<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Risky Anti-NAFTA Posturing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas_risky_antinafta_posturi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas_risky_antinafta_posturi/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David W. Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas_risky_antinafta_posturi/#comment-24111</link>
		<dc:creator>David W. Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/obamas-risky-anti-nafta-posturing/#comment-24111</guid>
		<description>There is a saying from the 1970s from this neck of the woods, &quot;Let the eastern bastards freeze in the dark&quot;.



As long as oil that comes from Alberta contributes to greenhouse emissions, it will not be bought by the United States.  Well, guess what, that is exactly the case.



Now, you can either get off your high horse and admit that you imbibed of the koolaid of Al Gore, or you can freeze in the dark.



The choice is yours.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a saying from the 1970s from this neck of the woods, &#8220;Let the eastern bastards freeze in the dark&#8221;.</p>
<p>As long as oil that comes from Alberta contributes to greenhouse emissions, it will not be bought by the United States.  Well, guess what, that is exactly the case.</p>
<p>Now, you can either get off your high horse and admit that you imbibed of the koolaid of Al Gore, or you can freeze in the dark.</p>
<p>The choice is yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Dugan</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas_risky_antinafta_posturi/#comment-24110</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Dugan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/obamas-risky-anti-nafta-posturing/#comment-24110</guid>
		<description>What Is Obama Really Going to Do About NAFTA?

Some people blame our weak job market and economic troubles on free trade; however what we really need is smart trade. Hillary Clinton will promote trade that has higher labor and environmental standards. As President, she will ensure that trade lifts up not only American workers, but also workers around the world. She will as President demand a total review of all existing trade agreements and will not sign any new trade agreements until she ensures that trade policies raise our standard of living, and they must have strong protections for workers and the environment. I am the daughter of a former Fisher Body employee and I know the issues of trade and job loss are very important here.
As an Ohioan, I have heard falsely, that Hillary is for NAFTA. Despite false claims regarding Hillarys position on free trade, she always has and always will put the American worker first. Last summer I read Carl Bernsteins biography on Hillary Clinton, who by the way is no fan of the Clintons, that Hillary actually opposed NAFTA behind the scenes. Importantly, in Ohio on February 24, Obama actually stated I don&#039;t think its realistic for us to repeal NAFTA, that would actually result in more job loss&quot;. So I urge you to look at the facts before you cast your vote. To learn more about Hillary Clintons plans to help the Middle Class visit www.hillaryclinton.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Is Obama Really Going to Do About NAFTA?</p>
<p>Some people blame our weak job market and economic troubles on free trade; however what we really need is smart trade. Hillary Clinton will promote trade that has higher labor and environmental standards. As President, she will ensure that trade lifts up not only American workers, but also workers around the world. She will as President demand a total review of all existing trade agreements and will not sign any new trade agreements until she ensures that trade policies raise our standard of living, and they must have strong protections for workers and the environment. I am the daughter of a former Fisher Body employee and I know the issues of trade and job loss are very important here.<br />
As an Ohioan, I have heard falsely, that Hillary is for NAFTA. Despite false claims regarding Hillarys position on free trade, she always has and always will put the American worker first. Last summer I read Carl Bernsteins biography on Hillary Clinton, who by the way is no fan of the Clintons, that Hillary actually opposed NAFTA behind the scenes. Importantly, in Ohio on February 24, Obama actually stated I don&#8217;t think its realistic for us to repeal NAFTA, that would actually result in more job loss&#8221;. So I urge you to look at the facts before you cast your vote. To learn more about Hillary Clintons plans to help the Middle Class visit <a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hillaryclinton.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amphipolis</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas_risky_antinafta_posturi/#comment-24109</link>
		<dc:creator>Amphipolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/obamas-risky-anti-nafta-posturing/#comment-24109</guid>
		<description>NAFTA is a treaty. Obama would have no authority to rescind it. He is a Senator, he knows this - as Hillary knows she can not violate mortgage contracts.

