Romney, Gingrich & Obama: The World, The Flesh, and The Devil
Barring yet another unexpected twist in the plot over the next nine months, the American electorate has a choice of three candidates for president. All are flawed. The presidential campaign between now and Election Day will be devoted to exposing and highlighting these failings. For those inclined to televised news networks, long evenings beckon, filled with an endless loop of “political observers” repeating their penetrating insights into the obvious from now till November 6th.
The campaign for the presidency of 2012 is best understood not by the pundits of today but by a drama written in 1485.
In that year, 527 years ago, a new production opened in England. Entitled Everyman, this morality play became an instant hit, and has enjoyed remarkable staying power — and relevance — to this day.
The plot is easily summarized: in an age of the bubonic plague and other pandemics, God is troubled by how mankind has forsaken Him and has become immersed in frivolity. He sends his messenger, Death, to summon Everyman who, like most of us, is afraid to meet his Maker. He’s certain his spiritual balance sheet isn’t ready to be tallied by God. He hasn’t lived the life he knows he should have and doesn’t want to be judged just yet. He wants more time to get his moral books in order — as who among us doesn’t?
He’s been seduced by the three greatest temptations known to humanity: the world, the flesh, and the Devil. He argues with Death and is granted a single wish: he may bring one friend with him to speak on his behalf when he meets with God on judgment day — for the presidential candidates, November 6, 2012. The play shows Everyman turning to his dearest companions, Fellowship, Kindred, Goods, Beauty, Strength, Discretion, and Five Wits (the five senses), all of whom forsake him. Only one character agrees to die with him and speak well of him as his advocate after his death when Everyman comes face to face with his Maker.
Everyman lives within us all, including those seeking the presidency.
Any of their weaknesses could prevent their entry into heaven — for the candidates, defined as 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C. The gatekeeper is the Electoral College, which requires 270 votes for admission through the pearly gates into the heavenly realm, the Oval Office.
Alas, each candidate, like Everyman, has been sorely tempted in his life, and, as much as he wishes it were otherwise, his capitulation to his own greatest temptation is now clear for all voters to see. Taking the great temptations of each candidate one by one, we begin with
THE TEMPTATION OF THE WORLD
Mitt Romney has been tempted by the World, the medieval reference to Mammon, the ancient Sumerian god of wealth. Christians began to use Mammon as a pejorative, a term that was used to describe a desire for worldly gain, described as a false god in Matthew 6:24 and Luke 16:13.
Romney correctly states that in the country in which we live, the free enterprise system encourages free markets with as little government regulation as possible. He says — and hundreds of millions of people the world over agree — that this is one of the glories of capitalism and that “wealth is good.” In his concession speech to his supporters in South Carolina, he said that the 2012 election is a “battle for the soul of America” and he vowed to balance the federal budget. He decried both Obama’s and, without mentioning his name, Newt Gingrich’s “assault on free enterprise,” saying that, “when my opponents attack me and free enterprise, they’re attacking you. I’m passionate for our free enterprise system. Our party is the party of free enterprise, free markets and free consumer choice.
“The Republican Party doesn’t demonize prosperity,” he continued. “We celebrate success in our party.”
While Romney doesn’t have the sinister affect of Wall Street‘s Gordon Gekko — he doesn’t publicly snarl, bellow, or, heaven knows, swear — he certainly epitomizes – in part, the medieval concept of the man clearly focused on — and rejoicing in– the world and the riches to be reaped therefrom. While I do not criticize his business acumen and success — far from it — it was striking that at a time when “income inequality” is, no matter how absurdly or erroneously, much bruited, the on-message Romney made no mention of private charity as did George H.W. Bush with his “thousand points of light.”
Romney made it sound as if anyone who works as hard as he has will be similarly rewarded. Coal miners and plumbers work hard and are not similarly rewarded. This is true of many industrious Americans. Personally, I don’t oppose economic disparities, which would make as much sense as opposing clouds, oxygen and sunsets. But it might have made him a more sympathetic candidate for the presidency if he had, while celebrating the wonders of free markets and his own successful participation in them, at least expressed empathy for those who have worked every bit as hard as he has, yet have so much less to show for their efforts.
THE TEMPTATION OF THE FLESH
Tempted at 16 by his 23 year-old geometry teacher who became his first wife three years later when he was 19 and she 26, Newt Gingrich was re-tempted by Marianne Ginther, whose vindictive revelations were tawdrily broadcast by ABC “News” two nights before the South Carolina primary — to no discernible negative effect there. After 18 years of marriage to her, he married his current wife, Callista, with whom he had an affair during the final six years of his marriage to Marianne. Whether there were others will be a matter for Obama’s henchmen and operatives to uncover. If none can be found, they will be fabricated and paid for, as was the fate of Herman Cain, in my view.
