Potential Pick for Romney VP Wants to Nix Threat of Government Shutdowns
A senator on the shortlist to be Mitt Romney’s potential running mate has introduced a bill intended to end the 11th-hour budget drama each year on the Hill.
Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) maintains that his End Government Shutdowns Act would prevent last-minute budget deals that might not be crafted in the best way to rein in out-of-control spending.
But it would also erase the black cloud that hangs over lawmakers and goads them into at least presenting budget proposals and meeting behind closed doors late into the night in an effort to avert a government shutdown.
The bill, introduced Wednesday and referred to the Appropriations Committee, would create an automatic continuing resolution for any regular appropriations bills and remove the threat of a government shutdown in the event of a congressional stalemate.
Conversely, in Newt Gingrich’s House of the 1990s, the speaker sought very public budget showdowns framed by the backdrop of a looming government shutdown.
“Despite repeated signs that Washington’s out-of-control spending threatens to bankrupt the country, Washington continues to be deadlocked about the budget debate,” Portman said.
“Although Congress continually fails to pass appropriations bills by the Oct. 1 deadline, we should not force Americans to face the threat of government shutdown hanging over their heads,” he added.
Portman, former Office of Management and Budget director and U.S. Trade Representative under President George W. Bush, has 21 co-sponsors on the bill, including Democrat Jon Tester (Mont.).
If he’s brought on the Romney ticket, it will be because the freshman member hails from a critical swing state and is also regarded as a “safe” choice who won’t rock any boats. His odds on InTrade today are 30 percent, leading the pack of potential picks.
But will his bill be seen as making the budget deadlines softer for legislators and basically letting them off the hook for reaching agreements in time, or as a measure that creates more stability for government agencies and the citizens who depend on their services?
Portman argues that it’s basically impossible to get the budget through on time, anyway, hence there’s a need to cut back on needless and potentially harmful drama.
Since 1997, Congress has failed to pass a regular appropriations bill by the Oct. 1 deadline. The rushed budget agreements reached in the midnight hour, threat of government shutdowns — including a near-miss last year — and unpredictability for government agencies would be addressed by Portman’s automatic continuing resolution.
After the first 120 days, CR funding would be reduced by 1 percentage point, and would continue to be reduced by that margin every 90 days. All discretionary spending is treated equally, the senator says, to “keep both sides eager to reach a final agreement in order to preserve their respective priorities.”
“Our legislation ensures the federal government continues to provide the necessary services to its citizens while protecting against the panic and pressure of last-minute budget deals, allowing Congress to make the decisions necessary to get Washington’s fiscal house back in order,” Portman said.
It’s similar to House legislation introduced last December by Rep. James Lankford (R-Okla.). The Government Shutdown Prevention Act of 2011 was unveiled as one of ten budget reforms in a set presented by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who is one of 27 co-sponsors on Lankford’s bill.
“This legislation is about getting Congress to appropriately perform its most basic function,” said Lankford, “and that is ensuring funds are appropriated for government services.”
His legislation also automatically triggers a continuing resolution as a stopgap measure. This would be accompanied by an across-the-board 1 percent decrease to discretionary spending. To motivate lawmakers away from relying on additional continuing resolutions, another 1 percent spending cut would take place every three months until a long-term budget is complete.
Ryan said at the time of the bill’s introduction that “lurching from budget crisis to budget crisis is no way to govern.”
Despite the support for Lankford’s bill, the Portman bill flies in the face of the way things have been traditionally done in the House, especially when the grass-roots wants to see Republicans dig in their heels against Democratic spending plans even when threatened with shutdown.
Neither hub of the grass-roots is excited with the Portman proposition, though: RedState called it the “Kick-the-Can-Down-the-Road-Until-January Act,” while Daily Kos called it the “Norquist Wet Dream Act.”
Lawmakers backing the House and Senate bills, though, defend the measures as necessary to guard against rush deals and gaps in vital services.
“At the core of our budget deficit is a flawed budget process,” said Lankford.






Those crazy RINOs, always proposing rules to prevent themselves from having to follow the Constitution or act in the interest of the nation, but sounding so conservative at every step.
It’s time to bring up that old question about whether it’s all a conspiracy with the RINOs secretly aligned with the “opponent” socialist party to deny us from having a real opposition party. True opposition must exist to avert a one-way grandfather clock, with the pendulum swinging only one way, with the framework of political discourse and decision shifting ever leftward with each election cycle. Tick tock, the fake ran up the clock.
After a glimmer of hope in 2010, Mitt’s a tough pill to swallow. Add Portman to the mix, and it becomes a package only a Bill O’Reilly or Laura Ingraham can love. Obama must be all smiles rat now.
I am so tired of being fed a steaming plate of horseshit and being told it is loaded with vitamins and good for me. It seems that everybody with any kind of political aspiration has this crazy idea that they’re smarter than those giants that brought this country to life. All these people have to do is follow the outline that was written 200+ years ago, If they start playing political games right of the bat Romney is going to have to deal with a BUNCH of people that will not comply. That nomination turnstile also lets people out. If he doesn’t see that by picking somebody like Porter he’s dooming his presidency to one term he’s an idiot. He’s the candidate only on the basis of sufferance. The TeaParty and others will have a lot to say regarding the VP pick. And NO, I’m not giving Rove or any other political hack a pass.
It’s unconstitutional. This is the same logic as “deem and pass,” and it’s illegal because no Congress can, by statute, bind a future Congress, nor can Congress appropriate monies for the military for a term exceeding two years.
