<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robots Should Go Where Man Hesitates to Tread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caestal</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-358232</link>
		<dc:creator>Caestal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 08:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-358232</guid>
		<description>Ten: U Gud Troll.  
Your posts mostly are just calling everyone doodieheads, though you use lots of other words, and don&#039;t really convince anyone your position might be right.  
Of course, you seem more interested in trolling than in actual discussion, and even when anyone attempts to take your posts seriously you just call them names and say they don&#039;t really get you... sounds like about a 13-year-old boy, maybe 14.  
&quot;Space is hard vacuum. Will you be mining in zero state then? Sending back little jars of nothing?&quot; The asteroid belt is filled with big old rocks that are basically pre-refined metals, including some radioactives and some things like nickel, gold, platinum... no use for those, I guess.  It would take a push to get them moving in the right direction, and whichever country is the first to develop it will get the easy picking and the rights to more or less set up how things will be handled there.  As far as &quot;hard vacuum,&quot; we already have the technology to extract oxygen that is bound into other substances, and could make industrial bases on the moon with not much more than current technology (and likewise on Mars); I guess you can&#039;t think of a benefit to being able to make dangerous substances or those that have toxic byproducts without having a pre-existing environment to have to worry about poisioning, eh?  
It takes a long time to get to Mars from here, but not a whole lot longer than it took a ship to get from England to the New World back in the day... guess that wasn&#039;t worthwhile, either, though.  It&#039;s not like we ever find new materials, medicines or other worthwhile discoveries when we visit a new place, right?




&quot;Make love, not war.&quot; Nothing wrong with that; given a *choice* I would much rather do the former...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten: U Gud Troll.<br />
Your posts mostly are just calling everyone doodieheads, though you use lots of other words, and don&#8217;t really convince anyone your position might be right.<br />
Of course, you seem more interested in trolling than in actual discussion, and even when anyone attempts to take your posts seriously you just call them names and say they don&#8217;t really get you&#8230; sounds like about a 13-year-old boy, maybe 14.<br />
&#8220;Space is hard vacuum. Will you be mining in zero state then? Sending back little jars of nothing?&#8221; The asteroid belt is filled with big old rocks that are basically pre-refined metals, including some radioactives and some things like nickel, gold, platinum&#8230; no use for those, I guess.  It would take a push to get them moving in the right direction, and whichever country is the first to develop it will get the easy picking and the rights to more or less set up how things will be handled there.  As far as &#8220;hard vacuum,&#8221; we already have the technology to extract oxygen that is bound into other substances, and could make industrial bases on the moon with not much more than current technology (and likewise on Mars); I guess you can&#8217;t think of a benefit to being able to make dangerous substances or those that have toxic byproducts without having a pre-existing environment to have to worry about poisioning, eh?<br />
It takes a long time to get to Mars from here, but not a whole lot longer than it took a ship to get from England to the New World back in the day&#8230; guess that wasn&#8217;t worthwhile, either, though.  It&#8217;s not like we ever find new materials, medicines or other worthwhile discoveries when we visit a new place, right?</p>
<p>&#8220;Make love, not war.&#8221; Nothing wrong with that; given a *choice* I would much rather do the former&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhyamInotsurprised?</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-355679</link>
		<dc:creator>WhyamInotsurprised?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 06:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-355679</guid>
		<description>#118 Pat J - &quot; ... illegal unnecessary wars ...&quot;  OMG, I think I&#039;ve either entered the Twilight Zone or a wormhole in &quot;Ten&#039;s&quot; hard vacuum of deep space.  Bush derangement continues.  Make love, not war.  No blood for oil.  Bush lied, people died.  Oh what a bunch of crap.  Just go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#118 Pat J &#8211; &#8221; &#8230; illegal unnecessary wars &#8230;&#8221;  OMG, I think I&#8217;ve either entered the Twilight Zone or a wormhole in &#8220;Ten&#8217;s&#8221; hard vacuum of deep space.  Bush derangement continues.  Make love, not war.  No blood for oil.  Bush lied, people died.  Oh what a bunch of crap.  Just go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat J</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-355218</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-355218</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got an idea.  Instead of spending Trillions of dollars on illegal unnecessary wars for example, why don&#039;t we try fixing things here at home.  Then, once we can afford it, maybe start considering exploring Mars.  

Oh.  And all in favor of sending Mongoose to Mars, please stand up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got an idea.  Instead of spending Trillions of dollars on illegal unnecessary wars for example, why don&#8217;t we try fixing things here at home.  Then, once we can afford it, maybe start considering exploring Mars.  </p>
<p>Oh.  And all in favor of sending Mongoose to Mars, please stand up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WhyamInotsurprised?</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-354628</link>
		<dc:creator>WhyamInotsurprised?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 13:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-354628</guid>
		<description>To the one who calls himself &quot;Ten&quot;:

What the hell is your problem man?  You come off as an arrogant asshole who is nothing more than a pissant of a bully.  Nothing good to say about nothing.  Disdain for all.  Everyone is inferior to you.  I&#039;m surprised your handle is &quot;Ten&quot; and not &quot;One.&quot;

So we&#039;re supposed to be impressed that you have been part of startups.  Big whup!  From your attitude you must have been more of a silent partner because your people skills suck and you would be a disaster at hands on operations.

