Paul Is Brain-Dead
Simon Pegg and Nick Frost built up gallons of good will with their genre parodies Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz.
The British duo squander plenty of it with Paul, their new comedy about two geeks trying to save an alien from the government’s clutches.
Paul’s mean-spirited mockery of Christianity won’t endear it to audiences with even a sprinkling of religion. But Paul’s bigger sin is the lack of genuinely sharp humor, the kind that lifted Shaun and Fuzz above the likes of those lazy Scary Movie-style parodies.
The film does amass major geek points by paying nonstop homage to sci-fi classics like Star Wars and ET, but ultimately a film must stand on its own. By the time a classic line from Aliens is recycled it’s hard not to think, “OK, enough. Your VHS collection rocks. Move on.”
Pegg and Frost play Graeme and Clive, two Brits visiting San Diego for a Comic-Con event and the chance to visit some real-life UFO sites. Their rented RV is nearly run off the road by a car driven by a runaway alien named Paul (voiced by Seth Rogen). Seems Paul is trying to get back home but an tireless FBI agent (Jason Batemen) wants to capture him first.
The affable alien has spent the last few decades sharing his otherworldly wisdom with the government. Now, with nothing left to share, agents want to literally wring the last bits of information out of him.
That won’t happen if our lovable Brits can keep Paul a few steps ahead of the law.
Along the way they pick up a one-eyed fundamentalist named Ruth (Saturday Night Live’s Kristen Wiig), whose faith gets shaken by the very sight of a pot-smoking alien.
Paul is aggressively anti-Christian despite the protestations of its cast members. One might forgive Wiig’s character, who sports a shirt with Jesus blowing away Charles Darwin, for being a conduit for a steady stream of jokes. Once Ruth casts aside her religion she starts spewing vulgarities with abandon, a tic Wiig nails with her droll delivery.
The real punishing caricature is Ruth’s fundamentalist father, a man given few lines but a constant, razed look in his eye. By the final reel he’s committed a horrific act which only underlines how the film’s creators see “his kind.”
And if that doesn’t cinch matters, another character dismisses people of faith with a tossed off line, “you can’t win with these people.”
Religious groups, already waging ideological battles against MTV’s Skins and the upcoming ABC show Good Christian Bitches, may let Paul slide on by. But will gay rights groups protest how Paul uses the word “fag” in a derogatory manner much like they protested the word “gay” in the trailer for The Dilemma?
At first blush, Paul seems scientifically engineered for the likes of Pegg and Frost, comic actors with a heady sense of meta-gags and the chops to pull them off. Normally, the pair work with fellow Brit Edgar Wright, but for Paul they’ve teamed up with director Greg Mottola of Superbad fame.
Not a bad switcheroo, but the results prove lackluster.
The crush of limp running gags doesn’t help. People keep thinking Graeme and Clive are a gay couple (har har) and that Paul is gearing up to deliver a heaping helping of anal probes.
Pegg and Frost, so good together in past vehicles, feel like they’re cashing in on their bromance history. Frost’s character is particularly prickly, and even when the screenplay fleshes out the reasons why it’s hardly revelatory.
Rogen fares better, even if he’s still trading on his stoner image from Pineapple Express. He gives Paul a rat-a-tat-tat of counter-culture lines, but he also finds the sentimental side of the bug-eyed lost soul.
Paul should have hit theaters in PG-13 form, since a younger audience won’t mind the sillier sequences and will happily name check all the movies referenced from start to finish. It’s aggressively R-rated for the wrong reasons. It heaps on vulgarity without the stinging effect found in a Judd Apatow production. Sure, Ruth is trying to understand how to properly incorporate F bombs into conversation, but the screenplay is littered with other key players speaking crassly to little comic effect.
Paul also squanders a top flight supporting cast, from Bateman’s unblinking G-man to Joe Lo Truglio as an agent with a soft spot for all things sci-fi. And, for once, Jane Lynch drops by a movie set and doesn’t steal every scene she’s in.
Paul coaxes a steady stream of grins for much of its running time without ever delivering a belly laugh. The film may be remembered more for its spirituality bashing than any comic inspiration.
