Saudis Continue Steaming Toward the 7th Century
Here’s an official plan submitted to invigorate tourism in Saudi Arabia: Marry four women, domicile them in corners of the kingdom, travel to visit each during the year, and — boom — you’ve stimulated airline business, hotel occupancy, and car rentals. This was submitted by none less than Hassan Alomair, director of self-development in Saudi Arabia, at a Jeddah conference for the development of internal tourism.
The project combines piety with efficacy by uniting Sharia’s entitlements to multiple wives with economic stimulus, Mr. Alomair argued. Sharing the dais was the female dean of the school of literature at King Faisal University, Dr. Feryal al-Hajeri, who remained silent as he prescribed his harem-induced economic scheming.
Not so with the readers and bloggers on the Saudi daily Al Watan’s website, which lit up on February 12 with commentary. “Why not make it four cows? He can fly around to milk them,” one said. “If that is the mentality of our director of self-development,” another asked, ”how are the others in that department?” There was plenty of accord with Mr. Alomair too. Some saw his idea as a “pillar” for building a true Islamic society, a “refuge” for unmarried Saudi women, and a “cure” for a widening spinster phenomena.
Dumbfounding episodes of this variety occur weekly in the Arabian Gulf and are regularly exposed by a growing contingent of brave reporters. Remember the girl condemned to 200 lashes for protesting being raped and that Saudi businesswoman arrested at a Riyadh Starbucks and jailed for having coffee with a male subordinate? The girl of Qatif was pardoned under world pressure but most victims of Saudi religious dementia are never heard from. Alas, if anything, new installments keep on illustrating a Saudi government sailing into the 21st century with social laws of the 7th century.
This weekend the Saudi TV network Al Arabia reported the arrests of 57 men in Mecca’s shopping malls by the Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice on charges of “flirting with Saudi girls.” Among other things, the young Saudi males were accused by the religious police of “wearing indecent clothes, playing loud music, and dancing.”
Just before Valentine’s Day, dubbed by the Commission as “a pagan Christian holiday,” the government issued an edict banning the sale of anything red: no red roses, no red ribbons, no red greeting cards, no red paint. The penalty as always was arrests and lashes of the cane.
On the face of it, some of this seems pitifully amusing.
It isn’t so for hundreds of thousands of Saudis and the eight million expatriates who live and work in the kingdom — men and women routinely humiliated in the streets, hauled into police stations for wearing a cross or not wearing a veil, or deemed to look the wrong way by a 20,000-man army of bearded fanatics.
This politico-religious repression has suited the royal family for over 60 years. To most of us it was their business. After 9/11 it spilled over when fulminating Islamofascists of the Osama bin Laden variety visited their obsessions upon infidels in New York, London, Paris, and Madrid. It then became “our” problem.
Internally, these miseries hamper all attempts to modernize the kingdom, turning aspirations to a normal life into Sisyphean daily challenges.
Externally, Islamofascism, fortified with oil money, is replicating the Saudi model across a wide swath of the Muslim world from Egypt to Pakistan, and even to enclaves in Europe and America. Witness the suggestion by the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams to create a special space for the application of Sharia laws for United Kingdom Muslims, in effect rolling back the parameters of freedom at home to accommodate imported modes of Islamofascism — multiple marriages, oppression of women, and suspension of free expression about all things Muslim.
Even modernized Arab sheiks are a problem.
Take one of the most celebrated Arabian friends of America and the West, Sheikh Mohammad bin Rashid (Sheikh Mo), the ruler of Dubai, a full business partner of President Bill Clinton and his billionaire friend Ron Burkle in their Yucaipa Company’s investment fund, a man of fine taste and zillions of dollars who loves to collect the world’s finest horses — and a few wives.
In all fairness, Sheikh Mo, a modern potentate by any standard, does make it a point to jet around visiting his far-flung horse stables and those multiple lush residences of his wives — spreading that wealth.
Youssef M. Ibrahim, a former Middle East correspondent for the New York Times and Energy Editor of the Wall Street Journal, is a freelance writer and Mideast political risk consultant based in New York.
It’s not just in the UK, but here in the good old USA that people are bending over for Islam. I just posted on my blog about how men are being discriminated against at Harvard so the tent-wearing ladies of Islam can have man-free gym hours. At an institution that gets Federal funds!
http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2008/02/islam_goes_to_c.html
At the risk of appearing old fashioned I must admit that Hassam’s proposal has its merits. For one thing there’s legitimacy attached to the relationship. What’s more appropriate: having four wives scattered within the Kingdom or the more modern three ex-wives and five children?
Having a harem is every teen aged boys fantasy. But the truth is, most men cant handle one wife. Four wives? What, are you nuts? No thanks.
Research has pointed out the obvious: multiple wives for rich guys leaves the average males frustrated and aggressive, perfect cannon fodder for whatever jihad or other stupidity is going. It’s a social organization left over from the days of nomadic raiders. And it deprives the economy of the statistically number one booster of progress and plenty: educated women.
why not 40 wives ?
if muslim man will hv 4 wife…and islam says it gives equality to women,why woman cant hv 4 husband also ?
why discriminate against muslim women for no reason ?
even in imaginary jannat of imaginary deity jehova/allah
man get 72 hot sexy virgins and unlimited wine for sex 24×7,
but woman must be satisfyed with 1 husband.
women r also all humans and have sexual urges and if man can hv multiple sexual partners,why women cant hv multiple sexual partners to fulfill her desire ?
if man hv 4 woman he is manly but woman hv 4 men she is slutty,why this bias against only woman ??
one men – four women… you know who is the father of your children.
four men – one woman… how could u know?
Islam is a barbaric cult . Arabia of pre-islamic times were far more tolerant and better evolved society. You can take Muhamad’s first wife Khadija for instance – she was an independent businessperson and Muhamad was only her servant/employee before she married him! Woman could do business in pre-islamic Arabia, and today women cannot drive a car or go alone to a shopping mall! Islam has indeed taken Arabians to the “Dark Age” ,people have been made insular with one track of mind that women are only ‘bedable ‘ commodities ( only a sex-and-baby making machine). Women’s personality and individuality as a human being has no place in that rotten cult “Islam” ,which after all means submit and become an unthinking ,mindless slave to the most backward bigotry ever in the world! A veritable brainless Zombie!
494219 920022i was just browsing along and came upon your blog. just wantd to say fantastic website and this post truly helped me. 773751