<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: POR (Pelosi-Obama-Reid) Congress the Most Profligate of Bush Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Obama&#8217;s Record on the Federal Debt is Worse (than Bush&#8217;s)</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-978850</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Obama&#8217;s Record on the Federal Debt is Worse (than Bush&#8217;s)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 07:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-978850</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Sorry, Charlie, your party&#8217;s to blame for running up the debt</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-965284</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Sorry, Charlie, your party&#8217;s to blame for running up the debt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 04:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-965284</guid>
		<description>[...] a post on Pajamas Media&#8217;s main page in October 2008, Tom Blumer provided a chart which helps us understand why we&#8217;re in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post on Pajamas Media&#8217;s main page in October 2008, Tom Blumer provided a chart which helps us understand why we&#8217;re in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Deficits were Declining under W &#8212; until Dems controlled Congress</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-959721</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Deficits were Declining under W &#8212; until Dems controlled Congress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 04:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-959721</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; The arrogance and ignorance of Bill Maher</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-940924</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; The arrogance and ignorance of Bill Maher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-940924</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Why a spending freeze is not enough</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-825472</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Why a spending freeze is not enough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 06:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-825472</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; 2008 Presidential Campaign pulls attention from Incompetent 110th Congress</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-138761</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; 2008 Presidential Campaign pulls attention from Incompetent 110th Congress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-138761</guid>
		<description>[...] only thing the Democratic Congress has been able to do has to be to increase federal spending at levels even greater than those of the preceding spendthrift Republican Congresses. Having scored his congressional colleagues in the past for spending money &#8220;like a drunken [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] only thing the Democratic Congress has been able to do has to be to increase federal spending at levels even greater than those of the preceding spendthrift Republican Congresses. Having scored his congressional colleagues in the past for spending money &#8220;like a drunken [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Historian</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-137765</link>
		<dc:creator>The Historian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-137765</guid>
		<description>UNI-PARTY GOVERNMENT: A BAD IDEA

One party rule is ruinous, as explained at this link:

http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2008/10/uni-party-government-very-bad-idea.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UNI-PARTY GOVERNMENT: A BAD IDEA</p>
<p>One party rule is ruinous, as explained at this link:</p>
<p><a href="http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2008/10/uni-party-government-very-bad-idea.html" rel="nofollow">http://greensrealworld.blogspot.com/2008/10/uni-party-government-very-bad-idea.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JL</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-137702</link>
		<dc:creator>JL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-137702</guid>
		<description>SandySalt, while you have a sound idea on a flat 1% sales tax under the stipulations that congress can&#039;t touch it, you must remember that the Social Security program was also meant to be both voluntary and kept away from congress as well. Of course, it didn&#039;t happen. 2 of the most recent examples were LBJ and Clinton, who both took funds from the SSA and added them to the general fund, thus creating the illusion of a balanced budget, both with congress&#039; approval. So while this plan sounds good in theory, the problem is that we cannot and have never been able to trust our government to keep their hands out of our money.

And on drilling, we have an idea of how much we have. The MMS states around 139 billion known barrels of crude located off shore, in ANWR, and in other locations around the U.S.. Of course, that does no good when we have a congressional majority who would rather take a vacation and go on book-signings during an energy crisis than help the people who elected trusted them with leadership, while continuing to smooth over the issue with the &#039;it&#039;s not enough, it won&#039;t help, it&#039;ll kill polar bears&#039; excuse, and not using any facts to back their claims. If they did choose to seek the facts, they would find that a) we have more than enough to help our immediate needs, b) the very passing of such legislation to access our own oil would drive the price of crude down due to market speculation of more supply coming (much like what happened with Bush&#039;s executive order enacted back in July) and c) the technology that has been developed in the drilling process allows underground and out of sight drilling, which will have a minimal effect on animal and plant habitats on the surface of the land, thus making the environmentalists&#039; claims of big unsightly oil platforms outdated. The Dem congress and their fans need to realize that our energy solution is a 2-part strategy: address the needs we have now, and to seek alternatives to address the needs we have in the future. A solid plan for energy cannot exclude either of these steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SandySalt, while you have a sound idea on a flat 1% sales tax under the stipulations that congress can&#8217;t touch it, you must remember that the Social Security program was also meant to be both voluntary and kept away from congress as well. Of course, it didn&#8217;t happen. 2 of the most recent examples were LBJ and Clinton, who both took funds from the SSA and added them to the general fund, thus creating the illusion of a balanced budget, both with congress&#8217; approval. So while this plan sounds good in theory, the problem is that we cannot and have never been able to trust our government to keep their hands out of our money.</p>
<p>And on drilling, we have an idea of how much we have. The MMS states around 139 billion known barrels of crude located off shore, in ANWR, and in other locations around the U.S.. Of course, that does no good when we have a congressional majority who would rather take a vacation and go on book-signings during an energy crisis than help the people who elected trusted them with leadership, while continuing to smooth over the issue with the &#8216;it&#8217;s not enough, it won&#8217;t help, it&#8217;ll kill polar bears&#8217; excuse, and not using any facts to back their claims. If they did choose to seek the facts, they would find that a) we have more than enough to help our immediate needs, b) the very passing of such legislation to access our own oil would drive the price of crude down due to market speculation of more supply coming (much like what happened with Bush&#8217;s executive order enacted back in July) and c) the technology that has been developed in the drilling process allows underground and out of sight drilling, which will have a minimal effect on animal and plant habitats on the surface of the land, thus making the environmentalists&#8217; claims of big unsightly oil platforms outdated. The Dem congress and their fans need to realize that our energy solution is a 2-part strategy: address the needs we have now, and to seek alternatives to address the needs we have in the future. A solid plan for energy cannot exclude either of these steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BizzyBlog &#187; The POR (Pelosi-Obama-Reid) Congress: Most Profligate of All During the Bush Administration</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-136365</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog &#187; The POR (Pelosi-Obama-Reid) Congress: Most Profligate of All During the Bush Administration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-136365</guid>
		<description>[...] This column originally appeared at Pajamas Media on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This column originally appeared at Pajamas Media on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Malone</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/por-pelosi-obama-reid-congress-the-most-profligate-of-bush-years/#comment-136121</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Malone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=36821#comment-136121</guid>
		<description>People get the kind of government they deserve. - Renee Descartes

The PORK acronym was clever and FUNNY!

One Party Rule.  That&#039;s &quot;The One&quot; to you, pal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People get the kind of government they deserve. &#8211; Renee Descartes</p>
<p>The PORK acronym was clever and FUNNY!</p>
<p>One Party Rule.  That&#8217;s &#8220;The One&#8221; to you, pal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

