Palin Takes on Obama and Dems in New Orleans
Sarah Palin may have been the headliner at the Friday afternoon session of the Southern Republican Leadership Conference, but there was some maneuvering behind the scenes regarding the Michael Steele controversy that sought to lay the matter to rest — at least with the Republican establishment.
Thirty-one state party chairmen signed a statement of support for Steele — a signal he needed badly before his scheduled speech to the delegates on Saturday afternoon. While the buzz about Steele had subsided somewhat on Friday, the issue loomed in the background.
The statement said in part:
The charge of any national Chairman is to raise money and win elections. With over $100 million raised, victories in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts, and victories in 29 of 37 special elections, Michael Steele has demonstrated that under his Chairmanship the RNC has the ability, focus, and drive to lead Republicans to a sweeping victory in November.
The RNC under Chairman Michael Steele is a full partner with state committees, responsive to our needs, and intensely interested in providing the support necessary for victory. That process is not an easy process. Technology has had a great impact on the art of politics. That impact has required the RNC to adapt and change to work effectively in this modern environment. Change can sometimes be difficult. But the changes Michael Steele has brought to the RNC were essential for our party to adapt, and win, when we do not, for the moment, hold the White House or Congress.
We stand behind Chairman Steele as he continues to lead us on the path victory in November.
By papering over the controversy, party leaders are hoping the focus can return to where they think it belongs: on the Democrats and President Obama. On that score, Sarah Palin did not disappoint.
Indeed, Steele can thank Palin for sucking the oxygen out of any other storyline at the conference. And that includes the retirement of Justice Stevens; not one speaker has mentioned that yet. The atmosphere in the Grand Ballroom prior to Palin’s entrance was thick with anticipation and excitement. She followed Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, whose speech proved that while cultural issues like abortion may have been downgraded by some — or, more accurately, de-emphasized by some of the more pragmatic Republicans — the pro-life issue is still near and dear to the hearts of most in the GOP. Perkins received a prolonged standing ovation for his rousing defense of the pro-life position. Some Republicans may wish the issue to merge into the background, but that wouldn’t be the choice of most attendees at this conference.
Palin seemed at times to rush her address a little, stepping on applause lines so that the flow of her speech was a little choppy. But she made up for it with some real zingers tossed at President Obama, including a sarcastic response to the president’s dismissal of her knowledge regarding nuclear weapons:
“And President Obama, with all that vast nuclear expertise he acquired as a community organizer, a part-time senator, and a candidate for president, has accomplished nothing to date with Iran or North Korea,” she said.
In a more serious vein, Palin criticized the administration’s policies toward friend and foe:
Meanwhile, this administration alienates our friends. They treated Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai poorly and acted surprised when he reacted in kind. And they escalated a minor zoning decision into a major breach with Israel, our closest ally in the Middle East.
Folks, someone needs to remind the President: Jerusalem is not a settlement. Israel is our friend. And the critical nuclear concerns of our time are North Korea, who has nuclear weapons, and Iran, who wants them.
So, “yes we can” kowtow to our enemies and publicly criticize our allies.
Yes, we can. But someone ought to tell the President and the Left that just because we can doesn’t mean we should.
Following her speech, Palin lingered a bit to shake some hands and sign some autographs. It struck me that her security situation, both in the ballroom and out in the lobby when she was mobbed making her way to her car, should be a concern. Louisiana state troopers were there but, whether by her request or not, failed to keep the enthusiastic crowds from pressing forward and thrusting camera phones and copies of her book toward her for her signature.
Following Palin was a real corker of a speech by Texas Governor Rick Perry. Governor Perry is, without a doubt, one of the strictest of strict constructionists in the party. Perry believes the federal government’s responsibilities should be limited to:
Have a strong military, secure our borders, and deliver the mail on time. And that’s it. …
And until you can get those three right, how about leaving everything else alone?