This is an obvious political ploy, as he told the Canadians. McCain should shred his credibility over this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NAFTA is a treaty. Obama would have no authority to rescind it. He is a Senator, he knows this &#8211; as Hillary knows she can not violate mortgage contracts.</p>
<p>This is an obvious political ploy, as he told the Canadians. McCain should shred his credibility over this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Thomson</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas_risky_antinafta_posturi/#comment-24108</link>
		<dc:creator>David Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/obamas-risky-anti-nafta-posturing/#comment-24108</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obama has a professional association with many of the nation&#039;s foremost economists at the University of Chicago&quot;

Barack Obama is obviously lying to somebody.  Is it the yuppie economists associated with the University of Chicago or the blue-collar bubbas who perhaps didn&#039;t even finish high school?  Who is being played for a sucker?  Obama talks a lot about change.  I think it is time that a few questions are presented to the presumptive Democratic Party candidate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama has a professional association with many of the nation&#8217;s foremost economists at the University of Chicago&#8221;</p>
<p>Barack Obama is obviously lying to somebody.  Is it the yuppie economists associated with the University of Chicago or the blue-collar bubbas who perhaps didn&#8217;t even finish high school?  Who is being played for a sucker?  Obama talks a lot about change.  I think it is time that a few questions are presented to the presumptive Democratic Party candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom W.</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas_risky_antinafta_posturi/#comment-24107</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/obamas-risky-anti-nafta-posturing/#comment-24107</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sadly, though Obama&#039;s other economic proposals are excellent, even visionary...&quot;

Visionary like George McGovern&#039;s proposals.

Here&#039;s my visonary economic proposal: All you wealthy leftists bitching that taxes aren&#039;t high enough? Donate all your money to the IRS.

Who&#039;s stopping you? Who&#039;s stopping Obama and his lovely wife, Hillary and Bill, George Clooney, George Soros, Warren Buffet, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Madonna, Bono, Noam Chomsky, and all the other stinking hypocrites from handing their millions and billions over to the government?

The answer, of course, is that they will never in a zillion years make any personal sacrifices whatsoever to help the poor they pretend to care about.

Visionary, my foot. He&#039;s a blast from the past, a socialist geezer in a new wrapper.

Once people realize how much he intends to steal from us and how quickly he intends to surrender to jihadist savages, he&#039;ll be toast.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sadly, though Obama&#8217;s other economic proposals are excellent, even visionary&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Visionary like George McGovern&#8217;s proposals.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my visonary economic proposal: All you wealthy leftists bitching that taxes aren&#8217;t high enough? Donate all your money to the IRS.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s stopping you? Who&#8217;s stopping Obama and his lovely wife, Hillary and Bill, George Clooney, George Soros, Warren Buffet, Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Madonna, Bono, Noam Chomsky, and all the other stinking hypocrites from handing their millions and billions over to the government?</p>
<p>The answer, of course, is that they will never in a zillion years make any personal sacrifices whatsoever to help the poor they pretend to care about.</p>
<p>Visionary, my foot. He&#8217;s a blast from the past, a socialist geezer in a new wrapper.</p>
<p>Once people realize how much he intends to steal from us and how quickly he intends to surrender to jihadist savages, he&#8217;ll be toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David W. Lincoln</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas_risky_antinafta_posturi/#comment-24106</link>
		<dc:creator>David W. Lincoln</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.pajamasmedia.com/blog/obamas-risky-anti-nafta-posturing/#comment-24106</guid>
		<description>Here is an exhibit of why mistrust, indeed distrust, of the United States takes place.



Talk like this is reminiscient of East European countries meeting when Gorbachev was under house arrest in August, 1991.  Walesa, Havel, and the rest of the newly liberated countries met to consider their options.



Abuse of power is abuse of power.  Canada can sell what it sells to countries other than the United States.  Oil for instance.




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an exhibit of why mistrust, indeed distrust, of the United States takes place.</p>
<p>Talk like this is reminiscient of East European countries meeting when Gorbachev was under house arrest in August, 1991.  Walesa, Havel, and the rest of the newly liberated countries met to consider their options.</p>
<p>Abuse of power is abuse of power.  Canada can sell what it sells to countries other than the United States.  Oil for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