It’s unconstitutional. This is the same logic as “deem and pass,”
The deem scam was not so much a logical progression as it was a con, one where the calculus was about what could be made to play within the available political space between what the media would say and what Congress would tolerate before being forced to pull the trigger the law gives us for such a patent and enormous power grab: the impeachment and unseating of the president.
It worked. And, as has since proved out, they were even safer in the con than they thought, given the coming out of Chief “Justice” Roberts since. We’re not a republic of laws any more, and saying we are is clearly to imbibe from a steaming pile of bullsheet. We’ve devolved into a national democracy with the mob playing itself out in one matter or another every month or so on the TV.
The problem I have with his proposal (other than it’s unconstitutional) is that it only reduces spending 1% every 90 days. In order to actually motivate them to do their jobs, it should cut 10% every 30 days (exempting the Defense Dept), cut congressional office budgets 10% every 10 days and every congressmen and Senators paycheck 25% every 10 days. That would motivate them to get a budget passed. When the staff sees a 10% pay cut, they’d start to get busy, and when Senator blowhard sees a 25% cut, he’ll start thinking about it. When he’s up to a 75% cut before the end of October, I’m thinking he’ll be ready to pass a budget.
They have 365 days to put together a budget. Waiting until September (after taking a month off in August) to start thinking about it, is not enough time. Starting a little earlier, say October 2nd would give them plenty of time to develop and pass a budget for the next fiscal year.
Walt, re-read this line from the article: “After the first 120 days, CR funding would be reduced by 1 percentage point, and would continue to be reduced by that margin every 90 days.”
The 1% penalty doesn’t kick in until 4 months have passed. Then it accelerates to 1% every 90 days. How laughable is that?
Portman has revealed his true colors. Only a full-blown DC insider would propose such a ridiculous, toothless strategy.
Rob who? Try again, Timid Mittens.
Pre-emptive surrender…the RINO way.
Why do the pundits keep saying he is a good choice for VP,
because he will secure Ohio for Romney? Does he really hold that
kind of sway in Ohio?
Rob Portman, so called conservative who has sponsored a bill to expand government “Global Conservation Act of 2012″? No thank you…
S. 3356: Global Conservation Act of 2012
112th Congress, 2011–2012
A bill to strengthen the role of the United States in the international community of nations in conserving natural resources to further global prosperity and security.
Sponsor:Sen. Robert “Rob” Portman [R-OH]Status: Referred to Committee
I was hoping the bloggers would pick this up and expose Portman, look at the co-sponsors Cosponsors:show cosponsors (4)
Sen. Olympia Snowe [R-ME]
Sen. Tom Udall [D-NM]
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse [D-RI]
Sen. Joseph Lieberman [I-CT] (joined Jul 19, 2012)
Portman is not a conservative, this is a progressive bill
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3356
Attorney Richard Gilbert speaks on Mitt Romney’s stated policy of supporting NDAA ‘National Defense Authorization Act.’ On December 31, 2011 President Obama signed the 2012 act into law. One of the provisions of the NDAA allows the government to detain any American citizen indefinitely without trial. To put it bluntly, if the government suspects you of commiting a “belligerent act” against the U.S. or its coalition allies in aid of enemy forces it can detain you indefinitely without trial. Literally, an American could be sent to Guantanamo Bay and held indefinitely without trial.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bK5cqAoYwTU
Deneen Borelli moved thousands with a brilliant speech at FreePAC in Dallas on Thursday night. Deneen was among many speakers at the Freedom Works event, hosted by Matt Kibbe, and drawing 15,000 people. Ms. Borelli is the author of Blacklash: How Obama and the Left are Driving Americans to the Government Plantation, and the Director of Outreach with FreedomWorks. The event, barely registered in the mainstream media, but the Freedom Works crowd is used to that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUwFC2Iusfo&feature=player_embedded
I live in Ohio. I propose the No Ohioans in Positions of Power Act. My case for this act is the George Voinovich, Dennis Kucinich, John Boehner, Rob Portman, John Glenn, Sherrod Brown, Lynn McGill and the infamous Howard Metzenbaum. Please support this act. Send me $25.
The real problem Portman (and the rest of us) faces is there are NO incentives to cut government spending but there are many incentives to INCREASE spending.
The incentives are so badly broken that not even hyperinflationary collapse can stop the spending, look at Argentina, imploded in 2001 and facing another collapse due to out of control spending in 2012.
Extend, pretend, bailout, print and spend until the US dollar is inflated away into infinity is the ONLY plan on the table and it is the change we are getting regardless of who is president.
How about a debate between Portman and Allen West, to help Mittens make up his mind?
Sc**w the 120 days! Start reducing the CR by 1% per month starting as soon as the Appropriations bills have passed the deadline, and keep the accumulated cuts in the final bill presented to the full House for approval.
This is a BAD IDEA. Without a looming government shut-down the liberals will NEVER present or pass a budget. This is why even as an Ohioan, I oppose Portman for VP because he is a Big Government Republican.
I think picking Portman would hurt Romney’s chances (rightly or wrongly he’s perceived as a dud like Old Yellowstain)….but Romney could help himself tremendously by announcing John Bolton as Sec State. Bolton would be wasted as a VP pick; put him where he will have the most influence. I like LTC West as VP. Just my opinion. Maybe bring Zell Miller back to run CIA and Uncle Don back to DoD….
For those too young to remember, the federal fiscal year used to end on 30 June. Congress couldn’t pass a budget so they moved the end of the fiscal year to 30 September. Guess what, they still can’t pass a budget on time. We might as well change the fiscal year to match the calendar year, that way a year becomes a year everyone understands.
My copy of the Constitution says “Section. 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
Every Bill …”
While not a constitutional scholar, I doubt that Senator Portman’s bill would be considered unconstitutional.