News
Directly To
Your Inbox
Follow PJ Media

Rise in Poverty and the Uninsured Results from Bad Policy

President Obama's economic policies have created a jobs gap — the difference between promise and reality.

by
Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Michael Ramlet

Bio

September 21, 2010 - 12:00 am

Liberals have seized on the release of new poverty and uninsurance rates in the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey as evidence of the virtue of their massive expansion of government spending programs and new health insurance entitlement. But is this really true?

It is hardly surprising that a severe recession would increase poverty. Neither is it a shock that the employer-based system would be stressed by severe labor market conditions. Maybe the answer is less, or at least better, economic policies that would spill over to improved rates of health insurance. Indeed, a closer look reveals that a significant portion of the increase in uninsured Americans, 41.3 percent, is attributable to the failure of the Obama policies to spur economic activity as promised.

As part of selling the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act — “stimulus” in the political parlance — the White House predicted that it would ensure that unemployment remained below 8 percent. As a dismayed labor force is well aware, the unemployment rate is currently 9.6 percent and averaged 9.3 percent during 2009. The “jobs gap” — the difference between promise and reality — means that 1.8 million more Americans were in the ranks of the uninsured in 2009.

Advertisement

Lost jobs means lost health insurance. We estimate that more than 2 million Americans would have been able to keep their private health insurance had the Obama administration met its promise.[1] Our estimates indicate that with each additional 1 percent increase in annual unemployment: (a) employer-based coverage declines 0.93 percent, (b) individual and non-group coverage increases 0.14 percent, (c) Medicaid enrollment increases 0.34 percent, and (d) the net result is an increase of the uninsured population at a rate of 3.6 percent (see table).

Policy matters. Good economic policy has broad-based benefits that extend beyond the narrow confines of GDP growth, productivity statistics, or monthly employment totals. No amount of messaging can disguise the fact that today’s bad news reflects in part yesteryear’s bad decisions.

[1] Based on Holahan J, Garrett, A. “Rising Unemployment, Medicaid and the Uninsured.” Kaiser Family Foundation. January 2009: http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/7850.pdf.  We use a weighted average to conservatively account for adult and child coverage eligibility differences.

Douglas Holtz-Eakin was the director of the Congressional Budget Office (2003–05). He also was chief economist in the President’s Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush (2001–02) and senior staff economist in President George H. W. Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers (1989–90). He is currently the president of the American Action Forum. Michael Ramlet is the Coordinator for the American Action Forum's Operation Healthcare Choice.

PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

2 Comments, 2 Threads

  1. 1. Bernie

    What we need is a comprehensive discussion of the national debt. As long as people keep on buying bonds the government can keep on spending. The debt grows. As Europe shows that process has limits. What is the structure of the debt: how much long term and how much short term? Above all who is going to pay the l3 trillion dollars as the debt comes due? The government position is that the debt doesn’t matter since we owe it to ourselves. Nonsense. Who pays will be decided by politics over the next ten years and it promises to be a wild ride.

  2. 2. OCULUS

    http://gallery.photo.net/photo/11465310-lg.jpg

Leave a Reply

We know you're busy. Sign up for our Daily Digest email to get a quick look each day at our editors' picks and readers' favorite stories. (You will receive an email asking you to verify your email address. If you have previously subscribed, no verification email will be sent.)