PJTV’s Poliwood Challenges Al Gore
Stop by the set and defend your Oscar, Mr. Gore.
February 8, 2010 - 4:56 pm
News
Directly To
Your Inbox
Directly To
Your Inbox
PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:
1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.
2. Stay on topic.
3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.
4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.
5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.
These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.
2 Comments, 2 Threads
Leave a Reply
My question is, I see a lot of Global Warming hysteria on channels like National Geographic etc and on cable tv. Is it not unreasonable to think that the folks who fund these productions are looking at a shelf life of long duration for the product that they are generating and expect some remunerative return sometime in the future?
For instance, how many times does one have to endure the Normandy D-Day landing or the Flag Raising on Iowa Jima to be replayed before it gets old? (Disclaimer, I am a Viet Nam Vet, Lt of Marines) Iconic yes, timeless yes, replay value yes.
But if these folks (global warming morons) are producing junk and in the near future the topic is found to be a matter of little importance and therefore the product has no replay (commercial )value, are they not doing their shareholders/investors a grave disservice?
Respectfully submitted
John Robinson
Oh, the Oscar. Right.