Obama’s UN Declaration: ‘The World Is More Stable Than It Was Five Years Ago’
General Assembly back-patting includes noting that diplomacy should be pursued with Iran again because ayatollah issued fatwa against nukes.
September 24, 2013 - 8:49 am
President Obama gave a meandering defense of U.S. policy before the United Nations General Assembly in New York today, capped by declarations of wiggle room on key issues such as Iran as he directed Secretary of State John Kerry to begin dialogue with new “reformer” Iranian President Hassan Rouhani.
Not bothering to mention the human rights of Iranians, the president’s muddled message continued: “We are not seeking regime change, and we respect the right of the Iranian people to access peaceful nuclear energy.”
He even declared that al-Qaeda had still been damaged even after rattling off recent terror attacks, and boldly proclaimed “the world is more stable than it was five years ago” — just before acknowledging that “a glance at today’s headlines indicates that dangers remain.”
Like he did just hours after last week’s Navy Yard shooting, Obama touted economic recovery “five years after the global economy collapsed.”
“And for much of my tenure as president, some of our most urgent challenges have involved around an increasingly integrated global economy and our efforts to recover from the worst economic crisis of our lifetime,” he said. “…Thanks to coordinated efforts by the countries here today, jobs are being created, global financial systems have stabilized and people are once again being lifted out of poverty.”
He gave himself kudos for pulling the U.S. out of Iraq and Afghanistan, the latter “having achieved its mission of dismantling the core of al-Qaeda that attacked us on 9/11.”
“In Kenya, we’ve seen terrorists target innocent civilians in a crowded shopping mall. And our hearts go out to the families of those who’ve been affected,” Obama said, failing to mention the name Al-Shabaab anywhere in his speech. “In Pakistan, nearly 100 people were recently killed by suicide bombers outside a church,” he continued, failing to mention it was a Taliban attack on Christians attending services.
“And meanwhile, al-Qaeda has splintered into regional networks and militias which doesn’t give them the capacity at this point to carry out attacks like 9/11, but does pose serious threats to governments and diplomats, businesses and civilians all across the globe,” he acknowledged, neglecting the powerful alliances that the terror group has calculatingly crafted with the express purpose of becoming more powerful with greater reach than before.
Obama focused a sizable chunk of his speech on Syria, noting “the ban against the use of chemical weapons, even in war, has been agreed to by 98 percent of humanity.”
“It is strengthened by the searing memories of soldiers suffocated in the trenches, Jews slaughtered in gas chambers, Iranians poisoned in the many tens of thousands,” he said. “…It’s an insult to human reason and to the legitimacy of this institution to suggest that anyone other than the regime carried out this attack.”
The president called on the UN Security Council to authorize force against Syria if it fails to dismantle its chemical weapons stockpile to “send a powerful message that the use of chemical weapons has no place in the 21st century and that this body means what it says.”
“I do not believe that military action by those within Syria or by external powers can achieve a lasting peace. Nor do I believe that America or any nation should determine who will lead Syria. That is for the Syrian people to decide,” he said. “…We are committed to working this political trek. And, as we pursue a settlement, let’s remember this is not a zero sum endeavor. We’re no longer in a cold war. There’s no great game to be won, nor does America have any interest in Syria beyond the well being of its people, the stability of its neighbors, the elimination of chemical weapons and insuring that it does not become a safe haven for terrorists.”
On Iran, Obama acknowledged “this mistrust has deep roots.”
“Iranians have long complained of a history of U.S. interference in their affairs and of America’s role in overthrowing the Iranian government during the Cold War. On the other hand, Americans see an Iranian government that has declared the United States an enemy and directly or through proxies taken American hostages, killed U.S. troops and civilians, and threatened our ally Israel with destruction,” he said.
“I don’t believe this difficult history can be overcome overnight. The suspicions run too deep. But I do believe that if we can resolve the issue of Iran’s nuclear program, that can serve as a major step down a long road toward a different relationship, one based on mutual interests and mutual respect.”