drove around looking for victims. Yes, I know, they were factually inaccurate as to who flew the planes. There was NO press coverage. I work there. I saw it. In addition, a young Muslim was executed by gang bangers, point blank.
Now, I don’t think this was a good thing. Most of the Muslims I see daily run restaurants that serve Jews and Christians. They’re from Pakistan or Indonesia. Money and food unites all. There’s plenty of room in New York.
But I have to say, a friend visited London some years back, and was attacked by a gang of brick throwing Muslim boys. I have no desire to go drop my hard earned money in London until the British grow a pair of balls, which apparently were cut off when Winston Churchill died. It’s this guilt about success that informs the policies of all so called progressives, from the current Anglican Church to the late Ted Kennedy. It must be some kind of brain disease that occurs as a result of owning too much land and money. I cannot figure out any other cause.
But one thing is for sure, Sharia ain’t coming to America any time soon. Anyone who thinks it is, is not properly educated. That mosque down at Ground Zero, to my understanding is run by Sufis, the Muslims who don’t wish to harm anyone, and get beat up on by the nutty ones.
Maybe I’m wrong. Educate me.
Go to Dearborn and Memphis.
I have two friends who are blind – never to see the light of day – but you davelnaf have a chance to improve your worldly sight – read Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat:
“Islam – What it isn’t !
Islam is not a religion, nor is it a cult. In its fullest form, it is a complete, total, 100% system of life.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic, social, and military components. The religious component is a beard for all of the other components.
Islamization begins when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their religious privileges.
When politically correct, tolerant, and culturally diverse societies agree to Muslim demands for their religious privileges, some of the other components tend to creep in as well.
As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.
Those nice quiet Muslim neighbors still look at you as an Infidel!
Ok. I can accept that.
But as Humphry Bogart said in Casablanc, “There are some parts of New York I would suggest your Hitler not try to invade.” I probably quoted wrong.
All I know is 10,000 New Yorkers joined the military after 9/11 to kick ass. Many of them actually expected to do so against the country of those who flew the planes. The muddle that followed kind of threw a wet blanket on any kind of nationalistic response to the attack.
How do you respond to someone walking down the street, wearing a head covering, with a few kids under her arms? Let’s be real, she’s protected by the First Amendment. The answer is, have your own kids. Have more. Educate them.
But from what I can see, most of the so called elite don’t breed. And most of the people who breed, like my family, we’re not the elites.
So keeping within the bounds of the law and the Constitution, what do you suggest?
Change the law and the Constitution: make it success friendly and not failure friendly based on some stupid notion that all men are created equal – they’re not nor did the D of I ever intend such a notion.
That was about the Divine Right of Kings, not equality. Why would men who owned slaves, wanted a landholder vote and no women’s rights write such a thing?
Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat is over $50 on Amazon. Cannot afford it. But it’s in my saved list.
YES and since the feds have outlawed even the hint of anything that smacks of calling certain factions Islamic terrorist, including the murders at Ft. Hood by the radical Isalmic terrorist Hasan, we are looking at same thing here in US.
As a former Navy officer, I feel sad that so many have died to defend what some easily give away in the name of political correctness.
As goes Europe and the UK, so goes America and other countries.
It is deeply alarming that Western leaders HATE freedom and human rights as they are fully united with Muslims to destroy all our freedom and human rights and replace it with excessively cruel Islamic sharia law where women are treated as inferior beings and defenseless non-Muslims have no human rights.
Western leaders stomp on the graves of all of our brave heroes who fought heroically and died so that we could live in freedom.
Who could think the 3rd World War would be like this? It is about time to think about old Winston, his speechs and what he had done! Not only for Britain, but in most of the European Countries. Sweden is one good example outside Britain…
May the Forces needed be with us “dhimmies”…
Here in the States we have a TV channel called “The Learning Channel”, TLC for short. They have recently come up with a new program called “All American Muslim” about what it is like for Muslims living here. It should be noted it is backed by CAIR. Recently Lowe’s Hardware pulled it’s ads from that show after receiving complaints from their customers. This is a reaction they got…
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/11/california-senator-threatens-boycott-after-lowes-pulls-ads-from-muslim-american/?test=latestnews#ixzz1gKiqQHEx
LOS ANGELES – Lowe’s Home Improvement has found itself facing a backlash after the retail giant pulled ads from a reality show about American Muslims.
