Get PJ Media on your Apple

A Sneak Peek at Obama’s Tardy Budget

Infrastructure spending, Energy Security Trust spending, research and development spending -- and entitlement reform?

by
Bill Straub

Bio

April 8, 2013 - 12:44 am
Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

WASHINGTON – President Obama’s extraordinarily tardy budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2014 is expected to include new funding for infrastructure improvement and scientific research but won’t offer a path toward reconciling spending with revenues any time in the near future.

The package, due Feb. 4 and slated for release on April 10, might also provide significant changes in entitlement programs like Social Security, perhaps altering the manner in which cost of living increases are calculated, resulting in smaller checks to beneficiaries.

“The president’s budget will achieve what it has in the past, which is through sensible, balanced deficit reduction, bring our deficit and debt into a place where we are on a fiscally sustainable path, where the ratio of debt to GDP is below 3 percent, and to do that in a way that also allows us to invest in our economy so that we’re building infrastructure for the future and we’re increasing our energy independence, and making sure that our kids are being educated so we can compete 25 years from now and not just today,” said White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.

Unlike the spending plan proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), chairman of the House Budget Committee, the Obama package will not produce a balanced budget over a 10-year window. It will, Carney said, “achieve a compromise that allows for both entitlement reform and tax reform that produce the savings necessary” to reduce the deficit during that period by more than $4 trillion.

The president’s top priority, Carney said, is “economic growth and job creation, not deficit reduction solely for the purpose of reducing the deficit.”

That effort, he said, will “put our economy on a fiscally sustainable path.”

Under federal law, the president is expected to produce an executive branch budget by the first Monday in February. Obama has failed to meet the target every year save for 2009, his first year in office.

This year is no exception, save for the fact that it is even later than usual – about nine weeks overdue. The administration attributes the delay to extended negotiation with Congress over sequestration – across-the-board cuts required by a prior budget agreement – and the appointment of a new director of the Office of Management and Budget, that being Jack Lew.

Congressional Republicans have blasted the administration’s tardiness and expressed disappointment that the president’s proposal will fail to balance the budget.

“It almost seems the president believes all spending is stimulating the economy and no spending, even wasteful spending, should be cut,” said Sen. Jeff Sessions, (R-Ala.), ranking member of the Senate Budget Committee.

The administration has hinted at some new initiatives in the upcoming budget plan, a large portion dealing with the nation’s crumbling infrastructure. The American Society of Civil Engineers, which recently awarded America’s infrastructure a rating of D+, placed total investment needs at $3.6 trillion by 2020 — leaving a funding shortfall of $1.6 trillion based on current funding levels.

“We must commit today to investing in modern, efficient infrastructure systems to position the U.S. for economic prosperity,” said Gregory E. DiLoreto, the organization’s president. “Infrastructure can either be the engine for long-term economic growth and employment, or it can jeopardize our nation’s standing if poor roads, deficient bridges and failing waterways continue to hurt our economy.”

In response, Obama is expected to propose a program called the Partnership to Rebuild America, with an estimated price tag of $21 billion. The initiative has three parts:

-       The creation of a fund, better known as an infrastructure bank, to attract private and public investment for projects selected based on their benefit to the overall economy.

-       The formation of a new bond program – America Fast Forward – intended to provide local and state governments with more flexibility and power to attract private investment for public projects.

-       Strengthening a loan program for transportation projects that, in the past, has helped governors and mayors leverage four times the money Washington put into it.

Comments are closed.

All Comments   (5)
All Comments   (5)
Sort: Newest Oldest Top Rated
Obama is still under the impression that employmnet in the government sector is a boon for the economy. The man truly does not have a clue about any part of the economy. Please Obama spend all of your time on the links and let Carney run the show, he will be a vast improvement over what is happening now.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Sorry, but the very last thing I want this particular administration learning is how my brain works. That's the last kind of information I think they should have because I can just see them rubbing their hands together in glee at the prospect of being able to figure out how to finally program people like little robots.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
"Under federal law, the president is expected to produce an executive branch budget by the first Monday in February. Obama has failed to meet the target every year save for 2009, his first year in office."
Federal law? We don't need no stinking law.

"In response, Obama is expected to propose a program called the Partnership to Rebuild America, with an estimated price tag of $21 billion. The initiative has three parts:

- The creation of a fund, better known as an infrastructure bank, to attract private and public investment for projects selected based on their benefit to the overall economy.

- The formation of a new bond program – America Fast Forward – intended to provide local and state governments with more flexibility and power to attract private investment for public projects.

- Strengthening a loan program for transportation projects that, in the past, has helped governors and mayors leverage four times the money Washington put into it."
Oh goodie... another bureaucracy he can appoint another czar to over see.

"The president’s top priority, Carney said, is “economic growth and job creation, not deficit reduction solely for the purpose of reducing the deficit.”"
Job creation: more federal jobs. Why worry, he and his pack of jackals don't have to pay for it, it comes out of our pockets. Deficit reduction: again, why worry, he and his pack of jackals don't have to pay for it, it comes out of our pockets.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
This is nothing but a tissue of lies, just like the last time with all those "shovel ready jobs" that sucked a few billion away and yet nobody wated to know where all that money went. Now if you read it carefully it says CREATE A BANK three diifferent ways with some R&D funding that smells a lot like pork to me.

NOWHERE is money being directly spent to "put people to work" through exisiting programs and agencies that are right now LAYING OFF WORKERS. It makes no sense at all is just another way to give huge chunks of money to rich bankers that don't need it, won't share it, and will keep it all for themselves while they cry poverty and get a "bailout" from their depositors.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
Is not the Obama proposal essentially, a repeat of historical approaches taken --
the depression and the CC and WPA and the continuation of the depression and war debt into into the 50's when Ike commission the national inter state highway system and other investment spending since?

Then we have a pretty good insight into opposite approaches taken by nations around the developed world for which the U.S. propped up in nearly every case, if not all. Some of those are also decades into their approaches.

Its a great discussion if, the factual information is on the table and partisan politics and misrepresntations are put aside.
1 year ago
1 year ago Link To Comment
View All