I’m just weary from this. Why can’t these damned hip, smug Tinseltown idiots ask themselves the question “Would I insult Muslims like this?” If the answer is “No,” then examine your actions.
Hollywood and pop culture and Academia have long been on a rant to strip
Christian and moral values. They make movies for kids and young people and the messages are always negative. Avatar, Golden Compass, and more.
Sexuality, nudity, foul lanquage, drug culture are in nearly every movie.
Even in movies rated Family. Television is the same. Dump it, save your money, read a good book.
Another reason NOT to go to the movies, not that there is much to see these days anyway. With junk like this out there, I think I’ll just watch some DVDs of some real movies, like Casablanca, The Great Escape, or The Searchers. No bad language, no gratuitous sex scenes, and that elusive thing that Hollywood never seems to get much of these days, a decent PLOT with decent dialogue. No wonder fewer and fewer ADULTS are going to movies these days.
This film didn’t have to include religion at all in order to be funny. It is so typical of today’s generation which believes government to be its God.
I have not seen the film. So I cannot say whether Toto is right or just thin skinned. In comedy anything goes. Nothing is sacred. In general though I think fundamentalist Muslims are better comedy material. But it is also inherently more dangerous to make fun of Islam. So if you want to bash religion in movies, Christianity is the safe way to go. But it also makes the filmmakers look a bit cowardly.
The assumption that the behaviour lampooned in the movie is typical of Christians is extremely bigoted. However, I *have* met one or two “christians” very much like that. They make me cringe and think “I can see where the left gets their stereotypes.”
I suppose if you met a couple radical Muslims you’d say “I hope they’re not wearing those bomb vests they seem to find so attractive.” Or do ya just “cringe & think”: Gee, I can see where the entire world gets their stereotypes.
Pow!
I heard that smack all the way over here.
Nice one!
You’ve met two Christians who are like that?
Well, hate to tell you there are a billion and a half Christians, so maybe you should try to meet a few more.
Those who do not trust, love and obey our Lord, Jesus Christ, will have a very different attitude when they stand before His judgment seat. And then it will be too late. Best to shape up now, folks!
Look, I’m not happy about the Christian-bashing in our culture. But seriously…you sound insane when you talk like that.
Thank you, C.Darwin. I’m tired of the Christian-bashing, as well, but too many people on PJM seem to believe that conservative must equal fundamentalist.
Well, it may sound insane to you, but that’s what Christianity is. The Bible has is that Jesus spent a lot of time talking about Hell. He must have thought it was important.
C.S. Lewis said that Jesus, in His teachings, doesn’t leave much room for middle ground. He either was who He said He was, namely the Messiah, the Son of God, or else He was an nut. And either you embrace the faith, or you will see His followers as nuts.
It’s going to be interesting to see what happens to the atheists and scoffers as Islam takes over more and more of the West. Christians give “insane” warnings to atheists; Muslims give something more.
And for all of atheism’s pretensions, it has not succeeded in society-building. For one thing, you gotta have kids for a society to survive for very long. Atheism is too hedonistic to place much value in children, and there are not many examples of great civilizations that were atheistic before the 20th century, and the Communist ones since then are either dead now, on life support, or are morphing into something else. The birth rates assure us that socialist post-Christian Europe is certainly doomed, and an Islamic Europe will take its place. European atheism’s life is doomed. Ironic that Darwinism leads us to atheism, and atheism leads society to a dead end. If Darwinism dies, was it fit?
Only if it’s not true.
Rational thought is not characterized by a priori assumptions and a refusal to consider the evidence presented by both sides.
Well, it is obvious that if Darwinism dies, then at least it does not hold true regarding philosophies.
But in Darwinism, God is rendered unnecessary. That, indeed, is its selling point at least with its most vocal proponents.
If God doesn’t exist, then what does truth have to do with anything? When we argue, are we not appealing to some sort of transcendent law of reason to become the arbiter? And just how does anything transcend our argument in a godless universe? There was a big bang, lots of matter and energy careening around in an expanding universe, and stuff happens. In a purely material world, transcendent truth cannot be explained; in fact, if all you wanted was to prove we have free will and are able even to choose between truth and falsehood, you’ve got it to do.
