Get PJ Media on your Apple

Republican Chairman Urges Conservatives to Restore Free Enterprise

Will Hensarling challenge Boehner for speaker's gavel?

Rodrigo Sermeño


May 28, 2014 - 11:26 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON – House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) said the Republican Party must sever its ties with “crony capitalism” in order to have the moral authority to usher in major economic policy changes.

Speaking at the Heritage Foundation last Tuesday, Hensarling laid out his vision of a Republican Party that champions a “Main Street competitive economy” and spurns the “great deal of economic activity that masquerades as free enterprise.”

Hensarling urged his fellow Republicans and conservatives to reject the Washington insider economy and its reliance on “earmarks, regulatory barriers to entry, subsidies, tax preferences, and political influence” and to “come down clearly on the side of free enterprise.”

“We conservatives know…that the genius of America is not to be found in Washington’s corridors of power and favor. Instead, we know that the true America is in the founding and enduring principles of our republic – namely faith, limited government, unlimited opportunity, individual freedom, and free enterprise,” he said.

Hensarling also called on Republicans to support his PATH Act proposal to end the government-backed mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, step up efforts to overhaul the tax code, and eliminate federal farm subsidies.

For the most part, Hensarling devoted his speech to the U.S. Export-Import Bank. The agency, which supports loans to overseas companies to help them buy U.S. exports, has come under fire by some Republicans who believe the Ex-Im Bank amounts to nothing more than corporate welfare that disproportionately benefits a handful of companies.

While the Texas Republican said he does not care much about the term “crony capitalism” – which he said suggests that capitalism is corrupt when the American free-enterprise system is in reality “the most fair and most moral economic system ever devised by the mind of man” – Hensarling characterized the bank’s activities as “crony-based political lending.”

“Crony capitalism slows economic growth and redistributes income. It can breed corruption and undermines the legitimacy of both government and free enterprise,” he said.

In fiscal year 2013, the Ex-Im Bank authorized $27.3 billion to support an estimated $37.4 billion in U.S. export sales. The bank borrows money from the Treasury Department and pays interest on the funds to the Treasury.

In 2013, the agency provided a South African company with $230 million in loan guarantees to buy 100 locomotives built by General Electric and a $190 million loan to an Israeli firm to finance the launch of a communications satellite aboard a rocket operated by SpaceX – a California-based company owned by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. No other U.S. company, though, has benefitted more from the bank than Boeing. Last year, the agency offered $7.9 billion in loan guarantees to help the manufacturer sell 106 of its airplanes to foreign airlines, reinforcing the agency’s moniker in Washington – “the Bank of Boeing.”

Hensarling voted against reauthorizing the bank in 2012 and said the House Financial Services Committee will hold hearings on the matter in the weeks ahead.

“Today I call upon every Republican in Congress to simply let Ex-Im expire,” Hensarling said. “Let the American taxpayer exit Ex-Im once and for all.”

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
No, Hensarling is absolutely right about Ex-Im. If it does indeed operate at a profit as you say, then there is no reason for the government to do it -- private financiers will be happy to finance that business and make that profit.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (4)
All Comments   (4)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Hensarling is a good man, but I disagree with him on Ex-Im Bank. What he doesn't say, nor does it say in this article, is the following:

1) The Ex-Im Bank operates at a profit, always has ... it is not "welfare" in the sense that anything is given ... most of the assistance is in terms of providing insurance at a profitable price to American companies doing business overseas where private insurance simply does not exist. Some money is in the form of loans, but these are not Solyndras based upon bogus business plans.

2) The principle purpose of Ex-Em Bank is to allow American companies to compete effectively with foreign competitors where US foreign aid is used. In other words, without the various support mechanisms provided by Ex-Im Bank, the same dollars would be sucked up entirely by foreign companies, creating foreign jobs and foreign profits paid for by US foreign aid dollars, which are a key part of American foreign policy.

3) As easy as it is to criticize current US foreign policy as practiced by Obama, he will only be President a couple more years. Ex-Im was around a long time before Obama began screwing up foreign policy, and it will be around a long time after a more competent CIC is in the White House.

Reasonable people can disagree on these matters - libertarians, of course, are knee-jerk isolationists who believe all foreign aid is a total waste, and they will never support Ex-Im Bank. But most conservative Republicans and most Americans understand that America must be engaged in the world unless we simply want to wait around for the next 9/11 attack ... maybe with nukes next time out.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
No, Hensarling is absolutely right about Ex-Im. If it does indeed operate at a profit as you say, then there is no reason for the government to do it -- private financiers will be happy to finance that business and make that profit.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
The reason that the Federal government is in the investment risk business is to promote American interests, including American jobs and American company profits, at the expense of foreign jobs and foreign profits. Private insurers don't have that motivation. As a result, private insurers did not enter the market, which is why Ex-Im Bank exists.

It's all arguable - reasonable people including lots of conservatives are on both sides of this argument. There may be ways in which the functions of Ex-Im Bank could be privatized, at least some of them, and it's fine to look at that. But simply pulling the plug on Ex-Im Bank without addressing the reasons it was needed is just dumb policy.

The problem is that Hensarling makes an error by suggesting that Ex-Im Bank is "crony capitalism", a la Solyndra ... and it's clearly not.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
Wot he said.
29 weeks ago
29 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All