Get PJ Media on your Apple

Odd Couple: Wall Street Foe Warren Stumps for Big-Businessman

But does she even have the touch among general voters? (For complete 2014 midterm coverage, get your campaign fix on The Grid.)

by
Rod Kackley

Bio

July 31, 2014 - 12:15 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

Chants of “Run, Liz Run” filled the hall as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Miss.) ran on to the stage at the Netroots Nation 2014 annual convention July 18 looking like everyone’s favorite college professor.

Warren was the keynote speaker at a Gary Peters for Senate campaign rally and fundraiser.

She accepted the cheers for a few minutes, then just as a good college professor would Warren signaled with both arms for the crowd to be quiet.

“Sit down. Sit down. Let’s get started,” Warren said to the crowd, which seemed to be merely passing time waiting for the moment their shining star of the Occupy Wall Street movement took the stage.

However, whether she can help Rep. Peters (D-Mich.) defeat Terri Lynn Land (R) for the Senate seat of retiring Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) is yet to be seen.

Besides the wildly cheering, chanting Liz Warren faithful in the Ambassador Ballroom of the Detroit Marriott hotel, there are hundreds of thousands people outside the political pundit-sphere who don’t know who Elizabeth Warren is.

A Politico Battleground poll, released July 21, shows 20 percent of Democrats likely to vote this fall in competitive House and Senate races, and 22 percent of voters overall said they had “never heard of Warren.”

Bill Clinton is seen much more positively than Warren by Democrats, Republicans and independents. According to the Politico poll, Clinton has a 36 percent approval rating, while Warren’s approval rating is 16 percent, only one point higher than Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

Michigan voters were included in the Politico poll because the Land-Peters race, along with four Michigan congressional elections, is seen as one of the most competitive races in the nation.

Warren is the favorite flavor of political pundits looking for someone to run against Hillary Clinton in the Democrats’ 2016 presidential primary. But a Gallup survey released July 18 also shows that Warren is far from a household name.

She doesn’t even have much of an impact among people who identify as Democrats. The Gallup survey shows 57 percent of Democrats nationally have either never heard of Warren or have no opinion of her.

Still, Warren brought the progressive faithful to their feet inside one of the finest hotels in downtown Detroit at the Peters for Senate rally. She is helping the Democrats paint a picture of contrast between Peters and Land, who has been branded as being the wealthiest Senate candidate in the nation by Bloomberg News.

Thousands cheered as Warren told them how she had defeated the million-dollar-a-day political budgets of the nation’s largest banks to win approval for the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

“The CFPB is proof that government can work for us,” Warren said. “It has already forced the biggest financial institutions in the country to return more than $4 billion to consumers they cheated.”

“We won because you got out there,” she told her cheering audience. “You kept that idea alive. You called out sleazy lobbyists. You won this fight.”

The National Republican Senatorial Committee was quick to point out the differences between the Democrats’ Senate candidate in Michigan and the junior senator from Massachusetts.

The NRSC called Peters and Warren two things that don’t go together in an email message that was sent out the day before the Netroots Nation rally.

“Occupy Wall Street Senator Elizabeth Warren and Wall Street broker Gary Peters certainly form a political odd couple,” wrote Brook Hougesen, the press secretary of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

“If history has taught us anything it’s that Gary Peters will do or say anything to save his political career, including pretending to be someone he’s not. If Gary Peters can turn on a dime to line his coffers, how can Michiganders trust him at all in the Senate to keep his promises?” she concluded.

OpenSecrets.org shows Peters has received more than $2 million in campaign contributions since 2008 from members of the finance/real estate and insurance sector, the very people Warren has been fighting.

Comments are closed.

Top Rated Comments   
Hmmm . . . smoke signals say that white squaw sound like lying, phony, faculty lounge pinko. Her make plenty good running-mate for Hillary Rodham. State Media get heap big excited! Stupid Party sure to act stupid. Election in bank
20 weeks ago
20 weeks ago Link To Comment
All Comments   (10)
All Comments   (10)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Fauxahontas, unlike Barack, is not black. Heap big difference when counting coup, wampum and votes!
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
Princess Spreading Bull, a mouthpiece for tired old socialist rhetoric, seems completely out of touch with middle American. But, then again, so did Barack Hussein Obama after a failed first term.
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
The solitary reason she got chose was that the Democrat "Machine" here turned out in full drive to supplant Scott Brown. However on a national level, well. I think she'd be moderately lukewarm and characterless, not so much somebody who the voters would run to.
http://www.agentstealth.net
19 weeks ago
19 weeks ago Link To Comment
Gary Peters is a lying pile of 'used food'. He'll do, say and act-out most anything to get and keep an office,.....any office will do.
Only those who think and act like he does would, or will vote for him.
Period.......
20 weeks ago
20 weeks ago Link To Comment
Pretty pathetic objections to Warren here. She has few weak spots, speaks to a lot of the same dupes as voted for Obama. We ignore her at our peril.
20 weeks ago
20 weeks ago Link To Comment
From all I've heard here in Massachusetts, Warren lacks the kind of "Spark" that would make her a great politician. The lone reason she got elected was that the Democrat "Machine" here came out in full force to replace Scott Brown. But on a national level, well. I suspect she'd be relatively tepid and characterless, not really someone who the voters would flock to. Of course, the Democrats would vote a Ham Sandwich into office, as long as it had a (D) attached, so who knows?
20 weeks ago
20 weeks ago Link To Comment
Where would Sen. Warren be without her bogus claim to have Amer-Indian ancestry? Like B. Obama, suddenly she is presidential candidate material, without any prior notoriety. Suddenly her every utterance has become 'important' to the Media. Is this a deliberate plan to make her name well-known, or is it just an aberration of the liberal US media? Really, all she has to recommend her is being female, and a Democrat in Massachusetts.
20 weeks ago
20 weeks ago Link To Comment
Rod: "A Politico Battleground poll, released July 21, shows 20 percent of Democrats likely to vote this fall in competitive House and Senate races, and 22 percent of voters overall said they had “never heard of Warren.”"

Perhaps she just hasn't been off the reservation long enough. /s
20 weeks ago
20 weeks ago Link To Comment
OpenSecrets.org shows Peters has received more than $2 million in campaign contributions since 2008 from members of the finance/real estate and insurance sector, the very people Warren has been fighting.

So? Warren herself pocketed $574k from "Securities and Investment" folk (at least publicly at Opensecrets.org). What's a little words compared to cold, hard cash needed to win elections?
20 weeks ago
20 weeks ago Link To Comment
Hmmm . . . smoke signals say that white squaw sound like lying, phony, faculty lounge pinko. Her make plenty good running-mate for Hillary Rodham. State Media get heap big excited! Stupid Party sure to act stupid. Election in bank
20 weeks ago
20 weeks ago Link To Comment
View All

One Trackback to “Odd Couple: Wall Street Foe Warren Stumps for Big-Businessman”