Think you&#039;ve got imagination?  Can&#039;t imagine that in tough times people might want a diversion from all the crap going on in Washington at in the economy to think about accomplishing something beyond our Fearless Reader wanting to redistribute the wealth of the nation, sink us in the developing nation status, making friends with our enemies, and giving the poor black folk some payback for their perceived grievances?  I can think of lots better things to do with the trillions being wasted to Stimulate unions and Obama loyalists, on &quot;Crap &amp; Tax&quot; and supposed Health Care Reform to &quot;cover&quot; the uninsured.

And all you can do is rain on everybody&#039;s parade.  That is mighty big of you.  So why don&#039;t you educate us about how the space program did not produce any payback to society, any economic benefits to Americans, pride, educational achievement (at least for awhile), and advances in scientific knowledge.  Go ahead O&#039;Wise One.  You proclaim it was all a big waste of money.  YOU prove it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the one who calls himself &#8220;Ten&#8221;:</p>
<p>What the hell is your problem man?  You come off as an arrogant asshole who is nothing more than a pissant of a bully.  Nothing good to say about nothing.  Disdain for all.  Everyone is inferior to you.  I&#8217;m surprised your handle is &#8220;Ten&#8221; and not &#8220;One.&#8221;</p>
<p>So we&#8217;re supposed to be impressed that you have been part of startups.  Big whup!  From your attitude you must have been more of a silent partner because your people skills suck and you would be a disaster at hands on operations.</p>
<p>Think you&#8217;ve got imagination?  Can&#8217;t imagine that in tough times people might want a diversion from all the crap going on in Washington at in the economy to think about accomplishing something beyond our Fearless Reader wanting to redistribute the wealth of the nation, sink us in the developing nation status, making friends with our enemies, and giving the poor black folk some payback for their perceived grievances?  I can think of lots better things to do with the trillions being wasted to Stimulate unions and Obama loyalists, on &#8220;Crap &amp; Tax&#8221; and supposed Health Care Reform to &#8220;cover&#8221; the uninsured.</p>
<p>And all you can do is rain on everybody&#8217;s parade.  That is mighty big of you.  So why don&#8217;t you educate us about how the space program did not produce any payback to society, any economic benefits to Americans, pride, educational achievement (at least for awhile), and advances in scientific knowledge.  Go ahead O&#8217;Wise One.  You proclaim it was all a big waste of money.  YOU prove it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton E. Cramer</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-354223</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton E. Cramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 01:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-354223</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;As an engineer, I sympathize with your desire to see your invention realised, and I expect that you already understand the points that I’m going to make, but I think it’s important to draw a sharp distinction between the nature of a subsidy and a patent in promoting technology.&lt;/I&gt;

I wasn&#039;t looking for a subsidy.  I was pointing out that sometimes, the only way to get a game changing invention into service may require a research subsidy, or some patent advantage.  There&#039;s nothing to what I came up with that justified a research subsidy (it&#039;s all pretty minor development), and there was no room to carve out a new patent.

&lt;I&gt;the other thing that bothers me about that is that something doesn’t smell right about a company, ostensibly blithely unaware that their patent has great potential. It happens, but not very often.

Clayton, have you approached them about a licensing agreement? A good patent attorney should be able to feel them out without tipping his (your) hat too much. You do your thing under their license, and they continue to do their thing. Win-win. Yes, it’s always possible that they just want to be butts.&lt;/I&gt;

It has potential, but not for their original purpose.  And anyone who holds that patent and couldn&#039;t figure out what we were trying to license would be too dumb to breathe.  (There is the slight danger that it might not have qualified for &quot;novel&quot; even though it seems that no one is doing it yet, just because it is pretty obvious, once you think about it for a few minutes.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As an engineer, I sympathize with your desire to see your invention realised, and I expect that you already understand the points that I’m going to make, but I think it’s important to draw a sharp distinction between the nature of a subsidy and a patent in promoting technology.</i></p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t looking for a subsidy.  I was pointing out that sometimes, the only way to get a game changing invention into service may require a research subsidy, or some patent advantage.  There&#8217;s nothing to what I came up with that justified a research subsidy (it&#8217;s all pretty minor development), and there was no room to carve out a new patent.</p>
<p><i>the other thing that bothers me about that is that something doesn’t smell right about a company, ostensibly blithely unaware that their patent has great potential. It happens, but not very often.</p>
<p>Clayton, have you approached them about a licensing agreement? A good patent attorney should be able to feel them out without tipping his (your) hat too much. You do your thing under their license, and they continue to do their thing. Win-win. Yes, it’s always possible that they just want to be butts.</i></p>
<p>It has potential, but not for their original purpose.  And anyone who holds that patent and couldn&#8217;t figure out what we were trying to license would be too dumb to breathe.  (There is the slight danger that it might not have qualified for &#8220;novel&#8221; even though it seems that no one is doing it yet, just because it is pretty obvious, once you think about it for a few minutes.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strawman</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-353966</link>
		<dc:creator>Strawman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-353966</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Scientists said 50 years ago we would all be riding around in our own personal hovercraft by now.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Those weren&#039;t scientists, those were futurists. Those are the same guys with 10 pairs of pointed rubber ears in their closets, who spend all their weekends at Star Trek conventions. The scientists were too busy doing actual science to bother with these dweebs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Scientists said 50 years ago we would all be riding around in our own personal hovercraft by now.</p></blockquote>
<p>Those weren&#8217;t scientists, those were futurists. Those are the same guys with 10 pairs of pointed rubber ears in their closets, who spend all their weekends at Star Trek conventions. The scientists were too busy doing actual science to bother with these dweebs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Greenteeth</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-353902</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Greenteeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-353902</guid>
		<description>Engineeers and Technologists put people on the moon. Scientists are saying they will build intellgent robots capable of manning space exploration vehicles.