His defense and support of the Tenth Amendment is, if anything, even more a reflection of his belief in first principles:
Basically, what it [the Tenth Amendment] says is that the federal government was created to be an agent of the states — not the other way around.
Perry has a knack for getting liberals’ blood to boil when he talks like this. I think he was exaggerating a little about what should be the responsibilities of the federal government. Texas is dependent on Washington as much as any other state. But Perry is a shrewd operator, having just dusted off a serious challenge from Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson, easily beating her in their recent primary. He seems a near lock for reelection.
Might he be a candidate for president in 2012? He wouldn’t be the first Texas governor to make a run.
Finally, a word about Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal’s address. He repeated his disinterest in national office and jabbed indirectly at Michael Steele with a little joke about Bourbon Street:
Jindal took to the stage and welcomed conference-goers to New Orleans. He told them to “enjoy our great food, our great music, our great culture.”
Then this: “A word of warning to RNC staffers: You may want to stay away from Bourbon Street,” he said. “Just a word of advice.”
The joke drew laughter and applause from the crowd.
If the GOP can laugh at their own folly, that may be a sign that the controversy can be laid to rest with no further damage to the party’s prospects in November.
Jindal was much more animated and at ease than he was in his disastrous response to President Obama’s State of the Union. He still has a way to go to recover from that performance, however, and it would appear that while he is still an attractive and intelligent potential candidate with a terrific personal story, he has some convincing to do regarding his ability to connect with an audience.
That may come with time. Until then, he is doing well as governor and should have a strong case to make for reelection when he runs in 2011.
UPDATE:
Fifty-eight RNC members have now signed the letter in support of the embattled RNC chair. As Allahpundit points out, Steele’s job appears safe at the moment.






By papering over Chairman Steele the party leaders are using the same flawed, inside the establishment crap that propels everything that the liberal Democrats do.
It has been the everyday American people functioning individually through blogs, talk radio and tea party gatherings that directly funded, organized, produced and assured the recent gubernatorial and special election GOP victories.
Michael Steele was and has been busy promoting Michael Steele and his own brand of countering the Democrat’s blackness of Obama with his own skin color.
Americans are sick of politicians forcing their brands of religion and thinking down their throats along with a steady stream of racism.
How common and shallow can things be and still survive?
There is good reason that Mitt Romney, among others stayed away from the Southern Republican Leadership Conference. Dog and Pony popularity shows held for the purpose of covering up and excusing bad behavior don’t cut the mustard anymore.
Nice knowing you Sarah.
Mr. Steele it is time for you to go.
Hooray for all the great speeches and hooray for America! Oh how I love that tough talkin’ Rick Perry. Whoever ends up at the top of the ticket in 2012 I really want Paul Ryan to be the VP. His ideas will return us to better days.
A Perry/Ryan ticket in 2012. I like it. I like that a lot…but for now keep your eye on the big prize coming our way in 2010.
Sarah is still tops with me. She’s valuable as a strong leader of good American Values. (please note with respect that I am not a Christian, but I do love my counrty) Because I respect him, I like Jindal and pray that he stays on as Gov, until we need him at the national level in 2012.
As for Steele. He sealed his doom with me with this lastest racial comment/comparison/flap. I can accept the blunder with the stripper club fiasco but urge that he/Steele take command of the party and do his job with integrity. He has so far failed in my estimation. Time for him to go.
Michael Steele is a lack luster representative of the Republican party.
Rick Perry is better than Romney. I did not understand why Kay was running against him
.
Paul Ryan…wow..I’d have to know a lot more than I do about him. He did like the tax on AIG bonuses…and TARP….
Although we need a strong Presidential candidate.. I feel it’s even more important to get congress right.. What good is a conservative president with a liberal congress?
Abi – here’s some faily recent footage of Ryan during the “healthcare summit”.