Speaking of his serial temptations, Gingrich has said,
There’s no question at times of my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate. And what I can tell you is that when I did things that were wrong, I wasn’t trapped in situation ethics, I was doing things that were wrong, and yet, I was doing them. I found that I felt compelled to seek God’s forgiveness. Not God’s understanding, but God’s forgiveness. I do believe in a forgiving God. And I think most people, deep down in their hearts hope there’s a forgiving God.
Somebody once said that when we’re young, we seek justice, but as we get older, we seek mercy. There’s something to that, I think. I feel that I’m now 67. I’m a grandfather. I have two wonderful grandchildren. I have two wonderful daughters and two great sons-in-law. Callista and I have a great marriage. I think that I’ve learned an immense amount.
And I do feel, in that sense, that God has given me, has blessed me with an opportunity as a person. Forget about all this political stuff. As a person, I’ve had the opportunity to have a wonderful life, to find myself now, truly enjoying the depths of my life in ways that I never dreamed it was possible to have a life that was that nice.
Unlike the Iowans for Christian Leadership in Government, whose very name suggests their intolerance, 40 percent of South Carolinians were willing to accept Newt’s penitence and give him their votes. It wasn’t as if he was tempted by Satan himself.
THE TEMPTATION OF THE DEVIL
In this year’s morality play, which candidate would personify a man successfully seduced by the Devil? Why, none other than Barack Obama. He’s a walking compendium of the seven deadly sins — greed, wrath (such as when he snapped at Senator John McCain at a health care conference on February 25, 2010: “We aren’t campaigning any more. The election is over”), sloth (90 rounds of golf, the equivalent of three full months of his three-year presidency, while the country goes down the tubes), pride, lust (for power), envy (of the “one percent”) and gluttony.
There are more, although they don’t make the top seven: condescension, grandiosity (“Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment … when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal”), despicable, underhanded lowball tactics toward candidates seeking the offices he sought, inability to master his own addictions, ostentation, and unconscionable rudeness, egregious choice of friends, of the chief law enforcement officer of the country, and of his mentor, in whose church he claims he managed to ignore the anti-American rants that drove Oprah Winfrey from its pews.
THE CONCLUSION OF THE MORALITY PLAY
In Everyman, the protagonist attempts to persuade others to accompany him on his journey to the grave, but all forsake him but one: the character known as Good Deeds. Everyman wails,
“O all thing faileth, save God alone;
Beauty, Strength, and Discretion;
For when Death bloweth his blast,
They all run from me full fast.”
Beauty, strength, discretion, and the five senses can, indeed, diminish over time: all that remains at the end of our lives are our good deeds, represented in the play by the character of that name. Finally, at peace with himself, Everyman dies with no one but Good Deeds to speak for the life he led when he meets his Maker. That is the message of the play.
Which of our Everyman candidates will ascend to the presidency a year from today on Inauguration Day? All are human. All could stumble and fall under the weighty baggage of their humanity.
As George Clooney’s character asks in Up In the Air, ”Whose backpack is the lightest?”






I don’t know why you, and Victor D. Hanson, and Donald Trump, and the Iowa GOP, etc. give such short shrift of Rick Santorum. He won the Iowa caucuses and because of the underhandedness of the party there, Romney reaped the benefits and glory. When Trump wanted to stage a debate, he was loathe to even acknowledge Santorum was running. You and Hanson have just written pieces declaring it a three way race between Romney, Gingrich, and Obama.
Maybe I don’t see what you all are seeing, but it seems to me that Santorum is the least vulnerable against Obama. The contrast is there. Obama can’t bash him for being filthy rich, nor for being a serial philanderer, nor for being an advocate of socialized healthcare.
If Santorum gets more votes, he’ll get more attention. This essay is about the three candidates who have fallen prey to the temptations of the world, the flesh and the devil. As a Santorum voter, surely you don’t want to see his name appear in such a column. He doesn’t have the “baggage” that these three do. If you read the column, and not just the headline, you’ll be glad your candidate isn’t worthy of Ms. Rogers’ fine insights.
What a pleasant relief to read your article. Thank you !! Now let us hope it doesn’t engender vitriolic, damning, one-sided remarks we get from the usual crowd.
