Sacha Baron Cohen’s Bruno: He’s No Borat
Every lightning bolt Sacha Baron Cohen caught in a bottle with Borat three years ago turns to static in Bruno.
The new film, which backstrokes into theaters on a tidal wave of publicity over its coarse material, proves just how rare a cinematic feat was Baron Cohen’s breakthrough role .
Borat blended scripted sequences with Candid Camera-style pranks into one hilarious romp across America. Bruno attempts the same formula, but the staged sequences fall pancake flat while the Punk’d moments feel equally hollow.
For the uninitiated, Bruno is Baron Cohen’s gay Austrian fashionista, an irrepressible elf desperate for fame and fortune. His media platform, the Austrian show Funkyzeit, gets canceled after Bruno disrupts a Milan fashion show with his Velcro ensemble. Crushed, he cheers himself up by deciding to come to America to become “the biggest gay movie star since Schwarzenegger,” an unfunny line that doesn’t even make sense. He hooks up with a talent agent, shoots his own television pilot, and invites Paula Abdul to be interviewed while sitting on the backs of Mexican immigrant workers.
Laughing yet?
Bruno frontloads the gay sexual hijinks, which deadens their ability to shock us while showing how precious little new material Cohen cooked up for round two. The sexual gags are the only ones that work, but you’ll feel more than a little dirty chuckling in your seat.
It’s also a mean-spirited affair, especially when Bruno makes a sexual pass at former presidential candidate Ron Paul.
Yes, the film is relentlessly shocking but rarely in a clever or inspired way. Stay through the entire 82 minutes and you will be treated to the site of an undulating erect penis, more simulated gay sex than the entire run of Showtime’s Queer as Folk, a black baby pinned to the cross a la Jesus, and an anal bleaching segment for good measure. Oh, and a guest on Bruno’s show describes Jamie Lynn Spears’ baby as “white trash” and suggests aborting it.
Real or staged? Who knows. Unfunny? Yup.
Beware the heterophobe,
He will break your words and bend your earlobe.
I have always found the SBC characters more mean spirited than funny. It’s fair to say I don’t get his brand of humor any more than I understood why Andy Kaufman was funny.
Bruno may do better in some countries than others and with some groups. If Reverend Al gets involved I’ll tune in to see which man prevails in his quest to challenge stereotypes. Perhaps they can both move the dialogue forward.
No comment until I see the movie.
Yeah, I felt the same way about An American Carol.
Hmm. I loved Borat, and have enjoyed the brief interludes I have seen with Bruno. I’m going to see the film and hope it isn’t as bad as you say.
American Jews and other progressives will ensure that it makes a profit. It is from the same strain of movie making that has made Adam Sandler a star(?).
Unquestionably, SBC’s humor is low-brow; probably as low as you can possibly get without an NC-17 rating (and he probably should get that in some of his work). Still, judging from Borat and Ali G, he also elicits laughs by challenging the comfort zone and pointing out the absurdity of assumptions we take for granted. Prime examples are Borat wanting a “[chick] magnet” installed in his new car or Ali G wanting to sample the illicit drugs displayed by a police officer live on the air. Yes, he does so mercilessly at the expense of the uwitting dupes on camera. It is like an intentional ambush in an alleyway and we are on the side of the guy wearing the $#!+kickers!
Sounds totally gay.
(Sorry, I couldn’t resist.)
Strange, I thought Cohen was at 14:59 not too long ago. I guess now that he has exhausted his trifecta of characters, he will be looking for a new job?
This is the problem with the present-day Left. They have become the political camp of comedians: Franken, Stewart, Maher, Behar, Sykes, Fey….
At first owning satire helps a political group like the Left because it makes the group seem wittier and sharper. Then after a while you realize they’re just mean and counterproductive, immature, never offering anything redemptive or positive, just relentlessly mocking and deflating everyone else.
Ergo, the present Democrat party. The party with lots of laughs, a wheelbarrow full of debt, and lots of smug, insufferably self-righteous people who don’t actually know how to do anything.
Here’s the bigotry-exposing satire *I’d* like to see: SBC as a southern Republican in Hollywood, where he exposes the “open-minded tolerant liberals” as people who feel perfectly comfortable prejudging someone on the basis of their race, religion and geographical origin.
You wasted words on that degenerate freak? When’s he going to be fifty so he can have an unexpected heart attack?
I would like to see a movie about black kids in a summer camp who join a private pool operated by white liberals who voted for Obama and then decide to cancel the black kids membership because they don’t want all those kids around and… oops! Sorry – that really did happen – my bad
Janegirl
You mean to say that there are white liberal bigots?
For most of my memory, one of the essential characteristics that distinguished an “R” rated film from an “X” rated one by MPAA’s standards, was the on-screen depiction of male genitalia. For the longest time an’ “R” film was forbidden any imagery of the penis (“Midnight Cowboy was “X” rated…and that had no such depictions)…I think it was “Boogie Nights”…a film about Porn, no less, that lowered that standard. So one has to wonder where exactly such lenience will lead the consumer in terms of psychological determinations when it come to such films as “Bruno”? What exactly does such lenience seek to accomplish? A frank explicitness about sexuality or an exploitation of social dynamics? In terms of Hollywood and porn, it is always the later. The later is a more profitable and discreet form of prostitution.
