(i realize we’re way off topic here, but i don’t mind)

1)”as the “tree of liberty” goes, the positive factors that allowed it grow generally were of liberal essence”

examples make points better. I would point to the civil war and say you’re wrong.

2) “as gaining & maintaining political power, the left has a grandiose record of murder -”

wow, are we talking over the course of history? you think one side is more murderous than the other? I bet a guy could spend a lifetime researching that one, and when he’s done he will have wasted a lifetime.

3)”it would be a good idea for you to come with some qualifiers for change”
qualifiers for change: basic human rights? interracial marriage. child labor laws. right for women to vote…etc etc etc etc etc

4) this part confused me, probably just a couple missing words, not sure exactly what you’re trying got say. although i caught the “left wing’s murderous activities”
what do you mean? who are you talking about? are you saying ‘liberals’ are violent? because I have always felt that it was the other way around, (example, KKK) but I’m all ears if you care to explain.

“Leftiness is a pathological state, not a state acquired through meditation, study, observation, and concern for society’s betterment”

where do you get this? I’m not sure what you’re pointing at again. you must be picturing something in your head when you write that and i’m curious as to what half retarded left leaning wind bag you are picturing.

Now, after clarifying a bit this “change invariably equals good” liberal postulate/superstition which is used to arouse the perennial useful idiots, we don’t make a mistake when assign the revolutionary bloodshed & misery to the large amount of criminals always present in the left-wings ranks and to their murderous activities.

Leftiness is a pathological state, not a state acquired through meditation, study, observation, and concern for society’s betterment -

do you mean they watered the tree of liberty with blood?
That’s incredibly ironic don’t you think?

Progressives by definition want change. You can’t help that. Conservatives by definition want things to stay the same.

Neither one are right or wrong. “it takes all kinds to make the world go round”

Yes, there are bad guys on ANY side, including buddhists – however, the overwhelming abundance of criminality amongst the left-wing revolutionaries/ violent upheaval leaders in the past century in the world makes rogue buddhists or guys like Tim McVeight marginal figures.
As far as bombing abortion clinics – what about destroying radio stations relays or bombing biology research labs?

No! That can’t be! It HAS to be George Bush’s fault! I mean, isn’t everything?

“Most of luminous leaders of revolutions and violent upheavals along history had/ have criminal background”

interesting theory, but citation needed.

“causal connection between criminal pre-dispositions and left-wing activism”

like bombing abortion clinics? or like bombing federal buildings?
oh you forgot that there are bad guys on both sides. never mind.

hmmm, not the theoricians ! even Ben Laden appears as a “civilised” person !