Get PJ Media on your Apple

Senate Seeks to Advance Medicare Payment System Reform

A long-term solution to the "doc fix"?

Rodrigo Sermeño


May 16, 2013 - 2:35 pm
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

Miller said the cost estimates for repealing the SGR depend on projections of growth in the volume and intensity of services provided by physicians and other health professionals and the relationship between that volume growth and gross domestic product growth. The difficulty in making the estimates, because of the unpredictability of volume growth, has made the estimates more volatile – a point that was constantly stated during the hearing.

Miller also said the current payment system must move from volume-drive systems to systems that focus on quality, coordination, and accountability.

“We should not simply repeal the SGR. We also must change the underlying fee-for-service system that Medicare uses to pay physicians. Fee-for-service promotes volume over value. Physicians are rewarded for doing more tests and more procedures, even when unnecessary,” Baucus said.

Bruce Steinwald, a healthcare consultant, mentioned that now is a particularly “fertile period” to do away with SGR.

“For years, the stance of the profession seemed to be repeal the SGR and then we’ll talk about reform,” Steinwald said. “Now it seems to me that the medical profession recognizes [reform] needs to be part of the same conversation.”

Baucus noted that the payments models being currently tested by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are not ready to replace the existing fee-for-service system.

Dr. Kavita Patel, managing director of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution, called for harmonization of all the existing incentive payment initiatives under the CMS into a “care coordination program” that would a offer a transition pathway to novel methods of payment.

“Short-term strategies that will result in better care coordination between primary care physicians and specialists are the ultimate answer but the question remains on how to get there,” Patel said.

Bipartisan support in both chambers of Congress to act quickly has increased in recent months. Panels in the House and Senate are eagerly pursuing a permanent “doc fix.”

Last month, the Energy and Commerce and Ways and Means panels outlined additional details of their latest draft plan to reform the current system. The proposal would also repeal the SGR and replace with a more “fair and stable system” of physician payment.

Baucus and Hatch sent a letter to healthcare providers Friday asking specific questions about repealing and replacing the SGR. Tuesday’s hearing made clear that there is no agreement on the best path forward yet.

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Rodrigo is a freelance writer living in Washington, D.C.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (3)
All Comments   (3)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Seniors would "see" doctors considerably less than they do if doctors didn't have a legal government enforced monopoly over access to medical drugs. The supposed "shortage" of primary care physicians is due the time the doctors "waste" seeing patients who are only there because the doctor holds the power of continued access to medical drugs over their head. Seeing people who really don't need to be "seen" is easy money for a doctor. The added unnecessary visits adds considerably to the cost of Medicare. Repeal of prescription laws (with the exception of narcotics and habit forming drugs) would free up physician time to see those who do actually need to see the doctor. Of course these people would require the doctor to actually "work", use his knowledge as a doctor, instead of taking the "easy way out" in seeing people who have no real need to see the doctor, but whom the doctor likes to see because it is "easy money" and in many cases, also results in "kick backs" from having the individual in question have lab tests which of course means employment for people who wouldn't otherwise be employed. Visit my blog at ""; for further details.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Baucus, 2013: “We need to ensure that seniors can continue to see their doctors."

Too late - already lost the specialists who were good, because of that 'doc fix uncertainty', since 2007 when the Dems controlled Congress.

Without that specialist, would prefer a death panel because no access to specialists is a slower death sentence.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
1) Any reform that comes out now will have to be tied to Obamacare. Death Panels anyone? The end result will be to kill off as many "useless eaters" as they can, as quickly as they can.

2) By the 9 Billion Names of G-d, this is coming out of the Senate! The Democrat controlled, Reid-run, RINO infested Senate. When was the last time something came out of the Senate that was not bad for the country and a betrayal of its people?

Subotai Bahadur
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All