Get PJ Media on your Apple

Obama’s Golden Opportunity to Tackle the Castro Regime

It’s audacious to hope that Obama would take up the plight of the Cuban people, but isn't audacity supposed to be what he's about? (Also read Roger L. Simon: Cuba Si, Obama Maybe)

by
Henry Gomez

Bio

March 9, 2009 - 12:13 am
<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page

In short, I believe that Barack Obama has the moral authority to rally the international community to join the U.S. in demanding freedom for Cuba’s political prisoners and concrete steps toward a democratic transition. There are of course precedents for such a thing. During the 1980s, the international anti-apartheid movement gained so much momentum that the South African government was no longer viable. The United States was late to that party and unfortunately Ronald Reagan vetoed the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, but his veto was overridden and within a few short years apartheid was dismantled.

Cuba presents a similar opportunity in reverse. It’s the rest of the world that needs to join America in denouncing an evil regime. While Congress was eager to use sanctions to isolate South Africa’s government during the 1980s, many in the current Congress are frothing at the mouth to dismantle the sanctions against Cuba. Which brings us to the president.

President Obama has several options available to him:

1. He can acquiesce to Congress and break his campaign promise to Cuban-Americans by capitulating to the Castro regime and lifting all of the current sanctions.

2. He can keep the promise of maintaining the overall trade embargo on Cuba with only the minor modifications that he indicated during the campaign and thus maintain the status quo.

3. He can take dramatic steps to bring the story of Cuba to the world, to champion members of Cuba’s political opposition like Dr. Oscar Elias Biscet, the Afro-Cuban doctor who today rots silently in one of Cuba’s political prisons.

If Obama were to choose the third approach it would send a strong signal to countries that currently enable the regime. These countries should be negotiated with privately and shamed publicly if they refuse to answer the call. The same could be done with foreign corporations that partner with the regime and collaborate in the exploitation of Cuban workers.

Many observers claimed that Raul Castro would be more reform-minded and thus the time would be right to “negotiate” with the regime.  The fact is that the repression under Raul continues as before.  In fact, last week there was a significant purge in the Cuban government that resulted in the sacking of two of the younger and more highly visible leaders, Carlos Lage and Felipe Perez Roque, who were often touted by the self-styled “experts” as heirs apparent that perhaps might play the role of Cuban Gorbachev.  The signal that this purge sends is clear: the regime is willing to accept U.S. concessions but unwilling to make any of their own.  President Obama should not give in to the temptation to make those concessions without reciprocation.

Yes, it’s audacious to hope that President Obama would take up the plight of the Cuban people as his personal mission, but if anyone knows about the audacity of hope it’s him, right? It’s often said that only Nixon could go to China. Perhaps only Obama can go to the rest of the world and ask for help on Cuba. Barack Obama has the political capital to do so. The question is: does he have the political will?

<- Prev  Page 2 of 2   View as Single Page
Henry Louis Gomez is Cuban-American and blogs at BabaluBlog.com.
Click here to view the 22 legacy comments

Comments are closed.