He’s obviously articulate but also comes across as reasoned and intelligent all sorley lacking in the current administration. Perry/Ryan….has a nice ring to it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPxMZ1WdINs
Personally, I am tired of the double standard blue nose conservatives that call for Republican resignations whenever the MSM gins up some controversy. Why do conservatives let themselves be led around by the MSM like so many sheep? Name just one good thing that has come about from some Republican resignation in the past. Go ahead Mr. Blue Nose, I dare you!
Palin’s endorsement of McLame severed her good standings with me. And Steele lack of leadership during the spending spree, Obama nomination/coronation, and now his race card defense sealed his fate also with me.
I can’t believe with all that we have seen from RINOs and the left that we as a party cannot get our act together, find a unifying leader, voice a unified message that counters the left, and unify our party to defeat as many of the left as we can. It’s bad enough we face a hostile MSM, more and much more well funded left 527s and foundations, the legal left, but we still have our OWN RINOs (most recently Corburn) siding and defending the left.
We are pathetic.
Palin’s endorsement of McLame severed her good standings with me. And Steele lack of leadership during the spending spree, Obama nomination/coronation, and now his race card defense sealed his fate also with me.
I can’t believe with all that we have seen from RINOs and the left that we as a party cannot get our act together, find a unifying leader, voice a unified message that counters the left, and unify our party to defeat as many of the left as we can. It’s bad enough we face a hostile MSM, more and much more well funded left 527s and foundations, the legal left, but we still have our OWN RINOs (most recently Corburn) siding and defending the left.
We are pathetic.
“Palin’s endorsement of McLame severed her good standings with me.”
Yeah, I understand. Loyalty, respect, and gratitude are terrible qualities to have.
Phineas:Show me which of those qualities Mclame, his staff and presidential committee and his daughter have shown to Ms. Palin, conservatives and our nation.
I’ll bet Palin is a far better fundraiser than Mikey, too.
Which is exactly why Steele should be immediately sent back to his law firm, and replaced with Sarah.
As party chair, Palin can do what she’s best positioned to do right now: rebuild the Republican brand in the image portrayed by people like Rick Perry and DUMP the versio of the GOP represented by self-serving RINOs like Romney & Steele. This would put the growing power of the TEA Party squarely behind the reform and resurgence of the GOP.
After a couple years of that and a resurgence in the economy like we saw during 2001-2006, anyone who resorted to the already-tired tactics used to demonize her today would simply be laughed at. President Palin in 2016 would not be unthinkable in that scenario. Hell, if the GOP gets their act together over the next two+ years, that might not be unthinkable in 2012.
Meanwhile, the real advantage of this change is that we’d then have an RNC chair who doesn’t NEED a faux ‘letter of support’ in order to maintain credibility.
And Rick – ALL STATES – are now dependent upon the federal government to an extent – i.e., dependent on getting BACK the wealth that the feds confiscate from their respective citizens and industry. This is largely due to the influence of white-hanky-waving, pseudo-conservatives (no, just look in a mirror, it’ll be easier) who’ve been ALLOWING that dependency to grow for decades. So that was a particularly cheap shot at Perry.
The Romney/Ron Paul alliance, ganging up on Sarah Palin, is in full view not only here, but all over the bloggosphere. The M Steele is just a front where this battle is taking place.
But fundamentally, this from (Palin versus the RINOs and the Libertarian nuts) is shaping to be the battle to reshape the New Rpeublican Party.
The Old GOP (that of the old Wall Street and Country Club) is dead. The New Republican Party, is the Party of Sarah Palin, Main Street, the Reagan Democrats, the Tea Party and the conservative Independents. The Libertarian nuts (the party of isolationists, anarchists, pedophiles and druggies) have no place here. The RINOs better come to understand that their only place is in the New Republican Party, but they no longer control it; they’re its left flank – that’s all.
