<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Afghanistan Strategy Copies Bush&#8217;s Surge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadosy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-265979</link>
		<dc:creator>wadosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 08:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-265979</guid>
		<description>china&#039;s gonna have the advantage as long as conventional oil costs less than shale oil.

the only strength america has left is military, which is why 9/11 became a necessity.

it&#039;s unimaginable that the chinese dont understand how this neocon project is supposed to work, and the fact that they havent yet demolished america economically might be seen as an indication of the contempt they have for the neocon scheme.

it&#039;s just so haywire in so many ways, it will never work.

the neocons are not stupid, and it seems most likely that even they dont believe in their project: they&#039;re just using it as cover for looting america as it dies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>china&#8217;s gonna have the advantage as long as conventional oil costs less than shale oil.</p>
<p>the only strength america has left is military, which is why 9/11 became a necessity.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s unimaginable that the chinese dont understand how this neocon project is supposed to work, and the fact that they havent yet demolished america economically might be seen as an indication of the contempt they have for the neocon scheme.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s just so haywire in so many ways, it will never work.</p>
<p>the neocons are not stupid, and it seems most likely that even they dont believe in their project: they&#8217;re just using it as cover for looting america as it dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadosy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-265157</link>
		<dc:creator>wadosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-265157</guid>
		<description>...not to mention the fact that, so far, we&#039;ve burned up about a trillion barrels of oil, which has resulted in about 100 part per million increase in the co2 concentration.

if we get a 100 part per million increase in co2 for every trillion barrels of oil burned, and we burn another couple trillion of shale oil, in addition to the trillion barrels of remaining conventional oil, plus the remaining coal and gas, what&#039;s gonna happen to the climate?

are you beginning to see why the israeli americans of the AEI and exxon are partners in denying global warming?

are you beginning to see why the israeli americans at CERA and exxon are partners in denying peak oil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;not to mention the fact that, so far, we&#8217;ve burned up about a trillion barrels of oil, which has resulted in about 100 part per million increase in the co2 concentration.</p>
<p>if we get a 100 part per million increase in co2 for every trillion barrels of oil burned, and we burn another couple trillion of shale oil, in addition to the trillion barrels of remaining conventional oil, plus the remaining coal and gas, what&#8217;s gonna happen to the climate?</p>
<p>are you beginning to see why the israeli americans of the AEI and exxon are partners in denying global warming?</p>
<p>are you beginning to see why the israeli americans at CERA and exxon are partners in denying peak oil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadosy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-265154</link>
		<dc:creator>wadosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-265154</guid>
		<description>shale oil might cost $45 a barrel to produce now.

how much does shale oil cost to produce when oil costs $150 a barrel?

how many barrels of oil does it take to produce a barrel of shale oil?

if you&#039;ve got a trillion barrel reserve of shale oil, and it takes a trillion barrels of oil to produce it, what&#039;s the point?

how much water does it take to produce shale oil? ...do we have enough water, or are we gonna have to use the whole colorado river system to produce shale oil?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shale oil might cost $45 a barrel to produce now.</p>
<p>how much does shale oil cost to produce when oil costs $150 a barrel?</p>
<p>how many barrels of oil does it take to produce a barrel of shale oil?</p>
<p>if you&#8217;ve got a trillion barrel reserve of shale oil, and it takes a trillion barrels of oil to produce it, what&#8217;s the point?</p>
<p>how much water does it take to produce shale oil? &#8230;do we have enough water, or are we gonna have to use the whole colorado river system to produce shale oil?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: typos_R_us</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-264949</link>
		<dc:creator>typos_R_us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 14:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-264949</guid>
		<description>wadosy, I don&#039;t even know where to start.
I personally think that Jews are better then Sand _iggers, but that is only because I know both sets of near humans well.  I shed no tears over the demise of any of them.  My solution to the Arab-Israeli problem is to send both sides lots of ammo, encourage them to fight it out then after the dust settles, kill off the survivors.
As far as the OIL thangie, you and your nutbag doctor both need to educate yourselves;
http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/oilshale/index.cfm
{snippet}
&quot;While oil shale is found in many places worldwide, by far the largest deposits in the world are found in the United States in the Green River Formation, which covers portions of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Estimates of the oil resource in place within the Green River Formation range from 1.2 to 1.8 trillion barrels. Not all resources in place are recoverable; however, even a moderate estimate of 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from oil shale in the Green River Formation is three times greater than the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. Present U.S. demand for petroleum products is about 20 million barrels per day. If oil shale could be used to meet a quarter of that demand, the estimated 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from the Green River Formation would last for more than 400 years.