He may be /your/ lord, but don’t go around speaking for anyone else and proclaim him /our/ lord. Sheesh. The reason that Christians are made fun of is exactly because of this sanctimonious self-righteousness.
She’s just stating her belief. There’s nothing self-righteous about it.
No, it isn’t a simple stating of their belief. That would be something like stating these sentiments in the first person. Instead, it is stated as a dictum for all of us and then punctuated with a warning for others. This is the very essence of self-righteousness. Shall we consult dictionary.com?
Seems to me that this comment is made exactly in a self-righteous manner. Its not Christianity per se that bothers me, its the endless finger-wagging moralizing that comes from people that profess a belief in Christianity. That is typified by this particular comment.
If they had something like the following:
I trust, love and obey my Lord, Jesus Christ and happily await His judgment.
That would have been a simple statement of their faith. However, that is not what was done. To state otherwise is to avoid the simple facts of what they wrote.
> No, it isn’t a simple stating of their belief. That would be something like stating these sentiments in the first person. Instead, it is stated as a dictum for all of us and then punctuated with a warning for others. This is the very essence of self-righteousness… confident of one’s own righteousness, especially when smugly moralistic and intolerant of the opinions and behavior of others.
Being of the opinion that it is good to help increase someone’s self-awareness, allow me to ask: what else are you doing here yourself, but moralizing about someone else’s moralizing?
So if it’s your opinion that it is wrong to adopt a self-righteous tone while acting smugly moralistic and intolerant of the opinions and behaviors of others, then why are you doing it?
Perhaps we can all agree that there is a time and place for moralizing. So, now all that’s left is to explain why you are allowed to do it and Christians aren’t.
> Its not Christianity per se that bothers me, its the endless finger-wagging moralizing that comes from people that profess a belief in Christianity.
I see the distinction, so thank you for wagging *your* finger at this Christian who has offended you. Also, you did this without even extending the benefit of the doubt by assuming that he or she does more than merely “profess a belief” in Christianity. If that isn’t finger-wagging, what is?
> If they had something like the following: I trust, love and obey my Lord, Jesus Christ and happily await His judgment.
“Shut up,” he explained.
It might help here if you understood the salient points of Christian theology. It starts with this: we are a fallen race. We are all dead in sin. All have fallen short. Nobody can withstand the judgment of the Lord. No, not one. We are terrified of it. That is why fearing the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. That is why we cling to His promises. That is why we hope and pray that Christ will have paid the penalty of our sins.
> That would have been a simple statement of their faith. However, that is not what was done. To state otherwise is to avoid the simple facts of what they wrote.
So please explain why Christians need to shut up in your presence when you do not shut up in theirs. What is the authority upholding your own moral judgments? What you find pleasing vs. what you find annoying? Sorry, but Christians have a right to speak even when it annoys you. I know a lot of people have a serious problem with this fact, but there it is.
Christians are routinely sneered at for accepting the Bible’s authority, but at least the Bible is a standard that exists outside of themselves. Apparently, you get to make your standards up as you go along, and it is allowed to be an arbitrary standard.
Richard,
The Great Commission is a fundamental aspect of Christianity. Some Christians aren’t very comfortable with witnessing, although, God bless them, they do try. Maybe they get too preachy or something for some tastes. Also, convicting another person of their sins and their need for a Savior can irritate like salt, and it’s not a popular message for someone unwilling or unable to forego their sin and repent.
As Christians we are always to be prepared to give an answer for the reason for our hope, but to do so with gentleness and respect. Key words being prepared, gentleness and respect. It is then up to the listener to accept or reject that message of salvation and hope. Some do, many don’t. Take care!
I’m still waiting for those super clever, cutting edge geniuses in Hollywood to come out with an anti-Muslim comedy.
Hope you brought along plenty of supplies. Might take a couple of decades or so.
Christianity has been under attack for over two thousand years, it will survive this little movie just fine.
This movie is further proof that there is a HUGE lack of talent in tinsel town. IMHO it comes from years of heavy drug usage mixed with brain dead politics mixed with inept writers and actors. This industry is dead as far as I’m concerned. If you want madness, just turn on the tube and catch Charlie Sheen. It’s probably more entertaining.
Charlie Sheen IS an alien!