While I greatly admire the Arctic Fox, Im afraid shes been sort of stamped with a big scarlet “A” on her forehead in the minds of those who barely pay attention to anything other than when there next government goody arrives. I personally beleive Sarah Palin might be best as a kingmaker sort. For all her great ideas, Sarah is no Reagan when it comes to knowing how to combat the commie media, something Reagan had due to his long years in Radio,TV, and as the president of the screen actors guild. Knowing how to defeat the leftist media is requirement # 1, since you know that that GE commie anti-american Immelt will see to it that all his NBC stations are sucking up to the extreme left, and that CNN and the rest of the lamebrain media will jump on the leftist ideology bandwagon. Right now, I dont see anyone out there with the media saavy necessary to win in 2012-maybe someone like Gen David Petraeus might work, providing hes willing to do so. We definitely need to remove the current communist moslem out of there. Hes trying to purposely destroy America. He and his comrades must be destroyed first.
Don’t try to focus Palin on a job. She already has a job and that’s unseating BHO in 2012. As to her speeches, they must be awful boring since people are paying $500 and up to go hear them in person. Yes, she uses sound bites. She was a communications major and she, unlike BHO who won’t release his grades, was awake in class and learned something.
When Reagan got the same negative press as Sarah does, the news media were still trying to give the appearance of fairness. Now they’ve given up the pretense of being fair. It’s true that she is not a member of the elite political class in this country. If that’s what makes a candidate for you, you should settle on Newt or Romney. She will make no effort to conform to someone else’s view of a proper candidate. If she runs, and I believe she will, it will be as Sarah Palin, hockey mom and former governor of Alaska. She will continue via ongoing media exposure to define herself and overcome the slanders thrown at her by the media.
I’ve been a fan of Michael Steele ever since I got a nice, long look at him in the role of Lt. Governor of my state. And I strongly suspect that about half of the negative remarks about him that I have been reading come from Democrats. The Democrats are afraid of him and they are desperate to deprive the Republican party of him.
Thank you for the very interesting reportage.
I wonder if any of these leaders is preparing a long term strategy to roll back the regime that the leftists are slowly building.
We need a deep action of de-brainwashing: the nihilist-subversive intoxication pervades the whole society: schools, universities, churches, communities… and we need to stop it. We need a domestic radio Free America to counter the lies and the possible “October surprises”.
As I repeat all the time, what we need most is to understand that this situation is not “politics as usual”: Freedom is at stake and if we play simple politics we will be doomed.
The way the nihilist-subversives have conquered the democratic party is the blueprint for what they are going to do to the whole country: we need strategists able to analyze in detail what has happened at a cultural and organizational level and able to plan a true (although absolutely original, because it is strategic but not military) “counterinsurgency” plan.
I was disappointed with Palin’s support of McCain but I still love her for saying the things that need to be said and not being cowed by the hostility of the media or the condescension of the turd in the White House.
As for Michael Steele his main job is to raise money. If he can do that successfully fine. If not he has to go. For myself I will not contribute to the RNC. The only people getting my money are true conservatives by way of their individual campaigns.
A couple of you have noted that Palin is a great fundraiser and messenger, and a good choice to lead the RNC.
I am an Alaskan and know her a bit better than the general US population, and I could not agree more. It is a great idea, and a position she could really do us all good in.
So long as she can overcome the McCain problem.
I wish I had thought of it myself…
I gave up on Michael Steele and the RNC when I started getting fundraising requests that were about as substantial as an ad for AARP. I do not go for wasting money on “pins”, dollar bills, stupid surveys and other direct mail gimmicks. Give me a substantial program, commitment to responsible government and fundraising efforts that respect my intelligence and common sense and then I will contribute to the RNC. Until then I will give my money directly to candidate who exhibit these characteristics. Above all the RNC needs to treat every voter and potential voter as an intelligent, common sense person. Talking down earns disrespect from the voters.
I agree, the RNC under Steele has wasted millions on these useless direct mail solicitations that I have started returning with “NOT A PENNY FROM ME TILL YOU GET RID OF THE RINOS” written across it. I was glad when Steele was chosen, but he has no idea what to do with this job; what a disappointment he has been. Don’t think Sarah would be the right one; the Patriots and TeaPartiers will just have to go their own way and not let tne RNC attempt to rule them. Use your brains, people!
