<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roger L. Simon: Speech Police On Parade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: purchase viagra</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-11004</link>
		<dc:creator>purchase viagra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-11004</guid>
		<description>cheap@viagra.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:cheap@viagra.com">cheap@viagra.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purchase viagra</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-11003</link>
		<dc:creator>purchase viagra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-11003</guid>
		<description>cheap@viagra.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:cheap@viagra.com">cheap@viagra.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online viagra</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-11002</link>
		<dc:creator>online viagra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-11002</guid>
		<description>cheap@viagra.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:cheap@viagra.com">cheap@viagra.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viagra cheap</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-11001</link>
		<dc:creator>viagra cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-11001</guid>
		<description>cheap@viagra.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:cheap@viagra.com">cheap@viagra.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viagra cheap</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-11000</link>
		<dc:creator>viagra cheap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 06:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-11000</guid>
		<description>cheap@viagra.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:cheap@viagra.com">cheap@viagra.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diplomad</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-10999</link>
		<dc:creator>Diplomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-10999</guid>
		<description>I agee with Ben.  Debate is over.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agee with Ben.  Debate is over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatov</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-10998</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-10998</guid>
		<description>If a million Americans agree to spend their time complaining to advertisers about a certain issue, I think that&#039;s true free speech. Contrast that with O&#039;Reilly shouting at JetBlue from his bully pulpit.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a million Americans agree to spend their time complaining to advertisers about a certain issue, I think that&#8217;s true free speech. Contrast that with O&#8217;Reilly shouting at JetBlue from his bully pulpit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ny nick</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-10997</link>
		<dc:creator>ny nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-10997</guid>
		<description>Ben writes:

&quot;Both the GOP base and moderates are extremely disillusioned with Republicans who are soft on illegal immigration and big on pork-barrel spending, and the President sucks on both issues. True conservatives (such as Sen. Coburn) are doing just fine. As soon as the GOP leadership gets its head out of the sand, the party will be fine, too.&quot;

That&#039;s my point.  In order to win, you will need to not only bring back enthusiasm within your own party but also bring in independents.  Independents have abandoned Republicans in very, very large numbers.