Perhaps Christianity would have been given a pass if only we cut the ears and noses off our women, waged constant war, & restrained the growth of knowledge and law thru something like sharia. It’s tough earning respect now days.
Pegg and Frost cut their comedic teeth in the UK where one must insult Christians and be nice to Muslims else one isn’t given space/time/exposure on the telly. The Brits know no other way. For them its a denial mechanism to get back at upstart Yanks who are “demonstrably too spiritual” for their own good, don’t you know? And they still have no idea why they’re slipping and will soon become a third rate nation. Politically correctness equals national euthanasia. Sad to see; impossible to reverse.
I thought that Bateman guy was big into born again Christianity- why would he participate in a film that bashes Christians?
The left (most of UK and Hollywood) truly fears and/or despises Christians- they are sincerely commited to the idea that Sarah Palin and tea party are a DANGER to their way of life- that the goal of their politics is to establish a theocratic state. A staet wher blasphemyis punishable and censorship rules.
Which is of course ironic. as they steadfastly defend any Muslims,seeing them as poor victims of the hated, bigoted, racist Christians, while simultaneosuly ignoring the fact that ISLAMICS truly do wish to change USA into a theocratic state where these moveiemakers would be censored, imprisoned for blasphemous comedy, or possibly hanged.
Bateman born-again? I hadn’t heard that. Maybe you’re thinking of another former child star, Kirk Cameron, who is a born-again Christian.
yeah you are right toby
My wife and I saw the film last night. She likes Pegg and Frost, having seen Shaun of the Dead. I tend to be unreligious myself, and generally uncomfortable with people who ridicule religious folks, too. However, if you see the movie, you’ll notice that the film-makers have made the religious folks in this film so outrageous that members of the Westboro Baptist church would tell them to calm down a bit. The characters are a father and daughter who own a trailer park out in the countryside. The daughter tells you that she believes the world is 4,000 years old, and as is mentioned in the article she wears a t-shirt depicting Jesus shooting Charles Darwin in the head, with a Dirty Harry-like pistol. Charlie’s head is getting splatted all over her left breast (seriously). Anyone know a Christian who would wear such a thing?
So yes, the movie makes fun of religious people, and Paul’s character makes comments about “these people” which make it clear that *he* knows the truth, even if they don’t. While he’s supposedly knowledgeable, he’s not infallable (he can’t drive a car, for example) and much of what he says and does is played for humor.
It’s not the best movie ever, but a reasonable diversion for an evening. I thought it funny, and some of the lines are cribbed from various SciFi classics, in one case delivered to a character who delivered the line themselves in a previous movie (which generated laughs in the theater I was in, when it happened).
You might be wrong in assuming that Christians won’t watch it…. we are fast becoming a group who believes in multiple ways to heaven, the Bible is not God inspired. And most of us go to R rated movies all the time. Sad to say, but Christianity is not what it used to be.
Interesting juxtaposition of illogic, that. Too attached to the old comfortable label to admit it no longer applies, and too timid to own up to a new sect’s name. And totally unaware the last sentence merely applies to oneself. Strange
That’s only true if what you call “christianity” follows creeds proposed by humans, because beliefs set forth by man are subject to changing with the passing tides. I suspect you don’t really know what the term means, nor probably do the “spiritual leaders” you follow.
refuse,
You’re describing false doctrine, which creepeth into the flock like a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Jesus said “I am the way, the truth and the light. NONE come to the Father but through me.”
Pastors, tend to your flock the way Jesus did. Compromise is not an option.
What is it with Brits these days…Seems like a requirement for being cool in the UK is to vocally assert your atheism. To me it’s very off-putting. I get the same feeling (I imagine) from vocal atheists as they get from hyper active over the top TV preachers. I guess what makes me uncomfortable about atheists is that if you have SOOOO much confidence in your understanding of the universe, you must be an insufferable know-it-all in other aspects of life. I also find it so bullying, unfair, juvenile, dismissive, and just wrong how liberals HAVE to make Christians out to be a bunch of science-denying, redneck idiots. Yeah sure…it’s easier that way. You don’t have to even consider for a minute their point of view. 2000 years of thought? Nope. They’re idiots. End of story. Kind of like the way they make tea-party people out to be a bunch of racists.
