Senator McConnell on the Perils of Campaign Finance ‘Reform’
It was standing room only at the American Enterprise Institute last Friday. The draw? Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who gave a stirring defense of political free speech, as highlighted in this hour-long video of the speech at C-SPAN. This cornerstone of American democracy has been under continuing attack by those who claim they are trying to “reform” our campaign finance system.
McConnell’s defense of the First Amendment was a remarkable contrast to President Obama, who has attempted to restrict political speech rights in one example after another during his administration. As AEI’s Peter Wallison said in his introduction, McConnell is one of the “few good men” in Washington who has been relentless in defending the First Amendment.
Sen. McConnell began his speech by pointing out that what has always distinguished Americans “as a people is the eagerness with which they have organized around issues and causes they believe in.” He expressed his concerns over an administration that “has shown an alarming willingness itself to use the powers of government to silence” groups that hold different views. He stressed the importance of politicians resisting the temptation to muffle “one’s critics.” The Framers intended and recognized that “the form of speech most needful of absolute protection is political speech.”
McConnell spoke of his own experiences over the last three decades, often taking an unpopular stance (“the media has been merciless”) in order to protect these First Amendment freedoms, such as his fight against the 2002 McCain-Feingold amendments to federal campaign finance controls. All McConnell needed to win were “the 45 words of the First Amendment, and the determination to see their true meaning vindicated.”
McConnell went on to highlight instances of the federal government’s most recent attacks on political speech. Most prominent is the proposed DISCLOSE Act, the legislative response to the Citizens United decision. “Those pushing the DISCLOSE Act have a simple view: if the Supreme Court is no longer willing to limit the speech of those who oppose their agenda, they’ll find other ways to do it.” McConnell called the Act a “political weapon” intended to force disclosure on some viewed as enemies by the sponsors but not on those viewed as allies (unions). It also calls for “government-compelled disclosure of contributions to all grassroots groups, which is far more dangerous than its proponents are willing to admit.” This is nothing less than an effort by the government to expose “its critics to harassment and intimidation.”
The senator then gave examples of such harassment, such as the “Idaho businessman who becomes a personal target of the president for speaking out on behalf of candidates and causes the president opposes.” The Koch brothers have become targets because of “their forceful and unapologetic promotion and defense of capitalism.” The president’s campaign even published an enemies list, “thuggish tactics” according to McConnell, and the president himself told Latino voters to “vote with the idea of punishing their enemies and rewarding their friends.” McConnell said the president should be condemning such tactics, not joining in them.
As McConnell said, “No individual or group in this country should have to face harassment or intimidation, or incur crippling expenses, defending themselves against their own government, simply because that government doesn’t like the message they’re advocating.”
“The “message of the order was clear: If you want a government contract, you’d better support our causes, or at least keep your mouth shut when it comes to the causes we oppose.”
Isn’t that the way it always works in Washington? Crony capitalism is nothing new. If you’re friends with the party in power, you get contracts. If you’re not, you’re out of luck. Wall Street knows this all too well, as do the lobbyists. And it just gives Washington an even worse reputation than it already has. And it will probably never change. Too much money is at stake.
It’s a shame he cannot buy a chin, or a spine… but I am sure the money helps all the same.
Truly a random blowhard.
I’ve generally don’t have much to say about Mitch, but he did very well with this one.
Thank you, Mr. von Spakovsky, for writing about it.
An Préachán
The Founding Father’s wrote the Bill of Rights in order of importance.
1) Freedom of Speech
2) Right to bear arms in case government infringes on #1
McDoody gave a “stirring” speech???????????
Howdy Doody lookalike, tiny mail slot mouth, mumbles like a mumblewit in a thin grandma whine.
Like all RINO pseudo-conservatives in the pansy Congress, McDoody can’t muster a ringing phrase to summon a churchmouse to the country’s defense.
He’s got his lifetime pension and implausible perks. Can’t he just GO?
Such a wonderfully logical argument. I think I’ll frame it and put it up on my bathroom wall.
Make sure the paper’s it on is soft and absorbent, so you can put the sentiment to proper use.
Typical liberal complaints.
Criticism of his appearance and complaints about his supposed lack of rhetorical skills
Not a thing to do with the substance, only the image.
But remember, liberals are the “deep thinkers”.
Yeah. Keep telling yourself that.
Yeah. Change in the same sense that Ion Mihai Pacepa has been describing how socialism is foisted on unsuspecting, gullible, and apathetic populations.
Mitch Henry Clay McConnell can strike a deal even if it means compromising principle. He and his ilk made Kentucky the worst managed state in the union. Offer a solution to a problem and he can tell you several reasons why it will never fly in congress and that no action is the safest course. I am pleased that he favors political free speech at least today, unchallenged.
Mr. McConnell’s defense of poor defenseless labor unions and corporate interests was truly inspirational. Money equal free speech, our overlords in black robes have told us so. Now the rest of us don’t need to bother with silly stuff like involving ourselves in democracy. Just let us know when I can give a labor union or corporation the death penalty. God bless Mitch McConnell!
Listening to a cretin like Von Spakovsky talk about “improving” the campaign finance system is like listening to a lecture on human rights from Attila the Hun.
This is one of the slimebags that the Bush Administration used to sabotage the elections system with voter “caging” operations, turning the civil rights operations in the Justice Department into another branch of the Republican National Committee and then lying to Congress to cover it all up. You want the lowest form of life on the planet, you’ve got it right here with Von Spakovsky.
And, of course, no surprise, you’ll find him on pjmedia, home away from home for the people determined to rule America by whatever means possible. You want the treasonous Fascist scum, you come here and find them in droves.
I think the best reorganization of everything to do with campaigns would be to limit the length of a campaign. Get rid of all the high priced ‘consultants’ Let the candidate mind himself and be himself. I can just picture Barry toting those grecian columns to that arena and affixing his pseudo presidential seal on that podium. I’re really had it with the wild campaigns for more and more money ……from everyone and for everyone. Cut down on the retirement benefits of an administration and the congress and use that money for campaigns. There is even an animal or canine caucus in the House now to handle animal-related issues. The snail darters probably have a lobbiest