<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scozzafava Candidacy: Not the Fault of DC GOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtb, dallas, texas, usa</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-435472</link>
		<dc:creator>jtb, dallas, texas, usa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-435472</guid>
		<description>It is past time for the Conservatives of this country to build a Republican party that has morals, has standards, welcomes anyone, protects everyone, but refuses to compromise on morals and standards for candidates...

The GOP &quot;Leadership&quot; needs to wake up and smell the coffee...  Or they will be replaced...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is past time for the Conservatives of this country to build a Republican party that has morals, has standards, welcomes anyone, protects everyone, but refuses to compromise on morals and standards for candidates&#8230;</p>
<p>The GOP &#8220;Leadership&#8221; needs to wake up and smell the coffee&#8230;  Or they will be replaced&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Shaw</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-430222</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-430222</guid>
		<description>Scozafazza is a liberal Democrat. Why is the RNC backing this woman calling herself a Republican? The RNC is clueless. The RNC should be backing Hoffman; given his ascendancy in the race, I hope he wins. Newt needs to go away. He&#039;s wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scozafazza is a liberal Democrat. Why is the RNC backing this woman calling herself a Republican? The RNC is clueless. The RNC should be backing Hoffman; given his ascendancy in the race, I hope he wins. Newt needs to go away. He&#8217;s wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berlet98</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-429793</link>
		<dc:creator>Berlet98</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-429793</guid>
		<description>New York Republicans Just Don’t Get It

She’s pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-card check, pro-tax and spend, in bed with labor unions, and has been endorsed by DailyKos.com.

I’m not referring to Nancy Pelosi or Barbara Boxer.  I’m referring to New York State Assmblywoman Dede Scozafazza, the Republican nominee for Congress in New York 23rd CD.

More liberal than many of her Democratic colleagues in the Assembly yet termed a moderate, Scozzafazza is about as moderate as George Soros and her nomination represents the most asinine Republican pick since Rick Lazio ran against Hillary in 2000.

Opposed in the special election on November 3rd by Democrat Bill Owens and the Conservative Party’s Doug Hoffman, Scozafazza’s nomination is a classic example of the political astigmatism and poor memories of the New York State Republicans.

The 23rd and this country as a whole are politically center right and generally reject political extremism of liberal candidates such as Barack Obama unless they successfully cloak that philosophy in rhetorical vagaries, such as Barack Obama did.

Last November’s election . . .

