Get PJ Media on your Apple

Sorry, Agendized Academics: The Recession Began in June 2008

That's when Obama's nomination became a foregone conclusion.

by
Tom Blumer

Bio

July 10, 2013 - 12:04 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

This column will show that the supposedly non-partisan National Bureau of Economic Research incorrectly pegged the most recent recession’s beginning as December 2007.

The timing of the recession’s inception is no trifle. NBER’s call less than a month after the 2008 presidential election made the breezy, now well-established meme that we should “blame Bush for everything” a fixture in the left’s rhetorical toolbox.

But if the economy really peaked in June of 2008 — and I will demonstrate that it did – that timing would be the noncoincidental point at which it became crystal clear that Barack Obama would turn back Hillary Clinton to become the Democrat Party’s nominee for president, and that he was a strong favorite to defeat Republican nominee John McCain.

NBER claimed in its “determination” that “domestic production and employment are the primary conceptual measures of economic activity.”

The monthly analysis of gross domestic product (GDP) done by Macroeconomic Advisers clearly shows that NBER seriously erred in evaluating its first stated component. Seasonally adjusted monthly output peaked in June 2008, reaching a level which was roughly an annualized 0.5 percent higher than in December 2007:

MacroAdvMonthlyGDP2005to1Q13no2

NBER claimed at the time that “the currently available estimates of quarterly aggregate real domestic production do not speak clearly about the date of a peak in activity.” Oh, but today’s currently available monthly estimates clearly do, and they say that the long-term decline in output didn’t begin until after June. Since NBER pointed to a single month to identify the recession’s starting point, it cannot justify ignoring Macro Advisers’ monthly analyses. (More on that later.)

As to employment, the government’s Household Survey results show that seasonally adjusted employment only dropped by 141,000 during the first four months of 2008, increasing a bit in April, before beginning to steeply decline. Because it estimates the number of self-employed and contract workers, the Household Survey is a more all-inclusive indicator of the number of people working than the Establishment Survey of payroll employment at companies, which fell more sharply during the first half of 2008, and for which NBER has an expressed but unjustifiable preference.

The other factors NBER cited mostly refute the idea that the economy’s peak was December 2007:

  • “Our measure of real personal income less transfers peaked in December 2007, displayed a zig-zag pattern from then until June 2008 at levels slightly below the December 2007 peak, and has generally declined since June.”
  • “Real manufacturing and wholesale-retail trade sales reached a well-defined peak in June 2008.” (How much more of an obvious admission that “we’re wrong, but we don’t care” can there be?)
  • “The Federal Reserve Board’s index of industrial production … (which) excludes all services and government … peaked in January 2008, fell through May 2008, rose slightly in June and July, and then fell substantially from July to September.”

I’ll add one factor on top of that: There were year-over-year increases in monthly federal tax collections during the first seven months of 2008, including what was then a single-month record $407 billion collected in April. Many of those who made quarterly estimated income tax payments in April and to a lesser extent June were doing so on optimistic assessments that 2008 would work out to be about as good a year as 2007.

If it was going to be consistent in downplaying positive real economic growth while giving great weight to job losses as it obviously did in claiming the nation was in recession during the first half of 2008, NBER should have extended the recession’s end to September 2009.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (10)
All Comments   (10)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
my neighbor's step-mother makes $89/hr on the internet. She has been fired from work for 9 months but last month her check was $17981 just working on the internet for a few hours. Go to this web site and read more... www.Can99.com
40 weeks ago
40 weeks ago Link To Comment
Pelosi-Reid controlled spending began on 1 Oct 2007 with the start of FY-2008. It generally takes about 18-24 months for fiscal policy to affect the economy.
Most private sector business plans for '07 were already in place at the time of the '06 elections and could only be altered on the margins - they hit full force when the direction of the Congress became known in '07, and business started to react to the new regulatory regime being cranked up by the radicals controlling congressional committees under Pelosi-Reid. Then, with the almost slam-dunk elevation of a non-experienced executive to the Oval Office with Obama's vanquishing of Hillary in the Dem Primaries culminating in June-08, the economy began to crack (of course, $4/gl gas didn't help - especially with many in the Obama orbit saying how energy costs would necessarily have to go up to possibly EU levels). So, people at the margins began being let go, and then the foreclosures started, and Fannie & Freddie drove the markets into the depths culminating in the crash of Lehman, and there we were - The Obama Depression!
40 weeks ago
40 weeks ago Link To Comment
my co-worker's aunt makes $66/hour on the computer. She has been fired for six months but last month her payment was $15316 just working on the computer for a few hours. Read more on this site>>>>http://www.wep6.com
41 weeks ago
41 weeks ago Link To Comment
December 2007, isn't that a year after the Democrats took control of both Houses. where appropriations and spending bills are written? Bujt I thought it was entirely Bush's fault, that one man caused it all, have I been misled?
The housing market was a contributor to this, years of of federal subsidies, going back to at least Clinton created bills that came due, with ramifications through out the economy. And then there was Obama and a Dem controlled Congress, ah, those first $trillion dolllar deficits, the ones that would spark growth[?]
41 weeks ago
41 weeks ago Link To Comment
I feel so visionary now.... I think our company "got it" sometime in October before the election. The hubster and I examined our business plan and looked at how to lower our tax and regulatory profile and still stay in business. We got rid of the big studio and laid off all of our full time employees. We moved the company into the paid for home office. We're doing more of the grunt work ourselves and hiring day workers to fill in. In our personal life, we eliminated or pre-paid outstanding debts, started minimizing casual expenditures - I'm an avid couponer for the first time in my life - and increasing our savings accounts.

Pretty much, we chose to "check out of the economy" until this administration is over.
41 weeks ago
41 weeks ago Link To Comment
The recession began with the implosion of the sub-prime housing market. Please recall Maxine Waters praising the job done by Franklin Rains. (Spelling?) Even then, she and her democrat partners in crime tried to say that our concerns were only based on racism. It is all part of the same scheme: Cloward-Piven.
41 weeks ago
41 weeks ago Link To Comment
Well, yes, the State long ago completed regulatory capture of all the agencies
set up to act as watchdogs over its behavior; The private sector economic
actors still see the handwriting on the wall and act accordingly - for now.

One fervently hopes that enough of them move their operations to Red
States before the words of warning are made manifest.
41 weeks ago
41 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All