Scientists said 50 years ago we would all be riding around in our own personal hovercraft by now. Scientists said 50 years ago we would all have a domestic robot to do the housework by now. Scientists said 50 years ago that nuclear power stations would produce electricity to chap to bill.

Let&#039;s go back to the moon but make sure we put engineers and technologists in charge of the project if we want to see the astronauts get home safely</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engineeers and Technologists put people on the moon. Scientists are saying they will build intellgent robots capable of manning space exploration vehicles.</p>
<p>Scientists said 50 years ago we would all be riding around in our own personal hovercraft by now. Scientists said 50 years ago we would all have a domestic robot to do the housework by now. Scientists said 50 years ago that nuclear power stations would produce electricity to chap to bill.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go back to the moon but make sure we put engineers and technologists in charge of the project if we want to see the astronauts get home safely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shorter Ten</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-353771</link>
		<dc:creator>Shorter Ten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-353771</guid>
		<description>Shorter Ten

&lt;i&gt;Bow to me.

I am the king of space and time. 

I am the master of my own domain.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter Ten</p>
<p><i>Bow to me.</p>
<p>I am the king of space and time. </p>
<p>I am the master of my own domain.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-353748</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-353748</guid>
		<description>Closed minds, Mike?  How so?  Because the numbers don&#039;t add up?  Because there&#039;s nothing in space you can prove the value of going and getting?  because we can&#039;t live on Mars, or the Moon or on some undiscovered planet light years away?  Because space kills just as surely and easily as a thousand feet under the sea does, in terms of &lt;i&gt;living&lt;/i&gt; there?

Do you know what a light year is, Mike?  Do you know where an inhabitable planet is?  Do you comprehend the expenditures of getting there and the impossibility of returning anything of value at anything other than a vast financial loss?

I thought not.  And it shows too.  Join the other ignorants in this thread.

I&#039;m not even remotely afraid of your or anyone proving me wrong by the facts.  In fact, I&#039;d applaud it!  But don&#039;t call &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; openness closed minded, planet ranger, when your argument hasn&#039;t so much as a single fact that supports the space venture on economic grounds.

It&#039;s not my mind that&#039;s closed, little space conqueror.  It&#039;s all the goofball minds that still think faster than light drive exists and tons of places have breathable atmospheres (and unicorns and fountains of gold, apparently).  &lt;i&gt;That&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; closed-minded, pal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Closed minds, Mike?  How so?  Because the numbers don&#8217;t add up?  Because there&#8217;s nothing in space you can prove the value of going and getting?  because we can&#8217;t live on Mars, or the Moon or on some undiscovered planet light years away?  Because space kills just as surely and easily as a thousand feet under the sea does, in terms of <i>living</i> there?</p>
<p>Do you know what a light year is, Mike?  Do you know where an inhabitable planet is?  Do you comprehend the expenditures of getting there and the impossibility of returning anything of value at anything other than a vast financial loss?</p>
<p>I thought not.  And it shows too.  Join the other ignorants in this thread.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not even remotely afraid of your or anyone proving me wrong by the facts.  In fact, I&#8217;d applaud it!  But don&#8217;t call <i>that</i> openness closed minded, planet ranger, when your argument hasn&#8217;t so much as a single fact that supports the space venture on economic grounds.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not my mind that&#8217;s closed, little space conqueror.  It&#8217;s all the goofball minds that still think faster than light drive exists and tons of places have breathable atmospheres (and unicorns and fountains of gold, apparently).  <i>That&#8217;s</i> closed-minded, pal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strawman</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/robots-should-go-where-man-fears-to-tread/#comment-353747</link>
		<dc:creator>Strawman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=62137#comment-353747</guid>
		<description>http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/07/one-giant-leap-come-on-america-lets-put-a-congress-on-the-moon.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/07/one-giant-leap-come-on-america-lets-put-a-congress-on-the-moon.html" rel="nofollow">http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2009/07/one-giant-leap-come-on-america-lets-put-a-congress-on-the-moon.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