(Read the rest at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1281)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Republicans Just Don’t Get It</p>
<p>She’s pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage, pro-card check, pro-tax and spend, in bed with labor unions, and has been endorsed by DailyKos.com.</p>
<p>I’m not referring to Nancy Pelosi or Barbara Boxer.  I’m referring to New York State Assmblywoman Dede Scozafazza, the Republican nominee for Congress in New York 23rd CD.</p>
<p>More liberal than many of her Democratic colleagues in the Assembly yet termed a moderate, Scozzafazza is about as moderate as George Soros and her nomination represents the most asinine Republican pick since Rick Lazio ran against Hillary in 2000.</p>
<p>Opposed in the special election on November 3rd by Democrat Bill Owens and the Conservative Party’s Doug Hoffman, Scozafazza’s nomination is a classic example of the political astigmatism and poor memories of the New York State Republicans.</p>
<p>The 23rd and this country as a whole are politically center right and generally reject political extremism of liberal candidates such as Barack Obama unless they successfully cloak that philosophy in rhetorical vagaries, such as Barack Obama did.</p>
<p>Last November’s election . . .</p>
<p>(Read the rest at <a href="http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1281" rel="nofollow">http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=1281</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: idalily</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-429790</link>
		<dc:creator>idalily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-429790</guid>
		<description>New to PJM, but for my first post, I have to say: I want fiscally responsible government. Why is this so hard for the RNC to understand? STOP SPENDING. Oh, and Newt: shut up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New to PJM, but for my first post, I have to say: I want fiscally responsible government. Why is this so hard for the RNC to understand? STOP SPENDING. Oh, and Newt: shut up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myth buster</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-429787</link>
		<dc:creator>myth buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-429787</guid>
		<description>No Eddie, it isn&#039;t.  The reason it isn&#039;t is that choosing the lesser of two evils is a losing battle.  You&#039;re always ceding ground with no way to reclaim it.  This makes disaster inevitable, as opposed to the opposition taking over fully and making a mess of things quickly, where it will get very bad, but you have a chance to turn the car around before you actually go over the cliff.  The guy driving at 10 mph will forcibly restrain you from grabbing the controls and turning around- the guy going 70 mph won&#039;t be able to stop you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Eddie, it isn&#8217;t.  The reason it isn&#8217;t is that choosing the lesser of two evils is a losing battle.  You&#8217;re always ceding ground with no way to reclaim it.  This makes disaster inevitable, as opposed to the opposition taking over fully and making a mess of things quickly, where it will get very bad, but you have a chance to turn the car around before you actually go over the cliff.  The guy driving at 10 mph will forcibly restrain you from grabbing the controls and turning around- the guy going 70 mph won&#8217;t be able to stop you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-429778</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-429778</guid>
		<description>Reagans law applys only to republicans not liberals hiding behind the elephant.Fiar game is anyone who agrees with liberal philosophy and is backed by groups such as acorn.They are not republicans when they vote against every other republican.Standing on their own MAKING DEALS WITH THE DEVIL,laughing at the rest.This candidate is a democrat,her record and what she supports proves that.So remove her from the ticket,or put democrat beside her name.Reagan would be appauled at the blurred lines we see nowdays.He would toss out his rule and join in the verbal attack on her,thats 100% forsure.At least in his day republican ment something.These days we are so confused it has become a dirty word.So yes we must fight to bring the GOP back to its roots.However if the GOP puts candidates that are really dems on the ticket,you can forget Reagans 11th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reagans law applys only to republicans not liberals hiding behind the elephant.Fiar game is anyone who agrees with liberal philosophy and is backed by groups such as acorn.They are not republicans when they vote against every other republican.Standing on their own MAKING DEALS WITH THE DEVIL,laughing at the rest.This candidate is a democrat,her record and what she supports proves that.So remove her from the ticket,or put democrat beside her name.Reagan would be appauled at the blurred lines we see nowdays.He would toss out his rule and join in the verbal attack on her,thats 100% forsure.At least in his day republican ment something.These days we are so confused it has become a dirty word.So yes we must fight to bring the GOP back to its roots.However if the GOP puts candidates that are really dems on the ticket,you can forget Reagans 11th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Graas</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-429732</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Graas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 03:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-429732</guid>
		<description>Dan, before that NRCC donation I would have totally agreed with you.  That rocked me. Six figures???  I&#039;m stunned. Yes, everything you say here *would* have been true, if not for that six-figure donation from the NRCC.  

Suffice it to say that I am really looking forward to reading Sarah Palin&#039;s book and I&#039;m hopeful that she is candid and names some names.  

I&#039;m quite convinced that Sarah Palin was intentionally sabotaged on the various invitations, to just make her look bad, and on the fundraiser itself, they tried to push off that Ryan TARP-supporter guy from Wisconsin as a &quot;Palin substitute&quot; because he&#039;s got sex appeal and has some conservative credentials (other than TARP).  He was given the spot of introducing Gingrich which was supposed to go to Palin.  There was a certain &quot;unnamed&quot; GOP Senator from a &quot;battleground state&quot; who dissed her in comments that night.........I could go on and on and on with this. I&#039;m telling you, I&#039;m not having any more of it.  

There was a great article at Politico today regarding the Hoffman endorsement where several people were quoted.  Palin was extensively quoted from her Facebook post.........and it ended with an **anonymous** GOP &quot;insider&quot; whose opinion means nothing to me.  Why should it?  He/she won&#039;t add his/her name to the comment.  Why are they afraid to add their names to comments about the grassroots who have been alienated?? These weasels need to go NOW or the party is going to go down with them.  

They all need to have some humility and RESIGN because the trashing has come from them &quot;anonymously&quot; every time Palin gets some good ink.  We are not amused by calls for us to &quot;play nice&quot; with the GOP when they are clearly out to destroy her and the momentum of the grassroots conservatives under her leadership.  