Palin, Perry and Steele are what the GOP needs right now to get them the saliva required to lick their wounds and recover from the 08 political devastation.
This leadership has little in the way of solutions but they do keep the base happy and the loonies in check. I think it is a wise choice. Hold on to these folks and by the ’16 elections they can come up with some realy policies. Good Luck GOP !!
Thanks for the gratuitous “insight,” troll. Keep the tingle up your leg going, and your hand wide open for the promissed handout.
Ditto what H wrote, PC.
Your lame attempts at passive-aggressive condescension don’t do much to make the left appear very gracious. Meanwhile, you obviously don’t understand the problem(s), let alone what solutions are required. Here’s a hint: government – especially socialist government – is not the solution.
Be interesting to see how long the media will continue to try to kill the messengers. The media can’t attack the message without being seen as glowering radicals. Must be really aggravating to the media as their preferred message is more than worn-out.
Careful, Sarah:
Barrack’s going to bite your head off!
BHO is a toothless wonderkin. He has a hard time biting a head of lettuce, let alone Sarah’s “head off”! He’s just like an old fuddy-duddy who don’t got none of ‘dem teeth left and he’s tryin’ to gum his meatloaf.
The Republican Party is replicating the political scene in Iraq…different tribes/cliques/religions fighting and hating one another. Not a formula for winning national elections.
If the media is picking on Palin, why are her own scripted speeches are so bad? Public speaking is not easy but should not be so difficult for somebody in politics. The tone is off, the message is vague, the cadence isn’t good, the one liners are totally contrived. She has the country’s ear right now but isn’t bringing anybody on-board that isn’t wearing a Stars and Stripes bowling shirt.
Really? Her speeches are bad? Hadn’t noticed. Maybe you just don’t like her tone because her words hurt your little ears. “She’s making sense and busting our liberal memes….ouch!” Maybe you prefer someone with a lower timbre to their voice…someone, like, say, Obama? Yeah, love that style over substance!
And you can bet Obama will take notice of her speech. You think Team BHO will give the first crap about what any of the other speakers at SRLC had to say? Who has the White House responded to time and again? And why do you think that is?
As for your little bowling shirt comment…thanks for your condescending attitude. Go piss up a rope, pal.
Following Palin was a real corker of a speech by Texas Governor Rick Perry. Governor Perry is, without a doubt, one of the strictest of strict constructionists in the party. Perry believes the federal government’s responsibilities should be limited to:
Have a strong military, secure our borders, and deliver the mail on time. And that’s it. …
And until you can get those three right, how about leaving everything else alone?
Yes! Repeal Medicare! Repeal Social Security! Perry for President … in 1932.
His defense and support of the Tenth Amendment is, if anything, even more a reflection of his belief in first principles:
Basically, what it [the Tenth Amendment] says is that the federal government was created to be an agent of the states — not the other way around.
Governor Faubus lives!
Yay for Governor Perry! Actually, the constitution provides the only real way for liberals and conservatives to get along. There is nothing wrong with Socialism itself in America – it is just *federal* socialism that is unconstitutional. If we could somehow get the feds back to their authorized duties, then states like California could pursue a Socialist agenda. As a few states in Europe have demonstrated, it *is* possible to run a fiscally sustainable socialist state. Some people actually prefer having professionals make all their decisions for them – so they would prefer to live in such states. (Actually, California seems bent on bankruptcy – it will probably be some other blue state that creates a sustainable American socialist paradise.)
This analogy helps liberals (as opposed to marxists) understand the problem. They like France and Denmark, which have successful socialist systems (for liberal tastes of “successful”). Suppose the European Union federal headquarters came up with their own (fiscally bankrupt) scheme, and forced it on all the European states. Would that be a good thing?
Palin needs to be a class act.
