Get PJ Media on your Apple

Reid’s ‘Nuclear Option’ Looms as Judicial Nominees Stall

McConnell: "About 75 percent of the vacancies that we have in the judiciary don’t even have nominees."

by
Bill Straub

Bio

April 10, 2013 - 1:15 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON – Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid is threatening anew to change the chamber’s filibuster rules if the pace of confirmations for nominees to the federal judiciary, often the targets of Republican stalling tactics, doesn’t speed up.

In an interview aired last week over Nevada Public Radio, the Nevada lawmaker warned that the Senate “is going to have to take more action” if recalcitrant Republicans “don’t start approving some judges and don’t start helping get some of these nominations done.”

“All within the sound of my voice, including my Democratic senators and the Republican senators who I serve with, should understand that we as a body have the power on any given day to change the rules with a simple majority, and I will do that if necessary,” Reid said.

The remarks raise the specter of invoking what commonly is characterized as “the nuclear option” — transforming Senate rules through a simple majority vote of those present. Rules changes generally require a two-thirds vote in the 100-member chamber.

Senate Democrats and Republicans agreed to some modest rules changes at the outset of the 113th Congress intended to make it easier to work around a filibuster. But Reid and other Democrats are growing increasingly irritated at GOP efforts to delay President Obama’s nominees to the federal bench, particularly at a time when the number of vacancies is becoming critical.

The American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, a progressive legal organization, reports that 86 of the 874 seats in the federal judiciary — almost 10 percent — are vacant. An additional 22 seats are likely to open up soon and 35 judicial emergencies exist on the district court and court of appeals levels. Nineteen nominees are waiting for a floor vote.

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, of Kentucky, insisted on Tuesday that his caucus is cooperating in getting the judicial seats filled. At this juncture of his presidency, about three months into his second term, Obama’s predecessor, former President George W. Bush, saw no new judges confirmed.

“With regard to vacancies, about 75 percent of the vacancies that we have in the judiciary don’t even have nominees,” McConnell told reporters. “So we have treated the president’s judicial nominations very, very fairly by any objective standard.”

Some presidential nominees have waited more than a year for the Senate to decide their fate, often because Republicans are standing in the way of a vote. One seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, generally considered a stepping stone to the U.S. Supreme Court, has been vacant since September 2005. Obama’s nominee for that post, Caitlin Halligan, general counsel for the district attorney’s office in Manhattan, recently asked that her name be withdrawn from consideration after GOP lawmakers, led by McConnell, blocked consideration.

Halligan was originally nominated to fill the seat once held by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts in September 2010, meaning she didn’t receive a full Senate vote for more than two-and-a-half years. Her nomination was initially filibustered in 2011.

Four vacancies exist on the 11-judge D.C. Circuit, which often is called on to consider vital constitutional matters and handles numerous regulatory matters, including challenges to rules created by the Environmental Protection Agency. No nominee has successfully navigated Senate confirmation to that particular bench since 2006.

Republicans expressed concern that Halligan would prove to be a liberal activist on the court, citing her work in New York to hold gun manufacturers civilly liable for the arms they produce. McConnell said that in considering Halligan’s “record of activism” that giving her a lifetime appointment to the D.C. Circuit was “a bridge too far.” The president didn’t see it that way.

“This unjustified filibuster obstructed the majority of senators from expressing their support,” Obama said in a statement. “I am confident that with Caitlin’s impressive qualifications and reputation, she would have served with distinction. The D.C. Circuit is considered the nation’s second-highest court, but it now has more vacancies than any other circuit court. This is unacceptable. I remain committed to filling these vacancies, to ensure equal and timely access to justice for all Americans.”

Now there is talk that Republicans plan to filibuster another Obama nominee to the D.C. Circuit — Sri Srinivasan, the principal deputy solicitor general. His confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee is set for April 10.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (4)
All Comments   (4)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Wait . . . Where have I seen this before? No! It couldn't be . . . ! Yes, it is! This is the same thing that was happening during Bush's administration. He'd nominate judges and the Dems would stall to make sure the courts didn't get conservative judges while the Republicans complained about Democratic obstructionism. I seem to recall lots of noise about invoking the 'nuclear option' then too.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Who put Reid in charge of everything?Last I knew we still have a senate&a congress in DC.Oh!I pray the next election he (Reid)can be unelectable&fail miserably.LIz
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
So during his first 3 years Obama submits fewer and distinctly more radical nominees for district court (i.e., lifetime appointments) than Bush or Clinton - thank God his confirmations are low!

I don't know the full impact of vacancies on the district court in terms of administering justice but - as with the Congress and the Executive these days - I prefer gridlock to a further march toward utopia.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
IOW ... Holder and Van Jones are campaigning for Obama's next term; and we're paying for it - in many ways.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All