A Michigan congressman spoke out against the company’s decision Sunday, saying the company is “upholding the beliefs of a fringe hate group.”
Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) also said Lowe’s is choosing to disregard the First Amendment.
“Our nation’s history is full of examples demonstrating how we have repeatedly torn down false divisions hate groups choose to create,” Ellison said in a statement.”But the struggle against bigotry and hatred must continue so we never give in to intolerance like Lowe’s Corporation has done.”
Ellison isn’t the only politician speaking out against Lowe’s. A state senator from Southern California said Sunday he was considering calling for a boycott.
Calling the Lowe’s decision “un-American” and “naked religious bigotry,” Sen. Ted Lieu, D-Torrance, told The Associated Press he would also consider legislative action if Lowe’s doesn’t apologize to Muslims and reinstate its ads. The senator sent a letter outlining his complaints to Lowe’s Chief Executive Officer Robert A. Niblock.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/11/california-senator-threatens-boycott-after-lowes-pulls-ads-from-muslim-american/?test=latestnews#ixzz1gMjSdAOn
English liberals are fools and dispatching their country with haste. liberal marxists in the U.S.A. would permit the same. Its going to get very nasty in the next few years as the islamists push the limits of timid foolish STUPID liberals.
In some aspect I would love to see sharia law imposed and watch the gays and lesbians scurry for cover, as I don’t feel that they would be having the parades and outlandish behavior that they now foist on others.
And then with Sharia law, I would love to see the NOW organization try to do what they have done in the past.
And with obozo, our clown in chief, in office, wouldn’t that be a funny gift that he gives the American people.
No, it would not be “a funny gift,” as you call it. islam is not a religion and the citizens of the U.S.A. most certainly do not want anything to do with sharia…!!! What are you gonna’ do when they come for you…?!!(unless you’re muslim, of course)
Political correctness is a cancerous scab that has decimated Great Britain, with the influx of foreigners(muslims) and sharia she’s barely keeping her head above water.
Winston Churchill was the best thing to ever come out of Britain, God knows she could use him now.(If Winston was still about, he would have kicked them all out, lock, stock and bloody barrel…!!)
The Queen and blathering Prince Charles are up to their arses in middle eastern oil money, that’s why they don’t care!! They have sold their country down the road for “Judas” money, they should be piked at London Bridge…!!
It’s of course quite difficult for us in the western world to understand what the present and fast developing situation demands from each other of us, but it’s necessary to wipe of all the policitcal correctness, and understand it has begun… the 3rd world war in an uncommon shape…
I’ve noticed the pattern of terror is the same no matter where. I’m saddend because when I look around, I know most American’s have no idea how bad it is.
“Villagers in several areas of the northeast Upper Nile region say that when women are captured by government forces they are asked: “Are you Christian or Muslim?” Women who answer “Muslim” are set free, but typically soldiers gang-rape those who answer “Christian” then cut off their breasts and leave them to die as an example for others.”
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=12985#ixzz1gOz9I1JV
But, Obama has decided to ignore the real persecution we see on a daily basis, as well as the majority of Americans by protecting LGBT?? In Egypt there is a nun (unless youtube removed it) who was (and I’m sure that’s over with by now) helping little girls (like seven and eight) who’d been kidnapped then gang raped for days. Afterwards they carved up their faces and left them on their families doorstep. Hey, I watched her computer screen and there were faces after faces she was pointing out as she scrolled down! I lie in bed at night and can’t seem to wrap my mind around that..I try an imagine it and almost feel morbid for doing so. What is the alternative..to forget? Well I can’t because this is what is known as sunna (rape) and rape is a form of jihad. In France, Norway.. rape is the very thing that is happening! My heart breaks for them-
Misogynistic scum. May a proverbial Lorena Bobbit have her way with your schlong one day.
oncur…to some extent. Interesting how these same organizations which purport to support gays and women blather and bleat against the nation of Israel, the only Mideastern country where gays are not only safe but (in Telaviv) glorified. And as for women, by the time they complete military duty, if not before, they possess the attributions of self-respect, toughness and courage (as well as beauty). Yet these politically correct organizations knock Israel and have no criticism of the Mideast where gays are isolated, ignored or spat upon, punished, even executed and women are veiled, restricted from driving, restricted from voting and subject to Sharia Law so that they, themselves, are punished when they are raped, subject to honour killings as well as heinous vaginal operations after birth. Phyllis Chesler, who sometimes appears in Pajamas, has written on the subject.