As much as I support/ed her, I do not want my future president or future anyone with power to be a ‘reality show’ loser.
The whole ‘celeb’ crappola is what is ruining the presidency.
We have enough ‘STUPID’ to go around.
UGH.
Ya know what we need?
We need a broke-@ss president wearing tattered clothes and driving a beater and eating po-folk food.
I’m seriously effin’ tired of the Ken & Barbie for President crap. Leave that to Miss America.
Give me a man or woman who has lived the hard life and is ready and willing to be an example by living frugally when the preach it.
I’ve had enough of the hypocrisy from the vaunted elites.
Don’t give me a hero.
Don’t give me a King or Queen.
Don’t give me a zero
Give me an American
Who knows what being an American means.
You are starting to make sense, good points!
Really, really strongly agree here. In my opinion there have only been two candidates for president in all American history running SOLELY on rhetoric, image, and a narrative of themselves propagated through mass media (whether MSM or Fox) – Barack Obama and Sarah Palin. The disadvantage to this approach is that we elect people without knowing what they really stand for from a policy perspective. I started out liking Sarah, and over the last year my respect for her has dwindled. I’m starting to think she just doesn’t have anything meaningful to say about policy.
When did Sarah Palin run for President?
“Give me an American
Who knows what being an American means”
Sounds to me like you just endorsed Palin.
Oh, and when you get rocket scientist like vivo agreeing with you, you know you’re in bad shape.
“Tony Perkins, Rick Perry, and Bobby Jindal also rock the house at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference.”
These guys were conducting serious business. Then the entertainment shows up: Palin spitting out loony cracks about things she has no idea what they are, showing her ‘superiority’, disdain for her own lack of rationality, always trying to be cute in her remarks, pushing the hot buttons of the press, feeding the mental gluttony of her fans, and proving again and again her lack of class to be a country leader. She will continue to do this because of the money she makes from idiots.
She is cute, most conservative woman are and she pull in the big doe. That’s a huge plus for our team. Drives ya crazy doen’t it?
Vivo! Troll-boy! How are you? Now be a good Troll and crawl back under your bridge. Your Mommy has dinner for you. That’s a good boy. Run along now. The adults are talking.
You misspelled ‘adults’, the correct spelling is ‘idiots’.
Palin left Alaska nearly bankrupt. Her tramp daughter broke into a house with a gang, and Sara swooped onto the police. Only the boys ended up being charged. So yes, she’s better than McCain and his dopefiend trust-fund wife.
Is it anywhere close to Illinois or Chicago? I didn’t think so.
And yet Alaska is in nowhere near the financial condition of Illinois or Chicago. Maybe President Obama when he is out of office can go up to Anchorage and Fairbanks, organize the communities a little bit and bring down the neighborhoods to Chi-Town levels.
“Palin left Alaska nearly bankrupt.”
So, in your drug-addled little mind, a $250,000 surplus is nearly bankrupt? Wow.
“Her tramp daughter broke into a house with a gang, and Sara swooped onto the police.”
Cite please; or did this whole episode take place in your noodle? Wow again.
Lotta hate going on in your “brain” there.
Sorry…that should read: $250,000,000.
That beats out skeeziks and vivo, both for trolling above and beyond the call of duty, and that’s not easy to do. Who has been on the forefront of the campaign against the
administration’s initiatives, on health care (where wunderkind Jindal was often AWOL)
and cap n trade, which Lindsey still wants to resurrect from it’s long buried grave.
No more “identity politics” of any kind. I dont want Obamas “blackness” replaced by Steeles “blackness”
Hillarys “feminism” replaced by Palins “feminism”.
The country is almost ungovernable as a result of decades of this crap. Diversity hasnt brought strength
its has brought chaos. We cannot be all things to
all people and the message needs to go out to the country and the world. If you are a Albanian American
Albino and you just find any existence outside of that pigeon hole..then vote Democratic..but from our side…the pandering is OVER.