First of all, we&#039;ve had a democratic congressional majority for less than a year and it&#039;s a thin majority at that.  There is polling that indicates that congress is unpopular for sure but why are they unpopular?  Mainly because they haven&#039;t ended the war.
Besides, polling generically for congress, as the Republicans and their corporate media enablers used to tell us all the time, does not translate into individual races.  Republicans will be defending a lot more contested races this election than Democrats will.  Why do you think that&#039;s so?  Also, if every Republican was cut from the same cloth as Sen. Coburn your party wouldn&#039;t be in the shape it is now. Unfortunately for you and the country, they&#039;re not.  From the blind loyalty, no questions asked policies of the last congress to Dennis Hastert&#039;s cover up of the Mark Foley scandal, the average Republican Senator or Congressman is going to have a lot of explaining to do.  Most will hold on. Some definitely won&#039;t.  The bed has been made and you guys are going to have to lay in it for a while.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;Both the GOP base and moderates are extremely disillusioned with Republicans who are soft on illegal immigration and big on pork-barrel spending, and the President sucks on both issues. True conservatives (such as Sen. Coburn) are doing just fine. As soon as the GOP leadership gets its head out of the sand, the party will be fine, too.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my point.  In order to win, you will need to not only bring back enthusiasm within your own party but also bring in independents.  Independents have abandoned Republicans in very, very large numbers.</p>
<p>First of all, we&#8217;ve had a democratic congressional majority for less than a year and it&#8217;s a thin majority at that.  There is polling that indicates that congress is unpopular for sure but why are they unpopular?  Mainly because they haven&#8217;t ended the war.<br />
Besides, polling generically for congress, as the Republicans and their corporate media enablers used to tell us all the time, does not translate into individual races.  Republicans will be defending a lot more contested races this election than Democrats will.  Why do you think that&#8217;s so?  Also, if every Republican was cut from the same cloth as Sen. Coburn your party wouldn&#8217;t be in the shape it is now. Unfortunately for you and the country, they&#8217;re not.  From the blind loyalty, no questions asked policies of the last congress to Dennis Hastert&#8217;s cover up of the Mark Foley scandal, the average Republican Senator or Congressman is going to have a lot of explaining to do.  Most will hold on. Some definitely won&#8217;t.  The bed has been made and you guys are going to have to lay in it for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sufimarie</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-10996</link>
		<dc:creator>sufimarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-10996</guid>
		<description>For Kos to fight back is justified and  in-line with what Kos is- they are an openly political organization designed to take action such as this. On the other hand for Fox, a self-proclaimed &#039;fair and balanced&#039; news source on public airwaves, to launch an attack (based on falsehood,) shows that the O&#039;Reilly Factor is decidedly slanted in its representation of news. O&#039;Reilly compared the Kos to violent parties. He bases this judgement on commments made at the site. How do we know he himself didn&#039;t put them there? There are many factors as to why Fox is illegitimate. It is not hard to find sound information about their peddling of a neo-con agenda. The people that expose Fox are not commies nor are they out to undermine the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s7csmAlJ3M&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &quot;white, Christian, male power structure&quot; &lt;/a&gt; that O&#039;Reilly so aptly created as his own reality. Fox is unhinged and it needs to be exposed for the neo-con tool that it is. I cheer the organization of the netroots!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Kos to fight back is justified and  in-line with what Kos is- they are an openly political organization designed to take action such as this. On the other hand for Fox, a self-proclaimed &#8216;fair and balanced&#8217; news source on public airwaves, to launch an attack (based on falsehood,) shows that the O&#8217;Reilly Factor is decidedly slanted in its representation of news. O&#8217;Reilly compared the Kos to violent parties. He bases this judgement on commments made at the site. How do we know he himself didn&#8217;t put them there? There are many factors as to why Fox is illegitimate. It is not hard to find sound information about their peddling of a neo-con agenda. The people that expose Fox are not commies nor are they out to undermine the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4s7csmAlJ3M" rel="nofollow"> &#8220;white, Christian, male power structure&#8221; </a> that O&#8217;Reilly so aptly created as his own reality. Fox is unhinged and it needs to be exposed for the neo-con tool that it is. I cheer the organization of the netroots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis F</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/roger_l_simon_speech_police_on/#comment-10995</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/roger-l-simon-speech-police-on-parade/#comment-10995</guid>
		<description>Encouraging advertisers to stop doing business with an entity whose opinions you oppose it not censorship nor suppression of speech. It is using one&#039;s influence in the marketplace to further one&#039;s own views. This tactic is similar to what we conservatives did when the Dixie Chicks made their reprehensible remark about the President.  We did not attempt to censor them nor suppress their right to express their opinion.  We did, however, exercise our right to express disapproval in a way that caused economic consequences for them.  They squealed &quot;censorship&quot; when none existed. Let&#039;s don&#039;t make the same claim here.  If MoveOn et al can in fact persuade advertisers to neglect the millions of Fox viewers, other advertisers will fill the void.  And if that happens, we should be vigilant to reward those who do -- and punish those who do MoveOn&#039;s bidding.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Encouraging advertisers to stop doing business with an entity whose opinions you oppose it not censorship nor suppression of speech. It is using one&#8217;s influence in the marketplace to further one&#8217;s own views. This tactic is similar to what we conservatives did when the Dixie Chicks made their reprehensible remark about the President.  We did not attempt to censor them nor suppress their right to express their opinion.  We did, however, exercise our right to express disapproval in a way that caused economic consequences for them.  They squealed &#8220;censorship&#8221; when none existed. Let&#8217;s don&#8217;t make the same claim here.  If MoveOn et al can in fact persuade advertisers to neglect the millions of Fox viewers, other advertisers will fill the void.  And if that happens, we should be vigilant to reward those who do &#8212; and punish those who do MoveOn&#8217;s bidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