Did you get that?  3 X the reserves of Saudi Arabia.  Enough for 400 years.  Nancy Pelosi might even be dead by then.

The moonbats such as yourself don&#039;t want the USA to process shale OIL.  That is because it would make your predictions as foolish as those of the algorenuts.  

BTW, that estimate is a CONSERVATIVE one.  I have seen them as high as 8.4 TRILLION barrels.

The wjole idea of there being a shortage or OIL is misleading.  What there is is a shortage of cheap to get at OIL,  Production costs ata KSA well head are less then a dollar per barrel.  Shale OIL costs about 45$US per barrel to produce.  So the OIL companies aren&#039;t interested in a product that costs 45$ that they sell for 65$ when they can get that same product off thru off coast drilling for about 18$ per barrel.  The swampies want no OIL anywhere for anything.  They want us all to go back to living in a cave, or maybe even returning to the trees.  So the swampies and the OIL Companies have shut down Shale OIL processing.

Next the swampies are going after off-shore drilling;
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aBUoYKhu7PWk&amp;refer=home

Most of the environmental efforts are funded by the OIL companies to keep the price and profits of OIL high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wadosy, I don&#8217;t even know where to start.<br />
I personally think that Jews are better then Sand _iggers, but that is only because I know both sets of near humans well.  I shed no tears over the demise of any of them.  My solution to the Arab-Israeli problem is to send both sides lots of ammo, encourage them to fight it out then after the dust settles, kill off the survivors.<br />
As far as the OIL thangie, you and your nutbag doctor both need to educate yourselves;<br />
<a href="http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/oilshale/index.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/oilshale/index.cfm</a><br />
{snippet}<br />
&#8220;While oil shale is found in many places worldwide, by far the largest deposits in the world are found in the United States in the Green River Formation, which covers portions of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. Estimates of the oil resource in place within the Green River Formation range from 1.2 to 1.8 trillion barrels. Not all resources in place are recoverable; however, even a moderate estimate of 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from oil shale in the Green River Formation is three times greater than the proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. Present U.S. demand for petroleum products is about 20 million barrels per day. If oil shale could be used to meet a quarter of that demand, the estimated 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from the Green River Formation would last for more than 400 years.</p>
<p>Did you get that?  3 X the reserves of Saudi Arabia.  Enough for 400 years.  Nancy Pelosi might even be dead by then.</p>
<p>The moonbats such as yourself don&#8217;t want the USA to process shale OIL.  That is because it would make your predictions as foolish as those of the algorenuts.  </p>
<p>BTW, that estimate is a CONSERVATIVE one.  I have seen them as high as 8.4 TRILLION barrels.</p>
<p>The wjole idea of there being a shortage or OIL is misleading.  What there is is a shortage of cheap to get at OIL,  Production costs ata KSA well head are less then a dollar per barrel.  Shale OIL costs about 45$US per barrel to produce.  So the OIL companies aren&#8217;t interested in a product that costs 45$ that they sell for 65$ when they can get that same product off thru off coast drilling for about 18$ per barrel.  The swampies want no OIL anywhere for anything.  They want us all to go back to living in a cave, or maybe even returning to the trees.  So the swampies and the OIL Companies have shut down Shale OIL processing.</p>
<p>Next the swampies are going after off-shore drilling;<br />
<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&#038;sid=aBUoYKhu7PWk&#038;refer=home" rel="nofollow">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&#038;sid=aBUoYKhu7PWk&#038;refer=home</a></p>
<p>Most of the environmental efforts are funded by the OIL companies to keep the price and profits of OIL high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadosy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-264309</link>
		<dc:creator>wadosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-264309</guid>
		<description>do you remember this map?

the peters guy who wrote that neocons will have to bomb the media (even though the media has, so far in the &quot;war on terror&quot; and 9/11, been the main neocon propaganda instrument) ...well, peters is the guy that dreamed up the map below...