God Bless the U S A !!!!
NEWT THRIVES ON HELLFIRE
I’m not predicting Newt will be the nominee. If he wins Florida, to be sure, the establishment will make a titanic effort to stop him and turn his candidacy into a living hell. However, the country is in an anti-establishment mood and this could end up propelling Newt to the top. Hercules went to hell and back and brought back the three headed dog Cerebus. Newt is a modern day Hercules who thrives on hellfire.
Click my name and read my popular, widely linked Townhall piece: Signs of Newt Gingrich Defeating Obama. It’s like nothing that’s been written on the subject.
STAY THE COURSE TO DISASTER
REELECT OBAMA
AppolloSpeaks: I wouldn’t put too much trust in numerology. It ranks right up there with astrology.
Ms. Rogers,
Great insight–thanks very much!
Belladonna Rogers: Masterful.
Thank you for a thoughtful and understanding essay regarding the questions that we deal with everyday. Newt has been vilified from every angle there is and it no doubt will continue. After years of floundering and looking for life’s fulfillment he obviously has found it. He among the candidates has the intestinal fortitude and view of the distant horizon to bring us back from the brink, I feel. May God Bless him in his quest. -And-if he gets the nomination may we all support him. 2012 is critical.
You can’t predict life once you get deeper than the truism that living creatures will do anything to survive.
Who would have thought that the major theme in 2012 would become a battle between Washington elite republicans and the people they demand to rule? Wasn’t it just assumed that we would unite to defeat obama?
But no, it turns out that protecting their sinecures is MORE important to the republican ruling class than defeating obama and reversing the tide of marxism. For them, it’s not even close. Like animals caught in a trap, they will do anything to maintain their wealth and power. Anything. Even support obama.
And who could have imagined that the object of their hatred would emerge in the form of Newt Gingrich? Wasn’t he the consumate Republican for two decades. Didn’t he engineer that last Republican revival? Oh wait, that wasn’t a Republican revival, it was a conservative revival. Within two years, the Washington elite had overthrown that, smeared him with a trumped up ethics charge (the basis of which was later rejected in a court of law, but of course, congress is a law unto itself, so the ethic violation remains on the make believe books of the most ethically challenged institution in US history), and forced him out of public life.
But like a vampire, he has risen from the dead, and guess what? Newt doesn’t like our self-styled betters any more than we do. He still has a thing for Reagan conservatism. And the elites are in a panic that hasn’t been seen for decades. The Tea Party wasnt bad enough. Ron Paul isn’t bad enough. Now they have a guy who knows all the inside tricks running against their Ken Doll candidate. And he’s pissed off.
They should have killed Chuckie when they had the chance.
Bring it on.
And Paul is the only one who can save us from this establishment stupidity
I am the walrus, dude.
if morality is the determining factor in this election, Newt’s name should not even be up for consideration. Give me a break. The man did not have overlapping marriages once; he did it twice.
The terrible truth about Newt is that he talks about Reagan, yet thinks about FDR. Ask him who he believes was the most consequential, effective, and best president/politician of the 20th century and the answer is always the same – FDR. Those who would support Newt laughed when Hillary was channeling her inner Eleanor in the White House; I’d say Franklin’s impact was far worse.
What a brilliant column. Original and clear.
are you telling me that you have to have henchmen to bring out the truth?
You’re exactly right Bella, “Let the one among you who has not sinned cast the first stone.” Mitt just needs a little help, I would suggest a colloquium on the adjustment of the modern chastity belt. Those final cinches can be critical, especially just before a big debate. Maybe scholars from MIT could be brought in on this, engineers, you know, expensive ones. Just a little tinkering…different fabrics…more features. He is lifelike though.
Ms. Rogers wasn’t looking into the past when writing this piece. Based on the evidence currently in circulation and the current electoral race she chose those who fit the role best. Whether the previous President or the current President is the harbinger of our country’s demise shouldn’t really matter at this point in time. Let the historians figure that out after we have all been able to achieve some compromise and prevent the ruination of our country.
Thank you very much for this article. I liked it a lot. I feel no compulsion to analyze every sentence, but to accept the piece whole and in its entirety. Bringing cultural antecedents into a modern narrative merits praise in and of itself, I think. Especially when done as thoughtfully as this.
in which I sigh in envy, and then rejoice that you’re sharing…..care to make a reading list of worthwhile stuff? and, then, like, curate a discussion? I love your literary breadth. I love how you handle it so deftly. I love how you relate it to today’s world.
just. sigh. what sort of class teaches stuff like this?