Sure, they didn&#039;t choose Scozzafava, but a six-figure donation???  Please.  *URP*

Nothing personal. I love ya, Dan, but no more for me.......until I see what Palin is going to do.  Can&#039;t wait for Palin&#039;s book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, before that NRCC donation I would have totally agreed with you.  That rocked me. Six figures???  I&#8217;m stunned. Yes, everything you say here *would* have been true, if not for that six-figure donation from the NRCC.  </p>
<p>Suffice it to say that I am really looking forward to reading Sarah Palin&#8217;s book and I&#8217;m hopeful that she is candid and names some names.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite convinced that Sarah Palin was intentionally sabotaged on the various invitations, to just make her look bad, and on the fundraiser itself, they tried to push off that Ryan TARP-supporter guy from Wisconsin as a &#8220;Palin substitute&#8221; because he&#8217;s got sex appeal and has some conservative credentials (other than TARP).  He was given the spot of introducing Gingrich which was supposed to go to Palin.  There was a certain &#8220;unnamed&#8221; GOP Senator from a &#8220;battleground state&#8221; who dissed her in comments that night&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;I could go on and on and on with this. I&#8217;m telling you, I&#8217;m not having any more of it.  </p>
<p>There was a great article at Politico today regarding the Hoffman endorsement where several people were quoted.  Palin was extensively quoted from her Facebook post&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;and it ended with an **anonymous** GOP &#8220;insider&#8221; whose opinion means nothing to me.  Why should it?  He/she won&#8217;t add his/her name to the comment.  Why are they afraid to add their names to comments about the grassroots who have been alienated?? These weasels need to go NOW or the party is going to go down with them.  </p>
<p>They all need to have some humility and RESIGN because the trashing has come from them &#8220;anonymously&#8221; every time Palin gets some good ink.  We are not amused by calls for us to &#8220;play nice&#8221; with the GOP when they are clearly out to destroy her and the momentum of the grassroots conservatives under her leadership.  </p>
<p>Sure, they didn&#8217;t choose Scozzafava, but a six-figure donation???  Please.  *URP*</p>
<p>Nothing personal. I love ya, Dan, but no more for me&#8230;&#8230;.until I see what Palin is going to do.  Can&#8217;t wait for Palin&#8217;s book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConservativeWanderer</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-429333</link>
		<dc:creator>ConservativeWanderer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-429333</guid>
		<description>Okay, Eddie, I&#039;ve got a challenge for you.

Show me the 70% of the GOP platform (that is, the official GOP platform as voted on at the 2008 convention) that Scozzafava has expressed her agreement with during this election cycle. If she hasn&#039;t commented on an issue, you can&#039;t count it as agreement.

I eagerly await the results of your exhaustive research... or your desperate Rockefeller Republican spin, whichever you decide to give us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Eddie, I&#8217;ve got a challenge for you.</p>
<p>Show me the 70% of the GOP platform (that is, the official GOP platform as voted on at the 2008 convention) that Scozzafava has expressed her agreement with during this election cycle. If she hasn&#8217;t commented on an issue, you can&#8217;t count it as agreement.</p>
<p>I eagerly await the results of your exhaustive research&#8230; or your desperate Rockefeller Republican spin, whichever you decide to give us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Richard Allen</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-428975</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Richard Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 06:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-428975</guid>
		<description>Just as there were no women in Theater in the days of Shakespeare&#039;s Globe and all of the female parts were played by poofters, so are there no Republicans in today&#039;s politics. 

And every Republican part is played at by a John McRainman or by a Lindthay Graham.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as there were no women in Theater in the days of Shakespeare&#8217;s Globe and all of the female parts were played by poofters, so are there no Republicans in today&#8217;s politics. </p>
<p>And every Republican part is played at by a John McRainman or by a Lindthay Graham.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/scozzafava-candidacy-not-the-fault-of-dc-gop/#comment-428842</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 01:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=69929#comment-428842</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to get involved... but every time I try what it gets me is more fliers asking for money. 

That said... if I have a choice between two cars driving towards disaster, I&#039;ll take the one driving at 10mph over the one moving at 70, every time.  

No candidate, unless you run yourself, is going to represent you 100% of the way. It&#039;s absurd to posture that allowing someone diametrically opposed to your views is better than voting in someone who agrees with you 70%, 60% or maybe only 30% of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to get involved&#8230; but every time I try what it gets me is more fliers asking for money. </p>
<p>That said&#8230; if I have a choice between two cars driving towards disaster, I&#8217;ll take the one driving at 10mph over the one moving at 70, every time.  </p>
<p>No candidate, unless you run yourself, is going to represent you 100% of the way. It&#8217;s absurd to posture that allowing someone diametrically opposed to your views is better than voting in someone who agrees with you 70%, 60% or maybe only 30% of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