&lt;a href=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7c/Ralph_Peters_solution_to_Mideast.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;neocons&#039; new map of the middle east&lt;/a&gt;

the problem seems to be that we just dont have enough people to cover all the requirements, especially when we include africa and south america... which means you will need a &lt;i&gt;new&lt;/i&gt; &quot;new pearl harbor&quot; to gather support for the draft that will enable israeli america to complete the PNAC project.

and if the original &quot;new pearl harbor&quot; was &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=netanyahu+9%2F11+%22very+good%22&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;very good&lt;/a&gt;&quot; (according to no lesser authority than bibi netanyahu), then there should be no problem with staging your &lt;i&gt;new&lt;/i&gt; new pearl harbor, should there?

...especially in view of the fact that you&#039;ve abandoned even the pretense of any morals other than &quot;might makes right&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you remember this map?</p>
<p>the peters guy who wrote that neocons will have to bomb the media (even though the media has, so far in the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; and 9/11, been the main neocon propaganda instrument) &#8230;well, peters is the guy that dreamed up the map below&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7c/Ralph_Peters_solution_to_Mideast.jpg" rel="nofollow">neocons&#8217; new map of the middle east</a></p>
<p>the problem seems to be that we just dont have enough people to cover all the requirements, especially when we include africa and south america&#8230; which means you will need a <i>new</i> &#8220;new pearl harbor&#8221; to gather support for the draft that will enable israeli america to complete the PNAC project.</p>
<p>and if the original &#8220;new pearl harbor&#8221; was &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=netanyahu+9%2F11+%22very+good%22&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=" rel="nofollow">very good</a>&#8221; (according to no lesser authority than bibi netanyahu), then there should be no problem with staging your <i>new</i> new pearl harbor, should there?</p>
<p>&#8230;especially in view of the fact that you&#8217;ve abandoned even the pretense of any morals other than &#8220;might makes right&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadosy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-264296</link>
		<dc:creator>wadosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-264296</guid>
		<description>good thing neocons have the solutions to all your problems...

for instance.... from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securityaffairs.org/issues/2009/16/peters.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jewish Institute for National Security&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;...future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, military attacks on the partisan media.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
although it&#039;s beyond me why you&#039;d bomb the new york times, the washington post and the televison networks... seeing as how they were a vital part of the mechanism that lied us into the iraq war...

...not to mention their part in enforcing the official conspiracy theory of 9/11, which was the justification for this whole neocon project.

but all&#039;s fair in love and war, so we&#039;re perfectly justified in killing a few thousand of our own citizens if that&#039;s the excuse we need to protect israel and grab the rest of the oil... because we have, after all, abandoned even the pretense of morality.

of course, JINSA is part of the neocon apparatus that includes people like rumsfeld, cheney, wolfowitz, perle, kristol and the rest of the AEI/PNAC likud establishment...

...you remember them, dont you? ...the guys and gals who coalesced into PNAC, and published their need for &quot;a new pearl harbor&quot; in september of 2000, just months before they were installed into positions from which they could make their &quot;new pearl harbor&quot; happen...?

but there&#039;s no problem in wishing for &quot;a new pearl harbor&quot;... in fact, there&#039;s no problem in &lt;i&gt;staging&lt;/i&gt; a new pearl harbor that kills a few thousand of your own citizens, if that&#039;s what it takes to get your project rolling... 