I would take him more seriously if he actually had something original to say; he’s basically Michael Moore in a thinner body & an attempt to find a punchline using stale cliches.
By lowering standards you create such opportunities of capital…A bit like being a land developer in South Korea with yer eyes on the property values of the DMZ. A nice bit of land there for condos…if you can get in there first.
For Hollywood, it is designated as “intellectual property”.
Keepin’ a clear eye on it…Could be a North Korean land developer too…
He had to wax all of his body hair off for this ‘role’.
OUCHHHHHHHHHH! LMAO!
Hmmm- didn’t Mike Myers (Shrek, Wayne’s World) have a falling out with Lorne Michaels when Lorne really pushed for Mike to do a movie about a gay German character based on his occasional skits playing one on Saturday Night Live?
I forget the characters name but he always said “Do you want to touch my monkey?”. Seems old Lorne couldn’t give up the idea even years later, even though it still stinks.
Sasha Baron Cohen is an observant Jew. I wish he could use his substantial talent, study, commitment and intelligence to challenge our comfort zone for the positive instead of in the ways he’s chosen thus far. Providing a laugh is good, uplifting people in a deep and meaningful way is a gift.
I saw the movie. It was not only disgusting but embarrassing and shameful. Some parts were so distasteful they were not funny. I could only sit through about 20 minutes and asked for a refund.
I saw a little of Borat on the tube, saw he was just a punk goofing on his betters, changed channels.
I don’t believe in censorship, but I do believe in FAIR RATINGS STANDARDS. If penises can be shown now in R-rated movies, then vaginas must be allowed to be shown too! And how the hell can the MPAA allow an ERECT PENIS to be shown and NOT give it an NC-17 rating, but then automatically give a woman’s vagina an NC-17 rating on the few occasions filmakers tried to show it???!! Why can we see penises but not women’s vaginas? Now they can even show erect penises, but still no vagina? That is completely sexist, unfair, and illegal. Maybe its because a WOMAN is now head of the MPAA’s ratings dept?
If they will allow any kind of graphic male nudity to be shown, then they must also allow any kind of graphic female nudity to be shown! That means if a film decides to show a woman’s vagina, anus, or spread-vagina (all of which are graphic nudity and no more explicit than showing an erect penis) then the MPAA MUST also rate that “R”.
The only thing I can think of is that the MPAA has changed its standards on nudity and will, in the future, also allow any type of female nudity to be shown in an R-rated film. Otherwise, its time for a CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT AND SUE THE MPAA for having a sexually discriminatory ratings policy! There is no justification to allow unlimited genital nudity of one gender to be shown with an R-rating, while giving the genital nudity of the other gender an NC-17 rating!
Saw “Borat” when it was new; even at right under 90 minutes that movie felt long. Won’t get fooled again with this one: I hear that many people share this view this time around: “Bruno” is tanking nationwide. You want a movie that is actually worth the trouble of going to the cinema then see “Public Enemies.”
I’m guessing the scenes where he makes a bunch of homophobic retarded hillbillies look like, well, homophobic retarded hillbillies hit too close to home for alot of conservatives. However he does convince the famously unintelligent Paula Abdul to sit on a Mexican beaner and goes to great lengths to show us just how stupid the mentally challenged, big-assed black women who sign up to be in Richard Bey’s talk show audience really are. He’s an equal opportunity offender that’s for sure.
I’ve seen the film – it’s not the same as the one in this review. On that note, this is probably one of the most badly written reviews I’ve read in a long time – ‘Christian Toto’; that’s a name not to look out for.
You people are real uptight. Pull the sticks out of your asses. This movie was funny–not as funny as Borat but still funny. Um, did you notice that everybody around you in the theatre was laughing ten times more than people laugh in any other movie except Borat?
KP: I agree with you 100%! But let me ask a question to you or anyone out there who HAS seen this movie. It appeared during the video focus group scene that the first couple shots of Bruno’s penis were soft, but the final one that ends with his penis hole opening up, his penis is semi-hard. It seemed that way, but I couldn’t tell for sure.
I completely agree that an erect-or even semi erect penis is the equivalent of showing a woman’s vagina. And if they are going to only give such a movie an R rating, than it should be perfectly ok to show a woman’s vagina in an R rated movie. Plain and simple. Which leads me to may final question.
Did you (or anyone who HAS seen this movie) pay attention to the woman who tries to get bruno to have sex with her at the swingers party? It almost appeared that a couple times-if only for a brief moment, it showed the lips between her legs and perhaps even a bit more than that. Someone mentioned in this forum that in an R rated movie, it is only legal to show a womans pubic hair down there. People weigh in on this! I want your thoughts.