“What sort of class teaches stuff like this?”
A non-unionized, private educational institution. Or a library full of such iconic stories and plays.
hey, how did your classes go last semester? Very well, I hope.
What are you taking right now?
Good-Deeds came, but Good-Intentions had something come up at the last minute.
I’m gettting old. I don’t want mercy – I want revenge. Justice is secondary…
Signed,
The Tree of Liberty
Why are we Conservatives making such a fuss over integrity in our candidates, when, clearly, the voters who will decide the election, the Moderates and Independents, don’t care. If they did, how did we get Obama?
I think we have it all wrong. I think we should support the Republican who has the worst record of perceived morals, which, of course, is Newt. In that sense, he could beat Obama easily among the Moderates and Independents. But, he would need to, gradually, adapt some stronger views on accepting “social justice” issues; and, I believe that Newt could pull that off, even if he didn’t mean it.
Obviously, it doesn’t make a lot of difference what a candidate says in the election, we won’t know what he is going to do until he is in office (again, I remind you of Obama).
So, since Newt is not Obama, I like Newt; and I believe he has a better moral position to appeal to the Moderates and Independents, who seem to appreciate an easy outlook on doing hard things that interfere with your “freedom” to do as you wish in your personal life.
Newt loves to fight. We need a fighter. He especially hates the media, and we especially need someone to dampen the effectiveness of the media.
If Newt was president and the Iranians block the Straits of Hormuz, what would Newt do? No one knows, but I don’t believe the Iranians would enjoy the outcome. What would he do about Obamacare? Everything he can to kill it; and, he knows how to handle Congress.
I don’t care if Newt has 2 wives while in the White House if he can beat Obama, stop the dash to profligacy, and give us respite from the sense that we are living in a Social Democracy that is about to become a Socialist state.
How could he possibly make things worse? And, bringing forth contempt and dissatisfaction from the Establishment does not seem to me to be damaging to the cause of liberty.
“All are flawed” Is there a competition to see how many times this phrase can be used and embroidered upon on this site? Is it an attempt at distancing and pretension to insight? It’s all so crazy, isn’t it? OMG OMG OMG
Watch Herman Cain deliver the Tea Party State of the Union at http://www.TeaPartyExpress.org ! The live stream starts on Tuesday, January 24th at 10:30 EST/7:30 PST.
Many thanks, amagikid. I look forward to hearing Mr. Cain again. Much appreciate your posting this link.
This may sound petty but I dont trust men who are not tempted by sins of the flesh. It always makes me suspect that they have a sexual perversion so interesting that it had better not ever see the light of day. Newt’s vices are right out there in the open for eveyone to see.
Romney on the other hand, is too perfect…..styled hair, no visible vices, a plastic candidate, with the backbone of a banana. He has been running for President effectively for the last 20 years. If he does become president, he will be immediately focused on not screwing up enough to doom his reelection chances, and that is not what we need right now. Ron Paul? Right about a lot of things but tin foil hat crazy nieve when it comes to Foreign policy.
Dont get me wromg, I will vote for whoever gets the nomination. The altenative is just too awful to contemplate.
An Alternative to the DREAM Act
In yet another effort to suck up to Latinos by pushing the so-called “DREAM Act,” a euphemistic acronym for the proposed law attempting to win votes by granting Latinos permanent residency in the United States, President Barack Hussein Obama has shown he is far more interested in re-election than in a commitment to the nation’s territorial integrity.
The Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act has been kicking around Congress for a decade and has been repeatedly rejected primarily since it rewards illegal aliens for an alien invasion.
The DREAM Act would ostensibly reward children of alien invaders ”of good moral character” with permanent residency if they have lived in the U.S. for five years, graduated from an accredited high school, and attended college for two years.
Or, illegals up to age 35–far beyond the status of “children”–may qualify if they had “served in the armed services for at least 2 years and, if discharged, received an honorable discharge.”
The stated rationale for the proposed legislation? Extending America’s gracious hand to people who are already in residence, who we can’t figure out how to get rid of, and who haven’t committed crimes they have been caught committing. The effective result? The Democrat Party adds up to 2.1 million grateful Latino voters to its ranks.
Florida Republican Rep. David Rivera, reasoning that, “If somebody is willing to die for America, then certainly they deserve a chance at life in America,” wants to change the DREAM Act to the ARMS Act, the Adjusted Residency for Military Service Act.
He proposes scrapping the college feature in favor of restricting the path to citizenship to those who serve in the military. . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=12329.)