because we have, after all, abandoned even the pretense of morals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good thing neocons have the solutions to all your problems&#8230;</p>
<p>for instance&#8230;. from the <a href="http://www.securityaffairs.org/issues/2009/16/peters.php" rel="nofollow">Jewish Institute for National Security</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&#8230;future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, military attacks on the partisan media.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>although it&#8217;s beyond me why you&#8217;d bomb the new york times, the washington post and the televison networks&#8230; seeing as how they were a vital part of the mechanism that lied us into the iraq war&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;not to mention their part in enforcing the official conspiracy theory of 9/11, which was the justification for this whole neocon project.</p>
<p>but all&#8217;s fair in love and war, so we&#8217;re perfectly justified in killing a few thousand of our own citizens if that&#8217;s the excuse we need to protect israel and grab the rest of the oil&#8230; because we have, after all, abandoned even the pretense of morality.</p>
<p>of course, JINSA is part of the neocon apparatus that includes people like rumsfeld, cheney, wolfowitz, perle, kristol and the rest of the AEI/PNAC likud establishment&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;you remember them, dont you? &#8230;the guys and gals who coalesced into PNAC, and published their need for &#8220;a new pearl harbor&#8221; in september of 2000, just months before they were installed into positions from which they could make their &#8220;new pearl harbor&#8221; happen&#8230;?</p>
<p>but there&#8217;s no problem in wishing for &#8220;a new pearl harbor&#8221;&#8230; in fact, there&#8217;s no problem in <i>staging</i> a new pearl harbor that kills a few thousand of your own citizens, if that&#8217;s what it takes to get your project rolling&#8230; </p>
<p>because we have, after all, abandoned even the pretense of morals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadosy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-264288</link>
		<dc:creator>wadosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-264288</guid>
		<description>good thing neocons have the solutions to all your problems...

for instance.... from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securityaffairs.org/issues/2009/16/peters.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jewish Institute for National Security&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;...future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, military attacks on the partisan media.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
although it&#039;s beyond me why you&#039;d bomb the new york times, the washington post and the televison networks... seeing as how they were a vital part of the mechanism that lied us into the iraq war...

...not to mention their part in enforcing the official conspiracy theory of 9/11, which was the justification for this whole neocon project.

but all&#039;s fair in love and war, so we&#039;re perfectly justified in killing a few thousand of our own citizens if that&#039;s the excuse we need to protect israel and grab the rest of the oil... because we have, after all, abandoned even the pretense of morality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good thing neocons have the solutions to all your problems&#8230;</p>
<p>for instance&#8230;. from the <a href="http://www.securityaffairs.org/issues/2009/16/peters.php" rel="nofollow">Jewish Institute for National Security</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&#8230;future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, military attacks on the partisan media.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>although it&#8217;s beyond me why you&#8217;d bomb the new york times, the washington post and the televison networks&#8230; seeing as how they were a vital part of the mechanism that lied us into the iraq war&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;not to mention their part in enforcing the official conspiracy theory of 9/11, which was the justification for this whole neocon project.</p>
<p>but all&#8217;s fair in love and war, so we&#8217;re perfectly justified in killing a few thousand of our own citizens if that&#8217;s the excuse we need to protect israel and grab the rest of the oil&#8230; because we have, after all, abandoned even the pretense of morality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaui-jan</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-264098</link>
		<dc:creator>shaui-jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-264098</guid>
		<description>some select &quot;gems&quot; from wadosy;&quot;i admit that the wars are mostly about securing israel, but in order to secure israel, the israeli american war machine must have access to oil, and it must prevent the chinese from buying the remaining oil… &quot;

really?.....so you would rather want a commumist dictatership with an apalling human rights record to have control over resources vital to US interests?


&quot;if you cant be content with embracing the “might makes right” neocon philosophy, well… i dont know what to tell you…&quot;

you mean that same philosophy that has kept the world from erupting into global conflict since 1945?...and triggered the longest period of stablity and economic growth in recorded history.not to mention the toppling of a brutal totalitarian regime controlling hundreds of millions of lives through forced misery and terror. 


&quot;and if a few million people are willing to addict themselves to heroin to prop up the banking system that finances economy that finances the israeli american war machinery, what’s the problem with that?&quot;

yes i sure the billions of dollars generated from the narcotics trade is proping up a system based on tens of trillions of dollars...with a  trillon or more circulated daily.....