> What is it with Brits these days…Seems like a requirement for being cool in the UK is to vocally assert your atheism.
It will be cool for about another fifteen years, maybe twenty. Then it will be punished under Sharia. It’s one thing to make fun of Christianity. You’re not likely to have your head carved off if you poke fun at Episcopalians.
I don’t have a problem with making fun of religion at all. The problem as some posters point out above, is where is the making fun of Muslims? Oh wait we know the answer to that already. Also it is so easy to poke fun at these rabid atheist evangelists (no that is not an oxymoron) like Dawkins, Dennett, P Z Myers and their ilk who take themselves so seriously and come across as no more thoughtful and open-minded than the religious zealots they are making fun of. There is a gold mine of comic material there, but with the exception of South Park and a very few others, who goes there?
British comedy (like American comedy) is very safe, don’t offend the Ummah like the good dhimmis they are and knock the Yanks constantly. I was at a West End comedy club a few years ago and the endless bash America act is simply tiresome and lame. I don’t mean they knock Christian Americans, I mean a very strong almost rabid anti-Americanism which is reflective of British attitudes. Successors to Lenny Bruce and Richard Pryor (who had no concern for sacred cows) they ain’t.
If Lenny Bruce was around now, do you think he would back off making fun of TODAY’S liberals and their Muslim allies? Don’t think so.
Larry,
Why do the brits, and so many others for that matter, mock us Americans? I’m sincerely asking because I don’t travel to foreign countries and therefore have no way of knowing why they hate us so much. It’s hurtful. Can you provide us with some insight? Is it the average American they detest, or is it our government?
Thank you.
I’ve had as many Brits insult me for my Irish last name as for my American accent.
It’s a class thing. The see all Irish as only good as blue collar workers and maids and we drink too much.
and they see Americans as lower class and crass.
Of course, the real reason they hate both groups is that we didn’t bow down and obey them for being superior.
tioedong,
A class thing. I should have realized that. It’s been in their blood for centuries. Their entire empire was built on class distinctions where the brits were morally and intellectually superior to their “subjects.”
They don’t seem to realize they’re just being elitist jerks.
They can take their “special relationship” and dip it in their tea.
They didn’t have to include the Christian bashing to make this so-called “comedy” in the first place; however, I believe they included it for spite & they have no real ideas themselves. The pot smoking, foul-mouthed alien is really a synthesis of the stars themselves; therefore, besides his CGI alien appearance, he’s no alien, but Hollywood’s animus toward Middle America personified in an in artful cartoon.
Shame really since I like Simon Pegg, but this film may well put him on my sh*tlist.
I can tell you someone who routinely insulted the Christians…
Martin Luther
I can tell you someone who vigorously insulted the Jews…
Jesus Christ
:: ))
Religions who believe they are above insult should be outlawed
:: ))
Ozzy,
Martin Luther relentlessly attacked countless tenets of the Roman Catholic Church. And he was a jew-hater in the extreme.
Jesus didn’t mock or ridicule jews, per se. Just the hypocritical jewish religious leaders of His day. He threatened their wealth, power and status, thus they had him crucified.
Ozzy makes the obvious point everyone seems to be missing. Would go a bit further that were Christ to visit earth he would not recognize what Pauline Doctrine has done to the teachings he left.
Theologians in the few hundred years after Christ debated, inserted, removed, modified, argued, fought, burned, and generally corrupted teachings Christ left. The inter-faith battles become so destructive Roman government interceded to settle and standardize the Bible; what would be left out, with political and religious appointees voting on which books would be approved.
Over the next thousand years the bible continued undergoing changes, translation errors, syntax errors, which continue to this day, The King James Bible being one of the most famous examples.
Does this all really matter..? only if you faith is based on a book.
If a comedy can upset your faith, maybe its time to reexamine the foundation of belief.
alex,
One man’s comedy is another man’s blaspheme. Besides, it’s not just one or two occasional anti-Christian Hollywood films that get under a Christian’s skin; it’s the relentless pounding of regurgitated anti-Christian agitprop that wears a bit thin over time.