It is definitely a great irony that the Rainbow Coalition is all in favor of importing and protecting the very entity that will do the most to try and uproot feminism, gay parades and marriage, black integration and Latino predominance.
At least Cleopatra knew her asp wasn’t a cuddly kitty cat.
The #1 baby name in 2010 England was Mohammed if factoring in the myriad of spellings. ‘Mohammed’ in of itself was 4th most popular.
Mr. Diamond, as I’m sure you know London is often referred to as Londonistan.
The Sharia law/Islamic faith is a sickening disguise for what it truly is. Complete and utter control over ALL residents in that country. Sure there may be a Catholic church here and there and a non-Halal section in the grocery store, but the idiotic prayers are on PA speakers dotted through town.
What’s pathetic and sad is the ONLY people going to these mosques at ‘assigned prayer time’ are the unemployed old folks wearing their ankle length boho and kufi. THAT IS IT. Why? Because it’s not the 7th Century! Well to post-Crusades technology living folks it is.
Islamic led countries are either 3rd World countries or 3rd World countries with oil. The day-to-day oil operations is maintained by non-Mulsim Westerners and AustralAsians.
Many Muslims don’t work on Friday or come to work later in the afternoon. So when there’s stock trading to be done it and their accounting too is carried out by people other than Muslims.
Being lazy, pushing one’s nomadic faith and the West PUSHING for said ‘religious recognition’ as well – PC/multi-culturalism is the most despicable practice hoisted upon free countries.
Let’s pray that Newt Gingrich is nominated and then elected to office. Actually, any Republican other than Ron Paul, the fantastic nitwit.
How the Muslims are trying to destroy Christmas in Britain and elsewhere: http://crombouke.blogspot.com/2011/03/islams-jihad-against-christmas.html
Very similar events are occurring in Canada, although Steven Harper (Prime Minister and leader of the Conservative Party) is attempting to put a curb on some of the more egregious policies. For example, just recently Jason Kenney (minister of immigration) has brought in a new ruling — Muslim women cannot wear a niqab that covers their faces when saying their oath for citizenship. Now this just sounds like common sense to me. Yet what have the Leftist media outlets (with the exception of SUN TV) in Canada characterized this as? Well, of course, Jason Kenney’s new ruling is “controversial”! “Controversial”? Please, it’s the other way around. What’s “controversial” is for someone to show up at a Citizen swearing-in ceremony while wearing a mask. Now that’s “controversial.” As is showing up at a voting station while adorned in a mask (that’s still “acceptable” by Elections Canada, btw.) imo, the “problem” is with the Leftists who allow (if not directly encourage and endorse) abuses of our system.
When importing morons from the Third World who bring nothing to the table other than ethnic cooking and take away more than they give is considered controversial, then Canada will be okay.
What this article represents is the death of a once-great, and free, nation. What is even more sad is that apparently, the British people either don’t want to stop this, or, like their “cousins” across the pond in the US, no longer have the sense, strength, or will to stop it. In either case, the Brits are doomed to become, not subjects of the crown, but subjects of the turbin. They are not going to like it, but as is the case in the US, sheep have very little to say…
AMERICAN PATRIOTS’ MOVEMENT OF AMERICA
To save America from being transformed in an islamic cockroach nest islam needs to be outlawed in America and extracted from American society.
To save the world from islam conquest and domination from sharia law then islam must be exterminated from the world.
If the first action is not taken then it will be necessary in the near future for American patriots and other Americans that believe in keeping their freedoms and liberties to engage in a hot, bloody war with moslem cockroaches to prevent America from turning into a moslem cockroach nest.
The same applies on the international level.
Muslims have close-knot communities, so where are the ‘holy men’ who are aware of the gooming and abhorrent behaviour enacted against mostly white children, acted out in their midst? Will any of them address this despicable immoral lustful, criminal activity? Silence !!