Get PJ Media on your Apple

Obama’s Battleground Advantage

Romney will be outspent and out-organized in all of the swing states.

by
Rich Baehr

Bio

April 1, 2012 - 12:00 am

Unbeknown to Rick Santorum and his campaign team, the GOP nominating contest is effectively over. There is a small chance that Santorum could spring an upset in Wisconsin’s primary Tuesday, since he has over-performed compared to his poll standing a few times, but  even if he does, Mitt Romney will still likely win more delegates that day by cruising to victory in the Maryland and Washington, D.C., primaries.

A Wisconsin win for Santorum would mean only one thing: that his delusions of becoming the eventual nominee will continue a bit longer, and he will force Mitt Romney to spend more time and money  fighting to win primaries, giving the incumbent more of a head-start in fighting the fall campaign.

In the past few weeks there have been a slew of polls in battleground states, pitting Romney versus Obama.  In general, Obama has performed better in the state polls than he has in the head-to-head national polls versus Romney. With the exception  of one recent CNN poll, most of the national surveys have shown Obama with a national lead over Romney that is smaller than Obama’s margin over John McCain in 2008 (7.2%).

There is one important reason for Obama’s early lead in the most competitive states. Just as in 2008, the Obama campaign team has invested heavily in ground operations in the battleground states. With no primary opponent , the Obama campaign team has used its money haul, which so far has been somewhat less than anticipated despite a record number of fundraisers attended by the president, to establish multiple campaign offices in states such as Virginia and Ohio, recruit both paid and volunteer staff, and begin direct contacts with voters many months before the November election. In 2008, the Obama ground operation swamped the McCain effort, and there is a chance for more of the same this time around.

Most analysts expect  that the 2012 race will be more like the 2004 election than the 2008 race, which became a decisive win for Obama after the financial collapse of Lehman Brothers in mid-September 2008. In 2004, George W. Bush won 31 states and 286 Electoral College votes. The states Bush won now contain 292 Electoral  College votes due to the every-ten-years Congressional redistricting process among the states. In 2008, the Obama campaign targeted ten of the Bush states from 2004  and won all but one of them — Missouri — which McCain won by 4,000 votes. Five of the Obama pickups were narrower victories than his general election margin — North Carolina, 15 Electoral College votes  (0.3% margin); Indiana, 11 Electoral College votes (1% margin);  Florida, 29 Electoral College votes  (2.8% margin); Ohio, 18 Electoral College votes (4.7% margin); and Virginia, 13 Electoral College votes (6.3% margin). The other four pickups were more decisive — Iowa (9%), Colorado (9%), Nevada (12%), New Mexico (15%).

Given the growth in the Hispanic percentage of all voters  in some of the western states — especially Colorado (9 Electoral College votes), Nevada (6 Electoral College votes), and New Mexico (5 Electoral College votes), Romney could not afford to lose any of the other battleground states that Bush won in 2004, if he lost all three of these western states. This is one of the reasons that there is speculation Romney might select an Hispanic to be his running mate (Florida Senator Marco Rubio or New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez).

Of course, there is the possibility that Romney could win a  “blue state” that John Kerry won in 2004, which would give him a bit more of a cushion to fall short in one or more of the other  battleground states Bush won in 2004. The best chances here would seem to be Pennsylvania, 20 Electoral College votes (a 10% Obama win in 2008); and New Hampshire, 4  Electoral College votes (a 9% Obama win in 2008). While some GOP pundits consider Wisconsin, 10 Electoral  College votes,  a tossup (a 13% Obama win in 2008), the GOP energy in this state seems directed at retaining Governor Scott Walker in the June recall election, and head-to-head polls between Obama and Romney give the president a big edge.

Recent polls suggest that President Obama holds about a 7 point lead over Romney in Ohio, Florida, and Virginia, and a 3 point lead over Romney in Pennsylvania and North Carolina.  The Pennsylvania poll is  an oddity, since it showed Romney doing better than Santorum versus Obama in Santorum’s state, as well as for the fact that Romney ran better against Obama in Pennsylvania than in Florida or Ohio, states that in recent presidential elections have been at least  5% more friendly to Republican candidates than Pennsylvania.

A new Rasmussen poll for four  battleground states — North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, and Florida — gave Obama a 3 point lead this week, two points closer than in a prior survey.

It will be very difficult for Mitt Romney to  win if he does not carry Florida, Ohio, and Virginia.  Most analysts think the Republican ticket will win both Indiana and North Carolina this time around , given how narrowly Obama won these traditional GOP leaning states in 2008. If Romney were to lose Ohio, he would need to win Pennsylvania, a state where Obama’s approval ratings have been weak and the GOP had a very good year in 2010. Of the three western states, Colorado is considered more of a tossup than Nevada or New Mexico .

The outcome in the battleground states will to a large extent reflect the national popular vote outcome. If either candidate wins by 3% or more, he will likely win most of the competitive battleground states. Where Obama may have an edge is that his superior ground effort may give him a point or two boost in some of these states. The Romney campaign and its Super PAC supporters  have very effectively used negative advertising to tar first Newt Gingrich, and then Rick Santorum during the primary season. Unlike 2008, the Republicans will not be badly outspent this time around, and there seems much less reluctance to make Barack Obama, as well as his record, an issue.

Several events from this past  week  suggest there is fertile ground for negative or comparative ads.  Obama’s open mic disaster with his “message to Vladimir” has already been made into one ad, and there will be more. Just what will Barack Obama do in a second term, beyond selling out our European allies to please the Russians? For Jewish voters who care about Israel, the leaking of information on Israel’s ties to to Azerbaijan, undoubtedly designed to forestall Israeli military action against Iran ,and the State Department’s statement on Jerusalem, suggesting that none of the city was in Israel, were both damaging. Worst of all was the disastrous performance of the administration’s attorneys  trying to defend Obama’s signature “achievement,” the “Affordable Health Care Act” (Obamacare as even its defenders started calling it this week), at the Supreme Court. If the Court were to throw out the entire law or much of it, it is likely this would help the Republicans up and down the ticket .

Over the past few days, the daily tracking polls conducted by Rasmussen and Gallup have shown a few point drop in Obama’s numbers. While these tracking polls have regular fluctuations, if they stay down for a bit, and the head-to-head matchups between Obama and Romney show some movement towards Romney, it will suggest that the week’s events may have taken a bit of a toll on Obama.

We are still more than seven months out from November 6, and Obama remains the favorite. Intrade gives him a 60% chance at the moment of winning re-election, which sounds about right. Obama has more red states to play in than Romney will have blue states. That is the most important reason why he is the favorite.

Richard A. Baehr is the co-founder and chief political correspondent for the American Thinker. For his day job, he has been a health care consultant for many years doing planning and financial analyses for providers.
Click here to view the 57 legacy comments

Comments are closed.