Your comment about Pauline Doctrine (as if it’s compromising Christian Doctrine) is especially troublesome. Have you been listening to Dawkins or Hitchens lately, by chance? What do you know about the life and ministry of the apostle Paul the rest of us believers are missing?
to those moaning that they wouldnt touch islam in the same way – look at the uk film “four lions”, does exactly that – a film by british cinema mocking muslim extremism, and critically well received by everyone – including muslims who love it – haven’t met one who hasn’t yet. some christians need to lighten up and accept that deep south america is full of fundamentalist christian idiots – by the definition of everyone outside america, and anyone in america with two brain cells. it’s a shame america still wallows in hypocrisy were they can’t see their own ideology driven extremism.
this is a brilliant film. the best of the 3 uk comedies. some people need to lighten the hell up and smell the roses of their own peoples idiocy. if you can’t laugh at yourself then artistic effort is wasted on you.
UK Paul, the way Paul goes over the top with Christian bashing, no, they do not even touch the Muslims in the same manner. The Christian bashing is not even funny, but quite foul. I want to see Simon Pegg write & star in a film making fun of Mohammad like they do with God. Is this going to happen? No. It may very well happen in an alternate reality, but not in this universe. Simon Pegg is a coward & a fool.
I’ll admit it. I’m a xenophobe. The image of the typical “Zeta Reticulan Gray” alien gives me the creeps.
Anything that drops down out of the sky and grabs people out of their cars on lonely highways to hypnotize them and stick rectal probes up their butts without telling them why is up to no good.
If they were truly our “space brothers” as the granola munching NewAgers say one would think they would have given us the cure to Crohn’s disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, diverticulitis and colon cancer by now, even if they don’t think we’re ready for the secret to faster than light space travel.
I think the little gray bastards are bad news.
Oh Hollywood…just as uneducated about the Bible as they think fundamentalist Christians are about evolution. What makes them think that seeing a space alien would shatter a Christian’s faith? Where does it say in Genesis that God made all life in their image? And while we’re at it, does Hollywood even address the notion that if Paul really existed, he might only be representative of an alien who smokes pot, swears and rejects belief in God? Also examine Paul’s claim that his people are all bi-sexual and into sex just for pleasure…how would procreation and the pleasure-killing aspects of rearing progeny have any feasible place in their ideology? The movie had its comedic moments, but overall, it was an insult, at least, to my intelligence.
Aliens? Check.
Dumb premise? Check.
Pointless profanity? Check.
Contrived acting? Check.
Golly. This has all the earmarks of nothing I would even remotely consider watching.
Die the ignominious celluloid death of straight to DVD obscurity, religious bigot screed!
Hollywood is spiritually bankrupt.
Boycott them. Don’t give them one thin dime to further their propaganda.
The trash they try to foist on us is just that, trash. Don’t pollute your mind or heart with this garbage.
Oakley,
Good advice for believers. Plus I can save the money to spend on food and gas and healthier lifestyle choices.
I appreciate the advanced review and whoever it was thanks for the heads up on the movie Skyline that I never went to see but everyone that saw it said it was a total waste. And whoever recommended Battle LA and mindless, exciting sci-fi thank you. I will pass on this one like Skyline but for the same reason, don’t want to waste money and not be entertained.
Thing is, Christians should believe that there can be no aliens other than demonic entities, making the anti-Christian stuff in the film even more suspect, dovetailing as it does with the agenda of “limited hangout” and V style “the visitors are our friends” propaganda going back to the early 1980s…
It makes you think.
(not really)
DAVID LETTERMAN’S HATE, ETC. !
David Letterman’s hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.
Speaking of anti-Semitism, it’s Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who’ve gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right?
Wrong! It’s the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that’ll outdo even Hitler’s by stating that “Judah hath dealt treacherously” and “the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this” and asks “Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?”
Haven’t evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and persons perceived to be Jewish? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (plus Sandra Bernhard, Larry David, Kathy Griffin, Bill Maher, Joan Rivers, and Sarah Silverman) against Christians like Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned such “crucifixion”!
While Letterman etc. are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable!
For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in “Separation of Raunch and State,” “Michael the Narc-Angel,” and “Bible Verses Obama Avoids.”
PS – - – There’s nothing wrong with Hollywood that a 10-point earthquake couldn’t fix !!
[Foregoing snippet seen lately on the amazing web! Sandy]