 
&quot;the fact that israel was founded in lies, terror and injustice —all of which continue to this day— is no cause for concern, because we’ve abandoned morals.&quot;

yes thousands of years ago you were present when israel was born.....and let us not dwell on the &quot;morals&quot; of israel&#039;s current neighbors.why don&#039;t you just put them side by side and compare them shall we.....

your maps are HILARIOUS!you should call micheal moore and collaberate.......you two would make quite a team....or just switch your medication and loosen the strap on your aluminum helmet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some select &#8220;gems&#8221; from wadosy;&#8221;i admit that the wars are mostly about securing israel, but in order to secure israel, the israeli american war machine must have access to oil, and it must prevent the chinese from buying the remaining oil… &#8221;</p>
<p>really?&#8230;..so you would rather want a commumist dictatership with an apalling human rights record to have control over resources vital to US interests?</p>
<p>&#8220;if you cant be content with embracing the “might makes right” neocon philosophy, well… i dont know what to tell you…&#8221;</p>
<p>you mean that same philosophy that has kept the world from erupting into global conflict since 1945?&#8230;and triggered the longest period of stablity and economic growth in recorded history.not to mention the toppling of a brutal totalitarian regime controlling hundreds of millions of lives through forced misery and terror. </p>
<p>&#8220;and if a few million people are willing to addict themselves to heroin to prop up the banking system that finances economy that finances the israeli american war machinery, what’s the problem with that?&#8221;</p>
<p>yes i sure the billions of dollars generated from the narcotics trade is proping up a system based on tens of trillions of dollars&#8230;with a  trillon or more circulated daily&#8230;..</p>
<p>&#8220;the fact that israel was founded in lies, terror and injustice —all of which continue to this day— is no cause for concern, because we’ve abandoned morals.&#8221;</p>
<p>yes thousands of years ago you were present when israel was born&#8230;..and let us not dwell on the &#8220;morals&#8221; of israel&#8217;s current neighbors.why don&#8217;t you just put them side by side and compare them shall we&#8230;..</p>
<p>your maps are HILARIOUS!you should call micheal moore and collaberate&#8230;&#8230;.you two would make quite a team&#8230;.or just switch your medication and loosen the strap on your aluminum helmet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadosy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-263673</link>
		<dc:creator>wadosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-263673</guid>
		<description>it would probably be good to keep the following in the back of your head:

there&#039;s a very powerful faction of sociopathic predators that has given up on everything (if they ever cared about anything in the first place) including america, israel, morals, decency... 

...given up on everything except loot, and they&#039;re exploiting the so-called &quot;war on terror&quot; to do the biggest looting operation in history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it would probably be good to keep the following in the back of your head:</p>
<p>there&#8217;s a very powerful faction of sociopathic predators that has given up on everything (if they ever cared about anything in the first place) including america, israel, morals, decency&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230;given up on everything except loot, and they&#8217;re exploiting the so-called &#8220;war on terror&#8221; to do the biggest looting operation in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wadosy</title>
		<link>http://pjmedia.com/blog/obamas-afghanistan-strategy-copies-bushs-surge/#comment-263645</link>
		<dc:creator>wadosy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pajamasmedia.com/?p=56689#comment-263645</guid>
		<description>the fact that israel was founded in lies, terror and injustice ---all of which continue to this day--- is no cause for concern, because we&#039;ve abandoned morals.

israel and israeli america have repealed laws of morality that developed over hundreds of thousands of years.

that&#039;s just how it is, and you&#039;ll have to live with it.

and if your grandchildren glow in the dark and have two heads, well, welcome to the new post-moral world order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fact that israel was founded in lies, terror and injustice &#8212;all of which continue to this day&#8212; is no cause for concern, because we&#8217;ve abandoned morals.</p>
<p>israel and israeli america have repealed laws of morality that developed over hundreds of thousands of years.</p>
<p>that&#8217;s just how it is, and you&#8217;ll have to live with it.</p>
<p>and if your grandchildren glow in the dark and have two heads, well, welcome to the new post-moral world order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

